Skip to content
1887

Abstract

A novel Gram-negative, oxidase- and catalase-positive, rod-shaped bacterium, designated strain KX21116, was isolated from the mussel collected from a cold seep field in the South China Sea. Strain KX21116 grew optimally at 28 °C, pH 6.0 with 3% (w/v) NaCl, under aerobic and microaerobic conditions. Its genome size was 3.16 Mb, with a G+C content of 28.4 mol%. The 16S rRNA sequences revealed that strain KX21116 was closely related to DSM 7299 (98.77% gene sequence similarity) and AR-13 (95.58%). Phylogenetic and phylogenomic analysis revealed that strain KX21116 clustered with the type species of the genus , with DSM 7299 as its nearest neighbour. The genomic average nucleotide identity (orthoANI) values between strain KX21116 and DSM 7299 were 92.74%, while the DNA–DNA hybridization (GGDC) values of the two strains were 48.8%. The predominant fatty acids are C, C c/C1 c and C c/C1 c. Based on a comparative analysis of phylogenetic, phylogenomic, phenotypic and chemotaxonomic characteristics, strain KX21116 represents a novel species of the genus , for which the name sp. nov. is proposed. The type strain is KX21116 (=MCCC 1K08505=KCTC 92900=JCM 35939).

Funding
This study was supported by the:
  • Key Technologies Research and Development Program (Award 2023YFC2811501)
    • Principal Award Recipient: ZhangHuan
  • Marine S&T Fund of Shandong Province for Pilot National Laboratory for Marine Science and Technology (Qingdao) (Award 2022QNLM030004-3)
    • Principal Award Recipient: ZhangHuan
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (Award 42030407)
    • Principal Award Recipient: LiChaolun
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.006818
2025-06-19
2026-03-07

Metrics

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. McCLUNG CR, Patriquin DG, Davis RE. Campylobacter nitrofigilis sp. nov., a nitrogen-fixing bacterium associated with roots of Spartina alterniflora Loisel. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1983; 33:605–612 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Waite DW, Vanwonterghem I, Rinke C, Parks DH, Zhang Y et al. Comparative genomic analysis of the class Epsilonproteobacteria and proposed reclassification to Epsilonbacteraeota (phyl. nov.). Front Microbiol 2017; 8:682 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Vandamme P, Falsen E, Rossau R, Hoste B, Segers P et al. Revision of Campylobacter, Helicobacter, and Wolinella taxonomy: emendation of generic descriptions and proposal of Arcobacter gen. nov. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1991; 41:88–103 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Pérez-Cataluña A, Salas-Massó N, Diéguez AL, Balboa S, Lema A et al. Revisiting the taxonomy of the genus Arcobacter: getting order from the chaos (vol 9, 2077, 2018). Front Microbiol 2018; 9: [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Pérez-Cataluña A, Salas-Massó N, Diéguez AL, Balboa S, Lema A et al. Corrigendum (2): revisiting the taxonomy of the genus Arcobacter: getting order from the chaos. Front Microbiol 2019; 10:2253 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  6. On SLW, Miller WG, Biggs PJ, Cornelius AJ, Vandamme P. Aliarcobacter, Halarcobacter, Malaciobacter, Pseudarcobacter and Poseidonibacter are later synonyms of Arcobacter: transfer of Poseidonibacter parvus, Poseidonibacter antarcticus, ‘Halarcobacter arenosus’, and ‘Aliarcobacter vitoriensis’ to Arcobacter as Arcobacter parvus comb. nov., Arcobacter antarcticus comb. nov., Arcobacter arenosus comb. nov. and Arcobacter vitoriensis comb. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2021; 71: [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  7. On SLW, Miller WG, Kelly DJ, Vandamme P. An emended description of Arcobacter anaerophilus Sasi Jyothsna et al. 2013: genomic and phenotypic insights. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2020; 70:3921–3923 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Pascual J, Lepleux C, Methner A, Spröer C, Bunk B et al. Arcobacter roscoffensis sp. nov., a marine bacterium isolated from coastal seawater. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2023; 73: [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Park S, Jung YT, Kim S, Yoon JH. Arcobacter acticola sp. nov., isolated from seawater on the East Sea in South Korea. J Microbiol 2016; 54:655–659 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Zhang Z, Yu C, Wang X, Yu S, Zhang X-H. Arcobacter pacificus sp. nov., isolated from seawater of the South Pacific Gyre. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2016; 66:542–547 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Sasi Jyothsna TS, Rahul K, Ramaprasad EVV, Sasikala Ch, Ramana ChV. Arcobacter anaerophilus sp. nov., isolated from an estuarine sediment and emended description of the genus Arcobacter. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2013; 63:4619–4625 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Guo X-H, Wang N, Yuan X-X, Zhang X-Y, Chen X-L et al. Poseidonibacter antarcticus sp. nov., isolated from Antarctic intertidal sediment. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2019; 69:2717–2722 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Tanaka R, Cleenwerck I, Mizutani Y, Iehata S, Bossier P et al. Arcobacter haliotis sp. nov., isolated from abalone species Haliotis gigantea. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2017; 67:3050–3056 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Levican A, Collado L, Aguilar C, Yustes C, Diéguez AL et al. Arcobacter bivalviorum sp. nov. and Arcobacter venerupis sp. nov., new species isolated from shellfish. Syst Appl Microbiol 2012; 35:133–138 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  15. On SLW, Althaus D, Miller WG, Lizamore D, Wong SGL et al. Arcobacter cryaerophilus isolated from New Zealand mussels harbor a putative virulence plasmid. Front Microbiol 2019; 10:1802 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Figueras MJ, Levican A, Collado L, Inza MI, Yustes C. Arcobacter ellisii sp. nov., isolated from mussels. Syst Appl Microbiol 2011; 34:414–418 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Diéguez AL, Balboa S, Magnesen T, Romalde JL. Arcobacter lekithochrous sp. nov., isolated from a molluscan hatchery. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2017; 67:1327–1332 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Kim MJ, Baek MG, Shin SK, Yi H. Poseidonibacter parvus sp. nov., isolated from a squid. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2021; 71: [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Lane DJ. 16S/23S rRNA sequencing. In Stackebrandt E, Goodfellow M. eds New York: John Wiley and Sons; 1991
  20. Turner S, Pryer KM, Miao VP, Palmer JD. Investigating deep phylogenetic relationships among cyanobacteria and plastids by small subunit rRNA sequence analysis. J Eukaryot Microbiol 1999; 46:327–338 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Kim O-S, Cho Y-J, Lee K, Yoon S-H, Kim M et al. Introducing EzTaxon-e: a prokaryotic 16S rRNA gene sequence database with phylotypes that represent uncultured species. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2012; 62:716–721 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Saitou N, Nei M. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 1987; 4:406–425 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Felsenstein J. Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: a maximum likelihood approach. J Mol Evol 1981; 17:368–376 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Rzhetsky A, Nei M. Theoretical foundation of the minimum-evolution method of phylogenetic inference. Mol Biol Evol 1993; 10:1073–1095 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Tamura K, Stecher G, Kumar S. MEGA11: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis Version 11. Mol Biol Evol 2021; 38:3022–3027 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Li W, O’Neill KR, Haft DH, DiCuccio M, Chetvernin V et al. RefSeq: expanding the prokaryotic genome annotation pipeline reach with protein family model curation. Nucleic Acids Res 2021; 49:D1020–D1028 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Ashburner M, Ball CA, Blake JA, Botstein D, Butler H et al. Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. Nat Genet 2000; 25:25–29 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Kanehisa M, Goto S, Hattori M, Aoki-Kinoshita KF, Itoh M et al. From genomics to chemical genomics: new developments in KEGG. Nucleic Acids Res 2006; 34:D354–7 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Kanehisa M, Goto S, Kawashima S, Okuno Y, Hattori M. The KEGG resource for deciphering the genome. Nucleic Acids Res 2004; 32:D277–80 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Emms DM, Kelly S. OrthoFinder: phylogenetic orthology inference for comparative genomics. Genome Biol 2019; 20:238 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Emms DM, Kelly S. OrthoFinder: solving fundamental biases in whole genome comparisons dramatically improves orthogroup inference accuracy. Genome Biol 2015; 16:157 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Edgar RC. MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res 2004; 32:1792–1797 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Capella-Gutiérrez S, Silla-Martínez JM, Gabaldón T. trimAl: a tool for automated alignment trimming in large-scale phylogenetic analyses. Bioinformatics 2009; 25:1972–1973 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Mirarab S, Reaz R, Bayzid MS, Zimmermann T, Swenson MS et al. ASTRAL: genome-scale coalescent-based species tree estimation. Bioinformatics 2014; 30:i541–8 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Yoon SH, Ha SM, Lim J, Kwon S, Chun J. A large-scale evaluation of algorithms to calculate average nucleotide identity. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 2017; 110:1281–1286 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Meier-Kolthoff JP, Auch AF, Klenk HP, Göker M. Genome sequence-based species delimitation with confidence intervals and improved distance functions. BMC Bioinform 2013; 14:60 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Meier-Kolthoff JP, Carbasse JS, Peinado-Olarte RL, Göker M. TYGS and LPSN: a database tandem for fast and reliable genome-based classification and nomenclature of prokaryotes. Nucleic Acids Res 2022; 50:D801–D807 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Kim M, Oh H-S, Park S-C, Chun J. Towards a taxonomic coherence between average nucleotide identity and 16S rRNA gene sequence similarity for species demarcation of prokaryotes. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2014; 64:346–351 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Richter M, Rosselló-Móra R. Shifting the genomic gold standard for the prokaryotic species definition. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2009; 106:19126–19131 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Goris J, Konstantinidis KT, Klappenbach JA, Coenye T, Vandamme P et al. DNA-DNA hybridization values and their relationship to whole-genome sequence similarities. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2007; 57:81–91 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  41. On SLW, Miller WG, Houf K, Fox JG, Vandamme P. Minimal standards for describing new species belonging to the families Campylobacteraceae and Helicobacteraceae: Campylobacter, Arcobacter, Helicobacter and Wolinella spp. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2017; 67:5296–5311 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Thevarajoo S, Selvaratnam C, Goh KM, Hong KW, Chan XY et al. Vitellibacter aquimaris sp. nov., a marine bacterium isolated from seawater. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2016; 66:3662–3668 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  43. On SL, Holmes B. Reproducibility of tolerance tests that are useful in the identification of campylobacteria. J Clin Microbiol 1991; 29:1785–1788 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Tindall BJ. A comparative study of the lipid composition of Halobacterium saccharovorum from various sources. Syst Appl Microbiol 1990; 13:128–130 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Tindall BJ. Lipid composition of Halobacterium Lacusprofundi. Fems Microbiol Lett 1990; 66:199–202 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Kates M. Techniques of lipidology, 2nd ed. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 1986
  47. Lai QL, Liu XP, Yuan J, Xie SC, Shao ZZ. Pararhodobacter marinus sp. nov., isolated from deep-sea water of the Indian Ocean. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2019; 69:932–936 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Sasser M. Identification of bacteria by gas chromatography of cellular fatty acids. USFCC News Lett 1990; 20:1–6
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.006818
Loading
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.006818
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplements

Supplementary material 1

PDF
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error