Skip to content
1887

Abstract

Four pink-pigmented bacteria, designated as strains sgz302003, sgz302004, sgz302005 and sgz302006, were isolated from a paddy soil enrichment. The cells were aerobic, Gram-stain-negative, motile and short rods. The ranges and optima of the temperature, NaCl concentration and pH for growth were 25–37 °C (optimum, 30 °C), 0–2% (w/v) (optimum, 0–0.5%) and pH 5.0–10.0 (optimum, pH 6.5), respectively. Major fatty acids were summed feature 8 (C 7 and/or C 6). Results of phylogenetic analysis based on 16S rRNA gene sequences indicated that the four strains were affiliated with the genus and were most closely related to AR24 (99.2% sequence similarity), ORS 206 (97.7%) and PR1016A (97.4%). The methanol dehydrogenase gene was absent, but was present. Phylogenomic tree supported that these four strains formed a distinct clade within . Q-10 was detected as the only respiratory quinone in the studied strains. The genomic DNA G+C content was 70.7–70.8 %. The orthologous average nucleotide identity and digital DNA–DNA hybridization values between the four strains and AR24 were 91.8–91.9% and 53.0–53.3%, respectively, while those with ORS 206 were 86.3–86.5% and 25.5%. Phylogenomic, physiological and chemotaxonomic analyses indicate that the four strains represent a novel species within the genus , for which the name sp. nov. is proposed, with strain sgz302003 (= MCCC 1K09384=KCTC 8693) as the type strain.

Funding
This study was supported by the:
  • Science and technology special project of Fujian Province (Award 2023L3022)
    • Principle Award Recipient: NotApplicable
  • Special project for outstanding scientific and technological innovation talents of Fujian Academy of Agricultural Sciences (Award YCZX202407)
    • Principle Award Recipient: Guo-HongLiu
  • National Nature Science Foundation of China (Award 42477274)
    • Principle Award Recipient: Guo-HongLiu
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.006805
2025-06-06
2025-06-24
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Patt TE, Cole GC, Hanson RS. Methylobacterium, a new genus of facultatively methylotrophic bacteria. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1976; 26:226–229 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Green PN, Ardley JK. Review of the genus Methylobacterium and closely related organisms: a proposal that some Methylobacterium species be reclassified into a new genus, Methylorubrum gen. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2018; 68:2727–2748 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Parte AC, Sardà Carbasse J, Meier-Kolthoff JP, Reimer LC, Göker M. List of Prokaryotic names with Standing in Nomenclature (LPSN) moves to the DSMZ. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2020; 70:5607–5612 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Zhang S, Luo Y, Zhang K, Song Z, Ling L et al. Methylobacterium amylolyticum sp. nov. and Methylobacterium ligniniphilum sp. nov., isolated from soil. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2024; 74: [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Wang X, Sahr F, Xue T, Sun B. Methylobacterium salsuginis sp. nov., isolated from seawater. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2007; 57:1699–1703 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Lee Y, Jeon CO. Methylobacterium frigidaeris sp. nov., isolated from an air conditioning system. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2018; 68:299–304 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Tani A, Sahin N, Kimbara K. Methylobacterium oxalidis sp. nov., isolated from leaves of Oxalis corniculata. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2012; 62:1647–1652 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Madhaiyan M, Poonguzhali S. Methylobacterium pseudosasae sp. nov., a pink-pigmented, facultatively methylotrophic bacterium isolated from the bamboo phyllosphere. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 2014; 105:367–376 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Sanjenbam P, Shivaprasad PV, Agashe D. Impact of Phyllosphere Methylobacterium on Host Rice Landraces. Microbiol Spectr 2022; 10:e0081022 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Lu X, Wang W, Zhang L, Hu H, Xu P et al. Molecular mechanism of n,n-dimethylformamide degradation in Methylobacterium sp. strain DM1. Appl Environ Microbiol 2019; 85:e00275–19
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Yousaf T, Saleem F, Andleeb S, Ali M, Farhan Ul Haque M. Methylotrophic bacteria from rice paddy soils: mineral-nitrogen-utilizing isolates richness in bulk soil and rhizosphere. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 2024; 40:188 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Chen X, Yang J, Zeng RJ, Qin S, Liu X et al. Reactive oxygen species promote nitrous oxide (N₂O) emissions from soil/sediment during the anoxic–oxic transition. Environ Sci Technol 2023; 57:801–809 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Huang S, Chen K, Chen X, Liao H, Zeng RJ et al. Sunlight significantly enhances soil denitrification via an interfacial biophotoelectrochemical pathway. Environ Sci Technol 2023; 57:7733–7742 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Wellner S, Lodders N, Kämpfer P. Diversity and biogeography of selected phyllosphere bacteria with special emphasis on Methylobacterium spp. Syst Appl Microbiol 2011; 34:621–630 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Madhaiyan M, Poonguzhali S, Kwon S-W, Sa T-M. Methylophilus rhizosphaerae sp. nov., a restricted facultative methylotroph isolated from rice rhizosphere soil. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2009; 59:2904–2908 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Madhaiyan M, Poonguzhali S, Lee J-S, Lee KC, Sundaram S. Flavobacterium glycines sp. nov., a facultative methylotroph isolated from the rhizosphere of soybean. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2010; 60:2187–2192 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Madhaiyan M, Poonguzhali S, Senthilkumar M, Lee JS, Lee KC. Methylobacterium gossipiicola sp. nov., a pink-pigmented, facultatively methylotrophic bacterium isolated from the cotton phyllosphere. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2012; 62:162–167 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Chaudhry V, Baindara P, Pal VK, Chawla N, Patil PB et al. Methylobacterium indicum sp. nov., a facultative methylotrophic bacterium isolated from rice seed. Syst Appl Microbiol 2016; 39:25–32 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Chen WM, Cai CY, Li ZH, Young CC, Sheu SY. Methylobacterium oryzihabitans sp. nov., isolated from water sampled from a rice paddy field. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2019; 69:3843–3850 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Madhaiyan M, Poonguzhali S, Kwon SW, Sa TM. Methylobacterium phyllosphaerae sp. nov., a pink-pigmented, facultative methylotroph from the phyllosphere of rice. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2009; 59:22–27 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Xie CJ, Yao L, Tang R, Han S, Yang S et al. Azotosporobacter soli gen. nov., sp. nov., a novel nitrogen-fixing bacterium isolated from paddy soil. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 2024; 117: [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Yoon S-H, Ha S-M, Kwon S, Lim J, Kim Y et al. Introducing EzBioCloud: a taxonomically united database of 16S rRNA gene sequences and whole-genome assemblies. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2017; 67:1613–1617 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Saitou N, Nei M. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 1987; 4:406–425 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Felsenstein J. Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: a maximum likelihood approach. J Mol Evol 1981; 17:368–376 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Kimura M. A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J Mol Evol 1980; 16:111–120 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Felsenstein J. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 1985; 39:783–791 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Fitch WM. Toward defining the course of evolution: minimum change for a specific tree topology. Syst Zool 1971; 20:406 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Tamura K, Stecher G, Kumar S. MEGA11: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis Version 11. Mol Biol Evol 2021; 38:3022–3027 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Chen S, Zhou Y, Chen Y, Gu J. fastp: an ultra-fast all-in-one FASTQ preprocessor. Bioinformatics 2018; 34:i884–i890 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Luo R, Liu B, Xie Y, Li Z, Huang W et al. SOAPdenovo2: an empirically improved memory-efficient short-read de novo assembler. Gigascience 2012; 1:18 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Delcher AL, Bratke KA, Powers EC, Salzberg SL. Identifying bacterial genes and endosymbiont DNA with GLIMMER. Bioinformatics 2007; 23:673–679 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Borodovsky M, McIninch J. GeneMark: parallel gene recognition for both DNA strands. Comput Chem 1993; 17:123–133 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Yoon SH, Ha SM, Lim JM, Kwon SJ, Chun J. A large-scale evaluation of algorithms to calculate average nucleotide identity. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 2017; 110:1281–1286 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Meier-Kolthoff JP, Auch AF, Klenk H-P, Göker M. Genome sequence-based species delimitation with confidence intervals and improved distance functions. BMC Bioinformatics 2013; 14:60 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Parks DH, Chuvochina M, Waite DW, Rinke C, Skarshewski A et al. A standardized bacterial taxonomy based on genome phylogeny substantially revises the tree of life. Nat Biotechnol 2018; 36:996–1004 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Chaumeil PA, Mussig AJ, Hugenholtz P, Parks DH. GTDB-Tk: a toolkit to classify genomes with the Genome Taxonomy Database. Bioinformatics 2019; 36:1925–1927 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Goris J, Konstantinidis KT, Klappenbach JA, Coenye T, Vandamme P et al. DNA-DNA hybridization values and their relationship to whole-genome sequence similarities. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2007; 57:81–91 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Richter M, Rosselló-Móra R. Shifting the genomic gold standard for the prokaryotic species definition. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2009; 106:19126–19131 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Chaudhari NM, Gupta VK, Dutta C. BPGA- an ultra-fast pan-genome analysis pipeline. Sci Rep 2016; 6:24373 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Ren Y, Yu G, Shi C, Liu L, Guo Q et al. Majorbio Cloud: a one-stop, comprehensive bioinformatic platform for multiomics analyses. Imeta 2022; 1:e12 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Chistoserdova L. Modularity of methylotrophy, revisited. Environ Microbiol 2011; 13:2603–2622 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Choi O, Kim J, Kim JG, Jeong Y, Moon JS et al. Pyrroloquinoline quinone is a plant growth promotion factor produced by Pseudomonas fluorescens B16. Plant Physiol 2008; 146:657–668 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  43. He R, Gu S, Xu J, Li X, Chen H et al. SIDERITE: unveiling hidden siderophore diversity in the chemical space through digital exploration. Imeta 2024; 3:e192 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Kramer J, Özkaya Ö, Kümmerli R. Bacterial siderophores in community and host interactions. Nat Rev Microbiol 2020; 18:152–163 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Narsing Rao MP, Dong ZY, Kan Y, Dong L, Li S et al. Description of Paenibacillus tepidiphilus sp. nov., isolated from a tepid spring. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2020; 70:1977–1981 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Kovacs N. Identification of Pseudomonas pyocyanea by the oxidase reaction. Nature 1956; 178:703 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Gallego V, García MT, Ventosa A. Methylobacterium isbiliense sp. nov., isolated from the drinking water system of Sevilla, Spain. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2005; 55:2333–2337 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Jourand P, Giraud E, Béna G, Sy A, Willems A et al. Methylobacterium nodulans sp. nov., for a group of aerobic, facultatively methylotrophic, legume root-nodule-forming and nitrogen-fixing bacteria. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2004; 54:2269–2273 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Sasser M. Identification of bacteria by gas chromatography of cellular fatty acids. USFCC News 1990; 20:16
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Collins MD, Pirouz T, Goodfellow M, Minnikin DE. Distribution of menaquinones in actinomycetes and corynebacteria. J Gen Microbiol 1977; 100:221–230 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Kroppenstedt RM. Separation of bacterial menaquinones by HPLC using reverse phase (RP18) and a silver loaded ion exchanger as stationary phases. J Liq Chromatogr 1982; 5:2359–2367 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Jia LJ, Zhang KS, Tang K, Meng JY, Zheng C et al. Methylobacterium crusticola sp. nov., isolated from biological soil crusts. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2020; 70:2089–2095 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Chen LB, OuYang YT, Liu L, Jin PJ, Huang RR et al. Methylobacterium nigriterrae sp. nov., isolated from black soil. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 2024; 117:83 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.006805
Loading
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.006805
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplements

Supplementary material 1

PDF
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error