Skip to content
1887

Abstract

The genus was proposed by Schleifer . by separating from the genus . Although the family consists of four genera, each genus contains a relatively small number of species, with the exception of the genus , which contains more than 100 species. The genera and currently comprise 26 species and a single species, respectively. This study evaluated the taxonomy of the genus based on the 16S rRNA gene phylogeny, core-genome phylogeny and (conserved) pairwise average amino acid identity. These evaluations clearly indicated that the genus could be divided into two genus-level clusters, and we propose to reclassify this genus into two; the authentic , which includes the group, and a novel genus for which the name is proposed. Three lactic acid bacterial strains, RyT2, OfM1 and OfM2, were isolated from the gut of termites in Okinawa, Japan. Based on the combination of genetic and phenotypic data, we conclude that these isolates represent two novel species of the genera and , respectively, for which we propose the names sp. nov. (RyT2=JCM 36015=DSM 118067) and sp. nov. (OfM1=JCM 34431=DSM 118066, OfM2=JCM 34432), respectively.

Funding
This study was supported by the:
  • Japan Society for Microbial Resources and Systematics
    • Principal Award Recipient: KotaAbe
  • Japan Science and Technology Agency (Award JPMJGX23B0)
    • Principal Award Recipient: MoriyaOhkuma
  • Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (Award JP19gm6010007)
    • Principal Award Recipient: MitsuoSakamoto
  • Institute for Fermentation, Osaka
    • Principal Award Recipient: SatokoNoda
  • Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (Award 19H05689)
    • Principal Award Recipient: MoriyaOhkuma
  • Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (Award 23K18534)
    • Principal Award Recipient: SatokoNoda
  • Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (Award 23K23738)
    • Principal Award Recipient: SatokoNoda
  • This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License. This article was made open access via a Publish and Read agreement between the Microbiology Society and the corresponding author’s institution.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.006803
2025-06-05
2025-12-07

Metrics

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/ijsem/75/6/ijsem006803.html?itemId=/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.006803&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Cho S-L, Nam S-W, Yoon J-H, Lee J-S, Sukhoom A et al. Lactococcus chungangensis sp. nov., a lactic acid bacterium isolated from activated sludge foam. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2008; 58:1844–1849 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Chen Y-S, Otoguro M, Lin Y-H, Pan S-F, Ji S-H et al. Lactococcus formosensis sp. nov., a lactic acid bacterium isolated from yan-tsai-shin (fermented broccoli stems). Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2014; 64:146–151 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Meucci A, Zago M, Rossetti L, Fornasari ME, Bonvini B et al. Lactococcus hircilactis sp. nov. and Lactococcus laudensis sp. nov., isolated from milk. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2015; 65:2091–2096 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Noda S, Sakamoto M, Aihara C, Yuki M, Katsuhara M et al. Lactococcus termiticola sp. nov., isolated from the gut of the wood-feeding higher termite Nasutitermes takasagoensis. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2018; 68:3832–3836 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Yuki M, Sakamoto M, Nishimura Y, Ohkuma M. Lactococcus reticulitermitis sp. nov., isolated from the gut of the subterranean termite Reticulitermes speratus. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2018; 68:596–601 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Goodman LB, Lawton MR, Franklin-Guild RJ, Anderson RR, Schaan L et al. Lactococcus petauri sp. nov., isolated from an abscess of a sugar glider. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2017; 67:4397–4404 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Pérez T, Balcázar JL, Peix A, Valverde A, Velázquez E et al. Lactococcus lactis subsp. tructae subsp. nov. isolated from the intestinal mucus of brown trout (Salmo trutta) and rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2011; 61:1894–1898 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Heo J, Cho H, Tamura T, Saitou S, Park K et al. Lactococcus allomyrinae sp. nov., isolated from gut of larvae of Allomyrina dichotoma. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2019; 69:3682–3688 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Wang XM, Ma S, Yang SY, Peng R, Zheng Y et al. Paenibacillus nasutitermitis sp. nov., isolated from a termite gut. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2016; 66:901–905 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Noda S, Koyama F, Aihara C, Ikeyama N, Yuki M et al. Lactococcus insecticola sp. nov. and Lactococcus hodotermopsidis sp. nov., isolated from the gut of the wood-feeding lower termite Hodotermopsis sjostedti. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2020; 70:4515–4522 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Bauer S, Tholen A, Overmann J, Brune A. Characterization of abundance and diversity of lactic acid bacteria in the hindgut of wood- and soil-feeding termites by molecular and culture-dependent techniques. Arch Microbiol 2000; 173:126–137 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Matthies C, Gössner A, Acker G, Schramm A, Drake HL. Lactovum miscens gen. nov., sp. nov., an aerotolerant, psychrotolerant, mixed-fermentative anaerobe from acidic forest soil. Res Microbiol 2004; 155:847–854 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Kikuchi Y, Hayatsu M, Hosokawa T, Nagayama A, Tago K et al. Symbiont-mediated insecticide resistance. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2012; 109:8618–8622 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Brune A, Ohkuma M. Role of the termite gut microbiota in symbiotic digestion. In Bignell DE, Roisin Y, Lo N N. eds Biology of Termites: A Modern Synthesis New York: Springer; 2011 pp 439–475
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Brune A. Symbiotic digestion of lignocellulose in termite guts. Nat Rev Microbiol 2014; 12:168–180 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Noda S, Shimizu D, Yuki M, Kitade O, Ohkuma M. Host-symbiont cospeciation of termite-gut cellulolytic protists of the genera Teranympha and Eucomonympha and their Treponema endosymbionts. Microbes Environ 2018; 33:26–33 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Ohbayashi T, Itoh H, Lachat J, Kikuchi Y, Mergaert P. Burkholderia gut symbionts associated with European and Japanese populations of the dock bug Coreus marginatus (Coreoidea: Coreidae). Microbes Environ 2019; 34:219–222 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Konstantinidis KT, Rosselló-Móra R, Amann R. Uncultivated microbes in need of their own taxonomy. ISME J 2017; 11:2399–2406 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Katoh K, Standley DM. MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: improvements in performance and usability. Mol Biol Evol 2013; 30:772–780 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Stamatakis A. RAxML version 8: a tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinformatics 2014; 30:1312–1313 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Stecher G, Tamura K, Kumar S. Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis (MEGA) for macOS. Mol Biol Evol 2020; 37:1237–1239 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Ronquist F, Teslenko M, van der Mark P, Ayres DL, Darling A et al. MrBayes 3.2: efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Syst Biol 2012; 61:539–542 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Noda S, Aihara C, Yuki M, Ohkuma M. Draft genome sequence of Lactococcus sp. strain NtB2 (JCM 32569), isolated from the gut of the higher termite Nasutitermes takasagoensis. Genome Announc 2018; 6:e00445-18 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Bankevich A, Nurk S, Antipov D, Gurevich AA, Dvorkin M et al. SPAdes: a new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J Comput Biol 2012; 19:455–477 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Tanizawa Y, Fujisawa T, Kaminuma E, Nakamura Y, Arita M. DFAST and DAGA: web-based integrated genome annotation tools and resources. Biosci Microbiota Food Health 2016; 35:173–184 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Meier-Kolthoff JP, Carbasse JS, Peinado-Olarte RL, Göker M. TYGS and LPSN: a database tandem for fast and reliable genome-based classification and nomenclature of prokaryotes. Nucleic Acids Res 2022; 50:D801–D807 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Yoon SH, Ha SM, Lim JM, Kwon SJ, Chun J. A large-scale evaluation of algorithms to calculate average nucleotide identity. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 2017; 110:1281–1286 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Parks D. CompareM: a toolbox for comparative genomics; 2020 https://github.com/dparks1134/CompareM
  29. Afrizal A, Jennings SAV, Hitch TCA, Riedel T, Basic M et al. Enhanced cultured diversity of the mouse gut microbiota enables custom-made synthetic communities. Cell Host Microbe 2022; 30:1630–1645 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Oren A, Göker M. Validation List no. 213. Valid publication of new names and new combinations effectively published outside the IJSEM. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2023; 73:005997 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Sun P, Li X, Shi W, Zhang L, Li M et al. Lactococcus intestinalis sp. nov., a new lactic acid bacterium isolated from intestinal contents in Alzheimer’s disease mice. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 2023; 116:425–433 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Oren A, Göker M. Validation List no. 216. Valid publication of new names and new combinations effectively published outside the IJSEM. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2024; 74:006229 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Kim J, Na S-I, Kim D, Chun J. UBCG2: Up-to-date bacterial core genes and pipeline for phylogenomic analysis. J Microbiol 2021; 59:609–615 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Miller LT. Single derivatization method for routine analysis of bacterial whole-cell fatty acid methyl esters, including hydroxy acids. J Clin Microbiol 1982; 16:584–586 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Kuykendall LD, Roy MA, O’neill JJ, Devine TE. Fatty acids, antibiotic resistance, and deoxyribonucleic acid homology groups of Bradyrhizobium japonicum. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1988; 38:358–361 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Williams AM, Fryer JL, Collins MD. Lactococcus piscium sp. nov. a new Lactococcus species from salmonid fish. FEMS Microbiol Lett 1990; 56:109–113 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Komagata K, Suzuki K. Lipid and cell-wall analysis in bacterial systematics. Methods Microbiol 1987; 19:161–207 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Hilgarth M, Werum V, Vogel RF. Lactococcus carnosus sp. nov. and Lactococcus paracarnosus sp. nov., two novel species isolated from modified-atmosphere packaged beef steaks. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2020; 70:5832–5840 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Collins MD, Farrow JA, Phillips BA, Kandler O. Streptococcus garvieae sp. nov. and Streptococcus plantarum sp. nov. J Gen Microbiol 1983; 129:3427–3431 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Garvie EI. Streptococcus raffinolactis Orla-Jensen Hansen, a group Streptococcus found in raw milk. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1978; 28:190–193 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.006803
Loading
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.006803
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplements

Supplementary material 1

PDF
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error