Skip to content
1887

Abstract

Whole-genome sequencing of cultures at the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC) is ongoing, with reference-quality genome sequences for our microbial strains added to the ATCC Genome Portal on a quarterly basis. Following genome assembly, authentication and taxonomy verification are needed for taxonomic updates based on the circumscription of genomic metrics for a species. sp. ATCC 23246 was originally identified as an atypical ; however, an analysis of the complete and closed genome of this strain indicates that it represents a novel species within the genus. We propose the name of sp. nov. for this long-mischaracterized strain as whole-genome sequencing was used to uncover the truth of this strain’s identity. The type strain is ATCC 23246 (=NCTC 4103).

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.006797
2025-05-21
2026-02-10

Metrics

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Li W, O’Neill KR, Haft DH, DiCuccio M, Chetvernin V et al. RefSeq: expanding the prokaryotic genome annotation pipeline reach with protein family model curation. Nucleic Acids Res 2021; 49:D1020–D1028 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Yarmosh DA, Lopera JG, Puthuveetil NP, Combs PF, Reese AL et al. Comparative analysis and data provenance for 1,113 bacterial genome assemblies. mSphere 2022; 7:e0007722 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Benton B, King S, Greenfield SR, Puthuveetil N, Reese AL et al. The ATCC genome portal: microbial genome reference standards with data provenance. Microbiol Resour Announc 2021; 10:e00818–21 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Nguyen SV, Puthuveetil NP, Petrone JR, Kirkland JL, Gaffney K et al. The ATCC genome portal: 3,938 authenticated microbial reference genomes. Microbiol Resour Announc 2024e0104523
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Chalita M, Kim YO, Park S, Oh H-S, Cho JH et al. EzBioCloud: a genome-driven database and platform for microbiome identification and discovery. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2024; 74:006421 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Riesco R, Trujillo ME. Update on the proposed minimal standards for the use of genome data for the taxonomy of prokaryotes. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2024; 74:006300 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Minot SS, Krumm N, Greenfield NB. One codex: a sensitive and accurate data platform for genomic microbial identification. Bioinformatics 2015 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Tatusova T, DiCuccio M, Badretdin A, Chetvernin V, Nawrocki EP et al. NCBI prokaryotic genome annotation pipeline. Nucleic Acids Res 2016; 44:6614–6624 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Haft DH, DiCuccio M, Badretdin A, Brover V, Chetvernin V et al. RefSeq: an update on prokaryotic genome annotation and curation. Nucleic Acids Res 2018; 46:D851–D860 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Jain C, Rodriguez-R LM, Phillippy AM, Konstantinidis KT, Aluru S. High throughput ANI analysis of 90K prokaryotic genomes reveals clear species boundaries. Nat Commun 2018; 9:5114 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Rossau R, Van Landschoot A, Gillis M, De Ley J. Taxonomy of Moraxellaceae fam. nov., a new Bacterial family to accommodate the genera Moraxella, Acinetobacter, and Psychrobacter and related organisms. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1991; 41:310–319 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Parte AC, Sardà Carbasse J, Meier-Kolthoff JP, Reimer LC, Göker M. List of prokaryotic names with standing in nomenclature (LPSN) moves to the DSMZ. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2020; 70:5607–5612 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Bartlett A, Padfield D, Lear L, Bendall R, Vos M. A comprehensive list of bacterial pathogens infecting humans. Microbiology 2022; 168: [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Aebi C. Moraxella catarrhalis - pathogen or commensal?. Adv Exp Med Biol 2011; 697:107–116 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Ioannou P, Alexakis K, Baliou S, Kofteridis DP. Infective endocarditis by Moraxella species: a systematic review. J Clin Med 2022; 11:1854 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Catlin BW. Transfer of the organism named Neisseria Catarrhalis to Branhamella gen. nov. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1970; 20:155–159 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Véron M, Lenvoisé-Furet A, Coustère C, Ged C, Grimont F. Relatedness of three species of “false neisseriae,” Neisseria caviae, Neisseria cuniculi, and Neisseria ovis, by DNA-DNA hybridizations and fatty acid analysis. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1993; 43:210–220 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Henriksen SD, Bovre K. The taxonomy of the genera Moraxella and Neisseria. J Gen Microbiol 1968; 51:387–392 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Catlin BW, Cunningham LS. Genetic transformation of Neisseria catarrhalis by deoxyribonucleate preparations having different average base compositions. Microbiology 1964; 37:341–352 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  20. P B, M D, Ry S. Study of the Moraxella group. I. genus Moraxella and the Neisseria catarrhalis group. J Bacteriol 1968; 95:
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Fox RH, McClain DE. Evaluation of the taxonomic relationship of Micrococcus cryophilus, Branhamella catarrhalis, and neisseriae by comparative polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis of soluble proteins1. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 1974; 24:172–176
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Juni E, Heym GA, Avery M. Defined medium for Moraxella (Branhamella) catarrhalis. Appl Environ Microbiol 1986; 52:546–551 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Blakeway LV, Power PM, Jen FE-C, Worboys SR, Boitano M et al. ModM DNA methyltransferase methylome analysis reveals a potential role for Moraxella catarrhalis phasevarions in otitis media. FASEB J 2014; 28:5197–5207 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Seib KL, Peak IRA, Jennings MP. Phase variable restriction-modification systems in Moraxella catarrhalis. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol 2002; 32:159–165 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Blakeway LV, Tan A, Lappan R, Ariff A, Pickering JL et al. Moraxella catarrhalis restriction-modification systems are associated with phylogenetic lineage and disease. Genome Biol Evol 2018; 10:2932–2946 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Jannes G, Vaneechoutte M, Lannoo M, Gillis M, Vancanneyt M et al. Polyphasic taxonomy leading to the proposal of Moraxella canis sp. nov. for Moraxella catarrhalis-like strains. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1993; 43:438–449 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Chen S, Zhou Y, Chen Y, Gu J. fastp: an ultra-fast all-in-one FASTQ preprocessor. Bioinformatics 2018; 34:i884–i890 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Wingett SW, Andrews S. FastQ Screen: a tool for multi-genome mapping and quality control. F1000Res 2018; 7:1338 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Wick RR, Menzel P. Filtlong (v0.20); 2018 https://github.com/rrwick/Filtlong
  30. Wick RR, Judd LM, Gorrie CL, Holt KE. Unicycler: resolving bacterial genome assemblies from short and long sequencing reads. PLoS Comput Biol 2017; 13:e1005595 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Wick RR, Judd LM, Cerdeira LT, Hawkey J, Méric G et al. Trycycler: consensus long-read assemblies for bacterial genomes. Genome Biol 2021; 22:266 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Kim O-S, Cho Y-J, Lee K, Yoon S-H, Kim M et al. Introducing EzTaxon-e: a prokaryotic 16S rRNA gene sequence database with phylotypes that represent uncultured species. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2012; 62:716–721 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Wilkes RP, Anis E, Kattoor JJ. Moraxella oculi sp. nov., isolated from a cow with infectious bovine keratoconjunctivitis. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2024; 74: [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Angelos JA, Ball LM. Differentiation of Moraxella Bovoculi sp. nov. from other coccoid Moraxellae by the use of polymerase chain reaction and restriction endonuclease analysis of amplified DNA. J VET Diagn Invest 2007; 19:532–534 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Richter M, Rosselló-Móra R. Shifting the genomic gold standard for the prokaryotic species definition. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2009; 106:19126–19131 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Richter M, Rosselló-Móra R, Oliver Glöckner F, Peplies J. JSpeciesWS: a web server for prokaryotic species circumscription based on pairwise genome comparison. Bioinforma Oxf Engl 2016; 32:929–931 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Dicks J, Fazal M-A, Oliver K, Grayson NE, Turnbull JD et al. NCTC3000: a century of bacterial strain collecting leads to a rich genomic data resource. Microb Genom 2023; 9:mgen000976 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Meier-Kolthoff JP, Göker M. TYGS is an automated high-throughput platform for state-of-the-art genome-based taxonomy. Nat Commun 2019; 10:2182 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Meier-Kolthoff JP, Auch AF, Klenk H-P, Göker M. Genome sequence-based species delimitation with confidence intervals and improved distance functions. BMC Bioinformatics 2013; 14:60 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Wirth T, Morelli G, Kusecek B, van Belkum A, van der Schee C et al. The rise and spread of a new pathogen: seroresistant Moraxella catarrhalis. Genome Res 2007; 17:1647–1656 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Earl JP, de Vries SPW, Ahmed A, Powell E, Schultz MP et al. Comparative genomic analyses of the Moraxella catarrhalis serosensitive and seroresistant lineages demonstrate their independent evolution. Genome Biol Evol 2016; 8:955–974 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Seib KL, Srikhanta YN, Atack JM, Jennings MP. Epigenetic regulation of virulence and immunoevasion by phase-variable restriction-modification systems in bacterial pathogens. Annu Rev Microbiol 2020; 74:655–671 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Wang A, Ash GJ. Whole genome phylogeny of Bacillus by feature frequency profiles (FFP). Sci Rep 2015; 5:13644 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Sims GE, Jun S-R, Wu GA, Kim S-H. Alignment-free genome comparison with feature frequency profiles (FFP) and optimal resolutions. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2009; 106:2677–2682 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Sadjadi S-A, Obedoza P, Annamarju P. Moraxella Catarrhalis peritonitis. Am J Case Rep 2012; 13:19–21 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Vaneechoutte M, Claeys G, Steyaert S, De Baere T, Peleman R et al. Isolation of Moraxella canis from an ulcerated metastatic lymph node. J Clin Microbiol 2000; 38:3870–3871 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Christensen JJ, Ursing J, Bruun B. Genotypic and phenotypic relatedness of 80 strains of Branhamella catarrhalis of worldwide origin. FEMS Microbiol Lett 1994; 119:155–159 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Gilchrist CLM, Chooi Y-H. clinker & clustermap.js: automatic generation of gene cluster comparison figures. Bioinformatics 2021; 37:2473–2475 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Peiris V, Heald J. Rapid method for differentiating strains of Branhamella catarrhalis. J Clin Pathol 1992; 45:532–534 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  50. McGee DJ, Zabaleta J, Viator RJ, Testerman TL, Ochoa AC et al. Purification and characterization of Helicobacter pylori arginase, RocF: unique features among the arginase superfamily. Eur J Biochem 2004; 271:1952–1962 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Warneke R, Garbers TB, Herzberg C, Aschenbrandt G, Ficner R et al. Ornithine is the central intermediate in the arginine degradative pathway and its regulation in Bacillus subtilis. J Biol Chem 2023; 299:104944 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Fox RH, McClain DE. Enzyme electrophoretograms in the analysis of taxon relatedness of Micrococcus cryophilus, Branhamella catarrhalis and atypical Neisserias. J Gen Microbiol 1975; 86:210–216 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Vandamme P, Sutcliffe I. Out with the old and in with the new: time to rethink twentieth century chemotaxonomic practices in bacterial taxonomy. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2021; 71:005127 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.006797
Loading
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.006797
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplements

Supplementary material 1

PDF
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error