Skip to content
1887

Abstract

Two novel Gram-stain-negative, rod-shaped, facultatively anaerobic and non-motile bacterial strains, designated as S1116L3 and S4756, were isolated from the marine sediment of Jingzi Port, Weihai, China. Strain S1116L3 grew at temperatures 15–37 ℃ within pH 5.5–9.0 and in the presence of 1.0%–10.0% (w/v) NaCl. Optimal growth required 3.0% (w/v) NaCl at 30 ℃ and pH 7.0. Strain S4756 grew at 15–37 ℃, pH 6.0–9.0 and in the presence of 1.0%–10.0% (w/v) NaCl. Optimal growth appeared with 2.0% (w/v) NaCl at 30 ℃ and pH 7.0. Strains S1116L3 and S4756 had a major fatty acid of C 7. The predominant respiratory quinone of the two strains was Q10. The major polar lipids detected in the two strains were phosphatidylethanolamine, phosphatidylglycerol and diphosphatidylglycerol. The phylogenetic analysis based on 16S rRNA gene sequences placed the strains S1116L3 and S4756 into the genus . The comparison of 16S rRNA gene sequence similarities revealed that strains S1116L3 and S4756 had the closest relative with KCTC 32014 (98.4% and 97.9%, respectively). These values were below the species delineation threshold of 98.6%. The average nucleotide identity (ANI) values based on the genome similarity between strain S1116L3 and species of the genus ranged from 74.6% to 82.8%, while the ANI values ranged from 74.3% to 82.5% for strain S4756, which is significantly lower than the species delineation threshold of 95%. The DNA G+C content of both strains is 63.0%. Based upon the results presented in this study, strains S1116L3 and S4756 represent two novel species of the genus , for which the names sp. nov. and sp. nov. are proposed with the type strains S1116L3 (=KCTC 8178=MCCC 1H01426=SDUM 031094) and S4756 (=KCTC 8179=MCCC 1H01425=SDUM 031096), respectively.

Funding
This study was supported by the:
  • Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province (Award ZR2023QD187)
    • Principle Award Recipient: JingZhang
  • China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (Award 2023M732055)
    • Principle Award Recipient: ZhenxingXu
  • the Science and Technology Fundamental Resources Investigation Program (Award 2022FY101100)
    • Principle Award Recipient: Zong-JunDu
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.006782
2025-06-03
2025-06-13
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Labrenz M, Collins MD, Lawson PA, Tindall BJ, Schumann P et al. Roseovarius tolerans gen. nov., sp. nov., a budding bacterium with variable bacteriochlorophyll a production from hypersaline Ekho Lake. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1999; 49 Pt 1:137–147 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Liang KYH, Orata FD, Boucher YF, Case RJ. Roseobacters in a sea of poly- and paraphyly: whole genome-based taxonomy of the family Rhodobacteraceae and the proposal for the split of the “roseobacter clade” into a novel family, Roseobacteraceae fam. nov. Front Microbiol 2021; 12:683109 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Slobodkina G, Ratnikova N, Merkel A, Kevbrin V, Kuchierskaya A et al. Lithoautotrophic lifestyle of the widespread genus Roseovarius revealed by physiological and genomic characterization of Roseovarius autotrophicus sp. nov. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 2022; 98:113 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Parte AC, Sardà CJ, Meier-Kolthoff JP, Reimer LC, Göker M. List of prokaryotic names with standing in nomenclature (LPSN) moves to the DSMZ. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2020; 70:5607–5612 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Biebl H, Allgaier M, Lünsdorf H, Pukall R, Tindall BJ et al. Roseovarius mucosus sp. nov., a member of the Roseobacter clade with trace amounts of bacteriochlorophylla. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2005; 55:2377–2383 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Lee MW, Baek JH, Kim JM, Bayburt H, Choi BJ et al. Roseovarius phycicola sp. nov. and Roseovarius rhodophyticola sp. nov., isolated from marine red algae. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2024; 74: [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Wang B, Tan T, Shao Z. Roseovarius pacificus sp. nov., isolated from deep-sea sediment. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2009; 59:1116–1121 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Choi EJ, Lee HJ, Kim JM, Jeon CO. Roseovarius lutimaris sp. nov., isolated from a marine tidal flat. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2013; 63:3835–3840 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Moran MA, Buchan A, González JM, Heidelberg JF, Whitman WB et al. Genome sequence of Silicibacter pomeroyi reveals adaptations to the marine environment. Nature 2004; 432:910–913 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Liao H, Qu M, Hou X, Lin X, Li H et al. Nitrogeniibacter mangrovi gen. nov., sp. nov., a novel anaerobic and aerobic denitrifying betaproteobacterium and reclassification of Azoarcus pumilus as Aromatoleum pumilum comb. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2021; 71:4946 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Wasmund K, Mußmann M, Loy A. The life sulfuric: microbial ecology of sulfur cycling in marine sediments. Environ Microbiol Rep 2017; 9:323–344 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Welte C, Hafner S, Krätzer C, Quentmeier A, Friedrich CG et al. Interaction between sox proteins of two physiologically distinct bacteria and a new protein involved in thiosulfate oxidation. FEBS Lett 2009; 583:1281–1286 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Zhang J, Liang Q, Mu D, Lian F, Gong Y et al. Cultivating the uncultured: Harnessing the “sandwich agar plate” approach to isolate heme-dependent bacteria from marine sediment. mLife 2024; 3:143–155 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Qin Q-L, Xie B-B, Zhang X-Y, Chen X-L, Zhou B-C et al. A proposed genus boundary for the prokaryotes based on genomic insights. J Bacteriol 2014; 196:2210–2215 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Lee I, Chalita M, Ha S, Na S, Yoon S et al. ContEst16S: an algorithm that identifies contaminated prokaryotic genomes using 16S RNA gene sequences. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2017; 67:2053–2057 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Chalita M, Kim YO, Park S, Oh H-S, Cho JH et al. EzBioCloud: a genome-driven database and platform for microbiome identification and discovery. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2024; 74:6421 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Tamura K, Stecher G, Kumar S. MEGA11: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 11. Mol Biol Evol 2021; 38:3022–3027 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Bankevich A, Nurk S, Antipov D, Gurevich AA, Dvorkin M et al. SPAdes: a new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J Comput Biol 2012; 19:455–477 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Yoon SH, Ha SM, Lim J, Kwon S, Chun J. A large-scale evaluation of algorithms to calculate average nucleotide identity. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 2017; 110:1281–1286 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Chaumeil PA, Mussig AJ, Hugenholtz P, Parks DH. GTDB-Tk: a toolkit to classify genomes with the genome taxonomy database. Bioinformatics 2019; 36:1925–1927 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Nguyen L-T, Schmidt HA, von Haeseler A, Minh BQ. IQ-TREE: a fast and effective stochastic algorithm for estimating maximum-likelihood phylogenies. Mol Biol Evol 2015; 32:268–274 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Aziz RK, Bartels D, Best AA, DeJongh M, Disz T et al. The RAST Server: rapid annotations using subsystems technology. BMC Genomics 2008; 9:75 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Kanehisa M, Sato Y, Morishima K. BlastKOALA and GhostKOALA: KEGG tools for functional characterization of genome and metagenome sequences. J Mol Biol 2016; 428:726–731 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Kang H, Kim JH, Jeon CO, Yoon JH, Kim W. Roseovarius aquimarinus sp. nov., a slightly halophilic bacterium isolated from seawater. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2015; 65:4514–4520 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Wang B, Sun F, Lai Q, Du Y, Liu X et al. Roseovarius nanhaiticus sp. nov., a member of the Roseobacter clade isolated from marine sediment. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2010; 60:1289–1295 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Bowman JP. Description of Cellulophaga algicola sp. nov., isolated from the surfaces of Antarctic algae, and reclassification of Cytophaga uliginosa (ZoBell and Upham 1944) Reichenbach 1989 as Cellulophaga uliginosa comb. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2000; 50 Pt 5:1861–1868 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Gerhardt P. Methods for General and Molecular Bacteriology Washington, D.C: American Society for Microbiology; 1994 p 791
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Bauer AW, Kirby WM, Sherris JC, Turck M. Antibiotic susceptibility testing by a standardized single disk method. Tech Bull Regist Med Technol 1966; 36:49–52 [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Offre P, Prosser JI, Nicol GW. Growth of ammonia-oxidizing archaea in soil microcosms is inhibited by acetylene. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 2009; 70:99–108 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Zhu K-L, Wang X-Q, Zhang T-S, Shang D-D, Du Z-J. Salibaculum halophilum gen. nov., sp. nov. and Salibaculum griseiflavum sp. nov., in the family Rhodobacteraceae. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2021; 71: [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Minnikin DE, O’Donnell AG, Goodfellow M, Alderson G, Athalye M et al. An integrated procedure for the extraction of bacterial isoprenoid quinones and polar lipids. J Microbiol Methods 1984; 2:233–241 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Kroppenstedt RM. Separation of bacterial menaquinones by HPLC using reverse phase (RP18) and a silver loaded ion-exchanger as stationary phases. J Liq Chromatogr 1982; 5:2359–2367 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Komagata K, Suzuki K. 4 lipid and cell-wall analysis in bacterial systematics. In Colwell RR, Grigorova R. eds Methods in Microbiology 19: Academic Press; 1988 pp 161–207
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Konstantinidis KT, Rosselló-Móra R, Amann R. Uncultivated microbes in need of their own taxonomy. ISME J 2017; 11:2399–2406 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Meier-Kolthoff JP, Auch AF, Klenk H-P, Göker M. Genome sequence-based species delimitation with confidence intervals and improved distance functions. BMC Bioinf 2013; 14:60 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Friedrich CG, Rother D, Bardischewsky F, Quentmeier A, Fischer J. Oxidation of reduced inorganic sulfur compounds by bacteria: emergence of a common mechanism?. Appl Environ Microbiol 2001; 67:2873–2882 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Friedrich CG, Quentmeier A, Bardischewsky F, Rother D, Kraft R et al. Novel genes coding for lithotrophic sulfur oxidation of Paracoccus pantotrophus GB17. J Bacteriol 2000; 182:4677–4687 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Hu X, Liu J, Liu H, Zhuang G, Xun L. Sulfur metabolism by marine heterotrophic bacteria involved in sulfur cycling in the ocean. Sci China 2018; 61:1369–1378 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Zander U, Faust A, Klink BU, de Sanctis D, Panjikar S et al. Structural basis for the oxidation of protein-bound sulfur by the sulfur cycle molybdohemo-enzyme sulfane dehydrogenase SoxCD. J Biol Chem 2011; 286:8349–8360 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.006782
Loading
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.006782
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplements

Supplementary material 1

PDF
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error