Skip to content
1887

Abstract

An actinomycete strain that produces a new antibiotic haneummycin, designated KM77-8, was isolated from marine sediment collected from Tokyo Bay near Haneda Airport, Japan. This strain was phylogenetically related to NBRC 12807, with the highest similarity (99.65%) based on 16S rRNA gene sequences. In contrast, genome-based comparisons between strain KM77-8 and JCM 4403 (=NBRC 12807) revealed that average nucleotide identity (ANI) and digital DNA–DNA hybridization (dDDH) values were 87.29% and 33.00 %, respectively. Moreover, genome-based comparisons between strain KM77-8 and other known species, including close relatives (more than 98.7% similarities of 16S rRNA gene sequences), showed that their ANI and dDDH values were <90% and <70%, respectively. The DNA G+C content of strain KM77-8 was 71.34%. The whole-cell hydrolysates of strain KM77-8 contained -diaminopimelic acid, galactose, glucose, mannose and ribose. The major menaquinones (MKs) of this strain were MK-9(H) and MK-9(H), and the major fatty acids (>10%) were anteiso-C, iso-C, C, iso-C and summed feature 3 (C cC c). Several phenotypic differences were observed between strain KM77-8 and NBRC 12807. Furthermore, supernatant and methanol extract of not NBRC 12807 but strain KM77-8 displayed antibacterial activity against and contained haneummycin. On the basis of the polyphasic data, we propose strain KM77-8 as a novel species of the genus , named sp. nov. The type strain is KM77-8 (=NBRC 115995=DSM 115857).

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.006777
2025-05-12
2025-06-22
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Waksman SA, Henrici AT. The nomenclature and classification of the actinomycetes. J Bacteriol 1943; 46:337–341 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Parte AC, Carbasse JS, Meier-Kolthoff JP, Reimer LC, Göker M. List of prokaryotic names with standing in nomenclature (LPSN) moves to the DSMZ. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2020; 70:5607–5612 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Jakubiec-Krzesniak K, Rajnisz-Mateusiak A, Guspiel A, Ziemska J, Solecka J. Secondary metabolites of actinomycetes and their antibacterial, antifungal and antiviral properties. Pol J Microbiol 2018; 67:259–272 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Selim MSM, Abdelhamid SA, Mohamed SS. Secondary metabolites and biodiversity of actinomycetes. J Genet Eng Biotechnol 2021; 19:72 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Durand GA, Raoult D, Dubourg G. Antibiotic discovery: history, methods and perspectives. Int J Antimicrob Agents 2019; 53:371–382 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Lima Procópio RE, Silva IR, Martins MK, Azevedo JL, Araújo JM. Antibiotics produced by Streptomyces. Brazilian J Infect Dis 2012; 16:466–471 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Quinn GA, Banat AM, Abdelhameed AM, Banat IM. Streptomyces from traditional medicine: sources of new innovations in antibiotic discovery. J Med Microbiol 2020; 69:1040–1048 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Uemura M, Kobayashi K, Sato N, Nagai K, Seki R et al. Haneummycin, a new 22-membered macrolide lactam antibiotic, produced by marine-derived Streptomyces sp. KM77-8. J Antibiot 2023; 76:650–657 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Hiraishi A. Direct automated sequencing of 16S rDNA amplified by polymerase chain reaction from bacterial cultures without DNA purification. Lett Appl Microbiol 1992; 15:210–213 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Hiraishi A, Shin YK, Ueda Y, Sugiyama J. Automated sequencing of PCR-amplified 16S rDNA on ‘Hydrolink’ gels. J Microbiol Methods 1994; 19:145–154 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Yoon SH, Ha SM, Kwon S, Lim J, Kim Y et al. Introducing EzBioCloud: a taxonomically united database of 16S rRNA gene sequences and whole-genome assemblies. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2017; 67:1613–1617 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Thompson JD, Higgins DG, Gibson TJ. CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res 1994; 22:4673–4680 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Tamura K, Stecher G, Kumar S. MEGA11: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 11. Mol Biol Evol 2021; 38:3022–3027 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Saitou N, Nei M. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 1987; 4:406–425 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Felsenstein J. Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: a maximum likelihood approach. J Mol Evol 1981; 17:368–376 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Fitch WM. Toward defining the course of evolution: minimum change for a specific tree topology. Syst Zool 1971; 20:406–416 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Felsenstein J. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 1985; 39:783–791 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Chen S, Zhou Y, Chen Y, Gu J. fastp: an ultra-fast all-in-one FASTQ preprocessor. Bioinformatics 2018; 34:i884–i890 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Tanizawa Y, Fujisawa T, Nakamura Y. DFAST: a flexible prokaryotic genome annotation pipeline for faster genome publication. Bioinformatics 2018; 34:1037–1039 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Yoon SH, Ha SM, Lim JM, Kwon SJ, Chun J. A large-scale evaluation of algorithms to calculate average nucleotide identity. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 2017; 110:1281–1286 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Meier-Kolthoff JP, Carbasse JS, Peinado-Olarte RL, Göker M. TYGS and LPSN: a database tandem for fast and reliable genome-based classification and nomenclature of prokaryotes. Nucleic Acids Res 2022; 50:D801–D807 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Goris J, Konstantinidis KT, Klappenbach JA, Coenye T, Vandamme P et al. DNA-DNA hybridization values and their relationship to whole-genome sequence similarities. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2007; 57:81–91 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Meier-Kolthoff JP, Göker M. TYGS is an automated high-throughput platform for state-of-the-art genome-based taxonomy. Nat Commun 2019; 10:2182 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Blin K, Shaw S, Augustijn HE, Reitz ZL, Biermann F et al. antiSMASH 7.0: new and improved predictions for detection, regulation, chemical structures and visualisation. Nucleic Acids Res 2023; 51:W46–W50 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute M07 Methods for Dilution Antimicrobial Susceptibility Tests for Bacteria That Grow Aerobically, 11th ed Wayne, PA, USA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; 2019
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Staneck JL, Roberts GD. Simplified approach to identification of aerobic actinomycetes by thin-layer chromatography. Appl Microbiol 1974; 28:226–231 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Hamada M, Yamamura H, Komukai C, Tamura T, Suzuki K et al. Luteimicrobium album sp. nov., a novel actinobacterium isolated from a lichen collected in Japan, and emended description of the genus Luteimicrobium. J Antibiot 2012; 65:427–431 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Sasser M. Identification of bacteria by gas chromatography of cellular fatty acids. MIDI Technical Note 1990; 101:
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Minnikin DE, Collins MD, Goodfellow M. Fatty acid and polar lipid composition in the classification of Cellulomonas, Oerskovia and related taxa. J Appl Bacteriol 1979; 47:87–95 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Dittmer JC, Lester RL. A simple, specific spray for the detection of phospholipids on thin-layer chromatograms. J Lipid Res 1964; 5:126–127 [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.006777
Loading
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.006777
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplements

Supplementary material 1

PDF
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error