Skip to content
1887

Abstract

Five strains related to the genus were isolated from five pet hamsters kept in Japan. Isolates were genotypically and phenotypically distinct from previously described species within the genus (family ). The five strains were the most genetically similar to 1625-19, exhibiting a 16S rRNA gene sequence similarity of 96.5%, an average nucleotide identity value of 90.8% and a digital DNA–DNA hybridization value of 42.7%. Phenotypic characteristics further distinguish the isolated strains from other species. Although they share -haemolysis capacity with , the novel strains are differentiated by their positive reactions for -glucosidase, -arabinose and trehalose, as well as negative reactions for -glucuronidase, mannose, inositol and glycerol. Genotypic and phenotypic differences between the novel strains and closely related known strains suggested that we have identified a new species. We propose the name sp. nov. The type strain is THUN1654 with a G+C DNA content of 40.6 mol%, and it is deposited in the DSMZ Germany (DSM 118002), KCTC Korea (KCTC 8595) and JCM Japan (JCM 37054).

Keyword(s): abscess , Rodentibacter and rodents
Funding
This study was supported by the:
  • Tenri University
    • Principal Award Recipient: NakamuraAkihiro
  • Miroku Medical Laboratory inc
    • Principal Award Recipient: TsuyoshiNakahara
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.006766
2025-04-24
2026-04-14

Metrics

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Adhikary S, Nicklas W, Bisgaard M, Boot R, Kuhnert P et al. Rodentibacter gen. nov. including Rodentibacter pneumotropicus comb. nov., Rodentibacter heylii sp. nov., Rodentibacter myodis sp. nov., Rodentibacter ratti sp. nov., Rodentibacter heidelbergensis sp. nov., Rodentibacter trehalosifermentans sp. nov., Rodentibacter rarus sp. nov., Rodentibacter mrazii and two genomospecies. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2017; 67:1793–1806 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Li M-S. Rodentibacter caecimuris comb. nov., arising from the heterotypic synonymy between Pasteurella caecimuris Lagkouvardos et al. 2016 and Rodentibacter heylii Adhikary et al. 2017. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2024; 74:6279 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Benga L, Sager M, Christensen H. From the [Pasteurella] pneumotropica complex to Rodentibacter spp.: an update on [Pasteurella] pneumotropica. Vet Microbiol 2018; 217:121–134 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Benga L, Nicklas W, Lautwein T, Verbarg S, Gougoula C et al. Rodentibacter haemolyticus sp. nov. isolated from laboratory rodents. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2021; 71:71 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Edwards U, Rogall T, Blöcker H, Emde M, Böttger EC. Isolation and direct complete nucleotide determination of entire genes. characterization of a gene coding for 16S ribosomal RNA. Nucleic Acids Res 1989; 17:7843–7853 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Weisburg WG, Barns SM, Pelletier DA, Lane DJ. 16S ribosomal DNA amplification for phylogenetic study. J Bacteriol 1991; 173:697–703 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Masaki T, Ohkusu K, Hata H, Fujiwara N, Iihara H et al. Mycobacterium kumamotonense sp. nov. recovered from clinical specimen and the first isolation report of Mycobacterium arupense in Japan: novel slowly growing, nonchromogenic clinical isolates related to Mycobacterium terrae complex. Microbiol Immunol 2006; 50:889–897 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Tamura K, Stecher G, Kumar S. MEGA11: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 11. Mol Biol Evol 2021; 38:3022–3027 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Altschul SF, Madden TL, Schäffer AA, Zhang J, Zhang Z et al. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res 1997; 25:3389–3402 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Goris J, Konstantinidis KT, Klappenbach JA, Coenye T, Vandamme P et al. DNA-DNA hybridization values and their relationship to whole-genome sequence similarities. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2007; 57:81–91 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.006766
Loading
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.006766
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error