Skip to content
1887

Abstract

The is a family of strict, intracellular bacteria which include human and animal pathogens such as and . Following the death of multiple fish (bushymouth catfish) in a tropical aquarium, the specimens were examined for a potential infectious agent. To do so, McCoy cells (ATCC CRL-1696) were inoculated with samples isolated from the specimens and became infected by an intracellular bacterium. The entire genome of the infectious agent was sequenced (study accession PRJEB69484) and, based on nine taxonomic markers, was classified as a novel species belonging to the genus (DSMZ no. 117479, CSUR no. QA1836). We propose the name sp. nov., in memory of the late Professor Lloyd Vaughan. has the largest genome (1.3 Mbp) of the genus. This appears to be a consequence of multiple duplications in genes encoding putative adhesins. Like other pathogenic , it can infect mammalian cells, but it cannot infect either insect or amoeba cells. It additionally can grow in Epithelioma papulosum cyprinis (EPC) cells (fathead minnow, ATCC CRL-2872) but only when cultivated at 30 °C. We developed a -specific quantitative PCR which amplifies the gene and analysed several samples from the aquarium. was retrieved from all deceased fish, but not from any other sample in the aquarium, suggesting that it indeed originated from the fish and was not a contaminant. is the first isolated from fish.

Funding
This study was supported by the:
  • G. Greub’s chlamydial research FFS fund (Award IMUR 31932 - Greub)
    • Principal Award Recipient: GilbertGreub
  • Faculté de Biologie et de Médecine, Université de Lausanne, Jurg-Tschopp MD-PhD scholarship (Award IMUR 31246 -Greub)
    • Principal Award Recipient: BastianMarquis
  • This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.006753
2025-07-09
2026-04-14

Metrics

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/ijsem/75/7/ijsem006753.html?itemId=/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.006753&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Marquis B, Kebbi-Beghdadi C, Pillonel T, Ruetten M, Marques-Vidal P et al.Chlamydia vaughanii sp. nov., a novel Chlamydia isolated from a tropical fish (bushymouth catfish) Figshare 2025 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Borel N, Polkinghorne A, Pospischil A. A review on chlamydial diseases in animals: still a challenge for pathologists?. Vet Pathol 2018; 55:374–390 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Dharamshi JE, Köstlbacher S, Schön ME, Collingro A, Ettema TJG et al. Gene gain facilitated endosymbiotic evolution of Chlamydiae. Nat Microbiol 2023; 8:40–54 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Arthofer P, Delafont V, Willemsen A, Panhölzl F, Horn M. Defensive symbiosis against giant viruses in amoebae. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2022; 119:e2205856119 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Thomas V, Casson N, Greub G. Criblamydia sequanensis, a new intracellular Chlamydiales isolated from Seine river water using amoebal co-culture. Environ Microbiol 2006; 8:2125–2135 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Coulon C, Eterpi M, Greub G, Collignon A, McDonnell G et al. Amoebal host range, host-free survival and disinfection susceptibility of environmental Chlamydiae as compared to Chlamydia trachomatis. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol 2012; 64:364–373 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Brokatzky D, Kretz O, Häcker G. Apoptosis functions in defense against infection of mammalian cells with environmental chlamydiae. Infect Immun 2020; 88: [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Sixt BS, Hiess B, König L, Horn M. Lack of effective anti-apoptotic activities restricts growth of Parachlamydiaceae in insect cells. PLoS One 2012; 7:e29565 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Yamane C, Yamazaki T, Nakamura S, Matsuo J, Ishida K et al. Amoebal endosymbiont Parachlamydia acanthamoebae Bn9 can grow in immortal human epithelial HEp-2 cells at low temperature; an in vitro model system to study chlamydial evolution. PLoS One 2015; 10:e0116486 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Batista C, Greub G. Permissivity of fish cell lines to three chlamydia-related bacteria: waddlia chondrophila, estrella lausannensis and parachlamydia acanthamoebae. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol 2011; 63:339–345 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Pilloux L, Aeby S, Gaümann R, Burri C, Beuret C et al. The high prevalence and diversity of Chlamydiales DNA within Ixodes ricinus ticks suggest a role for ticks as reservoirs and vectors of Chlamydia-related bacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol 2015; 81:8177–8182 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Kostanjšek R, Štrus J, Drobne D, Avguštin G. Candidatus Rhabdochlamydia porcellionis”, an intracellular bacterium from the hepatopancreas of the terrestrial isopod Porcellio scaber (Crustacea: Isopoda). Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2004; 54:543–549 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Corsaro D, Thomas V, Goy G, Venditti D, Radek R et al. Candidatus Rhabdochlamydia crassificans’, an intracellular bacterial pathogen of the cockroach Blatta orientalis (Insecta: Blattodea). Syst Appl Microbiol 2007; 30:221–228 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Halter T, Köstlbacher S, Collingro A, Sixt BS, Tönshoff ER et al. Ecology and evolution of chlamydial symbionts of arthropods. ISME Commun 2022; 2:1–11 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Sixt BS, Kostanjšek R, Mustedanagic A, Toenshoff ER, Horn M. Developmental cycle and host interaction of Rhabdochlamydia porcellionis, an intracellular parasite of terrestrial isopods. Environ Microbiol 2013; 15:2980–2993 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Kebbi-Beghdadi C, Cisse O, Greub G. Permissivity of Vero cells, human pneumocytes and human endometrial cells to Waddlia chondrophila. Microbes Infect 2011; 13:566–574 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Kebbi-Beghdadi C, Fatton M, Greub G. Permissivity of insect cells to Waddlia chondrophila, Estrella lausannensis and Parachlamydia acanthamoebae. Microbes Infect 2015; 17:749–754 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Chua PKB, Corkill JE, Hooi PS, Cheng SC, Winstanley C et al. Isolation of Waddlia malaysiensis, a novel intracellular bacterium, from fruit bat (Eonycteris spelaea). Emerg Infect Dis 2005; 11:271–277 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Pierlé SA, Morales CO, Martínez LP, Ceballos NA, Rivero JJP et al. Novel Waddlia intracellular bacterium in Artibeus intermedius fruit bats, mexico. Emerg Infect Dis 2015; 21:2161–2163 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Rurangirwa FR, Dilbeck PM, Crawford TB, McGuire TC, McElwain TF. Analysis of the 16S rRNA gene of microorganism WSU 86-1044 from an aborted bovine foetus reveals that it is a member of the order Chlamydiales: proposal of Waddliaceae fam. nov., Waddlia chondrophila gen. nov., sp. nov. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1999; 49:577–581 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Staub E, Marti H, Biondi R, Levi A, Donati M et al. Novel Chlamydia species isolated from snakes are temperature-sensitive and exhibit decreased susceptibility to azithromycin. Sci Rep 2018; 8:5660 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Chaiwattanarungruengpaisan S, Thongdee M, Anuntakarun S, Payungporn S, Arya N et al. A new species of Chlamydia isolated from Siamese crocodiles (Crocodylus siamensis). PLoS One 2021; 16:e0252081 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Studdert MJ, Studdert VP, Wirth HJ. Isolation of Chlamydia psittaci from cats with conjunctivitis. Aust Vet J 1981; 57:515–517 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Read TD, Joseph SJ, Didelot X, Liang B, Patel L et al. Comparative analysis of Chlamydia psittaci genomes reveals the recent emergence of a pathogenic lineage with a broad host range. mBio 2013; 4:e00604–12 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Hogerwerf L, DE Gier B, Baan B, VAN DER Hoek W. Chlamydia psittaci (psittacosis) as a cause of community-acquired pneumonia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Epidemiol Infect 2017; 145:3096–3105 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Dharamshi JE, Tamarit D, Eme L, Stairs CW, Martijn J et al. Marine sediments illuminate chlamydiae diversity and evolution. Curr Biol 2020; 30:1032–1048 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Collingro A, Köstlbacher S, Siegl A, Toenshoff ER, Schulz F et al. The fish pathogen “Candidatus Clavichlamydia salmonicola”-a missing link in the evolution of chlamydial pathogens of humans. Genome Biol Evol 2023; 15:evad147 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Nowak BF, LaPatra SE. Epitheliocystis in fish. J Fish Dis 2006; 29:573–588 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Stride MC, Polkinghome A, Nowak BF. Chlamydial infections of fish: diverse pathogens and emerging causes of disease in aquaculture species. Vet Microbiol 2014; 171:258–266 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Draghi A 2nd, Popov VL, Kahl MM, Stanton JB, Brown CC et al. Characterization of “Candidatus Piscichlamydia salmonis” (order Chlamydiales), a chlamydia-like bacterium associated with epitheliocystis in farmed Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar). J Clin Microbiol 2004; 42:5286–5297 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Karlsen M, Nylund A, Watanabe K, Helvik JV, Nylund S et al. Characterization of “Candidatus Clavochlamydia salmonicola”: an intracellular bacterium infecting salmonid fish. Environ Microbiol 2008; 10:208–218 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Schmidt-Posthaus H, Polkinghorne A, Nufer L, Schifferli A, Zimmermann DR et al. A natural freshwater origin for two chlamydial species, Candidatus Piscichlamydia salmonis and Candidatus Clavochlamydia salmonicola, causing mixed infections in wild brown trout (Salmo trutta). Environ Microbiol 2012; 14:2048–2057 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Mitchell SO, Steinum T, Rodger H, Holland C, Falk K et al. Epitheliocystis in Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar L., farmed in fresh water in Ireland is associated with ‘ Candidatus Clavochlamydia salmonicola’ infection. J Fish Dis 2010; 33:665–673 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Nylund A, Pistone D, Trösse C, Blindheim S, Andersen L et al. Genotyping of Candidatus Syngnamydia salmonis (Chlamydiales; Simkaniaceae) co-cultured in Paramoeba perurans (amoebozoa; Paramoebidae). Arch Microbiol 2018; 200:859–867 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Nylund S, Steigen A, Karlsbakk E, Plarre H, Andersen L et al. Characterization of “Candidatus Syngnamydia salmonis” (Chlamydiales, Simkaniaceae), a bacterium associated with epitheliocystis in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.). Arch Microbiol 2015; 197:17–25 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Taylor-Brown A, Pillonel T, Greub G, Vaughan L, Nowak B et al. Metagenomic analysis of fish-associated Ca. Parilichlamydiaceae reveals striking metabolic similarities to the terrestrial Chlamydiaceae. Genome Biol Evol 2018; 10:2587–2595 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Taylor‐Brown A, Pillonel T, Bridle A, Qi W, Bachmann NL et al. Culture‐independent genomics of a novel chlamydial pathogen of fish provides new insight into host‐specific adaptations utilized by these intracellular bacteria. Environ Microbiol 2017; 19:1899–1913 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Collingro A, Tischler P, Weinmaier T, Penz T, Heinz E et al. Unity in variety--the pan-genome of the Chlamydiae. Mol Biol Evol 2011; 28:3253–3270 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Vouga M, Baud D, Greub G. Simkania negevensis may produce long-lasting infections in human pneumocytes and endometrial cells. Pathog Dis 2017; 75:
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Quezada-Rodriguez PR, Taylor RS, Downes J, Egan F, White S et al. Prevalence of epitheliocystis in freshwater Atlantic salmon reared in flow-through and recirculation aquaculture systems. J Fish Dis 2022; 45:1721–1731 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Blandford MI, Taylor-Brown A, Schlacher TA, Nowak B, Polkinghorne A. Epitheliocystis in fish: an emerging aquaculture disease with a global impact. Transbound Emerg Dis 2018; 65:1436–1446 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  42. World Organisation for Animal Health Chapter 3.3.1. Avian chlamydiosis. In Manual of Diagnostic Tests and Vaccines for Terrestrial Animals 2022 2018 pp 783–795 https://www.oie.int/fileadmin/Home/eng/Health_standards/tahm/3.03.01_AVIAN_CHLAMYD.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Lienard J, Croxatto A, Aeby S, Jaton K, Posfay-Barbe K et al. Development of a new chlamydiales-specific real-time PCR and its application to respiratory clinical samples. J Clin Microbiol 2011; 49:2637–2642 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Chen S, Zhou Y, Chen Y, Gu J. fastp: an ultra-fast all-in-one FASTQ preprocessor. Bioinforma Oxf Engl 2018; 34:i884–i890 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Bankevich A, Nurk S, Antipov D, Gurevich AA, Dvorkin M et al. SPAdes: a new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J Comput Biol J Comput Mol Cell Biol 2012; 19:455–477 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Wick RR, Schultz MB, Zobel J, Holt KE. Bandage: interactive visualization of de novo genome assemblies. Bioinformatics 2015; 31:3350–3352 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ. Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol 1990; 215:403–410 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Li H, Durbin R. Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows–Wheeler transform. Bioinforma Oxf Engl 2009; 25:1754–1760 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  49. García-Alcalde F, Okonechnikov K, Carbonell J, Cruz LM, Götz S et al. Qualimap: evaluating next-generation sequencing alignment data. Bioinforma Oxf Engl 2012; 28:2678–2679 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Darling ACE, Mau B, Blattner FR, Perna NT. Mauve: multiple alignment of conserved genomic sequence with rearrangements. Genome Res 2004; 14:1394–1403 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Tatusova T, DiCuccio M, Badretdin A, Chetvernin V, Nawrocki EP et al. NCBI prokaryotic genome annotation pipeline. Nucleic Acids Res 2016; 44:6614–6624 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Pillonel T, Bertelli C, Salamin N, Greub G. Taxogenomics of the order Chlamydiales. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2015; 65:1381–1393 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Nguyen L-T, Schmidt HA, von Haeseler A, Minh BQ. IQ-TREE: a fast and effective stochastic algorithm for estimating maximum-likelihood phylogenies. Mol Biol Evol 2015; 32:268–274 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Minh BQ, Nguyen MAT, von Haeseler A. Ultrafast approximation for phylogenetic bootstrap. Mol Biol Evol 2013; 30:1188–1195 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Emms DM, Kelly S. OrthoFinder: phylogenetic orthology inference for comparative genomics. Genome Biol 2019; 20:238 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Katoh K, Standley DM. MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: improvements in performance and usability. Mol Biol Evol 2013; 30:772–780 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Kalyaanamoorthy S, Minh BQ, Wong TKF, von Haeseler A, Jermiin LS. ModelFinder: fast model selection for accurate phylogenetic estimates. Nat Methods 2017; 14:587–589 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  58. Marquis B, Pillonel T, Carrara A, Bertelli C. zDB: bacterial comparative genomics made easy. mSystems 2024; 9:e0047324 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  59. Letunic I, Bork P. Interactive Tree Of Life (iTOL) v5: an online tool for phylogenetic tree display and annotation. Nucleic Acids Res 2021; 49:W293–W296 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  60. Pritchard L, Glover RH, Humphris S, Elphinstone JG, Toth IK. Genomics and taxonomy in diagnostics for food security: soft-rotting enterobacterial plant pathogens. Anal Methods 2016; 8:12–24 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  61. Parks DH, Imelfort M, Skennerton CT, Hugenholtz P, Tyson GW. CheckM: assessing the quality of microbial genomes recovered from isolates, single cells, and metagenomes. Genome Res 2015; 25:1043–1055 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  62. Price MN, Dehal PS, Arkin AP. FastTree 2--approximately maximum-likelihood trees for large alignments. PLoS One 2010; 5:e9490 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  63. Galperin MY, Wolf YI, Makarova KS, Vera Alvarez R, Landsman D et al. COG database update: focus on microbial diversity, model organisms, and widespread pathogens. Nucleic Acids Res 2021; 49:D274–D281 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  64. Kanehisa M, Furumichi M, Tanabe M, Sato Y, Morishima K. KEGG: new perspectives on genomes, pathways, diseases and drugs. Nucleic Acids Res 2017; 45:D353–D361 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  65. El-Gebali S, Mistry J, Bateman A, Eddy SR, Luciani A et al. The Pfam protein families database in 2019. Nucleic Acids Res 2019; 47:D427–D432 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  66. Lu S, Wang J, Chitsaz F, Derbyshire MK, Geer RC et al. CDD/SPARCLE: the conserved domain database in 2020. Nucleic Acids Res 2020; 48:D265–D268 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  67. Aramaki T, Blanc-Mathieu R, Endo H, Ohkubo K, Kanehisa M et al. KofamKOALA: KEGG Ortholog assignment based on profile HMM and adaptive score threshold. Bioinformatics 2020; 36:2251–2252 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  68. Casson N, Entenza JM, Greub G. Serological cross-reactivity between different Chlamydia-like organisms. J Clin Microbiol 2007; 45:234–236 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  69. Fehr AGJ, Ruetten M, Seth-Smith HMB, Nufer L, Voegtlin A et al. A zebrafish model for chlamydia infection with the obligate intracellular pathogen waddlia chondrophila. Front Microbiol 2016; 7:1829
    [Google Scholar]
  70. Pilhofer M, Aistleitner K, Ladinsky MS, König L, Horn M et al. Architecture and host interface of environmental chlamydiae revealed by electron cryotomography. Environ Microbiol 2014; 16:417–429 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  71. Bodetti TJ, Jacobson E, Wan C, Hafner L, Pospischil A et al. Molecular evidence to support the expansion of the hostrange of Chlamydophila pneumoniae to include reptiles as well as humans, horses, koalas and amphibians. Syst Appl Microbiol 2002; 25:146–152 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  72. Schulz F, Tyml T, Fuchs BM, Amann R, Horn M et al. Chlamydial seasonal dynamics and isolation of “Candidatus Neptunochlamydia vexilliferae” from a Tyrrhenian coastal lake. Environ Microbiol 2016; 18:2405–2417
    [Google Scholar]
  73. Collingro A, Köstlbacher S, Horn M. Chlamydiae in the environment. Trends in Microbiology 2020; 28:877–888 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  74. Lagkouvardos I, Weinmaier T, Lauro FM, Cavicchioli R, Rattei T et al. Integrating metagenomic and amplicon databases to resolve the phylogenetic and ecological diversity of the Chlamydiae. ISME J 2014; 8:115–125 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  75. Köstlbacher S, Collingro A, Halter T, Schulz F, Jungbluth SP et al. Pangenomics reveals alternative environmental lifestyles among chlamydiae. Nat Commun 2021; 12:4021 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  76. Marquis B, Ardissone S, Greub G. Temperature affects the host range of Rhabdochlamydia porcellionis. Appl Environ Microbiol 2023; 89:e0030923 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  77. Sampo A, Matsuo J, Yamane C, Yagita K, Nakamura S et al. High-temperature adapted primitive Protochlamydia found in Acanthamoeba isolated from a hot spring can grow in immortalized human epithelial HEp-2 cells. Environ Microbiol 2014; 16:486–497 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  78. Corsaro D, Work TM. Gram-negative bacterium in internal organs of blue-striped snapper Lutjanus kasmira from Hawaii. Dis Aquat Org 2012; 98:249–254 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  79. Weber MM, Noriea NF, Bauler LD, Lam JL, Sager J et al. A functional core of IncA is required for Chlamydia trachomatis inclusion fusion. J Bacteriol 2016; 198:1347–1355 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  80. Suchland RJ, Rockey DD, Bannantine JP, Stamm WE. Isolates of Chlamydia trachomatis that occupy nonfusogenic inclusions lack IncA, a protein localized to the inclusion membrane. Infect Immun 2000; 68:360–367 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  81. Garvin LE, DeBoer AG, Carrell SJ, Wang X, Rockey DD. Microscopic analysis of the Chlamydia abortus inclusion and its interaction with those formed by other chlamydial species. Infect Immun 2022; 90:e0049921 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  82. Rockey DD, Fischer ER, Hackstadt T. Temporal analysis of the developing Chlamydia psittaci inclusion by use of fluorescence and electron microscopy. Infect Immun 1996; 64:4269–4278 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  83. Seth-Smith HMB, Katharios P, Dourala N, Mateos JM, Fehr AGJ et al. Similichlamydia in epitheliocystis co-infection of gilthead seabream gills: unique morphological features of a deep branching chlamydial family. Front Microbiol 2017; 8:508 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  84. Stride MC, Polkinghorne A, Miller TL, Groff JM, Lapatra SE et al. Molecular characterization of “Candidatus Parilichlamydia carangidicola,” a novel Chlamydia-like epitheliocystis agent in yellowtail kingfish, Seriola lalandi (Valenciennes), and the proposal of a new family, “Candidatus Parilichlamydiaceae” fam. nov. (order Chlamydiales). Appl Environ Microbiol 2013; 79:1590–1597 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  85. Steigen A, Nylund A, Karlsbakk E, Akoll P, Fiksdal IU et al. Cand. Actinochlamydia clariae” gen. nov., sp. nov., a unique intracellular bacterium causing epitheliocystis in catfish (Clarias gariepinus) in Uganda. PLoS One 2013; 8:e66840 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  86. Mehlitz A, Karunakaran K, Herweg J-A, Krohne G, van de Linde S et al. The chlamydial organism Simkania negevensis forms ER vacuole contact sites and inhibits ER-stress. Cell Microbiol 2014; 16:1224–1243 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  87. Harkinezhad T, Geens T, Vanrompay D. Chlamydophila psittaci infections in birds: a review with emphasis on zoonotic consequences. Vet Microbiol 2009; 135:68–77 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  88. Moran NA, Plague GR. Genomic changes following host restriction in bacteria. Curr Opin Genet Dev 2004; 14:627–633 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  89. Thomson NR, Yeats C, Bell K, Holden MTG, Bentley SD et al. The Chlamydophila abortus genome sequence reveals an array of variable proteins that contribute to interspecies variation. Genome Res 2005; 15:629–640 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  90. Grimwood J, Stephens RS. Computational analysis of the polymorphic membrane protein superfamily of Chlamydia trachomatis and Chlamydia pneumoniae. Microb Comp Genomics 1999; 4:187–201 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  91. Hölzer M, Barf L-M, Lamkiewicz K, Vorimore F, Lataretu M et al. Comparative genome analysis of 33 chlamydia strains reveals characteristic features of Chlamydia psittaci and closely related species. Pathogens 2020; 9:899 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  92. Voigt A, Schöfl G, Saluz HP. The Chlamydia psittaci genome: a comparative analysis of intracellular pathogens. PLoS One 2012; 7:e35097 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  93. Mölleken K, Schmidt E, Hegemann JH. Members of the Pmp protein family of Chlamydia pneumoniae mediate adhesion to human cells via short repetitive peptide motifs. Mol Microbiol 2010; 78:1004–1017 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  94. Gomes JP, Nunes A, Bruno WJ, Borrego MJ, Florindo C et al. Polymorphisms in the nine polymorphic membrane proteins of Chlamydia trachomatis across all serovars: evidence for serovar Da recombination and correlation with tissue tropism. J Bacteriol 2006; 188:275–286 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  95. Favaroni A, Trinks A, Weber M, Hegemann JH, Schnee C. Pmp repertoires influence the different infectious potential of avian and mammalian Chlamydia psittaci strains. Front Microbiol 2021; 12:656209 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  96. Grimwood J, Olinger L, Stephens RS. Expression of Chlamydia pneumoniae polymorphic membrane protein family genes. Infect Immun 2001; 69:2383–2389 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  97. Sigalova OM, Chaplin AV, Bochkareva OO, Shelyakin PV, Filaretov VA et al. Chlamydia pan-genomic analysis reveals balance between host adaptation and selective pressure to genome reduction. BMC Genomics 2019; 20:710 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  98. Dehoux P, Flores R, Dauga C, Zhong G, Subtil A. Multi-genome identification and characterization of chlamydiae-specific type III secretion substrates: the Inc proteins. BMC Genomics 2011; 12:109 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  99. Moore ER, Ouellette SP. Reconceptualizing the chlamydial inclusion as a pathogen-specified parasitic organelle: an expanded role for Inc proteins. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 2014; 4:157 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  100. Domman D, Collingro A, Lagkouvardos I, Gehre L, Weinmaier T et al. Massive expansion of ubiquitination-related gene families within the Chlamydiae. Mol Biol Evol 2014; 31:2890–2904 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.006753
Loading
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.006753
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplements

Loading data from figshare Loading data from figshare
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error