Skip to content
1887

Abstract

An obligately anaerobic bacterial strain (TW13) affiliated with the family within the class was isolated from an anoxic soil sample subjected to reductive soil disinfestation. Cells of the strain were stained Gram-positive and spore-forming straight rods with a polar flagellum. The strain was saccharolytic and decomposed polysaccharides (glucomannan, pectin, starch and xylan). The strain produced acetate, butyrate and H as fermentation products from carbohydrates utilized. The major cellular fatty acids of strain TW13 were C ω7c dimethylacetal, C and C ω8c/C (as summed feature). The most closely related species of strain TW13 based on the 16S rRNA gene sequences was WCA-383-APC-5B with a sequence identity of 96.3%. The next closely related species were all in the genus with sequence identities of up to 95.9% (for the type species of the genus, DSM 10702, 93.9%). The genome analysis of strain TW13 indicated that the genome size was 4.64 Mb, and the genomic DNA G+C content was 30.3 mol%. Strain TW13 had genes related to the production of acetate, butyrate and H, degradation of polysaccharides (mannan, pectin, starch and xylan) and glycogen metabolism. The values of the average amino acid identity and the percentage of conserved proteins between the genomes of strain TW13 and WCA-383-APC-5B or DSM 10702 were 67.6 and 50.5% or 62.9 and 43.0%, respectively. Based on the phylogenetic, genomic and phenotypic analyses, sp. nov. in the family is proposed to accommodate strain TW13 (= NBRC 112100 = DSM 114758).

Funding
This study was supported by the:
  • Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries Research Council (Award 27016C)
    • Principal Award Recipient: AtsukoUeki
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.006748
2025-04-11
2026-02-14

Metrics

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Ueki A, Tonouchi A, Honma S, Kaku N, Ueki K. Inconstantimicrobium mannanitabidum sp. nov., a novel member of the family Clostridiaceae isolated from anoxic soil under the treatment of reductive soil disinfestation. Figshare. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.27709965.v1
  2. Strauss SL, Kluepfel DA. Anaerobic soil disinfestation: a chemical-independent approach to pre-plant control of plant pathogens. J Integ Agric 2015; 14:2309–2318 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Lopes EA, Canedo EJ, Gomes VA, Vieira BS, Parreira DF et al. Anaerobic soil disinfestation for the management of soilborne pathogens: a review. Appl Soil Ecol 2022; 174:1044
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Momma N, Kobara Y, Uematsu S, Kita N, Shinmura A. Development of biological soil disinfestations in Japan. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2013; 97:3801–3809 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Ueki A, Kaku N, Ueki K. Role of anaerobic bacteria in biological soil disinfestation for elimination of soil-borne plant pathogens in agriculture. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2018; 102:6309–6318 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Swilling KJ, Shrestha U, Ownley BH, Gwinn KD, Butler DM. Volatile fatty acid concentration, soil pH and soil texture during anaerobic soil conditions affect viability of Athelia (Sclerotium) rolfsii sclerotia. Eur J Plant Pathol 2022; 162:149–161 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Shirane S, Momma N, Usami T, Suzuki C, Hori T et al. Fungicidal activity of caproate produced by Clostridium sp. strain E801, a bacterium isolated from cocopeat medium subjected to anaerobic soil disinfestation. Agronomy 2023; 13:747 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Lee CG, Kunitomo E, Iida T, Nakaho K, Ohkuma M. Soil prokaryotes are associated with decreasing Fusarium oxysporum density during anaerobic soil disinfestation in the tomato field. Appl Soil Ecol 2020; 155:103632 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Shrestha U, Dee ME, Ownley BH, Butler DM. Anaerobic soil disinfestation reduces germination and affects colonization of Sclerotium rolfsii sclerotia. Phytopathology 2018; 108:342–351 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Mowlick S, Hirota K, Takehara T, Kaku N, Ueki K et al. Development of anaerobic bacterial community consisted of diverse clostridial species during biological soil disinfestation amended with plant biomass. Soil Sci Plant Nutr 2012; 58:273–287 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Mowlick S, Takehara T, Kaku N, Ueki K, Ueki A. Proliferation of diversified clostridial species during biological soil disinfestation incorporated with plant biomass under various conditions. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2013; 97:8365–8379 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Ueki A, Takehara T, Ishioka G, Kaku N, Ueki K. Production of β-1,3-glucanase and chitosanase from clostridial strains isolated from the soil subjected to biological disinfestation. AMB Express 2019; 9:114 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Ueki A, Takehara T, Ishioka G, Kaku N, Ueki K. β-1,3-Glucanase production as an anti-fungal enzyme by phylogenetically different strains of the genus Clostridium isolated from anoxic soil that underwent biological disinfestation. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2020; 104:5563–5578 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Ueki A, Tonouchi A, Kaku N, Ueki K. Clostridium fungisolvens sp. nov., a new β-1,3-glucan-decomposing bacterium isolated from anoxic soil subjected to biological soil disinfestation. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2021; 71:004761 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Ueki A, Tonouchi A, Kaku N, Ueki K. Description of Anaeromicropila herbilytica gen. nov., sp. nov., a plant polysaccharide-decomposing anaerobic bacterium isolated from anoxic soil subjected to reductive soil disinfestation, and reclassification of Clostridium populeti as Anaeromicropila populeti comb. nov.. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2023; 73:005695 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Wylensek D, Hitch TCA, Riedel T, Afrizal A, Kumar N et al. A collection of bacterial isolates from the pig intestine reveals functional and taxonomic diversity. Nat Commun 2020; 11:6389 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Oren A, Garrity GM. Validation list no.200. list of new names and new combinations previously effectively, but not validly, published. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2021; 71:4846
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Yarza P, Yilmaz P, Pruesse E, Glöckner FO, Ludwig W et al. Uniting the classification of cultured and uncultured bacteria and archaea using 16S rRNA gene sequences. Nat Rev Microbiol 2014; 12:635–645 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Riesco R, Trujillo ME. Update on the proposed minimal standards for the use of genome data for the taxonomy of prokaryotes. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2024; 74:006300 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Rainey FA, Hollen BJ, Small A. Bergey’s Manual of Systematic Bacteriology, 2nd edn NewYork: Springer; 2009 pp 738–864
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Holdeman LV, Cato EP, Moore WEC. Anaerobe Laboratory Manual, 4th edn Blacksburg, VA: Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; 1977
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Akasaka H, Ueki A, Hanada S, Kamagata Y, Ueki K. Propionicimonas paludicola gen. nov., sp. nov., a novel facultatively anaerobic, Gram-positive, propionate-producing bacterium isolated from plant residue in irrigated rice-field soil. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2003; 53:1991–1998 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Altschul SF, Madden TL, Schäffer AA, Zhang J, Zhang Z et al. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res 1997; 25:3389–3402 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Tamura K, Stecher G, Kumar S. MEGA11: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 11. Mol Biol Evol 2021; 38:3022–3027 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Saitou N, Nei M. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 1987; 4:406–425 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Bowman KS, Dupré RE, Rainey FA, Moe WM. Clostridium hydrogeniformans sp. nov. and Clostridium cavendishii sp. nov., hydrogen-producing bacteria from chlorinated solvent-contaminated groundwater. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2010; 60:358–363 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Maio ND, Shaw LP, Hubbard A, George S, Sanderson ND et al. Comparison of long-read sequencing technologies in the hybrid assembly of complex bacterial genomes. Microb Genom 2017; 3:e000118
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Honma S, Ueki A, Tonouchi A, Kaku N, Ueki K. Clostridium gelidum sp. nov., a psychrotrophic anaerobic bacterium isolated from rice field soil. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2022; 72:005478 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Seemann T. Prokka: rapid prokaryotic genome annotation. Bioinformatics 2014; 30:2068–2069 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Yoon SH, Ha SM, Kwon S, Lim J, Kim Y et al. Introducing EzBioCloud: a taxonomically united database of 16S rRNA gene sequences and whole-genome assemblies. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2017; 67:1613–1617 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Goris J, Konstantinidis KT, Klappenbach JA, Coenye T, Vandamme P et al. DNA-DNA hybridization values and their relationship to whole-genome sequence similarities. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2007; 57:81–91 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Richter M, Rosselló-Móra R, Glöckner FO, Peplies J. JSpeciesWS: A web server for prokaryotic species circumscription based on pairwise genome comparison. Bioinformatics 2016; 32:929–931 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Kim D, Park S, Chun J. Introducing EzAAI: a pipeline for high throughput calculations of prokaryotic average amino acid identity. J Microbiol 2021; 59:476–480 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Meier-Kolthoff JP, Auch AF, Klenk HP, Göker M. Genome sequence-based species delimitation with confidence intervals and improved distance functions. BMC Bioinformatics 2013; 14:60 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Qin QL, Xie BB, Zhang XY, Chen XL, Zhou BC et al. A proposed genus boundary for the prokaryotes based on genomic insights. J Bacteriol 2014; 196:2210–2215 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Nicholson AC, Gulvik CA, Whitney AM, Humrighouse BW, Bell ME et al. Division of the genus Chryseobacterium: observation of discontinuities in amino acid identity values, a possible consequence of major extinction events, guides transfer of nine species to the genus Epilithonimonas, eleven species to the genus Kaistella, and three species to the genus Halpernia gen. nov., with description of Kaistella daneshvariae sp. nov. and Epilithonimonas vandammei sp. nov. derived from clinical specimens. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2020; 70:4432–4450 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Moriuchi R, Dohra H, Kanesaki Y, Ogawa N. Complete genome sequence of 3-chlorobenzoate-degrading bacterium Cupriavidus necator NH9 and reclassification of the strains of the genera Cupriavidus and Ralstonia based on phylogenetic and whole-genome sequence analyses. Front Microbiol 2019; 10:133 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Na SI, Kim YO, Yoon SH, Ha S, Baek I et al. UBCG: up-to-date bacterial core gene set and pipeline for phylogenomic tree reconstruction. J Microbiol 2018; 56:280–285 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Price MN, Dehal PS, Arkin AP. FastTree 2--approximately maximum-likelihood trees for large alignments. PLoS One 2010; 5:e9490 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Blenden DC, Goldberg HS. Silver impregnation stain for Leptospira and flagella. J Bacteriol 1965; 89:899–900 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Miller LT. Single derivatization method for routine analysis of bacterial whole-cell fatty acid methyl esters, including hydroxy acids. J Clin Microbiol 1982; 16:584–586 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Komagata K, Suzuki K. Lipid and cell-wall analysis in bacterial systematics. Methods Microbiol 1987; 19:161–207 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Dai Z, Zhu Y, Dong H, Zhao C, Zhang Y et al. Enforcing ATP hydrolysis enhanced anaerobic glycolysis and promoted solvent production in Clostridium acetobutylicum. Microb Cell Fact 2021; 20:149 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Vital M, Howe AC, Tiedje JM. Revealing the bacterial butyrate synthesis pathways by analyzing (meta)genomic data. mBio 2014; 5:e00889 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Buckel W. Energy conservation in fermentations of anaerobic bacteria. Front Microbio 2021; 12:703525
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Katsyv A, Schoelmerich MC, Basen M, Müller V. The pyruvate:ferredoxin oxidoreductase of the thermophilic acetogen, Thermoanaerobacter kivui. FEBS Open Bio 2021; 11:1332–1342 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Cifuente JO, Comino N, Trastoy B, D’Angelo C, Guerin ME. Structural basis of glycogen metabolism in bacteria. Biochem J 2019; 476:2059–2092 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Asención Diez MD, Demonte AM, Guerrero SA, Ballicora MA, Iglesias AA. The ADP-glucose pyrophosphorylase from Streptococcus mutans provides evidence for the regulation of polysaccharide biosynthesis in Firmicutes. Mol Microbiol 2013; 90:1011–1027 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Sueda R, Yoshida K, Onodera M, Fukui T, Yatsunami R et al. Characterization of a GlgC homolog from extremely halophilic archaeon Haloarcula japonica. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 2021; 85:1441–1447 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Das A, Ljungdahl LG. Clostridium pasteurianum F1Fo ATP synthase: operon, composition, and some properties. J Bacteriol 2003; 185:5527–5535 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Poehlein A, Solano JDM, Flitsch SK, Krabben P, Winzer K et al. Microbial solvent formation revisited by comparative genome analysis. Biotechnol Biofuels 2017; 10:58 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Hackmann TJ, Firkins JL. Electron transport phosphorylation in rumen butyrivibrios: unprecedented ATP yield for glucose fermentation to butyrate. Front Microbiol 2015; 6:622 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Sekiya M. Proton pumping ATPases: rotational catalysis, physiological roles in oral pathogenic bacteria, and inhibitors. Biol Pharm Bull 2022; 45:1404–1411 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.006748
Loading
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.006748
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplements

Loading data from figshare Loading data from figshare
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error