Skip to content
1887

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SYSTEMATIC AND EVOLUTIONARY MICROBIOLOGY logo International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology

Volume 75, Issue 4

Setting new boundaries of 16S rRNA gene identity for prokaryotic taxonomy Open Access

Abstract

The 16S rRNA gene is frequently sequenced to classify prokaryotes and identify new taxa. If sequences from two strains share less than ~99% identity, the strains are usually classified as different species. Classification thresholds for genera and other ranks have also been proposed, but they are based on dated datasets. Here we update these thresholds by determining the sequence identity of the 16S rRNA gene for =19,556 type strains. This represents 94% of all strains validly published, and it involved making more than 191 million pairwise sequence alignments. In 90% of all cases, sequences from the same species shared a minimum of 97.2–100% identity. The corresponding values were 90.1–99.0% for genus, 80.1–94.1% for family, 72.9–90.0% for order, 72.2–86.3% for class and 69.6–83.6% for phylum. We also present values specific to bacteria (=18,904 strains) and archaea (=652 strains). We propose these values serve as thresholds for classifying new prokaryotic taxa. A major change from previous guidelines is recognizing that these boundaries overlap. This overlap has already been observed for relative evolutionary divergence, a metric correlated with 16S rRNA gene identity. Together with other metrics, 16S rRNA gene identity allows classification of prokaryotes from species to phylum.

  • Received:
  • Accepted:
  • Published Online:
Keyword(s): 16S rRNA gene , prokaryotes and taxonomy
Funding
This study was supported by the:
  • U.S. Department of Agriculture (Award 1019985)
    • Principle Award Recipient: HackmannTimothy J.
  • U.S. Department of Agriculture (Award 2018-67015-27495)
    • Principle Award Recipient: HackmannTimothy J.
© 2025 The Authors
  • This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License. This article was made open access via a Publish and Read agreement between the Microbiology Society and the corresponding author’s institution.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.006747
2025-04-08
2025-04-27
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/ijsem/75/4/ijsem006747.html?itemId=/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.006747&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Lane DJ. 16S/23S rRNA sequencing. In Stackebrandt E, Goodfellow M. eds Nucleic Acid Techniques in Bacterial Systematics New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1991 pp 115–175
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Yoon S-H, Ha S-M, Kwon S, Lim J, Kim Y et al. Introducing EzBioCloud: a taxonomically united database of 16S rRNA gene sequences and whole-genome assemblies. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2017; 67:1613–1617 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Glöckner FO, Yilmaz P, Quast C, Gerken J, Beccati A et al. 25 years of serving the community with ribosomal RNA gene reference databases and tools. J Biotechnol 2017; 261:169–176 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Stackebrandt E, Ebers J. Taxonomic parameters revisited: tarnished gold standards. Microbiol Today 2006; 33:152–155
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Kim M, Oh H-S, Park S-C, Chun J. Towards a taxonomic coherence between average nucleotide identity and 16S rRNA gene sequence similarity for species demarcation of prokaryotes. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2014; 64:346–351 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Yarza P, Yilmaz P, Pruesse E, Glöckner FO, Ludwig W et al. Uniting the classification of cultured and uncultured bacteria and archaea using 16S rRNA gene sequences. Nat Rev Microbiol 2014; 12:635–645 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Meier-Kolthoff JP, Carbasse JS, Peinado-Olarte RL, Göker M. TYGS and LPSN: a database tandem for fast and reliable genome-based classification and nomenclature of prokaryotes. Nucleic Acids Res 2022; 50:D801–D807 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Parks DH, Chuvochina M, Rinke C, Mussig AJ, Chaumeil P-A et al. GTDB: an ongoing census of bacterial and archaeal diversity through a phylogenetically consistent, rank normalized and complete genome-based taxonomy. Nucleic Acids Res 2022; 50:D785–D794 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Reinert K, Dadi TH, Ehrhardt M, Hauswedell H, Mehringer S et al. The SeqAn C++ template library for efficient sequence analysis: a resource for programmers. J Biotechnol 2017; 261:157–168 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Bengtsson H. A unifying framework for parallel and distributed processing in R using futures. The R Journal 2021; 13:208 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Parks DH, Chuvochina M, Waite DW, Rinke C, Skarshewski A et al. A standardized bacterial taxonomy based on genome phylogeny substantially revises the tree of life. Nat Biotechnol 2018; 36:996–1004 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Louca S, Doebeli M. Efficient comparative phylogenetics on large trees. Bioinformatics 2018; 34:1053–1055 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Wickham H. ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis, 2nd ed New York: Springer-Verlag; 2016
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Wu C, Dong X, Liu X. Syntrophomonas wolfei subsp. Methylbutyratica subsp. nov., and assignment of Syntrophomonas wolfei subsp. saponavida to Syntrophomonas saponavida sp. nov. comb. nov. Syst Appl Microbiol 2007; 30:376–380 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Edgar RC. Updating the 97% identity threshold for 16S ribosomal RNA OTUs. Bioinformatics 2018; 34:2371–2375 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Riesco R, Trujillo ME. Update on the proposed minimal standards for the use of genome data for the taxonomy of prokaryotes. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2024; 74:006300 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Parks DH, Chuvochina M, Chaumeil P-A, Rinke C, Mussig AJ et al. A complete domain-to-species taxonomy for bacteria and archaea. Nat Biotechnol 2020; 38:1079–1086 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Richter M, Rosselló-Móra R. Shifting the genomic gold standard for the prokaryotic species definition. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2009; 106:19126–19131 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Konstantinidis KT, Tiedje JM. Genomic insights that advance the species definition for prokaryotes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2005; 102:2567–2572 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Konstantinidis KT, Tiedje JM. Towards a genome-based taxonomy for prokaryotes. J Bacteriol 2005; 187:6258–6264 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Qin Q-L, Xie B-B, Zhang X-Y, Chen X-L, Zhou B-C et al. A proposed genus boundary for the prokaryotes based on genomic insights. J Bacteriol 2014; 196:2210–2215 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Meier-Kolthoff JP, Auch AF, Klenk H-P, Göker M. Genome sequence-based species delimitation with confidence intervals and improved distance functions. BMC Bioinf 2013; 14:60 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Nayfach S, Roux S, Seshadri R, Udwary D, Varghese N et al. A genomic catalog of earth’s microbiomes. Nat Biotechnol 2021; 39:499–509 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Stoddard SF, Smith BJ, Hein R, Roller BRK, Schmidt TM. rrnDB: improved tools for interpreting rRNA gene abundance in bacteria and archaea and a new foundation for future development. Nucleic Acids Res 2015; 43:D593–8 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Stackebrandt E, Goebel BM. Taxonomic note: a place for DNA-DNA reassociation and 16S rRNA sequence analysis in the present species definition in bacteriology. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1994; 44:846–849 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.006747
Loading
Setting new boundaries of 16S rRNA gene identity for prokaryotic taxonomy
Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 75, 006747 (2025); https://doi.org/10.1099/ijsem.0.006747
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.006747
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.006747
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplements

Supplementary material 1

PDF

Supplementary material 2

EXCEL

Most cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error