Proposal of Actinoplanes capillaceus Matsumoto et al. 2000 as a later heterotypic synonym of Actinoplanes campanulatus (Couch 1963) Stackebrandt and Kroppenstedt 1987 and an emended description of Actinoplanes campanulatus

References

1. Matsumoto A, Takahashi Y, Kudo T, Seino A, Iwai Y et al. Actinoplanes capillaceus sp. nov., a new species of the genus Actinoplanes. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 2000; 78:107–115 [View Article] [PubMed]
   [Google Scholar]
2. Stackebrandt E, Kroppenstedt RM. Union of the genera Actinoplanes couch, Ampullariella couch, and Amorphosporangium couch in a redefined genus Actinoplanes. Syst Appl Microbiol 1987; 9:110–114 [View Article]
   [Google Scholar]
3. Couch JN. A proposal to replace the name Ampullaria couch with Ampullariella. J Elisha Mitchell Sci Soc 1963; 80:29
   [Google Scholar]
4. Couch JN. Actinoplanes, a new genus of the Actinomycetales. J Elisha Mitchell Sci Soc 1950; 66:87–92
   [Google Scholar]
5. Marcone GL, Binda E, Reguzzoni M, Gastaldo L, Dalmastri C et al. Classification of Actinoplanes sp. ATCC 33076, an actinomycete that produces the glycolipodepsipeptide antibiotic ramoplanin, as Actinoplanes ramoplaninifer sp. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2017; 67:4181–4188 [View Article] [PubMed]
   [Google Scholar]
6. Bardone MR, Paternoster M, Coronelli C. Teichomycins, new antibiotics from Actinoplanes teichomyceticus nov. sp. II. Extraction and chemical characterization. J Antibiot 1978; 31:170–177 [View Article]
   [Google Scholar]
7. Debono M, Merkel KE, Molloy RM, Barnhart M, Presti E et al. Actaplanin, new glycopeptide antibiotics produced by Actinoplanes missouriensis. The isolation and preliminary chemical characterization of actaplanin. J Antibiot 1984; 37:85–95 [View Article]
   [Google Scholar]
8. Wagman GH, Testa RT, Patel M, Marquez JA, Oden EM et al. New polyene antifungal antibiotic produced by a species of Actinoplanes. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1975; 7:457–461 [View Article] [PubMed]
   [Google Scholar]
9. Stackebrandt E, Ebers J. Taxonomic parameters revisited: tarnished gold standards. Microbiol Today 2006; 33:152–155
   [Google Scholar]
10. Atlas RM, Parks LC. Handbook of Microbiological Media Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 1993
    [Google Scholar]
11. Reasoner DJ, Geldreich EE. A new medium for the enumeration and subculture of bacteria from potable water. Appl Environ Microbiol 1985; 49:1–7 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
12. Shirling EB, Gottlieb D. Methods for characterization of Streptomyces species. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1966; 16:313–340 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
13. Ridgway R. Color Standards and Color Nomenclature Washington, DC: Published by the author; 1912
    [Google Scholar]
14. Xu LH, Li WJ, Liu ZH, Jiang CL. Actinomycete systematic-principle. In Methods and Practice Beijing: Science Press; 2007
    [Google Scholar]
15. Yoon S-H, Ha S-M, Kwon S, Lim J, Kim Y et al. Introducing EzBioCloud: a taxonomically united database of 16S rRNA gene sequences and whole-genome assemblies. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2017; 67:1613–1617 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
16. Kumar S, Stecher G, Tamura K. MEGA7: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis Version 7.0 for Bigger Datasets. Mol Biol Evol 2016; 33:1870–1874 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
17. Saitou N, Nei M. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 1987; 4:406–425 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
18. Felsenstein J. Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: a maximum likelihood approach. J Mol Evol 1981; 17:368–376 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
19. Kluge AG, Farris JS. Quantitative phyletics and the evolution of Anurans. Syst Zool 1969; 18:1 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
20. Meier-Kolthoff JP, Göker M. TYGS is an automated high-throughput platform for state-of-the-art genome-based taxonomy. Nat Commun 2019; 10:2182 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
21. Richter M, Rosselló-Móra R, Oliver Glöckner F, Peplies J. JSpeciesWS: a web server for prokaryotic species circumscription based on pairwise genome comparison. Bioinformatics 2016; 32:929–931 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
22. Meier-Kolthoff JP, Auch AF, Klenk HP, Göker M. Genome sequence-based species delimitation with confidence intervals and improved distance functions. BMC Bioinformatics 2013; 14:14 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
23. Aziz RK, Bartels D, Best AA, DeJongh M, Disz T et al. The RAST Server: rapid annotations using subsystems technology. BMC Genomics 2008; 9:75 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
24. Richter M, Rosselló-Móra R. Shifting the genomic gold standard for the prokaryotic species definition. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2009; 106:19126–19131 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
25. Wayne LG, Brenner DJ, Colwell RR, Grimont PAD, Kandler O. International committee on systematic bacteriology. report of the AD hoc committee on the reconciliation of approaches to bacterial systematics. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1987; 37:463–464 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
26. Oren A, Arahal DR, Göker M, Moore ERB, Rossello-Mora R. Sutcliffe IC international code of nomenclature of prokaryotes. prokaryotic code (2022 revision). Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2023; 73:005585
    [Google Scholar]
27. Vincent L, Richard D, Olivier G. FastME 2.0: a comprehensive, accurate, and fast distance-based phylogeny inference program. Mol Biol Evol 2015; 32:2798–2800 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
28. Farris JS. Estimating phylogenetic trees from distance matrices. Am Nat 1972; 106:645–668 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]