Skip to content
1887

Abstract

The strain TOYAMA8 is a deep-sea alkaliphilic cellulolytic bacterium isolated from a slurry-adhered epiphytic site of . Cells of this strain are Gram-negative, aerobic, curved rods or spirilla, motile with monopolar flagella, and grow on cellulose as the sole carbon source. Compared to other closely related species, this bacterium is characterized by a large number of cellulase genes. Strain TOYAMA8 showed alkaliphilic growth within the pH range 7.5–9.0. The major cellular fatty acids were C ω7, C, C and C ω7. The major polar lipids were phosphatidylglycerol, phosphatidylethanolamine, unidentified phospholipids and aminolipids. A major respiratory lipoquinone was Q-9. Phylogenomic analysis using the 16S rRNA gene and whole-genome sequence data showed that the strain is related to the families , and . The values of 16S rRNA gene sequence similarity, amino acid identity and percentage of conserved proteins between the strain TOYAMA8 and related species were low, with maximum values of 90.6, 48.1 and 34.6%, respectively. These results, together with differences in phenotypic and biochemical characteristics, indicate that the new isolate TOYAMA8 represents a novel genus and species, for which the name gen. nov., sp. nov., is proposed. The type strain is TOYAMA8 (JCM 31119=DSM 114864).

Funding
This study was supported by the:
  • Nagase Science Technology Foundation
    • Principal Award Recipient: ShigeruDeguchi
  • Core Research for Evolutional Science and Technology (Award MJCR21L4)
    • Principal Award Recipient: ShigeruDeguchi
  • Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (Award 23K14000, 19K15956)
    • Principal Award Recipient: MikakoTachioka
  • This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License. This article was made open access via a Publish and Read agreement between the Microbiology Society and the corresponding author’s institution.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.006742
2025-04-03
2025-12-15

Metrics

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/ijsem/75/4/ijsem006742.html?itemId=/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.006742&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Deguchi S, Degaki H, Taniguchi I, Koga T. Deep-sea-inspired chemistry: a hitchhiker’s guide to the bottom of the ocean for chemists. Langmuir 2023; 39:7987–7994 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Tsudome M, Tachioka M, Miyazaki M, Uchimura K, Tsuda M et al. An ultrasensitive nanofiber-based assay for enzymatic hydrolysis and deep-sea microbial degradation of cellulose. iScience 2022; 25:104732 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Tachioka M, Tsudome M, Deguchi S. Protocol for analyzing enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose using surface pitting observation technology. Star Protoc 2023; 4:102066 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Tsudome M, Tachioka M, Miyazaki M, Tsuda M, Takaki Y et al. Marinagarivorans cellulosilyticus sp. nov., a cellulolytic bacterium isolated from the deep-sea off Noma-misaki, Japan. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2023; 73: Epub ahead of print 2023 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Okuyama M, Saito Y, Ogawa M, Takeuchi A, Jing Z et al. Morphological studies on the bathyal ascidian, Megalodicopia hians Oka 1918 (Octacnemidae, Phlebobranchia), with remarks on feeding and tunic morphology. Zool Sci 2002; 19:1181–1189 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Inoue J, Nakashima K, Satoh N. ORTHOSCOPE Analysis reveals the presence of the cellulose synthase gene in all tunicate genomes but not in other animal genomes. Genes 2019; 10:294 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Tachioka M, Tsudome M, Tsuda M, Hiraoka S, Miyazaki M et al. Characteristics of deep-sea microbial cellulases: key determinants of the ultimate fate of plant biomass on Earth. J Wood Sci 2024; 70:52 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Liao H, Lin X, Li Y, Qu M, Tian Y. Reclassification of the taxonomic framework of orders Cellvibrionales, Oceanospirillales, Pseudomonadales, and Alteromonadales in class Gammaproteobacteria through phylogenomic tree analysis. mSystems 2020; 5:e00543-20 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Kevbrin V, Boltyanskaya Y, Grouzdev D, Koziaeva V, Park M et al. Natronospirillum operosum gen. nov., sp. nov., a haloalkaliphilic satellite isolated from decaying biomass of a laboratory culture of cyanobacterium Geitlerinema sp. and proposal of Natronospirillaceae fam. nov., Saccharospirillaceae fam. nov. and Gynuellaceae fam. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2020; 70:511–521 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Garrity GM, Bell JA, Lilburn T. Oceanospirillales ord. nov. In Brenner DJ, Krieg NR, Staley JT, Garrity GM, Boone DR et al. eds Bergey’s Manual® of Systematic Bacteriology, Volume Two The Proteobacteria Part B The Gammaproteobacteria Boston, MA: Springer; 2005 pp 270–323 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Parks DH, Chuvochina M, Waite DW, Rinke C, Skarshewski A et al. A standardized bacterial taxonomy based on genome phylogeny substantially revises the tree of life. Nat Biotechnol 2018; 36:996–1004 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Deguchi S, Tsudome M, Shen Y, Konishi S, Tsujii K et al. Preparation and characterisation of nanofibrous cellulose plate as a new solid support for microbial culture. Soft Matter 2007; 3:1170–1175 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Tsudome M, Deguchi S, Tsujii K, Ito S, Horikoshi K. Versatile solidified nanofibrous cellulose-containing media for growth of extremophiles. Appl Environ Microbiol 2009; 75:4616–4619 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Bolger AM, Lohse M, Usadel B. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics 2014; 30:2114–2120 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Chin C-S, Alexander DH, Marks P, Klammer AA, Drake J et al. Nonhybrid, finished microbial genome assemblies from long-read SMRT sequencing data. Nat Methods 2013; 10:563–569 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Edgar RC. MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res 2004; 32:1792–1797 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Capella-Gutiérrez S, Silla-Martínez JM, Gabaldón T. trimAl: a tool for automated alignment trimming in large-scale phylogenetic analyses. Bioinformatics 2009; 25:1972–1973 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Tamura K, Stecher G, Kumar S. MEGA11: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 11. Mol Biol Evol 2021; 38:3022–3027 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Chaumeil P-A, Mussig AJ, Hugenholtz P, Parks DH. GTDB-Tk: a toolkit to classify genomes with the Genome Taxonomy Database. Bioinformatics 2020; 36:1925–1927 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Lee I, Ouk Kim Y, Park S-C, Chun J. OrthoANI: an improved algorithm and software for calculating average nucleotide identity. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2016; 66:1100–1103 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Rodriguez-R LM, Konstantinidis KT. Bypassing cultivation to identify bacterial species: culture-independent genomic approaches identify credibly distinct clusters, avoid cultivation bias, and provide true insights into microbial species. Microbe Mag 2014; 9:111–118 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Harris HMB, Bourin MJB, Claesson MJ, O’Toole PW. Phylogenomics and comparative genomics of Lactobacillus salivarius, a mammalian gut commensal. Microb Genom 2017; 3:e000115 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Qin Q-L, Xie B-B, Zhang X-Y, Chen X-L, Zhou B-C et al. A proposed genus boundary for the prokaryotes based on genomic insights. J Bacteriol 2014; 196:2210–2215 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Zheng J, Ge Q, Yan Y, Zhang X, Huang L et al. dbCAN3: automated carbohydrate-active enzyme and substrate annotation. Nucleic Acids Res 2023; 51:W115–W121 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Ling S-K, Zhang H, Wang N-N, Chen G-J, Du Z-J. Salinibius halmophilus gen. nov., sp. nov., isolated from a marine solar saltern. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2020; 70:1079–1085 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Riesco R, Trujillo ME. Update on the proposed minimal standards for the use of genome data for the taxonomy of prokaryotes. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2024; 74:006300 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Drula E, Garron M-L, Dogan S, Lombard V, Henrissat B et al. The carbohydrate-active enzyme database: functions and literature. Nucleic Acids Res 2022; 50:D571–D577 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Chung EJ, Park JA, Jeon CO, Chung YR. Gynuella sunshinyii gen. nov., sp. nov., an antifungal rhizobacterium isolated from a halophyte, Carex scabrifolia Steud. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2015; 65:1038–1043 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Zillig W, Holz I, Janekovic D, Klenk HP, Imsel E et al. Hyperthermus butylicus, a hyperthermophilic sulfur-reducing archaebacterium that ferments peptides. J Bacteriol 1990; 172:3959–3965 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Miyazaki M, Sakai S, Ritalahti KM, Saito Y, Yamanaka Y et al. Sphaerochaeta multiformis sp. nov., an anaerobic, psychrophilic bacterium isolated from subseafloor sediment, and emended description of the genus Sphaerochaeta. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2014; 64:4147–4154 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  31. MIDI Sherlock, Microbial Identification System, Operating Manual, Version 3.0 Newark, DE: MIDI, Inc; 1999
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Christie WW. Structural analysis of fatty acids. In Christie WW. ed Advances in Lipid Methodology Dundee: Oily Press; 1997 pp 119–169 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Minnikin DE, O’Donnell AG, Goodfellow M, Alderson G, Athalye M et al. An integrated procedure for the extraction of bacterial isoprenoid quinones and polar lipids. Journal of Microbiological Methods 1984; 2:233–241 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Komagata K, Suzuki K-I. Lipid and cell-wall analysis in bacterial systematics. Methods Microbiol 1988; 19:161–207
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Pinhassi J, Pujalte MJ, Macián MC, Lekunberri I, González JM et al. Reinekea blandensis sp. nov., a marine, genome-sequenced gammaproteobacterium. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2007; 57:2370–2375 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Romanenko LA, Schumann P, Rohde M, Mikhailov VV, Stackebrandt E. Reinekea marinisedimentorum gen. nov., sp. nov., a novel gammaproteobacterium from marine coastal sediments. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2004; 54:669–673 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Choi A, Cho J-C. Reinekea aestuarii sp. nov., isolated from tidal flat sediment. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2010; 60:2813–2817 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Kang H, Kim H, Joung Y, Joh K. Reinekea marina sp. nov., isolated from seawater, and emended description of the genus Reinekea. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2016; 66:360–364 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Kim I, Chhetri G, Kim J, Kang M, Seo T. Reinekea thalattae sp. nov., a new species of the genus Reinekea Isolated from surface seawater in Sehwa Beach. Curr Microbiol 2020; 77:4174–4179 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Labrenz M, Lawson PA, Tindall BJ, Collins MD, Hirsch P. Saccharospirillum impatiens gen. nov., sp. nov., a novel γ-Proteobacterium isolated from hypersaline Ekho Lake (East Antarctica). Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2003; 53:653–660 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Zhang W, Yuan Y, Su D, Ding L, Yan X et al. Saccharospirillum mangrovi sp. nov., a bacterium isolated from mangrove sediment. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2018; 68:2813–2818 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Chen Y-G, Cui X-L, Li Q-Y, Wang Y-X, Tang S-K et al. Saccharospirillum salsuginis sp. nov., a gammaproteobacterium from a subterranean brine. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2009; 59:1382–1386 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Choi A, Oh H-M, Cho J-C. Saccharospirillum aestuarii sp. nov., isolated from tidal flat sediment, and an emended description of the genus Saccharospirillum. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2011; 61:487–492 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Fidalgo C, Rocha J, Proença DN, Morais PV, Alves A et al. Saccharospirillum correiae sp. nov., an endophytic bacterium isolated from the halophyte Halimione portulacoides. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2017; 67:2026–2030 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Yang Q, Jiang Z, Zhou X, Xie Z, Wang Y et al. Saccharospirillum alexandrii sp. nov., isolated from the toxigenic marine dinoflagellate Alexandrium catenella LZT09. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2020; 70:820–826 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Shahinpei A, Amoozegar MA, Fazeli SAS, Schumann P, Ventosa A. Salinispirillum marinum gen. nov., sp. nov., a haloalkaliphilic bacterium in the family “Saccharospirillaceae”. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2014; 64:3610–3615 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.006742
Loading
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.006742
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplements

Supplementary material 1

PDF
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error