Skip to content
1887

Abstract

A Gram-negative, rod-shaped, non-motile, aerobic bacterium, designated MK-3, was isolated from shallow seawater in Gochang, Republic of Korea. Growth of strain MK-3 occurred at 15–40 °C (30 °C), pH 6.0–7.0 (pH 7.0) and in the presence of 2–3 % NaCl (2%). Phylogenetic analysis based on the 16S rRNA gene sequence placed strain MK-3 within the family . It exhibited sequence similarities of 95.7% with CK-I3-6, DSM 22011 and P9; 95.4% with 1NDH52C, VSW210 and DSM 10146; 95.3% with AM-4 and B17; and 95.2% with FJ12. Phylogenetic and phylogenomic analyses consistently demonstrated that strain MK-3 formed a distinct lineage within the genus , clustering with its closest relatives. The major fatty acids were C cC1 c, C c 11-methyl and C. The genome length of strain MK-3 was 3.3 Mbp, and the DNA G+C content was 62.8 mol%. The strain contained Q-10 as the major ubiquinone. The polar lipids consisted of three phosphatidylinositol mannosides and a diphosphatidylglycerol. Based on its phenotypic, chemotaxonomic, phylogenetic and genomic characteristics, strain MK-3 represents a novel species in the genus , for which the name sp. nov. is proposed. The type strain is MK-3 (=KEMB 21417=KCTC 8294=JCM 36630).

Funding
This study was supported by the:
  • Korea Institute of Marine Science and Technology promotion (Award RS-2022-KS221563)
    • Principal Award Recipient: Sang-SeobLee
  • Ministry of Science and ICT, South Korea (Award NRF-2022M3H9A1085063)
    • Principal Award Recipient: Sang-SeobLee
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.006735
2025-03-24
2026-01-24

Metrics

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Pujalte MJ, Lucena T, Ruvira MA et al. The family Rhodobacteraceae. In The Prokaryotes Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 2014 pp 439–512 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Simon M, Scheuner C, Meier-Kolthoff JP, Brinkhoff T, Wagner-Döbler I et al. Phylogenomics of Rhodobacteraceae reveals evolutionary adaptation to marine and non-marine habitats. ISME J 2017; 11:1483–1499 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Liang KYH, Orata FD, Boucher YF, Case RJ. Roseobacters in a sea of poly- and paraphyly: whole genome-based taxonomy of the family Rhodobacteraceae and the proposal for the split of the “Roseobacter Clade” into a novel family, Roseobacteraceae fam. nov. Front Microbiol 2021; 12: Epub ahead of print 25 June 2021 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Parte AC. LPSN – list of prokaryotic names with standing in nomenclature (bacterio.net), 20 years on. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2018; 68:1825–1829 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Göker M. Filling the gaps: missing taxon names at the ranks of class, order and family. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2022; 72: Epub ahead of print 14 December 2022 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Oren A, Göker M. Notification that new names of prokaryotes, new combinations, and new taxonomic opinions have appeared in volume 72, part 12 of the IJSEM. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2023; 73: Epub ahead of print 31 March 2023 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Zhang D-F, He W, Shao Z, Ahmed I, Zhang Y et al. Phylotaxonomic assessment based on four core gene sets and proposal of a genus definition among the families Paracoccaceae and Roseobacteraceae. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2023; 73: Epub ahead of print 16 November 2023 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Parte AC, Sardà Carbasse J, Meier-Kolthoff JP, Reimer LC, Göker M. List of prokaryotic names with standing in nomenclature (LPSN) moves to the DSMZ. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2020; 70:5607–5612 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Weisburg WG, Barns SM, Pelletier DA, Lane DJ. 16S ribosomal DNA amplification for phylogenetic study. J Bacteriol 1991; 173:697–703 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Thompson JD, Gibson TJ, Plewniak F, Jeanmougin F, Higgins DG. The CLUSTAL_X windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Res 1997; 25:4876–4882 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Felsenstein J. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 1985; 39:783–791 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Kimura M. A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J Mol Evol 1980; 16:111–120 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Nei M, kumar S. Molecular Evolution and Phylogenetics New York: Oxford University Press; 2000
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Prjibelski A, Antipov D, Meleshko D, Lapidus A, Korobeynikov A. Using SPAdes de novo assembler. CP in Bioinform 2020; 70: Epub ahead of print 19 June 2020 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Hyatt D, Chen G-L, Locascio PF, Land ML, Larimer FW et al. Prodigal: prokaryotic gene recognition and translation initiation site identification. BMC Bioinformatics 2010; 11:119 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Aziz RK, Bartels D, Best AA, DeJongh M, Disz T et al. The RAST server: rapid annotations using subsystems technology. BMC Genomics 2008; 9:75 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Overbeek R, Olson R, Pusch GD, Olsen GJ, Davis JJ et al. The SEED and the rapid annotation of microbial genomes using subsystems technology (RAST). Nucleic Acids Res 2014; 42:D206–14 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Brettin T, Davis JJ, Disz T, Edwards RA, Gerdes S et al. RASTtk: a modular and extensible implementation of the RAST algorithm for building custom annotation pipelines and annotating batches of genomes. Sci Rep 2015; 5:8365 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Lee I, Chalita M, Ha S-M, Na S-I, Yoon S-H et al. ContEst16S: an algorithm that identifies contaminated prokaryotic genomes using 16S RNA gene sequences. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2017; 67:2053–2057 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Na S-I, Kim YO, Yoon S-H, Ha S-M, Baek I et al. UBCG: up-to-date bacterial core gene set and pipeline for phylogenomic tree reconstruction. J Microbiol 2018; 56:280–285 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Chaumeil P-A, Mussig AJ, Hugenholtz P, Parks DH. GTDB-Tk v2: memory friendly classification with the genome taxonomy database. Bioinformatics 2022; 38:5315–5316 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Yoon S-H, Ha S, Lim J, Kwon S, Chun J. A large-scale evaluation of algorithms to calculate average nucleotide identity. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 2017; 110:1281–1286 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Kim D, Park S, Chun J. Introducing EzAAI: a pipeline for high throughput calculations of prokaryotic average amino acid identity. J Microbiol 2021; 59:476–480 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Meier-Kolthoff JP, Auch AF, Klenk H-P, Göker M. Genome sequence-based species delimitation with confidence intervals and improved distance functions. BMC Bioinformatics 2013; 14:60 Epub ahead of print 21 February 2013 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Buck JD. Nonstaining (KOH) method for determination of gram reactions of marine bacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol 1982; 44:992–993 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Collee JG, Miles RS, Watt B. Practical Medical Microbiology, 14th edn New York: Churchill Livingstone; 1996
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Dong XZ, Cai MY. Determinative Manual for Routine Bacteriology Beijing: Scientific Press; 2001
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Minnikin DE, O’Donnell AG, Goodfellow M, Alderson G, Athalye M et al. An integrated procedure for the extraction of bacterial isoprenoid quinones and polar lipids. J Microbiol Methods 1984; 2:233–241 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Minnikin DE, Patel PV, Alshamaony L, Goodfellow M. Polar lipid composition in the classification of nocardia and related bacteria. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1977; 27:104–117 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Cai X, Wang Y, Yang X, Liu J, Wu Y et al. Paraphaeobacter pallidus gen. nov., sp. nov., isolated from seawater. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2017; 67:2520–2526 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Dai X, Wang B-J, Yang Q-X, Jiao N-Z, Liu S-J. Yangia pacifica gen. nov., sp. nov., a novel member of the roseobacter clade from coastal sediment of the East China Sea. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2006; 56:529–533 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Hördt A, López MG, Meier-Kolthoff JP, Schleuning M, Weinhold L-M et al. Analysis of 1,000+ type-strain genomes substantially improves taxonomic classification of Alphaproteobacteria. Front Microbiol 2020; 11:468 Epub ahead of print 7 April 2020 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Du J, Liu Y, Pei T, Deng M-R, Zhu H. Salipiger mangrovisoli sp. nov., isolated from mangrove soil and the proposal for the reclassification of Paraphaeobacter pallidus as Salipiger pallidus comb. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2021; 71: Epub ahead of print 16 july 2021 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Sorokin Dy, Tourova TP, Muyzer G. Citreicella thiooxidans gen. nov., sp. nov., a novel lithoheterotrophic sulfur-oxidizing bacterium from the black sea. Syst Appl Microbiol 2005; 28:679–687 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Rajasabapathy R, Mohandass C, Dastager SG, Liu Q, Li W-J et al. Citreicella manganoxidans sp. nov., a novel manganese oxidizing bacterium isolated from a shallow water hydrothermal vent in espalamaca (azores). Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 2015; 108:1433–1439 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Lee K, Srinivasan S, Lee S-S. Paradonghicola geojensis gen. nov., sp. nov., isolated from seawater, Geoje-si, South Korea. Arch Microbiol 2016; 198:501–507 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Wirth JS, Whitman WB. Phylogenomic analyses of a clade within the roseobacter group suggest taxonomic reassignments of species of the genera Aestuariivita, Citreicella, Loktanella, Nautella, Pelagibaca, Ruegeria, Thalassobius, Thiobacimonas and Tropicibacter, and the proposal of six novel genera. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2018; 68:2393–2411 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Park MS, Chung B-S, Lee HJ, Jin HM, Lee S-S et al. Citreicella aestuarii sp. nov., isolated from a tidal flat. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2011; 61:2595–2599 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Lai Q, Fu Y, Wang J, Chen S, Zhong H et al. Citreicella marina sp. nov., isolated from deep-sea sediment. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2011; 61:728–731 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Yang Y, Ni K, Wang D, Wu X, Wei Y. Genome-based reclassification of salipiger manganoxidans (Rajasabapathy et al. 2016) wirth et al. 2018 as a later heterotypic synonym of salipiger marinus (Lai et al. 2011) Wirth et al. 2018. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2024; 74: Epub ahead of print 15 April 2024 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Du J, Liu Y, Pei T, Li A, Zhu H. Ruegeria alba sp. nov., isolated from a tidal flat sediment. Curr Microbiol 2022; 79:267 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Zhang G, Haroon MF, Zhang R, Dong X, Wang D et al. Ruegeria profundi sp. nov. and Ruegeria marisrubri sp. nov., isolated from the brine–seawater interface at erba deep in the red sea. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2017; 67:4624–4631 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Huo Y-Y, Xu X-W, Li X, Liu C, Cui H-L et al. Ruegeria marina sp. nov., isolated from marine sediment. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2011; 61:347–350 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Baek J, Kim J-H, Sukhoom A, Kim W. Ruegeria sediminis sp. nov., isolated from tidal flat sediment. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2020; 70:3055–3061 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Lee J, Whon TW, Shin N-R, Roh SW, Kim J et al. Ruegeria conchae sp. nov., isolated from the ark clam Scapharca broughtonii. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2012; 62:2851–2857 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Uchino Y, Hirata A, Yokota A, Sugiyama J. Reclassification of marine Agrobacterium species: proposals of Stappia stellulata gen. nov., comb. nov., Stappia aggregata sp. nov., nom. rev., Ruegeria atlantica gen. nov., comb. nov., Ruegeria gelatinovora comb. nov., Ruegeria algicola comb. nov., and Ahrensia kieliense gen. nov., sp. nov., nom. rev. J Gen Appl Microbiol 1998; 44:201–210 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Yi H, Lim YW, Chun J. Taxonomic evaluation of the genera Ruegeria and Silicibacter: a proposal to transfer the genus Silicibacter Petursdottir and Kristjansson 1999 to the genus Ruegeria Uchino et al. 1999. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2007; 57:815–819 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Petursdottir SK, Kristjansson JK. Silicibacter lacuscaerulensis gen. nov., sp. nov., a mesophilic moderately halophilic bacterium characteristic of the blue lagoon geothermal lake in Iceland. Extremophiles 1997; 1:94–99 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Qu L, Li Y, Wang W, Shao Z, Gao Z et al. Aestuarium zhoushanense is a later heterotypic synonym of Marivivens donghaensis, and transfer of Paradonghicola geojensis to the genus Marivivens as Marivivens geojensis comb. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2022; 72: Epub ahead of print 11 November 2022 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Park S, Kim S, Jung Y-T, Yoon J-H. Marivivens donghaensis gen. nov., sp. nov., isolated from seawater. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2016; 66:666–672 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Wang G, Xu S, Su H, Chen B, Liang J et al. Histidinibacterium lentulum gen. nov., sp. nov., a marine bacterium from the culture broth of marine microalga Picochlorum sp. 122. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2019; 69:578–583 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Klotz F, Brinkhoff T, Freese HM, Wietz M, Teske A et al. Tritonibacter horizontis gen. nov., sp. nov., a member of the rhodobacteraceae, isolated from the deepwater horizon oil spill. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2018; 68:736–744 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Vandecandelaere I, Nercessian O, Segaert E, Achouak W, Faimali M et al. Ruegeria scottomollicae sp. nov., isolated from a marine electroactive biofilm. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2008; 58:2726–2733 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Ren X-B, Cha Q-Q, Guo X-H, He X-Y, Su H-N et al. Pelagovum pacificum gen. nov., sp. nov., a novel member of the family Rhodobacteraceae isolated from surface seawater of the mariana trench. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2020; 70:6155–6162 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Sonnenschein EC, Phippen CBW, Nielsen KF, Mateiu RV, Melchiorsen J et al. Phaeobacter piscinae sp. nov., a species of the Roseobacter group and potential aquaculture probiont. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2017; 67:4559–4564 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Martens T, Heidorn T, Pukall R, Simon M, Tindall BJ et al. Reclassification of Roseobacter gallaeciensis Ruiz-Ponte et al. 1998 as Phaeobacter gallaeciensis gen. nov., comb. nov., description of Phaeobacter inhibens sp. nov., reclassification of Ruegeria algicola (Lafay et al. 1995) Uchino et al. 1999 as Marinovum algicola gen. nov., comb. nov., and emended descriptions of the genera Roseobacter, Ruegeria and Leisingera. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2006; 56:1293–1304 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Kim M-J, Guan Y, Choe H, Li Z, Chung N et al. n.d. Leisingera thetidis sp. nov., isolated from coastal water. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 73: Epub ahead of print 23 June 2023 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  58. Cho J-C, Giovannoni SJ. Oceanicola granulosus gen. nov., sp. nov. and Oceanicola batsensis sp. nov., poly-beta-hydroxybutyrate-producing marine bacteria in the order “Rhodobacterales”. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2004; 54:1129–1136 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  59. Park S, Jung Y-T, Yoon J-H. Wenxinia saemankumensis sp. nov., isolated from a tidal flat sediment. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2014; 64:1958–1963 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  60. Ying J-Y, Wang B-J, Dai X, Yang S-S, Liu S-J et al. Wenxinia marina gen. nov., sp. nov., a novel member of the Roseobacter clade isolated from oilfield sediments of the South China Sea. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2007; 57:1711–1716 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  61. Lothier J, Gaufichon L, Sormani R, Lemaître T, Azzopardi M et al. The cytosolic glutamine synthetase GLN1;2 plays a role in the control of plant growth and ammonium homeostasis in arabidopsis rosettes when nitrate supply is not limiting. J Exp Bot 2011; 62:1375–1390 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  62. Rhee SG, Park SC, Koo JH. The role of adenylyltransferase and uridylyltransferase in the regulation of glutamine synthetase in Escherichia coli. Curr Top Cell Regul 1985; 27:221–232 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  63. Koper K, Han S-W, Pastor DC, Yoshikuni Y, Maeda HA. Evolutionary origin and functional diversification of aminotransferases. J Biol Chem 2022; 298:102122 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  64. Ninfa A, Atkinson M, Kamberov YG et al. Two-Component Signal Transduction Washington, DC, USA: ASM Press; 2014 Epub ahead of print 16 May 2014 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  65. Yoon S-H, Ha S-M, Lim J, Kwon S, Chun J. A large-scale evaluation of algorithms to calculate average nucleotide identity. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 2017; 110:1281–1286 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  66. Nicholson AC, Gulvik CA, Whitney AM, Humrighouse BW, Bell ME et al. Division of the genus Chryseobacterium: observation of discontinuities in amino acid identity values, a possible consequence of major extinction events, guides transfer of nine species to the genus Epilithonimonas, eleven species to the genus Kaistella, and three species to the genus Halpernia gen. nov., with description of Kaistella daneshvariae sp. nov. and Epilithonimonas vandammei sp. nov. derived from clinical specimens. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2020; 70:4432–4450 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  67. Xu Z, Masuda Y, Hayakawa C, Ushijima N, Kawano K et al. Description of three novel members in the family Geobacteraceae, Oryzomonas japonicum gen. nov., sp. nov., Oryzomonas sagensis sp. nov., and Oryzomonas ruber sp. nov. Microorganisms 2020; 8:634 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  68. Hu D, Wang L, Lai Q, Sun F, Shao Z. Marivivens niveibacter sp. nov., isolated from the seawater of tropical mangrove. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2018; 68:570–574 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.006735
Loading
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.006735
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplements

Supplementary material 1

PDF
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error