Skip to content
1887

Abstract

The sourdough isolates FUA3702, FUA3912 and FUA3913, as well as FUA3695 and FUA3914, could not be identified to known species of the . The 16S rRNA gene sequences of FUA3702 and FUA3913, FUA3695 and FUA3914 were>99% identical to and , respectively. The average nucleotide identity (ANI) and digital DNA–DNA hybridization (dDDH) values of strain FUA3913 when compared to were 83.67 and 26.60%, respectively. In addition, strains FUA3702, FUA3912 and FUA3913 produce different levels of a yellow C30 carotenoid, but pigmentation has not been described in . The ANI and dDDH values of FUA3695 and FUA3914 when compared to were 95.22 and 61.20%, respectively. In addition, FUA3695 and FUA3914 convert lactate to 1,2-propanediol and further to propionate. The conversion of lactate to propionate by a single strain has not been documented for any of the species in the . Based on the genomic and physiological characteristics, we proposed the novel species sp. nov. FUA3913 (=DSM 118650=LMG 33758) and sp. nov. FUA3695 (=DSM 118651=LMG 33759).

Funding
This study was supported by the:
  • Kaslo Sourdough
    • Principal Award Recipient: MichaelGänzle
  • Canada Research Chairs (Award 20230069)
    • Principal Award Recipient: MichaelGänzle
  • Mitacs
    • Principal Award Recipient: ViD. Pham
  • This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License. This article was made open access via a Publish and Read agreement between the Microbiology Society and the corresponding author’s institution.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.006726
2025-03-20
2026-04-13

Metrics

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/ijsem/75/3/ijsem006726.html?itemId=/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.006726&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Vuyst L, González-Alonso V, Raditya Wardhana Y, Pradal I. Taxonomy and species diversity of sourdough lactic acid bacteria. In Gobbetti M, Gänzle B. eds Handbook of Sourdough Biotechnology Heidelberg: Springer; pp 97–160 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Gu CT, Li CY, Yang LJ, Huo GC. Lactobacillus mudanjiangensis sp. nov., Lactobacillus songhuajiangensis sp. nov. and Lactobacillus nenjiangensis sp. nov., isolated from Chinese traditional pickle and sourdough. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2013; 63:4698–4706 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Simpson DJ, Zhang JS, D’Amico V, Llamas-Arriba MG, Gänzle MG. Furfurilactobacillus milii sp. nov., isolated from fermented cereal foods. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2022; 72:005386 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Brandt M, Loponen J, Cappelle S. Technology of sourdough fermentation and sourdough application. In Gänzle M, Gobbetti M. eds Handbook of Sourdough Biotechnology Springer: Heidelberg; pp 67–80 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Gänzle MG, Zheng J. Lifestyles of sourdough lactobacilli - do they matter for microbial ecology and bread quality?. Int J Food Microbiol 2019; 302:15–23 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Gänzle MG, Qiao N, Bechtner J. The quest for the perfect loaf of sourdough bread continues: novel developments for selection of sourdough starter cultures. Int J Food Microbiol 2023; 407:110421 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Van Kerrebroeck S, Maes D, De Vuyst L. Sourdoughs as a function of their species diversity and process conditions, a meta-analysis. Trends Food Sci Technol 2017; 68:152–159 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Vogel RF, Knorr R, Müller MRA, Steudel U, Gänzle MG et al. Non-dairy lactic fermentations: the cereal world. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 1999; 76:403–411 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Landis EA, Oliverio AM, McKenney EA, Nichols LM, Kfoury N et al. The diversity and function of sourdough starter microbiomes. eLife 2021; 10:e61644 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Shah S, Brown PDS, Mayengbam S, Gänzle MG, Wang W et al. Metabolic and gut microbiota responses to sourdough pasta consumption in overweight and obese adults. Front Nutr 2020; 7:615003 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Pham VD, Xu ZS, Simpson DJ, Zhang JS, Gänzle MG. Does strain-level persistence of lactobacilli in long-term back-slopped sourdoughs inform on domestication of food-fermenting lactic acid bacteria?. Appl Environ Microbiol 2024; 90: [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Arora K, Ameur H, Polo A, Di Cagno R, Rizzello CG et al. Thirty years of knowledge on sourdough fermentation: a systematic review. Trends Food Sci Technol 2021; 108:71–83 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Pham VD, Gerlinsky M, Lettrari S, Gänzle MG. Evolution and ecology of C30 carotenoid synthesis in Lactobacillaceae and application of pigmented lactobacilli in pasta production. Food Microbiol 2025; 127:104688 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Meroth CB, Walter J, Hertel C, Brandt MJ, Hammes WP. Monitoring the bacterial population dynamics in sourdough fermentation processes by using PCR-denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis. Appl Environ Microbiol 2003; 69:475–482 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Vera A, Rigobello V, Demarigny Y. Comparative study of culture media used for sourdough lactobacilli. Food Microbiol 2009; 26:728–733 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Minervini F, Di Cagno R, Lattanzi A, De Angelis M, Antonielli L et al. Lactic acid bacterium and yeast microbiotas of 19 sourdoughs used for traditional/typical italian breads: interactions between ingredients and microbial species diversity. Appl Environ Microbiol 2012; 78:1251–1264 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Kim M, Oh HS, Park SC, Chun J. Towards a taxonomic coherence between average nucleotide identity and 16S rRNA gene sequence similarity for species demarcation of prokaryotes. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2014; 64:346–351 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Zheng Z, Zhao M, Zhang Z, Hu X, Xu Y et al. Lactic acid bacteria are prevalent in the infrabuccal pockets and crops of ants that prefer aphid honeydew. Front Microbiol 2022; 12:785016 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Emms DM, Kelly S. OrthoFinder: phylogenetic orthology inference for comparative genomics. Genome Biol 2019; 20:238 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Katoh K, Standley DM. MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: improvements in performance and usability. Mol Biol Evol 2013; 30:772–780 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Kozlov AM, Darriba D, Flouri T, Morel B, Stamatakis A. RAxML-NG: a fast, scalable and user-friendly tool for maximum likelihood phylogenetic inference. Bioinformatics 2019; 35:4453–4455 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Darriba D, Posada D, Kozlov AM, Stamatakis A, Morel B et al. ModelTest-NG: a new and scalable tool for the selection of DNA and protein evolutionary models. Mol Biol Evol 2020; 37:291–294 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Lee I, Ouk Kim Y, Park S-C, Chun J. OrthoANI: an improved algorithm and software for calculating average nucleotide identity. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2016; 66:1100–1103 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Richter M, Rosselló-Móra R. Shifting the genomic gold standard for the prokaryotic species definition. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2009; 106:19126–19131 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Meier-Kolthoff JP, Carbasse JS, Peinado-Olarte RL, Göker M. TYGS and LPSN: a database tandem for fast and reliable genome-based classification and nomenclature of prokaryotes. Nucleic Acids Res 2022; 50:D801–D807 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Garrido-Fernández J, Maldonado-Barragán A, Caballero-Guerrero B, Hornero-Méndez D, Ruiz-Barba JL. Carotenoid production in Lactobacillus plantarum. Int J Food Microbiol 2010; 140:34–39 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Matsumoto W, Takemura M, Nanaura H, Ami Y, Maoka T et al. Carotenoid productivity in human intestinal bacteria Eubacterium limosum and Leuconostoc mesenteroides with functional analysis of their carotenoid biosynthesis genes. Eng Microbiol 2024; 4:100147 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Pelz A, Wieland K-P, Putzbach K, Hentschel P, Albert K et al. Structure and biosynthesis of staphyloxanthin from Staphylococcus aureus. J Biol Chem 2005; 280:32493–32498 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Lebeer S, Legein M, Eilers T, Temmermans J, Dillen J et al. Distribution of C30 carotenoid biosynthesis genes suggests habitat adaptation function in insect-adapted and nomadic Lactobacillaceae. Res Sq PreprintVersion [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Zheng J, Wittouck S, Salvetti E, Franz CMAP, Harris HMB et al. A taxonomic note on the genus Lactobacillus: description of 23 novel genera, emended description of the genus Lactobacillus Beijerinck 1901, and union of Lactobacillaceae and Leuconostocaceae. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2020; 70:2782–2858 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Kim M, Jung D-H, Seo D-H, Chung W-H, Seo M-J. Genome analysis of Lactobacillus plantarum subsp. plantarum KCCP11226 reveals a well-conserved C30 carotenoid biosynthetic pathway. 3 Biotech 2020; 10:150 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Kim M, Seo D-H, Park Y-S, Cha I-T, Seo M-J. Isolation of Lactobacillus plantarum subsp. plantarum producing C30 carotenoid 4,4’-diaponeurosporene and the assessment of its antioxidant activity. J Microbiol Biotechnol 2019; 29:1925–1930 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Siziya IN, Yoon DJ, Kim M, Seo M-J. Enhanced production of C 30 carotenoid 4,4’-diaponeurosporene by optimizing culture conditions of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum subsp. plantarum KCCP11226 T. J Microbiol Biotechnol 2022; 32:892–901
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Moore WEC, Stackebrandt E, Kandler O, Colwell RR, Krichevsky MI et al. Report of the ad hoc committee on reconciliation of approaches to bacterial systematics. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 1987; 37:463–464 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Walter D, Ailion M, Roth J. Genetic characterization of the pdu operon: use of 1,2-propanediol in Salmonella typhimurium. J Bacteriol 1997; 179:1013–1022 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Sriramulu DD, Liang M, Hernandez-Romero D, Raux-Deery E, Lünsdorf H et al. Lactobacillus reuteri DSM 20016 produces cobalamin-dependent diol dehydratase in metabolosomes and metabolizes 1,2-propanediol by disproportionation. J Bacteriol 2008; 190:4559–4567 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Zhang C, Brandt MJ, Schwab C, Gänzle MG. Propionic acid production by cofermentation of Lactobacillus buchneri and Lactobacillus diolivorans in sourdough. Food Microbiol 2010; 27:390–395 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Elvan Gezer M, Gravlund Fønss K, Bambace MF, Marietou A, Sandberg Overby S et al. Investigation on l-rhamnose metabolism of Loigolactobacillus coryniformis subsp. coryniformis DSM 20001 and its propionate-containing fermentates. Appl Environ Microbiol 2025; 91:e0161324 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Sauvageot N, Muller C, Hartke A, Auffray Y, Laplace J-M. Characterisation of the diol dehydratase pdu operon of Lactobacillus collinoides. FEMS Microbiol Lett 2002; 209:69–74 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Liu DD, Li YQ, Zhang LP, Ding W, Tian WL et al. Apilactobacillus nanyangensis sp. nov., Secundilactobacillus hailunensis sp. nov., Secundilactobacillus yichangensis sp. nov., Levilactobacillus andaensis sp. nov., Levilactobacillus wangkuiensis sp. nov., Levilactobacillus lanxiensis sp. nov., Lacticaseibacillus mingshuiensis sp. nov. and Lacticaseibacillus suilingensis sp. nov., isolated from traditional Chinese pickle and the gut of honeybee (Apis mellifera). Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2021; 71: Epub ahead of print 2021 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  41. De Angelis M, Bottacini F, Fosso B, Kelleher P, Calasso M et al. Lactobacillus rossiae, a vitamin B12 producer, represents a metabolically versatile species within the genus Lactobacillus. PLoS One 2014; 9:e107232 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Bobik TA, Havemann GD, Busch RJ, Williams DS, Aldrich HC. The propanediol utilization (pdu) operon of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium LT2 includes genes necessary for formation of polyhedral organelles involved in coenzyme B12-dependent 1, 2-propanediol degradation. J Bacteriol 1999; 181:5967–5975 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Yoshida K, Ueda S, Maeda I. Carotenoid production in Bacillus subtilis achieved by metabolic engineering. Biotechnol Lett 2009; 31:1789–1793 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.006726
Loading
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.006726
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplements

Supplementary material 1

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error