Skip to content
1887

Abstract

Gram-stain-negative, aerobic, rod-shaped bacterial strains, designated HL-TH1 and HL-TH5, were isolated from deep seawater (1127 m depth) of the Amundsen Sea, Antarctica. Phylogenetic analyses based on the 16S rRNA gene sequence revealed that strains HL-TH1 and HL-TH5 were members of the genus with close relatives GH25 (99.3%), NZ-96 (99.3%), G39 (99.1%) and RE35F/1 (98.8%). The complete genome sequences of strains HL-TH1 and HL-TH5 comprised a chromosome of 3.2 Mbp and a plasmid of 0.1 Mbp, with DNA G+C content of 64.1%. The whole genome-based comparisons using the average nt identity and digital DNA–DNA hybridization values revealed that both strains belonged to the same genomic species but were clearly discriminated (79.4–85.8% and 21.9–29.3%, respectively) from their close relatives in the genus . Both strains showed optimal growth at 30 °C, pH 6.5–7.0 and 1.5–2.5% sea salts. The major fatty acids of both strains were C 6 and/or C 7 (37.8–38.4%), C 6 (18.1–19.7%) and C 6 and/or C 7 (12.3–16.7%). The major isoprenoid quinone was ubiquinone-10. The polar lipids consisted of diphosphatidylglycerol, phosphatidylglycerol, phosphatidylethanolamine, phosphatidylcholine and two unidentified lipids. Hence, we propose that strains HL-TH1 and HL-TH5 are assigned to a novel species belonging to the genus , for which the name sp. nov. is proposed. The type strain is HL-TH1 (=KCCM 90517=JCM 36585). In addition, GH25 and NZ-96 were found to be the same species based on a polyphasic approach. Therefore, we propose the reclassification of as a later heterotypic synonym of .

Funding
This study was supported by the:
  • Korea Institute of Marine Science and Technology promotion (Award RS-2023-00239449)
    • Principal Award Recipient: BoMin Lee
  • Korea Institute of Marine Science and Technology promotion (Award RS-2023-00256677)
    • Principal Award Recipient: BoMin Lee
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.006713
2025-03-17
2026-01-25

Metrics

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Feng X-M, Mo Y-X, Han L, Nogi Y, Zhu Y-H et al. Qipengyuania sediminis gen. nov., sp. nov., a member of the family Erythrobacteraceae isolated from subterrestrial sediment. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2015; 65:3658–3665 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Xu L, Sun C, Fang C, Oren A, Xu X-W. Genomic-based taxonomic classification of the family Erythrobacteraceae.. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2020; 70:4470–4495 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Liu Y, Pei T, Du J, Yao Q, Deng M-R et al. Comparative genomics reveals genetic diversity and metabolic potentials of the genus Qipengyuania and suggests fifteen novel species. Microbiol Spectr 2022; 10:e01264–21 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Wang Y, You H, Bu Y-X, Zhou P, Xu L et al. Qipengyuania benthica sp. nov. and Qipengyuania profundimaris sp. nov., two novel Erythrobacteraceae members isolated from deep-sea environments. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2024; 74:006313 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Parte AC, Sardà Carbasse J, Meier-Kolthoff JP, Reimer LC, Göker M. List of Prokaryotic names with Standing in Nomenclature (LPSN) moves to the DSMZ. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2020; 70:5607–5612 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Denner EBM, Vybiral D, Koblízek M, Kämpfer P, Busse H-J et al. Erythrobacter citreus sp. nov., a yellow-pigmented bacterium that lacks bacteriochlorophyll a, isolated from the western Mediterranean Sea. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2002; 52:1655–1661 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Yoon J-H, Kim H, Kim I-G, Kang KH, Park Y-H. Erythrobacter flavus sp. nov., a slight halophile from the East Sea in Korea. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2003; 53:1169–1174 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Wu H, Lai PY, Lee OO, Zhou X-J, Miao L et al. Erythrobacter pelagi sp. nov., a member of the family Erythrobacteraceae isolated from the Red Sea. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2012; 62:1348–1353 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Kristyanto S, Lee SD, Kim J. Porphyrobacter algicida sp. nov., an algalytic bacterium isolated from seawater. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2017; 67:4526–4533 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Park S, Won SM, Yoon J-H. Erythrobacter marisflavi sp. nov., isolated from isolated from estuary water. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2019; 69:2696–2702 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Yoon J-H, Kang KH, Oh T-K, Park Y-H. Erythrobacter aquimaris sp. nov., isolated from sea water of a tidal flat of the Yellow Sea in Korea. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2004; 54:1981–1985 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Yoon J-H, Oh T-K, Park Y-H. Erythrobacter seohaensis sp. nov. and Erythrobacter gaetbuli sp. nov., isolated from a tidal flat of the Yellow Sea in Korea. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2005; 55:71–75 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Yang Y, Zhang G, Sun Z, Cheung MK, Huang C. Altererythrobacter oceanensis sp. nov., isolated from the Western Pacific. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 2014; 106:1191–1198 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Liu Y, Pei T, Deng M-R, Zhu H. Qipengyuania soli sp. nov., isolated from mangrove soil. Curr Microbiol 2021; 78:2806–2814 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Ivanova EP, Bowman JP, Lysenko AM, Zhukova NV, Gorshkova NM et al. Erythrobacter vulgaris sp. nov., a novel organism isolated from the marine invertebrates. Syst Appl Microbiol 2005; 28:123–130 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Zhang M, Song Q, Sang J, Li Z. Qipengyuania spongiae sp. nov., isolated from marine sponge Cinachyrella kuekenthali. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2023; 73:005800 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Tareen S, Risdian C, Müsken M, Wink J. Qipengyuania pacifica sp. nov., a novel carotenoid-producing marine bacterium of the family Erythrobacteraceae, isolated from sponge (Demospongiae), and antimicrobial potential of its crude extract. Diversity 2022; 14:295 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Yoon S-T, Lee WS, Nam S, Lee C-K, Yun S et al. Ice front retreat reconfigures meltwater-driven gyres modulating ocean heat delivery to an Antarctic ice shelf. Nat Commun 2022; 13:306 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Yoon S-T. Review of the melting of west Antarctic ice shelves in the amundsen sea and its influence: research issues and scientific questions. Ocean Polar Res 2023; 45:155–172
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Jacobs S, Giulivi C, Dutrieux P, Rignot E, Nitsche F et al. Getz Ice shelf melting response to changes in ocean forcing. JGR Oceans 2013; 118:4152–4168 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Nakayama Y, Timmermann R, Schröder M, Hellmer HH. On the difficulty of modeling circumpolar deep water intrusions onto the Amundsen Sea continental shelf. Ocean Modelling 2014; 84:26–34 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Choi S-B, Kim J-G, Jung M-Y, Kim S-J, Min U-G et al. Cultivation and biochemical characterization of heterotrophic bacteria associated with phytoplankton bloom in the Amundsen sea polynya, Antarctica. Deep Sea Res Part II: Top Stud Oceanogr 2016; 123:126–134 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Si O-J, Yang H-Y, Hwang CY, Kim S-J, Choi S-B et al. Kiloniella antarctica sp. nov., isolated from a polynya of Amundsen Sea in Western Antarctic Sea. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2017; 67:2397–2402 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Lane DJ. 16S/23S rRNA sequencing. In Stackebrandt E, Goodfellow M. eds Nucleic Acid Techniques in Bacterial Systematics Chichester: Wiley; 1991
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Englen MD, Kelley LC. A rapid DNA isolation procedure for the identification of Campylobacter jejuni by the polymerase chain reaction. Lett Appl Microbiol 2000; 31:421–426 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Lee I, Chalita M, Ha S-M, Na S-I, Yoon S-H et al. ContEst16S: an algorithm that identifies contaminated prokaryotic genomes using 16S RNA gene sequences. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2017; 67:2053–2057 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Yoon S-H, Ha S-M, Kwon S, Lim J, Kim Y et al. Introducing EzBioCloud: a taxonomically united database of 16S rRNA gene sequences and whole-genome assemblies. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2017; 67:1613–1617 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Jeon Y-S, Lee K, Park S-C, Kim B-S, Cho Y-J et al. EzEditor: a versatile sequence alignment editor for both rRNA- and protein-coding genes. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2014; 64:689–691 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Kumar S, Stecher G, Li M, Knyaz C, Tamura K. MEGA X: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis across computing platforms. Mol Biol Evol 2018; 35:1547–1549 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Jukes TH, Cantor CR. Evolution of protein molecules. In Munro HN. eds Mammalian Protein Metabolism New York: Academic Press; 1969
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Kimura M. A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J Mol Evol 1980; 16:111–120 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Nei M, Kumar S. Molecular Evolution and Phylogenetics Oxford University Press; 2000
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Kolmogorov M, Yuan J, Lin Y, Pevzner PA. Assembly of long, error-prone reads using repeat graphs. Nat Biotechnol 2019; 37:540–546 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Vaser R, Sović I, Nagarajan N, Šikić M. Fast and accurate de novo genome assembly from long uncorrected reads. Genome Res 2017; 27:737–746 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Mikheenko A, Prjibelski A, Saveliev V, Antipov D, Gurevich A. Versatile genome assembly evaluation with QUAST-LG. Bioinformatics 2018; 34:i142–i150 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Danecek P, Bonfield JK, Liddle J, Marshall J, Ohan V et al. Twelve years of SAMtools and BCFtools. GigaScience 2021; 10:giab008 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Chklovski A, Parks DH, Woodcroft BJ, Tyson GW. CheckM2: a rapid, scalable and accurate tool for assessing microbial genome quality using machine learning. Nat Methods 2023; 20:1203–1212 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Yoon S-H, Ha S, Lim J, Kwon S, Chun J. A large-scale evaluation of algorithms to calculate average nucleotide identity. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 2017; 110:1281–1286 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Meier-Kolthoff JP, Carbasse JS, Peinado-Olarte RL, Göker M. TYGS and LPSN: a database tandem for fast and reliable genome-based classification and nomenclature of prokaryotes. Nucleic Acids Res 2022; 50:D801–D807 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Tatusova T, DiCuccio M, Badretdin A, Chetvernin V, Nawrocki EP et al. NCBI prokaryotic genome annotation pipeline. Nucleic Acids Res 2016; 44:6614–6624 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Page AJ, Cummins CA, Hunt M, Wong VK, Reuter S et al. Roary: rapid large-scale prokaryote pan genome analysis. Bioinformatics 2015; 31:3691–3693
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Chaumeil P-A, Mussig AJ, Hugenholtz P, Parks DH. GTDB-tk: a toolkit to classify genomes with the genome taxonomy database. Bioinformatics 2019; 36:1925–1927
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Riesco R, Trujillo ME. Update on the proposed minimal standards for the use of genome data for the taxonomy of prokaryotes. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2024; 74:006300
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Viver T, Conrad RE, Rodriguez-R LM, Ramírez AS, Venter SN et al. Towards estimating the number of strains that make up a natural bacterial population. Nat Commun 2024; 15:544 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Goris J, Konstantinidis KT, Klappenbach JA, Coenye T, Vandamme P et al. DNA-DNA hybridization values and their rela-tionship to whole genome sequence similarities. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2007; 57:81–91
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Seo H, Kim S, Sagong H-Y, Son HF, Jin KS et al. Structural basis for cytokinin production by LOG from Corynebacterium glutamicum. Sci Rep 2016; 6:31390 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Lin JT, Stewart V. Nitrate assimilation by bacteria. Adv Microb Physiol 1997; 39:1–30
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Gates AJ, Luque-Almagro VM, Goddard AD, Ferguson SJ, Roldán MD et al. A composite biochemical system for bacterial nitrate and nitrite assimilation as exemplified by Paracoccus denitrificans. Biochem J 2011; 435:743–753 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Pinchbeck BJ, Soriano-Laguna MJ, Sullivan MJ, Luque-Almagro VM, Rowley G et al. A dual functional redox enzyme maturation protein for respiratory and assimilatory nitrate reductases in bacteria. Mol Microbiol 2019; 111:1592–1603 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Luque-Almagro VM, Gates AJ, Moreno-Vivián C, Ferguson SJ, Richardson DJ et al. Bacterial nitrate assimilation: gene distribution and regulation. Biochem Soc Trans 2011; 39:1838–1843 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Jang Y-H, Khim B-K, Shin H-C, Sigman DM, Wang Y et al. Variation of nitrate concentrations and δ15N values of seawater in the Drake Passage, Antarctic Ocean. Ocean and Polar Research 2008; 30:407–418 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Tittsler RP, Sandholzer LA. The use of semi-solid agar for the detection of bacterial motility. J Bacteriol 1936; 31:575–580 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Tindall BJ, Sikorski J, Smibert RA, Kreig NR. Phenotypic characterization and the principles of comparative systematics. In Reddy CA, Beveridge TJ, Breznak JA, Marzluf G. eds Methods for General and Molecular Microbiology American Society of Microbiology; 2007 pp 330–393
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Smibert RA, Kreig NR. Phenotypic characterization. In Gerhardt P, Murray RGE, Wood WA, Kreig NR. eds Methods for General and Molecular Microbiology Washington, DC: American Society for Microbiology; 1994 pp 607–654
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Cowan ST, Steel KJ. Manual for the Identification of Medical Bacteria London: Cambridge University Press; 1965
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Lányi B. Classical and rapid identification methods for medically important bacteria. Methods Microbiol 1988; 19:1–67
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Clayton RK. Spectroscopic analysis of bacteriochlorophylls in vitro and in vivo. Photochem Photobiol 1966; 5:669–677
    [Google Scholar]
  58. Dieser M, Greenwood M, Foreman CM. Carotenoid pigmentation in Antarctic heterotrophic bacteria as a strategy to withstand environmental stresses. Arct, Antarct, Alp Res 2010; 42:396–405 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  59. Jang GI, Lee I, Ha TT, Yoon SJ, Hwang YJ et al. Pseudomonas neustonica sp. nov., isolated from the sea surface microlayer of the Ross Sea (Antarctica). Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2020; 70:3832–3838 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  60. Sasser M. Bacterial identification by gas chromatographic analysis of fatty acids methyl esters (GC-FAME) Newark, NY: Microbial ID; 2006
    [Google Scholar]
  61. Minnikin DE, O’Donnell AG, Goodfellow M, Alderson G, Athalye M et al. An integrated procedure for the extraction of bacterial isoprenoid quinones and polar lipids. J Microbiol Methods 1984; 2:233–241 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  62. Collins MD, Jones D. Distribution of isoprenoid quinone structural types in bacteria and their taxonomic implication. Microbiol Rev 1981; 45:316–354 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  63. Xu X, Fu G, Wang M et al. Qipengyuania. In Trujillo ME, Dedysh S, DeVos P, Hedlund B, Kämpfer P. eds Bergey’s Manual of Systematics of Archaea and Bacteria Oxford: Wiley; 2024 pp 1–28 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  64. Oren A, Arahal DR, Göker M, Moore ERB, Rossello-Mora R et al. International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes: Prokaryotic Code (2022 Revision). Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2023; 73:005585 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.006713
Loading
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.006713
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplements

Supplementary material 1

PDF
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error