Skip to content
1887

Abstract

sp. (OM1, OM4 and OM7) novel strains were isolated from the gastric fluid of a spotted dolphin (). These strains were phenotypically and genotypically characterized, and compared with known species of the genus . All isolated strains hydrolysed urea and metabolized arginine, but did not produce acid from glucose. All strains were propagated using pleuropneumonia-like organisms medium supplemented with serum and urea under aerobic and anaerobic atmospheric conditions at 37 °C. Transmission electron microscopy revealed a typical mollicute cellular morphology. Analysis of the 16S rRNA gene sequence indicated that the most closely related, validly named type strain was ATCC 43346 (89.4% similarity). The average nucleotide identity and digital DNA–DNA hybridization values among strain OM1 and closely related species were lower than the accepted thresholds for describing novel prokaryotic species at the genomic level. Based on the genomic, phenotypic and phylogenetic properties, the strains represent a novel species of the genus , for which the name sp. nov. with type strain OM1 (=DSM 116106=JCM 39153) is proposed. The genomic G+C content and draft genome sizes of the type strain were 31.7% and 889 711 bp, respectively.

Keyword(s): cetacean , dolphin , forestomach and Ureaplasma
Funding
This study was supported by the:
  • Japan science society (Award 2021-5043)
    • Principal Award Recipient: TakaoSegawa
  • Japan Society for the Promotion of Science London (Award 23K05386)
    • Principal Award Recipient: TakaoSegawa
  • Japan Society for the Promotion of Science London (Award 20K15598)
    • Principal Award Recipient: TakaoSegawa
  • Japan Society for the Promotion of Science London (Award 17J00949)
    • Principal Award Recipient: TakaoSegawa
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.006712
2025-03-11
2025-12-07

Metrics

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Razin S, Hayflick L. Highlights of mycoplasma research—an historical perspective. Biol 2010; 38:183–190 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Razin S. Molecular biology and genetics of mycoplasmas (Mollicutes). Microbiol Rev 1985; 49:419–455 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Waites KB, Xiao L, Paralanov V, Viscardi RM, Glass JI. Mycoplasma and Ureaplasma. In De Filippis I, McKee ML. eds Molecular typing in bacterial infections Totowa, NJ: Humana Press; pp 229–281 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Smith DG, Russell WC, Ingledew WJ, Thirkell D. Hydrolysis of urea by Ureaplasma urealyticum generates a transmembrane potential with resultant ATP synthesis. J Bacteriol 1993; 175:3253–3258 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Santos Junior MN, de Macêdo Neres NS, Campos GB, Bastos BL, Timenetsky J et al. A review of Ureaplasma diversum: a representative of the mollicute class associated with reproductive and respiratory disorders in cattle. Front Vet Sci 2021; 8:572171 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Huang C, Zhu HL, Xu KR, Wang SY, Fan LQ et al. Mycoplasma and ureaplasma infection and male infertility: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Andrology 2015; 3:809–816 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Chen L, Qiu Q, Jiang Y, Wang K, Lin Z et al. Large-scale ruminant genome sequencing provides insights into their evolution and distinct traits. Science 2019; 364:eaav6202 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Zurano JP, Magalhães FM, Asato AE, Silva G, Bidau CJ et al. Cetartiodactyla: updating a time-calibrated molecular phylogeny. Mol Phylogenet Evol 2019; 133:256–262 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Huelsmann M, Hecker N, Springer MS, Gatesy J, Sharma V et al. Genes lost during the transition from land to water in cetaceans highlight genomic changes associated with aquatic adaptations. Sci Adv 2019; 5:eaaw6671 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  10. McGowen MR, Gatesy J, Wildman DE. Molecular evolution tracks macroevolutionary transitions in cetacea. Trends Ecol Evol 2014; 29:336–346 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Bik EM, Costello EK, Switzer AD, Callahan BJ, Holmes SP et al. Marine mammals harbor unique microbiotas shaped by and yet distinct from the sea. Nat Commun 2016; 7:10516 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Godoy-Vitorino F, Rodriguez-Hilario A, Alves AL, Gonçalves F, Cabrera-Colon B et al. The microbiome of a striped dolphin (Stenella coeruleoalba) stranded in portugal. Res Microbiol 2017; 168:85–93 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Wan X-L, McLaughlin RW, Zheng J-S, Hao Y-J, Fan F et al. Microbial communities in different regions of the gastrointestinal tract in East Asian finless porpoises (Neophocaena asiaeorientalis sunameri). Sci Rep 2018; 8:14142 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Segawa T, Ohno Y, Tsuchida S, Ushida K, Yoshioka M. Helicobacter delphinicola sp. nov., isolated from common bottlenose dolphins Tursiops truncatus with gastric diseases. Dis Aquat Organ 2020; 141:157–169 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Jain C, Rodriguez-R LM, Phillippy AM, Konstantinidis KT, Aluru S. High throughput ANI analysis of 90K prokaryotic genomes reveals clear species boundaries. Nat Commun 2018; 9:5114 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Emms DM, Kelly S. OrthoFinder: phylogenetic orthology inference for comparative genomics. Genome Biol 2019; 20:238 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Tanizawa Y, Fujisawa T, Nakamura Y. DFAST: a flexible prokaryotic genome annotation pipeline for faster genome publication. Bioinform 2018; 34:1037–1039 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Cumsille A, Durán RE, Rodríguez-Delherbe A, Saona-Urmeneta V, Cámara B et al. GenoVi, an open-source automated circular genome visualizer for bacteria and archaea. PLoS Comput Biol 2023; 19:e1010998 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Lian C-A, Yan G-Y, Huang J-M, Danchin A, Wang Y et al. Genomic characterization of a novel gut symbiont from the hadal snailfish. Front Microbiol 2020; 10:2978 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Nishida H. Ureaplasma urease genes have undergone a unique evolutionary Process. Open Sys Biol J 20096 December 2023 2:
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Kanehisa M, Goto S. KEGG: kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes. Nucleic Acids Res 2000; 28:27–30 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Kotrba P, Inui M, Yukawa H. Bacterial phosphotransferase system (PTS) in carbohydrate uptake and control of carbon metabolism. J Biosci Bioeng 2001; 92:502–517 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Glass JI, Lefkowitz EJ, Glass JS, Heiner CR, Chen EY et al. The complete sequence of the mucosal pathogen Ureaplasma urealyticum. Nature 2000; 407:757–762 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Marques LM, Rezende IS, Barbosa MS, Guimarães AMS, Martins HB et al. Ureaplasma diversum genome provides new insights about the interaction of the surface molecules of this bacterium with the host. PLoS One 2016; 11:e0161926 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Oshima K. Molecular biological study on the survival strategy of phytoplasma. J Gen Plant Pathol 2021; 87:403–407 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Siewert C, Hess WR, Duduk B, Huettel B, Reinhardt R et al. Complete genome determination and analysis of Acholeplasma oculi strain 19L, highlighting the loss of basic genetic features in the Acholeplasmataceae. BMC Genomics 2014; 15:931 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Rechnitzer H, Rottem S, Herrmann R. Reconstitution of an active arginine deiminase pathway in Mycoplasma pneumoniae M129. Infect Immun 2013; 81:3742–3749 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Srirangsan P, Hamada-Sato N, Kawai K, Watanabe M, Suzuki T. Improvement of fish freshness determination method by the application of amorphous freeze-dried enzymes. J Agric Food Chem 2010; 58:12456–12461 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Gutiérrez-Preciado A, Torres AG, Merino E, Bonomi HR, Goldbaum FA et al. Extensive identification of bacterial riboflavin transporters and their distribution across bacterial species. PLoS One 2015; 10:e0126124 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Fuchs TM, Eisenreich W, Heesemann J, Goebel W. Metabolic adaptation of human pathogenic and related nonpathogenic bacteria to extra- and intracellular habitats. FEMS Microbiol Rev 2012; 36:435–462 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Vitreschak AG, Rodionov DA, Mironov AA, Gelfand MS. Regulation of riboflavin biosynthesis and transport genes in bacteria by transcriptional and translational attenuation. Nucleic Acids Res 2002; 30:3141–3151 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Cheaib B, Yang P, Kazlauskaite R, Lindsay E, Heys C et al. Genome erosion and evidence for an intracellular niche - exploring the biology of mycoplasmas in Atlantic salmon. Aquac 2021; 541:736772 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Shimizu T, Kida Y, Kuwano K. Ureaplasma parvum lipoproteins, including MB antigen, activate NF-κB through TLR1, TLR2 and TLR6. Microbiol 2008; 154:1318–1325 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Zheng X, Teng LJ, Watson HL, Glass JI, Blanchard A et al. Small repeating units within the Ureaplasma urealyticum MB antigen gene encode serovar specificity and are associated with antigen size variation. Infect Immun 1995; 63:891–898 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Paralanov V, Lu J, Duffy LB, Crabb DM, Shrivastava S et al. Comparative genome analysis of 19 Ureaplasma urealyticum and Ureaplasma parvum strains. BMC Microbiol 2012; 12:88 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Benson G. Tandem repeats finder: a program to analyze DNA sequences. Nucleic Acids Res 1999; 27:573–580 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Hille F, Richter H, Wong SP, Bratovič M, Ressel S et al. The biology of CRISPR-cas: backward and forward. Cell 2018; 172:1239–1259 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Ipoutcha T, Tsarmpopoulos I, Talenton V, Gaspin C, Moisan A et al. Multiple origins and specific evolution of CRISPR/Cas9 systems in minimal bacteria (Mollicutes). Front Microbiol 2019; 10:2701 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Couvin D, Bernheim A, Toffano-Nioche C, Touchon M, Michalik J et al. CRISPRCasFinder, an update of CRISRFinder, includes a portable version, enhanced performance and integrates search for cas proteins. Nucleic Acids Res 2018; 46:W246–W251 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Makarova KS, Wolf YI, Iranzo J, Shmakov SA, Alkhnbashi OS et al. Evolutionary classification of CRISPR-cas systems: a burst of class 2 and derived variants. Nat Rev Microbiol 2020; 18:67–83 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Bernheim A, Bikard D, Touchon M, Rocha EP. Co-occurrence of multiple CRISPRs and cas clusters suggests epistatic interactions. bioRxiv592600 2019 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Chylinski K, Makarova KS, Charpentier E, Koonin EV. Classification and evolution of type II CRISPR-cas systems. Nucleic Acids Res 2014; 42:6091–6105 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Chylinski K, Le Rhun A, Charpentier E. The tracrRNA and Cas9 families of type II CRISPR-Cas immunity systems. RNA Biol 2013; 10:726–737 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Fonfara I, Le Rhun A, Chylinski K, Makarova KS, Lécrivain A-L et al. Phylogeny of Cas9 determines functional exchangeability of dual-RNA and Cas9 among orthologous type II CRISPR-Cas systems. Nucleic Acids Res 2014; 42:2577–2590 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Deltcheva E, Chylinski K, Sharma CM, Gonzales K, Chao Y et al. CRISPR RNA maturation by trans-encoded small RNA and host factor RNase III. Nature 2011; 471:602–607 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Brown DR, Whitcomb RF, Bradbury JM. Revised minimal standards for description of new species of the class mollicutes (division Tenericutes). Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2007; 57:2703–2719 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Riesco R, Trujillo ME. Update on the proposed minimal standards for the use of genome data for the taxonomy of prokaryotes. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2024; 74:006300 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.006712
Loading
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.006712
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplements

Supplementary material 1

PDF
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error