Skip to content
1887

Abstract

Three strains, designated as J27, J71 and J72, belonging to the genus , were isolated from stable foams formed in activated sludge wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) in New South Wales, Australia. Phenotypic and genomic analyses revealed that these strains belong to the family and are closely related to . However, distinct genomic and physiological characteristics, including overall genomic relatedness indices, phylogenomic analysis, genomic metabolic profiles and MALDI-TOF MS (Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometry), confirmed their status as a new species.

Ecologically, these strains showed a wide metabolic versatility, like enhanced membrane transport systems for amino acids, metals and phosphate, as well as the ability to synthesize mycolic acids, contributing to their hydrophobic nature and involvement in foam stabilization. Their adaptations likely provide a competitive advantage in WWTPs, where they persist in nutrient-rich, metal-laden and foam-stabilizing environments. The species did not present the typical rod-coccus cycle, described previously as a defining characteristic of the genus. Based on their unique genomic, phenotypic and ecological features, we propose the name sp. nov., with strain J71 (JCM 34493, NCIMB 15450) designated as the type strain. Additional strains include J27 (JCM 33914, NCIMB 15449) and J72 (NCIMB 15448).

Funding
This study was supported by the:
  • Universidad de Salamanca (Award NA)
    • Principal Award Recipient: JhonA. Suescún-Sepúlveda
  • Ministerio de Universidades (Award C21.I4.P1)
    • Principal Award Recipient: Riesco JarrinRaul
  • Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación (Award TED2021-131105B-I00)
    • Principal Award Recipient: MarthaE. Trujillo
  • Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación (Award PID2021-124068NB-I00)
    • Principal Award Recipient: MarthaE. Trujillo
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.006695
2025-02-28
2026-04-13

Metrics

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Petrovski S, Dyson ZA, Quill ES, McIlroy SJ, Tillett D et al. An examination of the mechanisms for stable foam formation in activated sludge systems. Water Res 2011; 45:2146–2154 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Soddell JA, Seviour RJ. Microbiology of foaming in activated sludge plants. J Appl Bacteriol 1990; 69:145–176 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Riesco R, Rose JJA, Batinovic S, Petrovski S, Sánchez-Juanes F et al. Gordonia pseudamarae sp. nov., a home for novel actinobacteria isolated from stable foams on activated sludge wastewater treatment plants. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2022; 72: [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  4. de los Reyes F. Foaming. In Seviour R, Nielsen PH. eds Microbial Ecology of Activated Sludge London: IWA Publishing; 2010 pp 215–258 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Soddell JA, Seviour RJ. Numerical taxonomy of Skermania piniformis and related isolates from activated sludge. J Appl Microbiol 1998; 84:272–284 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Männle D, McKinnie SMK, Mantri SS, Steinke K, Lu Z et al. Comparative Genomics and Metabolomics in the Genus Nocardia. mSystems 2020; 5:e00125-20 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Minnikin DE, Alshamaony L, Goodfellow M. Differentiation of Mycobacterium, Nocardia, and related taxa by thin-layer chromatographic analysis of whole-organism methanolysates. J Gen Microbiol 1975; 88:200–204 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Batinovic S, Rose JJA, Ratcliffe J, Seviour RJ, Petrovski S. Cocultivation of an ultrasmall environmental parasitic bacterium with lytic ability against bacteria associated with wastewater foams. Nat Microbiol 2021; 6:703–711 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Goodfellow M. Nocardiaceae. In Bergey’s Manual of Systematics of Archaea and Bacteria Wiley; pp 1–5 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Dong Lee S, Kim IS, Verbarg S, Joung Y. Antrihabitans stalactiti gen. nov., sp. nov., a new member of the family Nocardiaceae isolated from a cave. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2020; 70:5503–5511 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Val-Calvo J, Vázquez-Boland JA. Mycobacteriales taxonomy using network analysis-aided, context-uniform phylogenomic approach for non-subjective genus demarcation. mBio 2023; 14:e0220723 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Soddell JA, Seviour RJ. Incidence and morphological variability of Nocardia pinensis in australian activated sludge plants. Water Research 1994; 28:2343–2351 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Skerman VBD. A new type of micromanipulator and microforge. J Gen Microbiol 1968; 54:287–297 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Trujillo ME, Fernández-Molinero C, Velázquez E, Kroppenstedt RM, Schumann P et al. Micromonospora mirobrigensis sp. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2005; 55:877–880 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Trujillo ME, Alonso-Vega P, Rodríguez R, Carro L, Cerda E et al. The genus Micromonospora is widespread in legume root nodules: the example of Lupinus angustifolius. ISME J 2010; 4:1265–1281 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Tamura K, Stecher G, Kumar S. MEGA11: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 11. Mol Biol Evol 2021; 38:3022–3027 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Larkin MA, Blackshields G, Brown NP, Chenna R, McGettigan PA et al. Clustal W and Clustal X version 2.0. Bioinformatics 2007; 23:2947–2948 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Chun J, Lee J-H, Jung Y, Kim M, Kim S et al. EzTaxon: a web-based tool for the identification of prokaryotes based on 16S ribosomal RNA gene sequences. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2007; 57:2259–2261 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Kimura M. A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J Mol Evol 1980; 16:111–120 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Felsenstein J. Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: a maximum likelihood approach. J Mol Evol 1981; 17:368–376 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Letunic I, Bork P. Interactive Tree of Life (iTOL) v6: recent updates to the phylogenetic tree display and annotation tool. Nucleic Acids Res 2024; 52:W78–W82 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Ferreira L, Sánchez-Juanes F, García-Fraile P, Rivas R, Mateos PF et al. MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry is a fast and reliable platform for identification and ecological studies of species from family Rhizobiaceae. PLoS One 2011; 6:e20223 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Wu L, Ma J. The Global Catalogue of Microorganisms (GCM) 10K type strain sequencing project: providing services to taxonomists for standard genome sequencing and annotation. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2019; 69:895–898 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Wu L, McCluskey K, Desmeth P, Liu S, Hideaki S et al. The global catalogue of microorganisms 10K type strain sequencing project: closing the genomic gaps for the validly published prokaryotic and fungi species. Gigascience 2018; 7:giy026 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Chen Y, Chen Y, Shi C, Huang Z, Zhang Y et al. SOAPnuke: a MapReduce acceleration-supported software for integrated quality control and preprocessing of high-throughput sequencing data. Gigascience 2018; 7:1–6 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Riesco R, Trujillo ME. Update on the proposed minimal standards for the use of genome data for the taxonomy of prokaryotes. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2024; 74:1–12 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Jain C, Rodriguez-R LM, Phillippy AM, Konstantinidis KT, Aluru S. High throughput ANI analysis of 90K prokaryotic genomes reveals clear species boundaries. Nat Commun 2018; 9:5114 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Konstantinidis K, Ruiz-Perez C, Gerhardt K, Rodriguez-R L, Jain C et al. FastAAI: efficient estimation of genome average amino acid identity and phylum-level relationships using tetramers of universal proteins. Res Sq 20220–22 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Meier-Kolthoff JP, Carbasse JS, Peinado-Olarte RL, Göker M. TYGS and LPSN: a database tandem for fast and reliable genome-based classification and nomenclature of prokaryotes. Nucleic Acids Res 2022; 50:D801–D807 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  30. R Core Team R: a language and environment for statistical computing; 2022 https://www.r-project.org/
  31. Kolde R. pheatmap: pretty heatmaps; 2019 https://cran.r-project.org/package=pheatmap
  32. Na S-I, Kim YO, Yoon S-H, Ha S, Baek I et al. UBCG: up-to-date bacterial core gene set and pipeline for phylogenomic tree reconstruction. J Microbiol 2018; 56:280–285 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Cantalapiedra CP, Hernández-Plaza A, Letunic I, Bork P, Huerta-Cepas J. eggNOG-mapper v2: functional annotation, orthology assignments, and domain prediction at the metagenomic scale. Mol Biol Evol 2021; 38:5825–5829 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Huerta-Cepas J, Szklarczyk D, Heller D, Hernández-Plaza A, Forslund SK et al. eggNOG 5.0: a hierarchical, functionally and phylogenetically annotated orthology resource based on 5090 organisms and 2502 viruses. Nucleic Acids Res 2019; 47:D309–D314 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Barrett T, Dowle M, Srinivasan A, Gorecki J, Chirico M et al. data.table: extension of `data.frame`; 2024 https://cran.r-project.org/package=data.table
  36. Kanehisa M, Sato Y, Kawashima M, Furumichi M, Tanabe M. KEGG as a reference resource for gene and protein annotation. Nucleic Acids Res 2016; 44:D457–62 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Gu Z, Eils R, Schlesner M. Complex heatmaps reveal patterns and correlations in multidimensional genomic data. Bioinformatics 2016; 32:2847–2849 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Kassambara A, Mundt F. factoextra: extract and visualize the results of multivariate data analyses; 2020 https://cran.r-project.org/package=factoextra
  39. S, Josse J, Husson F. {FactoMineR}: a package for multivariate analysis. J Stat Softw 2008; 25:1–18 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Blin K, Shaw S, Augustijn HE, Reitz ZL, Biermann F et al. antiSMASH 7.0: new and improved predictions for detection, regulation, chemical structures and visualisation. Nucleic Acids Res 2023; 51:W46–W50 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Huang L, Zhang H, Wu P, Entwistle S, Li X et al. dbCAN-seq: a database of carbohydrate-active enzyme (CAZyme) sequence and annotation. Nucleic Acids Res 2018; 46:D516–D521 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Arkin AP, Cottingham RW, Henry CS, Harris NL, Stevens RL et al. KBase: the United States department of energy systems biology knowledgebase. Nat Biotechnol 2018; 36:566–569 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Rossetti S, Levantesi C, Tandoi V. The microbiology of the activated sludge process. In Activated Sludge Separation Problems International Water Association; pp 21–51 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Lee SD, Kim IS, Kim Y-J, Joung Y. Rhodococcus cavernicola sp. nov., isolated from a cave, and Rhodococcus degradans is a later heterosynonym of Rhodococcus qingshengii. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2020; 70:4409–4415 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Kim SM, Lee SD, Koh YS, Kim IS. Antrihabitans stalagmiti sp. nov., isolated from a larva cave and a proposal to transfer Rhodococcus cavernicola Lee et al. 2020 to a new genus Spelaeibacter as Spelaeibacter cavernicola gen. nov. comb. nov. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 2022; 115:521–532 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Bailo R, Radhakrishnan A, Singh A, Nakaya M, Fujiwara N et al. The mycobacterial desaturase DesA2 is associated with mycolic acid biosynthesis. Sci Rep 2022; 12:6943 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Chipasa KB, Medrzycka K. Behavior of lipids in biological wastewater treatment processes. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 2006; 33:635–645 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Stam MR, Danchin EGJ, Rancurel C, Coutinho PM, Henrissat B. Dividing the large glycoside hydrolase family 13 into subfamilies: towards improved functional annotations of alpha-amylase-related proteins. Protein Eng Des Sel 2006; 19:555–562 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Mewis K, Lenfant N, Lombard V, Henrissat B. Dividing the large glycoside hydrolase family 43 into subfamilies: a motivation for detailed enzyme characterization. Appl Environ Microbiol 2016; 82:1686–1692 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Shirling EB, Gottlieb D. Methods for characterization of Streptomyces species. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1966; 16:313–340 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Vincent JM. The cultivation, isolation and maintenance of rhizobia. In A Manual for the Practical Study of Root-Nodule Bacteria Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications; 1970 pp 1–13
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Williams ST, Goodfellow M, Alderson G, Wellington EMH, Sneath PHA et al. Numerical classification of Streptomyces and related genera. Microbiology 1983; 129:1743–1813 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Román-Ponce B, Millán-Aguiñaga N, Guillen-Matus D, Chase AB, Ginigini JGM et al. Six novel species of the obligate marine actinobacterium Salinispora, Salinispora cortesiana sp. nov., Salinispora fenicalii sp. nov., Salinispora goodfellowii sp. nov., Salinispora mooreana sp. nov., Salinispora oceanensis sp. nov. and Salinispora vitiensis sp. nov., and emended description of the genus Salinispora. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2020; 70:4668–4682 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.006695
Loading
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.006695
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplements

Supplementary material 1

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error