Skip to content
1887

Abstract

Between 1976 and 2010, four bacterial isolates were collected in New South Wales and Queensland, Australia, and stored as part of routine biosecurity surveillance. Recently, these historic isolates were analysed as part of a larger project to enhance the taxonomic accuracy of our culture collection and improve Australia’s biosecurity preparedness. Three isolates were collected from , initially identified as sp., and one from , identified as subsp. . In this study, we employed modern phenotypic and genomic techniques to further characterize these isolates. Matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization–time of flight MS biotyping and Biolog GEN III MicroPlates confirmed that they are members of the genus but did not allow for species-level classification. Genome-relatedness indices and phylogenetic analysis confirmed that they were and revealed that they represent three novel species. The maximum average nucleotide identity and digital DNA–DNA hybridization values observed when comparing the four isolates to all type strains and each other were 93.9% and 50.7%, respectively. Pathogenesis assays confirmed that two of the isolates are not pathogenic to , the plant from which they were isolated. Based on these findings, we propose the names sp. nov. (DAR 80977=ICMP 24943), sp. nov. (DAR 35659=ICMP 24942) and sp. nov. (DAR 34887=ICMP 24940).

Funding
This study was supported by the:
  • Grains Research and Development Corporation (Award 9177866)
    • Principal Award Recipient: ToniAnn Chapman
  • Australian Research Council (Award LP180100593)
    • Principal Award Recipient: DanielJ E McKnight
  • This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.006686
2025-03-10
2026-02-17

Metrics

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/ijsem/75/3/ijsem006686.html?itemId=/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.006686&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. An S-Q, Potnis N, Dow M, Vorhölter F-J, He Y-Q et al. Mechanistic insights into host adaptation, virulence and epidemiology of the phytopathogen Xanthomonas. FEMS Microbiol Rev 2020; 44:1–32 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Young JM, Park D-C, Shearman HM, Fargier E. A multilocus sequence analysis of the genus Xanthomonas. Syst Appl Microbiol 2008; 31:366–377 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Mafakheri H, Taghavi SM, Zarei S, Portier P, Dimkić I et al. Xanthomonas bonasiae sp. nov. and Xanthomonas youngii sp. nov., isolated from crown gall tissues. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2022; 72: [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Triplett LR, Verdier V, Campillo T, Van Malderghem C, Cleenwerck I et al. Characterization of a novel clade of Xanthomonas isolated from rice leaves in Mali and proposal of Xanthomonas maliensis sp. nov. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 2015; 107:869–881 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  5. McKnight DJE, Wong-Bajracharya J, Okoh EB, Snijders F, Lidbetter F et al. Xanthomonas rydalmerensis sp. nov., a non-pathogenic member of group 1 Xanthomonas. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2024; 74:006294 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Bansal K, Kaur A, Midha S, Kumar S, Korpole S et al. Xanthomonas sontii sp. nov., a non-pathogenic bacterium isolated from healthy basmati rice (Oryza sativa) seeds from India. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 2021; 114:1935–1947 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Martins L, Fernandes C, Blom J, Dia NC, Pothier JF et al. Xanthomonas euroxanthea sp. nov., a new xanthomonad species including pathogenic and non-pathogenic strains of walnut. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2020; 70:6024–6031 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Essakhi S, Cesbron S, Fischer-Le Saux M, Bonneau S, Jacques M-A et al. Phylogenetic and variable-number tandem-repeat analyses identify nonpathogenic Xanthomonas arboricola lineages lacking the canonical type III secretion system. Appl Environ Microbiol 2015; 81:5395–5410 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Vauterin L, Yang P, Alvarez A, Takikawa Y, Roth DA et al. Identification of nonpathogenic Xanthomonas strains associated with plants. Syst Appl Microbiol 1996; 19:96–105 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Gilani SL, Najafpour GD, Heydarzadeh HD, Zare H. Kinetic models for xanthan gum production using Xanthomonas campestris from molasses. CI&CEQ 2011; 17:179–187 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Sutherland IW. Biofilm exopolysaccharides: a strong and sticky framework. Microbiology 2001; 147:3–9 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Farhana A, Khan YS. Biochemistry, Lipopolysaccharide. StatPearls, Treasure Island (FL) StatPearls Publishing; 2024
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Davey ME, O’toole GA. Microbial biofilms: from ecology to molecular genetics. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 2000; 64:847–867 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Zhang G, Meredith TC, Kahne D. On the essentiality of lipopolysaccharide to gram-negative bacteria. Curr Opin Microbiol 2013; 16:779–785 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Alvarez-Martinez CE, Sgro GG, Araujo GG, Paiva MRN, Matsuyama BY et al. Secrete or perish: the role of secretion systems in Xanthomonas biology. Comput Struct Biotechnol J 2021; 19:279–302 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Vauterin L, Rademaker J, Swings J. Synopsis on the taxonomy of the genus Xanthomonas. Phytopathology 2000; 90:677–682 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Vauterin L, Hoste B, Kersters K, Swings J. Reclassification of Xanthomonas. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1995; 45:472–489 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Parkinson N, Aritua V, Heeney J, Cowie C, Bew J et al. Phylogenetic analysis of Xanthomonas species by comparison of partial gyrase B gene sequences. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2007; 57:2881–2887 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Richter M, Rosselló-Móra R. Shifting the genomic gold standard for the prokaryotic species definition. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2009; 106:19126–19131 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Meier-Kolthoff JP, Auch AF, Klenk H-P, Göker M. Genome sequence-based species delimitation with confidence intervals and improved distance functions. BMC Bioinf 2013; 14:60 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Bogema DR, Micallef ML, Liu M, Padula MP, Djordjevic SP et al. Analysis of Theileria orientalis draft genome sequences reveals potential species-level divergence of the Ikeda, Chitose and Buffeli genotypes. BMC Genom 2018; 19:298 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Hauben L, Vauterin L, Swings J, Moore ERB. Comparison of 16S ribosomal DNA sequences of all Xanthomonas species. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1997; 47:328–335 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Minh BQ, Schmidt HA, Chernomor O, Schrempf D, Woodhams MD et al. IQ-TREE 2: new models and efficient methods for phylogenetic inference in the genomic era. Mol Biol Evol 2020; 37:1530–1534 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Jain C, Rodriguez-R LM, Phillippy AM, Konstantinidis KT, Aluru S. High throughput ANI analysis of 90K prokaryotic genomes reveals clear species boundaries. Nat Commun 2018; 9:5114 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Meier-Kolthoff JP, Carbasse JS, Peinado-Olarte RL, Göker M. TYGS and LPSN: a database tandem for fast and reliable genome-based classification and nomenclature of prokaryotes. Nucleic Acids Res 2022; 50:D801–D807 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  26. O’Leary NA, Cox E, Holmes JB, Anderson WR, Falk R et al. Exploring and retrieving sequence and metadata for species across the tree of life with NCBI Datasets. Sci Data 2024; 11:732 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Strejcek M, Smrhova T, Junkova P, Uhlik O. Whole-cell MALDI-TOF MS versus 16S rRNA gene analysis for identification and dereplication of recurrent bacterial isolates. Front Microbiol 2018; 9:1294 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Panda A, Kurapati S, Samantaray JC, Srinivasan A, Khalil S. MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry proteomic based identification of clinical bacterial isolates. Indian J Med Res 2014; 140:770–777 [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Buchfink B, Reuter K, Drost H-G. Sensitive protein alignments at tree-of-life scale using DIAMOND. Nat Methods 2021; 18:366–368 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Gétaz M, Blom J, Smits THM, Pothier JF. Comparative genomics of Xanthomonas fragariae and Xanthomonas arboricola pv. fragariae reveals intra- and interspecies variations. Phytopathol Res 2020; 2:17 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  31. R Core Team R: a language and environment for statistical computing; 2021
  32. Kolde R. Pheatmap: Pretty Heatmaps; 2019
  33. Gurevich A, Saveliev V, Vyahhi N, Tesler G. QUAST: quality assessment tool for genome assemblies. Bioinformatics 2013; 29:1072–1075 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Schwengers O, Jelonek L, Dieckmann MA, Beyvers S, Blom J et al. Bakta: rapid and standardized annotation of bacterial genomes via alignment-free sequence identification. Microb Genom 2021; 7:000685 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.006686
Loading
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.006686
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplements

Supplementary material 1

EXCEL
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error