Skip to content
1887

Abstract

Enrichment cultures of archaea and bacteria performing the anaerobic oxidation of methane (AOM) regularly contain persistent methanogens. Here, we isolated the marine methanogen sp. nov. strain LMO-2 from a long-term AOM enrichment culture from the Northern Gulf of Mexico. Strain LMO-2 is Gram-stain-negative, irregular 0.5–1 µm coccus without flagella. It utilizes a variety of methylated compounds including methanol, monomethylamine, dimethylamine and trimethylamine for growth and methanogenesis. However, it does not grow on formate, acetate, dimethyl sulphate, H/CO, betaine and choline. The optimal conditions for growth were observed within a temperature range of 30–35 °C, a pH range of 7.0–8.0 and a salinity range of 2–4% NaCl. Based on the similarity and phylogeny of the 16S rRNA gene and genomic sequence, strain LMO-2 is classified within the genus . Among the isolated type strains of the genus, strain LMO-2 exhibited the highest 16S rRNA gene sequence identity with SLH33 (99.4%). The digital DNA–DNA hybridization and average nucleotide identity based on genome sequence showed that strain LMO-2 shared the highest similarity with LMO-1, with values of 27.3% and 83.4%, respectively. In conclusion, we isolated a methylotrophic methanogen from an AOM culture, and the isolated strain LMO-2 represented a novel species of the genus , for which the name sp. nov. is proposed. The type strain is LMO-2 (=CGMCC 1.18051=KCTC 25774).

Funding
This study was supported by the:
  • Postdoctoral Fellowship Program of CPSF (Award GZB20230406)
    • Principal Award Recipient: LiangLewen
  • China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (Award 2023M732206)
    • Principal Award Recipient: LiangLewen
  • The State Key R&D Project of China. (Award 2022YFC2804101)
    • Principal Award Recipient: WangFengping
  • Natural Science Foundation of PR. China (Award 42230401, 42406089)
    • Principal Award Recipient: WangFengpingLiangLewen
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.006685
2025-03-03
2025-12-07

Metrics

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Wang Y, Wegener G, Williams TA, Xie R, Hou J et al. A methylotrophic origin of methanogenesis and early divergence of anaerobic multicarbon alkane metabolism. Sci Adv 2021; 7: [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Lv Z, Ding J, Wang H, Wan J, Chen Y et al. Isolation of a novel thermophilic methanogen and the evolutionary history of the class Methanobacteria. Biology 2022; 11:1514 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Garcia PS, Gribaldo S, Borrel G. Diversity and evolution of methane-related pathways in archaea. Annu Rev Microbiol 2022; 76:727–755 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Thauer RK. Biochemistry of methanogenesis: a tribute to Marjory Stephenson. 1998 Marjory Stephenson Prize Lecture. Microbiology 1998; 144 (Pt 9):2377–2406 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Kurth JM, Nobu MK, Tamaki H, de Jonge N, Berger S et al. Methanogenic archaea use a bacteria-like methyltransferase system to demethoxylate aromatic compounds. ISME J 2021; 15:3549–3565 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Zhou Z, Zhang C-J, Liu P-F, Fu L, Laso-Pérez R et al. Non-syntrophic methanogenic hydrocarbon degradation by an archaeal species. Nature 2022; 601:257–262 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Oremland RS, Taylor BF. Sulfate reduction and methanogenesis in marine sediments. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 1978; 42:209–214 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Xu L, Zhuang GC, Montgomery A, Liang Q, Joye SB et al. Methyl-compounds driven benthic carbon cycling in the sulfate-reducing sediments of South China Sea. Environ Microbiol 2021; 23:641–651 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Liang L, Vigderovich H, Sivan O, Hou J, Niu M et al. Iron (oxyhydr) oxides shift the methanogenic community in deep sea methanic sediment - insights from long-term high-pressure incubations. Sci Total Env 2022; 848:157590 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Zhuang G-C, Heuer VB, Lazar CS, Goldhammer T, Wendt J et al. Relative importance of methylotrophic methanogenesis in sediments of the Western Mediterranean Sea. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 2018; 224:171–186 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Göker M, Oren A. Valid publication of four additional phylum names. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2023; 73: [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Chuvochina M, Mussig AJ, Chaumeil P-A, Skarshewski A, Rinke C et al. Proposal of names for 329 higher rank taxa defined in the Genome Taxonomy Database under two prokaryotic codes. FEMS Microbiol Lett 2023; 370:fnad071 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Boone DR, Whitman WB, Koga Y. Methanosarcinales ord. nov. In Bergey’s Manual of Systematics of Archaea and Bacteria 2015 p 1 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Balch WE, Fox GE, Magrum LJ, Woese CR, Wolfe RS. Methanogens: reevaluation of a unique biological group. Microbiol Rev 1979; 43:260–296 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Sowers KR, Ferry JG. Isolation and characterization of a methylotrophic marine methanogen, Methanococcoides methylutens gen. nov., sp. nov. Appl Environ Microbiol 1983; 45:684–690 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Singh N, Kendall MM, Liu Y, Boone DR. Isolation and characterization of methylotrophic methanogens from anoxic marine sediments in Skan Bay, Alaska: description of Methanococcoides alaskense sp. nov., and emended description of Methanosarcina baltica. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2005; 55:2531–2538 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Liang L, Sun Y, Dong Y, Ahmad T, Chen Y et al. Methanococcoides orientis sp. nov., a methylotrophic methanogen isolated from sediment of the East China Sea. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2022; 72:005384 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Franzmann PD, Springer N, Ludwig W, Conway De Macario E, Rohde M. A Methanogenic Archaeon from Ace Lake, Antarctica: Methanococcoides burtonii sp. nov. Syst Appl Microbiol 1992; 15:573–581 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  19. L’Haridon S, Chalopin M, Colombo D, Toffin L. Methanococcoides vulcani sp. nov., a marine methylotrophic methanogen that uses betaine, choline and N, N-dimethylethanolamine for methanogenesis, isolated from a mud volcano, and emended description of the genus Methanococcoides. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2014; 64:1978–1983 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Knittel K, Boetius A. Anaerobic oxidation of methane: progress with an unknown process. Annu Rev Microbiol 2009; 63:311–334 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Boetius A, Ravenschlag K, Schubert CJ, Rickert D, Widdel F et al. A marine microbial consortium apparently mediating anaerobic oxidation of methane. Nature 2000; 407:623–626 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Wang F-P, Zhang Y, Chen Y, He Y, Qi J et al. Methanotrophic archaea possessing diverging methane-oxidizing and electron-transporting pathways. ISME J 2014; 8:1069–1078 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Yang S, Lv Y, Liu X, Wang Y, Fan Q et al. Genomic and enzymatic evidence of acetogenesis by anaerobic methanotrophic archaea. Nat Commun 2020; 11:3941 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Wegener G, Krukenberg V, Ruff SE, Kellermann MY, Knittel K. Metabolic capabilities of microorganisms involved in and associated with the anaerobic oxidation of methane. Front Microbiol 2016; 7:46 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Yu H, Skennerton CT, Chadwick GL, Leu AO, Aoki M et al. Sulfate differentially stimulates but is not respired by diverse anaerobic methanotrophic archaea. ISME J 2022; 16:168–177 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Yu H, Speth DR, Connon SA, Goudeau D, Malmstrom RR et al. Community structure and microbial associations in sediment-free methanotrophic enrichment cultures from a marine methane seep. Appl Environ Microbiol 2022; 88:e0210921 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Laso-Pérez R, Krukenberg V, Musat F, Wegener G. Establishing anaerobic hydrocarbon-degrading enrichment cultures of microorganisms under strictly anoxic conditions. Nat Protoc 2018; 13:1310–1330 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Widdel F, Bak F. Gram-negative mesophilic sulfate-reducing bacteria. In The Prokaryotes: A Handbook on the Biology of Bacteria: Ecophysiology, Isolation, Identification, Applications Springer; 1992 pp 3352–3378 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Prjibelski A, Antipov D, Meleshko D, Lapidus A, Korobeynikov A. Using SPAdes de novo assembler. Curr Protoc Bioinformatics 2020; 70:e102 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Lee I, Chalita M, Ha S-M, Na S-I, Yoon S-H et al. ContEst16S: an algorithm that identifies contaminated prokaryotic genomes using 16S RNA gene sequences. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2017; 67:2053–2057 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Yoon S-H, Ha S-M, Kwon S, Lim J, Kim Y et al. Introducing EzBioCloud: a taxonomically united database of 16S rRNA gene sequences and whole-genome assemblies. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2017; 67:1613–1617 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Meier-Kolthoff JP, Carbasse JS, Peinado-Olarte RL, Göker M. TYGS and LPSN: a database tandem for fast and reliable genome-based classification and nomenclature of prokaryotes. Nucleic Acids Res 2022; 50:D801–D807 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Meier-Kolthoff JP, Göker M. TYGS is an automated high-throughput platform for state-of-the-art genome-based taxonomy. Nat Commun 2019; 10:2182 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Meier-Kolthoff JP, Auch AF, Klenk H-P, Göker M. Genome sequence-based species delimitation with confidence intervals and improved distance functions. BMC Bioinf 2013; 14:1–14 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Lefort V, Desper R, Gascuel O. FastME 2.0: a comprehensive, accurate, and fast distance-based phylogeny inference program. Mol Biol Evol 2015; 32:2798–2800 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Farris JS. Estimating phylogenetic trees from distance matrices. Am Nat 1972; 106:645–668 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Kreft L, Botzki A, Coppens F, Vandepoele K, Van Bel M. PhyD3: a phylogenetic tree viewer with extended phyloXML support for functional genomics data visualization. Bioinformatics 2017; 33:2946–2947 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Richter M, Rosselló-Móra R, Oliver Glöckner F, Peplies J. JSpeciesWS: a web server for prokaryotic species circumscription based on pairwise genome comparison. Bioinformatics 2016; 32:929–931 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Hyatt D, Chen G-L, Locascio PF, Land ML, Larimer FW et al. Prodigal: prokaryotic gene recognition and translation initiation site identification. BMC Bioinf 2010; 11:1–11 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Lagesen K, Hallin P, Rødland EA, Staerfeldt H-H, Rognes T et al. RNAmmer: consistent and rapid annotation of ribosomal RNA genes. Nucleic Acids Res 2007; 35:3100–3108 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Shaffer M, Borton MA, McGivern BB, Zayed AA, La Rosa SL et al. DRAM for distilling microbial metabolism to automate the curation of microbiome function. Nucleic Acids Res 2020; 48:8883–8900 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Kanehisa M, Goto S. KEGG: kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes. Nucleic Acids Res 2000; 28:27–30 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Suzek BE, Huang H, McGarvey P, Mazumder R, Wu CH. UniRef: comprehensive and non-redundant UniProt reference clusters. Bioinformatics 2007; 23:1282–1288 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Mistry J, Chuguransky S, Williams L, Qureshi M, Salazar GA et al. Pfam: the protein families database in 2021. Nucleic Acids Res 2021; 49:D412–D419 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Yin Y, Mao X, Yang J, Chen X, Mao F et al. dbCAN: a web resource for automated carbohydrate-active enzyme annotation. Nucleic Acids Res 2012; 40:W445–51 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Rawlings ND, Barrett AJ, Bateman A. MEROPS: the peptidase database. Nucleic Acids Res 2010; 38:D227–33 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Lyimo TJ, Pol A, Jetten MSM, den Camp HJMO. Diversity of methanogenic archaea in a mangrove sediment and isolation of a new Methanococcoides strain. FEMS Microbiol Lett 2009; 291:247–253 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Riesco R, Trujillo ME. Update on the proposed minimal standards for the use of genome data for the taxonomy of prokaryotes. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2024; 74:006300 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Guan Y, Ngugi DK, Blom J, Ali S, Ferry JG et al. Draft genome sequence of an obligately methylotrophic methanogen, Methanococcoides methylutens, isolated from marine sediment. Genome Announc 2014; 2:e01184-14 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Webster G, Mullins AJ, Watkins AJ, Cunningham-Oakes E, Weightman AJ et al. Genome sequences of two choline-utilizing methanogenic archaea, Methanococcoides spp., isolated from marine sediments. Microbiol Resour Announc 2019; 8:e00342-19 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Li L, Zhang W, Zhang S, Song L, Sun Q et al. Bacteria and archaea synergistically convert glycine betaine to biogenic methane in the Formosa cold seep of the South China Sea. mSystems 2021; 6:e0070321 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  52. L’Haridon S, Toffin L, Roussel E, Whitman WB. Methanococcoides. In Bergey’s Manual of Systematics of Archaea and Bacteria 2020 pp 1–9 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.006685
Loading
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.006685
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplements

Supplementary material 1

PDF
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error