Skip to content
1887

Abstract

, a genus of yeasts in which many species reproduce sexually, has attracted the attention of researchers because of its prevalence in diverse ecological niches. Building on our extensive collection efforts since 2020, three previously unknown yeast strains from wild species trapped in ripe bananas in Okinawa, Japan, were isolated. Using a multifaceted approach, including physiological assessments and sequence analysis of the D1/D2 domain of the 26S LSU rRNA gene and the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region, it was revealed that these strains are novel members of the genus . The three strains, JCM 36741, JCM 36742 and JCM 36748, had identical sequences in their respective D1/D2 and ITS regions, justifying their classification as a single species. Moreover, the new species exhibited a remarkable degree of sequence divergence from its closest relatives, differing by 7 nucleotide substitutions (1.28%) in the D1/D2 domain, 29 nucleotide substitutions and 4 gaps (4.08%) in the ITS regions. These substantial sequence differences highlight the distinctiveness of this novel species in the genus . Further analysis revealed physiological characteristics that distinguished the new species from its closest relative, (nom. inval.). These findings culminated in the proposed name sp. nov., which recognizes the unique ecological niche within the microbiota. By uncovering this novel species, this study not only adds to the growing body of knowledge on yeast diversity but also sheds light on the intricate ecological relationships that shape microbial communities. The implications of this discovery extend beyond taxonomic boundaries, inviting further exploration of the evolutionary dynamics and ecological significance of yeast–fly interactions. We propose accommodating sp. nov. in the genus with JCM 36741 as the holotype. The MycoBank accession number is MB 853822.

Funding
This study was supported by the:
  • Institute for Fermentation, Osaka (IFO) (Award G-2023-1-026)
    • Principal Award Recipient: TaisukeSeike
  • JST, GteX Program (Award JPMJGX23B4)
    • Principal Award Recipient: TaisukeSeike
  • JST, ACT-X (Award JPMJAX21B9)
    • Principal Award Recipient: TaisukeSeike
  • Japan Society for the Promotion of Science KAKENHI (Award 21K05342)
    • Principal Award Recipient: TaisukeSeike
  • This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.006661
2025-02-04
2025-11-10

Metrics

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/ijsem/75/2/ijsem006661.html?itemId=/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.006661&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Čadež N, Smith M. Hanseniaspora zikes. In Fell JW, Boekhout T, Kurtzman CP. eds The Yeasts, A Taxonomic Study, 5th ed vol 2 Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2011 pp 421–434 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Tsuchiya T, Kawakita S, Imai M, Miyagawa K. Serological classification of the genera Kloeckera and Hanseniaspora. Jpn J Exp Med 1966; 36:555–562 [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Tsuchiya T, Imai M. Serological relationships among various yeast species of Hansenula, Kloeckera and Hanseniaspora. In Taxonomy of Microorganisms, Proc. 10th I.A.M. Symposium on Microbiology 1968 pp 147–158
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Čadež N, Bellora N, Ulloa R, Hittinger CT, Libkind D. Genomic content of a novel yeast species Hanseniaspora gamundiae sp. nov. from fungal stromata (Cyttaria) associated with a unique fermented beverage in Andean Patagonia, Argentina. PLoS One 2019; 14:e0210792 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Jindamorakot S, Ninomiya S, Limtong S, Yongmanitchai W, Tuntirungkij M et al. Three new species of bipolar budding yeasts of the genus Hanseniaspora and its anamorph Kloeckera isolated in Thailand. FEMS Yeast Res 2009; 9:1327–1337 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Chang CF, Huang LY, Chen SF, Lee CF. Kloeckera taiwanica sp. nov., an ascomycetous apiculate yeast species isolated from mushroom fruiting bodies. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2012; 62:1434–1437 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Čadež N, Pagnocca FC, Raspor P, Rosa CA. Hanseniaspora nectarophila sp. nov., a yeast species isolated from ephemeral flowers. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2014; 64:2364–2369 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Ouoba LII, Nielsen DS, Anyogu A, Kando C, Diawara B et al. Hanseniaspora jakobsenii sp. nov., a yeast isolated from Bandji, a traditional palm wine of Borassus akeassii. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2015; 65:3576–3579 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Groenewald M, Lombard L, de Vries M, Lopez AG, Smith M et al. Diversity of yeast species from Dutch garden soil and the description of six novel Ascomycetes. FEMS Yeast Res 2018; 18: [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Liu Z, Wang MM, Wang GS, Li AH. Hanseniaspora terricola sp. nov., an ascomycetous yeast isolated from tibet. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2021; 71:4741
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Čadež N, Bellora N, Ulloa R, Tome M, Petković H et al. Hanseniaspora smithiae sp. nov., a novel apiculate yeast species from Patagonian forests that lacks the typical genomic domestication signatures for fermentative environments. Front Microbiol 2021; 12:679894 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Chen X, Qiao YZ, Hui FL. Hanseniaspora menglaensis f.a., sp. nov., a novel apiculate yeast species isolated from rotting wood. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2023; 73:005970 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Saubin M, Devillers H, Proust L, Brier C, Grondin C et al. Investigation of genetic relationships between Hanseniaspora species found in grape musts revealed interspecific hybrids with dynamic genome structures. Front Microbiol 2019; 10:2960 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Martin V, Valera MJ, Medina K, Boido E, Carrau F. Oenological impact of the Hanseniaspora/Kloeckera yeast genus on wines—a review. Fermentation 2018; 4:76 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Hoang D, Kopp A, Chandler JA. Interactions between Drosophila and its natural yeast symbionts-Is Saccharomyces cerevisiae a good model for studying the fly-yeast relationship?. PeerJ 2015; 3:e1116 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Chandler JA, Eisen JA, Kopp A. Yeast communities of diverse Drosophila species: comparison of two symbiont groups in the same hosts. Appl Environ Microbiol 2012; 78:7327–7336 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Jones R, Fountain MT, Günther CS, Eady PE, Goddard MR. Separate and combined Hanseniaspora uvarum and Metschnikowia pulcherrima metabolic volatiles are attractive to Drosophila suzukii in the laboratory and field. Sci Rep 2021; 11:1201 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Kurtzman CP, Robnett CJ. Identification and phylogeny of ascomycetous yeasts from analysis of nuclear large subunit (26S) ribosomal DNA partial sequences. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 1998; 73:331–371 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  19. White TJ, Bruns T, Lee S, Taylor J. Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In Innis MA, Gelfand DH, JJ S, White JW. eds PCR Protocols. A Guide to Methods And Applications New York, NY: Academic press; 1990 pp 315–322
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Edgar RC. MUSCLE: a multiple sequence alignment method with reduced time and space complexity. BMC Bioinformatics 2004; 5:1–19 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Kumar S, Stecher G, Li M, Knyaz C, Tamura K. MEGA X: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis across Computing Platforms. Mol Biol Evol 2018; 35:1547–1549 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Felsenstein J. Confidence limits on phylogenies: An approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 1985; 39:783–791 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Libkind D, Čadež N, Opulente DA, Langdon QK, Rosa CA et al. Towards yeast taxogenomics: lessons from novel species descriptions based on complete genome sequences. FEMS Yeast Res 2020; 20:foaa042 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Lee I, Ouk Kim Y, Park S-C, Chun J. OrthoANI: an improved algorithm and software for calculating average nucleotide identity. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2016; 66:1100–1103 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Kurtzman CP, Fell JW, Boekhout T, Robert V. Methods for the isolation, phenotypic characterization and maintenance of yeasts. In Kurtzman CP, Fell JW, Boekhout T. eds The Yeasts: A Taxonomic Study, 5th ed vol 1 Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier; 2011 pp 87–110
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Morais PB, Martins MB, Klaczko LB, Mendon a-Hagler LC, Hagler AN. Yeast succession in the Amazon fruit Parahancornia amapa as resource partitioning among Drosophila spp. Appl Environ Microbiol 1995; 61:4251–4257 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  27. da Cunha AB, Shehata AME-T, de Oliveira W. A study of the diets and nutritional preferences of tropical species of Drosophila. Ecology 1957; 38:98–106 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Čadež N, Poot GA, Raspor P, Smith MT. Hanseniaspora meyeri sp. nov., Hanseniaspora clermontiae sp. nov., Hanseniaspora lachancei sp. nov. and Hanseniaspora opuntiae sp. nov., novel apiculate yeast species. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2003; 53:167–180 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Seike T, Takekata H, Uchida Y, Sakata N, Furusawa C et al. Wickerhamiella bidentis sp. nov., a novel yeast species isolated from flowers and insects in Japan. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2023; 73:005739 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Palanca L, Gaskett AC, Günther CS, Newcomb RD, Goddard MR. Quantifying variation in the ability of yeasts to attract Drosophila melanogaster. PLoS One 2013; 8:e75332 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Seike T, Sakata N, Matsuda F, Furusawa C. Elevated sporulation efficiency in fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces japonicus strains isolated from Drosophila. J Fungi 2021; 7:350 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Coluccio AE, Rodriguez RK, Kernan MJ, Neiman AM. The yeast spore wall enables spores to survive passage through the digestive tract of Drosophila. PLoS One 2008; 3:e2873 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.006661
Loading
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.006661
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplements

Supplementary material 1

PDF
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error