Skip to content
1887

Abstract

A novel mesophilic, hydrogenotrophic methanogen, strain CWC-01, was isolated from the sediment sample of the piston core collected at station 3 at Good Weather Ridge area offshore southwestern Taiwan from ORI-902A cruise in 2009. Cells of strain CWC-01 are rod-shaped, measuring 0.4–0.5 µm in width and 1.0–2.0 µm in length. Strain CWC-01 utilizes formate and H/CO to produce methane, but not secondary alcohol, methanol, ethanol, methylamines or acetate as catabolic substrates. The optimal growth conditions are 37 °C, 0.043 M NaCl and pH 6.3. Growth effectors tests indicate tryptone, but not acetate and yeast extract, could stimulate the growth of strain CWC-01. Phylogenetic analysis of 16S rRNA gene reveals that strain CWC-01 is most closely related to Mic5c12, with 96.63% identity. Genome size of strain CWC-01 is 1.98 Mb and it is the smallest genome size of genus. The genomic DNA G+C content obtained from the genome sequence of strain CWC-01 is 44.15 mol%. Based on these phenotypic, phylogenetic and genomic analyses, we propose that strain CWC-01 represents a novel species in genus , for which the name sp. nov. is proposed. The type strain is CWC-01 (=BCRC AR10053=NBRC 113991).

Funding
This study was supported by the:
  • Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province (Award 2022H6035)
    • Principal Award Recipient: WangchuanXiao
  • Sanming University (Award 22YG13)
    • Principal Award Recipient: Chih-HungWu
  • Sanming University (Award 20YG09)
    • Principal Award Recipient: Sheng-ChungChen
  • Sanming University (Award 20YG04)
    • Principal Award Recipient: JingjingZhao
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (Award 32101406)
    • Principal Award Recipient: YinLi
  • Department of Education, Fujian Province (Award JAT200646/B202037)
    • Principal Award Recipient: Chih-HungWu
  • Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University (Award KC180079)
    • Principal Award Recipient: Chih-HungWu
  • Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province (Award 2021J011119, 2023J011018)
    • Principal Award Recipient: Chih-HungWu
  • National Science and Technology Council (Award NSTC 113-2320-B-039-016)
    • Principal Award Recipient: Shu-JungLai
  • Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan (Award MOST110-2320-B-039-058)
    • Principal Award Recipient: Shu-JungLai
  • Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan (Award MOST103/104/105/106/107-3113-M-005-001)
    • Principal Award Recipient: Mei-ChinLai
  • China Medical University, Taiwan (Award CMU110-N-31 and CMU113-MF-99)
    • Principal Award Recipient: Shu-JungLai
  • Central Geological Survey, Ministry of Economic Affairs (Award 99-5226904000-04-03)
    • Principal Award Recipient: Mei-ChinLai
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.006658
2025-02-11
2025-12-09

Metrics

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Kvenvolden KA. Gas hydrates—geological perspective and global change. Rev Geophys 1993; 31:173–187 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Milkov AV. Global estimates of hydrate-bound gas in marine sediments: how much is really out there?. Earth-Sci Rev 2004; 66:183–197 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Lin AT, Liu C-S, Lin C-C, Schnurle P, Chen G-Y et al. Tectonic features associated with the overriding of an accretionary wedge on top of a rifted continental margin: an example from Taiwan. Mar Geol 2008; 255:186–203 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Lin C-C, Tien-Shun Lin A, Liu C-S, Chen G-Y, Liao W-Z et al. Geological controls on BSR occurrences in the incipient arc-continent collision zone off southwest Taiwan. Mar Pet Geol 2009; 26:1118–1131 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Chi W-C, Reed DL, Liu C-S, Lundberg N. Distribution of the bottom-simulating reflector in the offshore Taiwan collision zone. Terr Atmos Ocean Sci 1998; 9:779 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Schnürle P, Liu C-S, Lin AT, Lin S. Structural controls on the formation of BSR over a diapiric anticline from a dense MCS survey offshore southwestern Taiwan. Mar Pet Geol 2011; 28:1932–1942 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Liu C-S, Schnurle P, Wang Y, Chung S-H, Chen S-C et al. Distribution and Characters of Gas Hydrate Offshore of Southwestern Taiwan. Terr Atmos Ocean Sci 2006; 17:615 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Chen S-C, Hsu S-K, Wang Y, Chung S-H, Chen P-C et al. Distribution and characters of the mud diapirs and mud volcanoes off southwest Taiwan. J Asian Earth Sci 2014; 92:201–214 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Lin S, Hsieh W-C, Lim YC, Yang TF, Liu C-S et al. Methane migration and its influence on sulfate reduction in the good weather ridge region, South China sea continental margin sediments. Terr Atmos Ocean Sci 2006; 17:883 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Chuang P-C, Yang TF, Lin S, Lee H-F, Lan TF et al. Extremely High Methane Concentration in Bottom Water and Cored Sediments from Offshore Southwestern Taiwan. Terr Atmos Ocean Sci 2006; 17:903 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Yang TF, Chuang P-C, Lin S, Chen J-C, Wang Y et al. Methane venting in gas hydrate potential area offshore of SW Taiwan: evidence of gas analysis of water column samples. Terr Atmos Ocean Sci 2006; 17:933 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Chuang P, Dale AW, Wallmann K, Haeckel M, Yang TF et al. Relating sulfate and methane dynamics to geology: accretionary prism offshore SW Taiwan. Geochem Geophys Geosyst 2013; 14:2523–2545 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Chuang P ‐C., Yang TF, Hong W ‐L., Lin S, Sun C ‐H. et al. Estimation of methane flux offshore SW Taiwan and the influence of tectonics on gas hydrate accumulation. Geofluids 2010; 10:497–510 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Lim YC, Lin S, Yang TF, Chen Y-G, Liu C-S. Variations of methane induced pyrite formation in the accretionary wedge sediments offshore southwestern Taiwan. Mar Pet Geol 2011; 28:1829–1837 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Mikucki JA, Liu Y, Delwiche M, Colwell FS, Boone DR. Isolation of a methanogen from deep marine sediments that contain methane hydrates, and description of Methanoculleus submarinus sp. nov. Appl Environ Microbiol 2003; 69:3311–3316 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Kendall MM, Liu Y, Sieprawska-Lupa M, Stetter KO, Whitman WB et al. Methanococcus aeolicus sp. nov., a mesophilic, methanogenic archaeon from shallow and deep marine sediments. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2006; 56:1525–1529 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Dabir A, Honkalas V, Arora P, Pore S, Ranade DR et al. Draft genome sequence of Methanoculleus sp. MH98A, a novel methanogen isolated from sub-seafloor methane hydrate deposits in Krishna Godavari basin. Mar Genomics 2014; 18PB:139–140 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Katayama T, Yoshioka H, Kaneko M, Amo M, Fujii T et al. Cultivation and biogeochemical analyses reveal insights into methanogenesis in deep subseafloor sediment at a biogenic gas hydrate site. ISME J 2022; 16:1464–1472 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Imachi H, Aoi K, Tasumi E, Saito Y, Yamanaka Y et al. Cultivation of methanogenic community from subseafloor sediments using a continuous-flow bioreactor. ISME J 2011; 5:1913–1925 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Ijiri A, Inagaki F, Kubo Y, Adhikari RR, Hattori S et al. Deep-biosphere methane production stimulated by geofluids in the Nankai accretionary complex. Sci Adv 2018; 4:eaao4631 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Weng C-Y, Chen S-C, Lai M-C, Wu S-Y, Lin S et al. Methanoculleus taiwanensis sp. nov., a methanogen isolated from deep marine sediment at the deformation front area near Taiwan. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2015; 65:1044–1049 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Chen S-C, Chen M-F, Lai M-C, Weng C-Y, Wu S-Y et al. Methanoculleus sediminis sp. nov., a methanogen from sediments near a submarine mud volcano. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2015; 65:2141–2147 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Chien H-H, Lai M-C, Weng C-Y, Chen M-F, Wu S-Y et al. Methanovulcanius yangii gen. nov., sp. nov., a hydrogenotrophic methanogen, isolated from a submarine mud volcano in the offshore area of southwestern Taiwan. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2023; 73: [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Zhang W-L, Lai M-C, Lin S, Chen W-C, Deng Y-C et al. Methanooceanicella nereidis gen. nov., sp. nov., the first oceanic Methanocellaceae methanogen, isolated from potential methane hydrate bearing area offshore southwestern Taiwan. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2024; 74:006322 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Lai S-J, Lai M-C, Lin S, You Y-T, Wei W-H et al. Six novel species of the genus Methanoculleus isolated from various environments in Taiwan. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2024; 74:006477 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Sower K, Noll K. Techniques for anaerobic growth. In Robb FT, Sowers KR, Schreier HJ, DasSarma S, Fleischmann EM. eds Archaea: A Laboratory Manual. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press Plainview, NY: A Laboratory Manual. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; 1995 pp 15–47
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Balch WE, Fox GE, Magrum LJ, Woese CR, Wolfe RS. Methanogens: reevaluation of a unique biological group. Microbiol Rev 1979; 43:260–296 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Miller TL, Wolin MJ. A serum bottle modification of the Hungate technique for cultivating obligate anaerobes. Appl Microbiol 1974; 27:985–987 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Hungate R. Chapter IV A roll tube method for cultivation of strict anaerobes. In Methods in Microbiology Elsevier; 1969 pp 117–132
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Wolin E, Wolin MJ, Wolfe R. Formation of methane by bacterial extracts. J Biol Chem 1963; 238:2882–2886 [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Ferguson TJ, Mah RA. Isolation and characterization of an H2-oxidizing thermophilic methanogen. Appl Environ Microbiol 1983; 45:265–274 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  32. DeLong EF. Archaea in coastal marine environments. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1992; 89:5685–5689 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Utsumi M, Belova SE, King GM, Uchiyama H. Phylogenetic comparison of methanogen diversity in different wetland soils. J Gen Appl Microbiol 2003; 49:75–83 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Gray JP, Herwig RP. Phylogenetic analysis of the bacterial communities in marine sediments. Appl Environ Microbiol 1996; 62:4049–4059 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Turner S, Pryer KM, Miao VP, Palmer JD. Investigating deep phylogenetic relationships among cyanobacteria and plastids by small subunit rRNA sequence analysis. J Eukaryot Microbiol 1999; 46:327–338 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Lai M-C, Shih C-J. Characterization of Methanococcus voltaei strain P2F9701a: a new methanogen isolated from estuarine environment. Curr Microbiol 2001; 42:432–437 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Lai M-C, Chen S-C. Methanofollis aquaemaris sp. nov., a methanogen isolated from an aquaculture fish pond. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2001; 51:1873–1880 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Wu S-Y, Lai M-C. Methanogenic archaea isolated from Taiwan’s Chelungpu fault. Appl Environ Microbiol 2011; 77:830–838 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Jarrell KF, Faguy D, Hebert AM, Kalmokoff ML. A general method of isolating high molecular weight DNA from methanogenic archaea (archaebacteria). Can J Microbiol 1992; 38:65–68 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Mukherjee S, Stamatis D, Bertsch J, Ovchinnikova G, Sundaramurthi JC et al. Genomes OnLine Database (GOLD) v.8: overview and updates. Nucleic Acids Res 2021; 49:D723–D733 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Markowitz VM, Chen I-MA, Palaniappan K, Chu K, Szeto E et al. IMG 4 version of the integrated microbial genomes comparative analysis system. Nucleic Acids Res 2014; 42:D560–7 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Chen I-MA, Markowitz VM, Chu K, Palaniappan K, Szeto E et al. IMG/M: integrated genome and metagenome comparative data analysis system. Nucleic Acids Res 2017; 45:D507–D516 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Chen I-MA, Chu K, Palaniappan K, Pillay M, Ratner A et al. IMG/M v.5.0: an integrated data management and comparative analysis system for microbial genomes and microbiomes. Nucleic Acids Res 2019; 47:D666–D677 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Kumar S, Stecher G, Li M, Knyaz C, Tamura K. MEGA X: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis across computing platforms. Mol Biol Evol 2018; 35:1547–1549 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ. Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol 1990; 215:403–410 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Mori K, Harayama S. Methanobacterium petrolearium sp. nov. and Methanobacterium ferruginis sp. nov., mesophilic methanogens isolated from salty environments. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2011; 61:138–143 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Kitamura K, Fujita T, Akada S, Tonouchi A. Methanobacterium kanagiense sp. nov., a hydrogenotrophic methanogen, isolated from rice-field soil. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2011; 61:1246–1252 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Ma K, Liu X, Dong X. Methanobacterium beijingense sp. nov., a novel methanogen isolated from anaerobic digesters. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2005; 55:325–329 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Chen S-C, Lai S-J, You Y-T, Shih C-J, Wu Y-C et al. Complete genome sequence of Methanofollis aquaemaris BCRC 16166T, isolated from a marine aquaculture fishpond. Microbiol Resour Announc 2022; 11:e0074322 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Chen S-C, Lai S-J, You Y-T, Shih C-J, Wu Y-C et al. Draft genomes of Methanocalculus taiwanensis P2F9704aT and Methanocalculus chunghsingensis K1F9705bT, hydrogenotrophic methanogens belonging to the Methanocalculaceae. Microbiol Resour Announc 2022; 11:e0079222 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Bolger AM, Lohse M, Usadel B. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics 2014; 30:2114–2120
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Bankevich A, Nurk S, Antipov D, Gurevich AA, Dvorkin M et al. SPAdes: a new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J Comput Biol 2012; 19:455–477
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Gurevich A, Saveliev V, Vyahhi N, Tesler G. QUAST: quality assessment tool for genome assemblies. Bioinformatics 2013; 29:1072–1075
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Tatusova T, DiCuccio M, Badretdin A, Chetvernin V, Nawrocki EP et al. NCBI prokaryotic genome annotation pipeline. Nucleic Acids Res 2016; 44:6614–6624 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Haft DH, DiCuccio M, Badretdin A, Brover V, Chetvernin V et al. RefSeq: an update on prokaryotic genome annotation and curation. Nucleic Acids Res 2018; 46:D851–D860
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Yoon S-H, S-m H, Lim J, Kwon S, Chun J. A large-scale evaluation of algorithms to calculate average nucleotide identity. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 2017; 110:1281–1286
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Meier-Kolthoff JP, Auch AF, Klenk H-P, Göker M. Genome sequence-based species delimitation with confidence intervals and improved distance functions. BMC Bioinf 2013; 14:1–14
    [Google Scholar]
  58. Meier-Kolthoff JP, Göker M. TYGS is an automated high-throughput platform for state-of-the-art genome-based taxonomy. Nat Commun 2019; 10:2182
    [Google Scholar]
  59. Lefort V, Desper R, Gascuel O. FastME 2.0: a comprehensive, accurate, and fast distance-based phylogeny inference program. Mol Biol Evol 2015; 32:2798–2800
    [Google Scholar]
  60. Farris JS. Estimating phylogenetic trees from distance matrices. Am Nat 1972; 106:645–668 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  61. Boone DR. Methanobacterium. In Bergey’s Manual of Systematics of Archaea and Bacteria pp 1–8
    [Google Scholar]
  62. Goris J, Konstantinidis KT, Klappenbach JA, Coenye T, Vandamme P et al. DNA-DNA hybridization values and their relationship to whole-genome sequence similarities. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2007; 57:81–91 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  63. Jain C, Rodriguez-R LM, Phillippy AM, Konstantinidis KT, Aluru S. High throughput ANI analysis of 90K prokaryotic genomes reveals clear species boundaries. Nat Commun 2018; 9:5114 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  64. Schirmack J, Mangelsdorf K, Ganzert L, Sand W, Hillebrand-Voiculescu A et al. Methanobacterium movilense sp. nov., a hydrogenotrophic, secondary-alcohol-utilizing methanogen from the anoxic sediment of a subsurface lake. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2014; 64:522–527 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  65. Borrel G, Joblin K, Guedon A, Colombet J, Tardy V et al. Methanobacterium lacus sp. nov., isolated from the profundal sediment of a freshwater meromictic lake. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2012; 62:1625–1629 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  66. Cadillo-Quiroz H, Bräuer SL, Goodson N, Yavitt JB, Zinder SH. Methanobacterium paludis sp. nov. and a novel strain of Methanobacterium lacus isolated from northern peatlands. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2014; 64:1473–1480 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  67. Kern T, Linge M, Rother M. Methanobacterium aggregans sp. nov., a hydrogenotrophic methanogenic archaeon isolated from an anaerobic digester. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2015; 65:1975–1980 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  68. Kotelnikova S, Macario AJL, Pedersen K. Methanobacterium subterraneum sp. nov., a new alkaliphilic, eurythermic and halotolerant methanogen isolated from deep granitic groundwater. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 1998; 48:357–367 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  69. Shlimon AG, Friedrich MW, Niemann H, Ramsing NB, Finster K. Methanobacterium aarhusense sp. nov., a novel methanogen isolated from a marine sediment (Aarhus Bay, Denmark). Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2004; 54:759–763 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  70. Joulian C, Patel BK, Ollivier B, Garcia JL, Roger PA. Methanobacterium oryzae sp. nov., a novel methanogenic rod isolated from a Philippines ricefield. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2000; 50 Pt 2:525–528 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  71. Cuzin N, Ouattara AS, Labat M, Garcia J-L. Methanobacterium congolense sp. nov., from a methanogenic fermentation of cassava peel. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2001; 51:489–493 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  72. Trubitsyn VE, Suzina NE, Rivkina EM, Shcherbakova VA. A new methanogenic, hydrogenotrophic archaeon from Spitsbergen permafrost. Microbiology 2023; 92:119–128 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  73. Zellner G, Bleicher K, Braun E, Kneifel H, Tindall BJ et al. Characterization of a new mesophilic, secondary alcohol-utilizing methanogen, Methanobacterium palustre spec. nov. from a peat bog. Arch Microbiol 1988; 151:1–9 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  74. Krivushin KV, Shcherbakova VA, Petrovskaya LE, Rivkina EM. Methanobacterium veterum sp. nov., from ancient Siberian permafrost. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2010; 60:455–459 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  75. Bryant MP, Boone DR. Isolation and characterization of Methanobacterium formicicum MF. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 1987; 37:171 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  76. Boone DR. Request for an opinion: replacement of the type strain of Methanobacterium formicicum and reinstatement of Methanobacterium bryantii sp. nov. nom. rev.(ex Balch and Wolfe, 1981) with MoH (DSM 863) as the type strain. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 1981; 37:172–173 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  77. König H. Isolation and characterization of Methanobacterium uliginosum sp. nov. from a marshy soil. Can J Microbiol 1984; 30:1477–1481 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  78. Shcherbakova V, Rivkina E, Pecheritsyna S, Laurinavichius K, Suzina N et al. Methanobacterium arcticum sp. nov., a methanogenic archaeon from Holocene Arctic permafrost. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2011; 61:144–147 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  79. Belyaev S, Obraztsova AY, Laurinavichus K, Bezrukova L. Characteristics of rod-shaped methane-producing bacteria from an oil pool and description of Methanobacterium ivanovii sp. nov. Microbiol 1986; 55:821–826
    [Google Scholar]
  80. Patel GB, Sprott GD, Fein JE. Isolation and characterization of Methanobacterium espanolae sp. nov., a mesophilic, moderately acidiphilic methanogen. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 1990; 40:12–18 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  81. Mei N, Postec A, Bartoli M, Vandecasteele C, Wils L et al. Methanobacterium alkalithermotolerans sp. nov., a novel alkaliphilic and hydrogen-utilizing methanogen isolated from an alkaline geothermal spring (La Crouen, New Caledonia). Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2022; 72: [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  82. Worakit S, Boone DR, Mah RA, Abdel-samie M-E, El-halwagi MM. Methanobacterium alcaliphilum sp. nov., an H2-utilizing methanogen that grows at high ph values. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 1986; 36:380–382 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  83. Zhu J, Liu X, Dong X. Methanobacterium movens sp. nov. and Methanobacterium flexile sp. nov., isolated from lake sediment. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2011; 61:2974–2978 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  84. Blotevogel K-H, Fischer U. Isolation and characterization of a new thermophilic and autotrophic methane producing bacterium: Methanobacterium thermoaggregans spec. nov. Arch Microbiol 1985; 142:218–222 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.006658
Loading
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.006658
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplements

Supplementary material 1

PDF
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error