Skip to content
1887

Abstract

A polyphasic taxonomic study was carried out on strain T9W2-O, isolated from the roots of the aquatic plant . This isolate is rod-shaped, forms yellow/orange pigmented colonies and produces the pigment flexirubin. Nearly complete 16S rRNA gene sequence homology related the strain to , with 98.8 and 98.5% similarity to and , respectively. Average nucleotide identity and digital DNA–DNA hybridization with the closest phylogenetic neighbour of T9W2-O showed differences at the species level, further confirmed by differences in several physiological characteristics. The main fatty acids are iso C, iso C, iso C 3-OH and summed feature 4 (iso-C 2-OH and/or C). DNA G+C content is 37.2 mol%. MK-6 is the only menaquinone found, and phosphatidylethanolamine is the dominant polar lipid. Based on the results obtained, this bacterium is assigned to the genus as a new species with the name sp. nov., type strain T9W2-O (=NRRL B-65715 =DSM 118061).

Funding
This study was supported by the:
  • Department of Biology, Slippery Rock University
    • Principal Award Recipient: MaltmanChris
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.006644
2025-01-15
2025-12-13

Metrics

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Vandamme P, Bernardet JF, Segers P, Kersters K, Holmes B. NOTES: new perspectives in the classification of the flavobacteria: description of Chryseobacterium gen. nov., Bergeyella gen. nov., and Empedobacter nom. rev. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 1994; 44:827–831 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Parte AC, Sardà Carbasse J, Meier-Kolthoff JP, Reimer LC, Göker M. List of Prokaryotic Names with Standing in Nomenclature (LPSN) moves to the DSMZ. Int J Syst Bacteriol 2020; 70:5607–5612 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Mwanza EP, Hugo A, Charimba G, Hugo CJ. Pathogenic potential and control of Chryseobacterium species from clinical, fish, food and environmental sources. Microorganisms 2022; 10:895 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Zhang L, Wang Y, Kong D, Ma Q, Li Y et al. Chryseobacterium herbae isolated from the rhizospheric soil of Pyrola calliantha H. Andres in Segrila mountain on the Tibetan plateau. Microorganisms 2023; 11:2017 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Shin D-S, Park MS, Jung S, Lee MS, Lee KH et al. Plant growth-promoting potential of endophytic bacteria isolated from roots of coastal sand dune plants. J Microbiol Biotechnol 2007; 17:1361–1368 [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Strahan BL, Failor KC, Batties AM, Hayes PS, Cicconi KM et al. Chryseobacterium piperi sp. nov., isolated from a freshwater creek. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2011; 61:2162–2166 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Radzki W, Gutierrez Mañero FJ, Algar E, Lucas García JA, García-Villaraco A et al. Bacterial siderophores efficiently provide iron to iron-starved tomato plants in hydroponics culture. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 2013; 104:321–330 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Singh AV, Chandra R, Goel R. Phosphate solubilization by Chryseobacterium sp. and their combined effect with N and P fertilizers on plant growth promotion. Archiv Agron Soil Sci 2013; 59:641–651 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Chhetri G, Kim I, Kim J, So Y, Seo T. Chryseobacterium tagetis sp. nov., a plant growth promoting bacterium with an antimicrobial activity isolated from the roots of medicinal plant (Tagetes patula). J Antibiot 2022; 75:312–320 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Rehm K, Vollenweider V, Gu S, Friman V-P, Kümmerli R et al. Chryseochelins-structural characterization of novel citrate-based siderophores produced by plant protecting Chryseobacterium spp. Metallomics 2023; 15:mfad008 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Kutsuna R, Mashima I, Miyoshi-Akiyama T, Muramatsu Y, Tomida J et al. Chryseobacterium lecithinasegens sp. nov., a siderophore-producing bacterium isolated from soil at the bottom of a pond. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2021; 71:005135 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Jung H, Lee D, Lee S, Kong HJ, Park J et al. Comparative genomic analysis of Chryseobacterium species: deep insights into plant-growth-promoting and halotolerant capacities. Microb Genom 2023; 9:001108 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Kumar V, Patial V, Thakur V, Singh R, Singh D. Genomics assisted characterization of plant growth-promoting and metabolite producing psychrotolerant Himalayan Chryseobacterium cucumeris PCH239. Arch Microbiol 2023; 205:108 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Montero-Calasanz MDC, Göker M, Rohde M, Spröer C, Schumann P et al. Chryseobacterium hispalense sp. nov., a plant-growth-promoting bacterium isolated from a rainwater pond in an olive plant nursery, and emended descriptions of Chryseobacterium defluvii, Chryseobacterium indologenes, Chryseobacterium wanjuense and Chryseobacterium gregarium. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2013; 63:4386–4395 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Montero-Calasanz M del C, Göker M, Rohde M, Spröer C, Schumann P et al. Chryseobacterium oleae sp. nov., an efficient plant growth promoting bacterium in the rooting induction of olive tree (Olea europaea L.) cuttings and emended descriptions of the genus Chryseobacterium, C. daecheongense, C. gambrini, C. gleum, C. joostei, C. jejuense, C. luteum, C. shigense, C. taiwanense, C. ureilyticum and C. vrystaatense. Syst Appl Microbiol 2014; 37:342–350 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Jeong J-J, Sang MK, Lee DW, Choi I-G, Kim KD. Chryseobacterium phosphatilyticum sp. nov., a phosphate-solubilizing endophyte isolated from cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) root. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2019; 69:610–615 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Kim H, Yu SM. Chryseobacterium salivictor sp. nov., a plant-growth-promoting bacterium isolated from freshwater. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 2020; 113:989–995 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Lee S, Kim S, Sang M, Song J, Weon H-Y. Complete genome sequence of Chryseobacterium sp. T16E-39, a plant-growth-promoting and biocontrol bacterium, isolated from tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) root. Korean J Microbiol 2017; 53:351–353
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Pahari A, Pradhan A, Nayak S, Mishra B. Bacterial siderophore as a plant growth promoter. In Patra J, Vishnuprasad C, Das G. eds Microbial Biotechnology Singapore: Springer; 2017 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Kook M, Son H-M, Ngo HTT, Yi T-H. Chryseobacterium camelliae sp. nov., isolated from green tea. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2014; 64:851–857 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Chaudhary DK, Dahal RH, Kim D-U, Kim J. Chryseobacterium cheonjiense sp. nov., isolated from forest soil. Arch Microbiol 2021; 203:725–731 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Chaudhary DK, Kim J. Chryseobacterium nepalense sp. nov., isolated from oil-contaminated soil. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2017; 67:646–652 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Xu L, Huo Y-Y, Li Z-Y, Wang C-S, Oren A et al. Chryseobacterium profundimaris sp. nov., a new member of the family Flavobacteriaceae isolated from deep-sea sediment. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 2015; 107:979–989 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Park M, Jung S, Lee K, Lee M-S, Do J et al. Chryseobacterium soldanellicola sp. nov. and Chryseobacterium taeanense sp. nov., isolated from roots of sand-dune plants. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2006; 56:433–438 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Zhao R, Chen XY, Li XD, Chen ZL, Li YH. Chryseobacterium takakiae sp. nov., a member of the phylum Bacteroidetes isolated from Takakia lepidozioides. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2015; 65:71–76 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Jordan EO, Caldwell ME, Reiter D. Bacterial motility. J Bacteriol 1934; 27:165–174 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Bauer AW, Kirby WM, Sherris JC, Turck M. Antibiotic susceptibility testing by a standardized single disk method. Am J Clin Pathol 1966; 45:493–496 [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Holt JG, Krieg NR, Sneath PHA. Bergey’s Manual of Determinative Bacterology Baltimore, MD, USA: The Williams and Wilkins Co; 1994
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Bernardet J-F, Nakagawa Y, Holmes B. Proposed minimal standards for describing new taxa of the family Flavobacteriaceae and emended description of the family. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2002; 52:1049–1070 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Sasser M. Identification of bacteria by gas chromatography of cellular fatty acids. In MIDI Technical Note 101 Newark, DE: MIDI Inc; 1990
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Minnikin DE, O’Donnell AG, Goodfellow M, Alderson G, Athalye M et al. An integrated procedure for the extraction of bacterial isoprenoid quinones and polar lipids. J Microbiol Methods 1984; 2:233–241 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Chen WP, Kuo TT. A simple and rapid method for the preparation of gram-negative bacterial genomic DNA. Nucleic Acids Res 1993; 21:2260 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Tamura K, Stecher G, Kumar S. MEGA11: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 11. Mol Biol Evol 2021; 38:3022–3027 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Yoon SH, Ha SM, Lim JM, Kwon SJ, Chun J. A large-scale evaluation of algorithms to calculate average nucleotide identity. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 2017; 110:1281–1286 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Meier-Kolthoff JP, Carbasse JS, Peinado-Olarte RL, Göker M. TYGS and LPSN: a database tandem for fast and reliable genome-based classification and nomenclature of prokaryotes. Nucleic Acids Res 2022; 50:D801–D807 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Meier-Kolthoff JP, Göker M. TYGS is an automated high-throughput platform for state-of-the-art genome-based taxonomy. Nat Commun 2019; 10:1–10 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Lefort V, Desper R, Gascuel O. FastME 2.0: a comprehensive, accurate, and fast distance-based phylogeny inference program. Mol Biol Evol 2015; 32:2798–2800 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Farris JS. Estimating phylogenetic trees from distance matrices. Am Nat 1972; 106:645–668 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Kreft L, Botzki A, Coppens F, Vandepoele K, Van Bel M. PhyD3: a phylogenetic tree viewer with extended phyloXML support for functional genomics data visualization. Bioinformatics 2017; 33:2946–2947 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Grimm D, Guy N, Lengyel G, Franks J, Maltman C. Gordonia metallireducens sp. nov., a tellurite- and selenite-resistant bacterium isolated from the sediment of an acid mine drainage stream. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2023; 73: [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Hugo C, Bernardet J-F, Nicholson A, Kampfer P et al. Chryseobacterium. In Trujillo ME, Dedysh S, DeVos P, Hedlund B, Kämpfer P et al. eds Bergey’s Manual of Systematics of Archaea and Bacteria 2019
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Heidler von Heilborn D, Nover L-L, Weber M, Hölzl G, Gisch N et al. Polar lipid characterization and description of Chryseobacterium capnotolerans sp. nov., isolated from high CO2-containing atmosphere and emended descriptions of the genus Chryseobacterium, and the species C. balustinum, C. daecheongense, C. formosense, C. gleum, C. indologenes, C. joostei, C. scophthalmum and C. ureilyticum. International journal of systematic and evolutionary microbiology 2022; 72: [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Bernardet J-F, Hugo C, Bruun B. The genera Chryseobacterium and Elizabethkingia. In The Prokaryotes: A Handbook on the Biology of Bacteria vol 7 2006 pp 638–676
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Richter M, Rosselló-Móra R. Shifting the genomic gold standard for the prokaryotic species definition. Proc Natl Acad Sci 2009; 106:19126–19131 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.006644
Loading
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.006644
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplements

Supplementary material 1

PDF
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error