Skip to content
1887

Abstract

https://doi.org/10.1099/ijsem.0.006671

A crude oil aggregation-forming, strictly anaerobic, Gram-stain-positive, spore-forming, rod-shaped, motile and mesophilic bacterium, named strain SH18-2, was isolated from marine sediment near Sado Island in the Sea of Japan. The temperature, salinity and pH ranges of this strain for the growth were 15–40 °C (optimum 35 °C), 0.5–6.0% NaCl (w/v; optimum 2.0%) and pH 6.0–8.0 (optimum 7.5), respectively. A phylogenetic analysis of the 16S rRNA gene sequence showed that this strain belongs to the genus . It was most closely related to A-1 (97.02% homology). The draft genome size was 5616089 bp, with a G+C content of 29.7 mol%. The digital DNA–DNA hybridization values determined using the Genome-to-Genome Distance Calculator and the average nucleotide identity between this strain and A-1 were 20.30 and 78.24%, respectively. Whole-organism hydrolysates of strain SH18-2 contained diaminopimelic acid; the major fatty acid was C and the polar lipid pattern consisted of diphosphatidylglycerol, phosphatidylglycerol, glycolipid and three unidentified polar lipids. From the results of genotypic, phenotypic and chemotaxonomic analyses, SH18-2 (=NBRC 116030=DSM 115762) is the type strain and represents a novel species of the genus , and the name sp. nov. is proposed.

Funding
This study was supported by the:
  • ENEOS Corporation
    • Principal Award Recipient: TakeshiKobayashi
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.006641
2025-01-15
2026-02-15

Metrics

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. List of Prokaryotic Names with Standing in Nomenclature Genus Clostridium. n.d https://lpsn.dsmz.de/genus/clostridium accessed 8 March 2024
  2. Prazmowski A. Untersuchung Über Die Entwickelungsgeschichte Und Fermentwirking Einiger Bacterien-Arten Inaugural Dissertation Germany: Hugo Voigt Leipzig; 1880
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Collins MD, Lawson PA, Willems A, Cordoba JJ, Fernandez-Garayzabal J et al. The phylogeny of the genus Clostridium: proposal of five new genera and eleven new species combinations. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1994; 44:812–826 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Yutin N, Galperin MY. A genomic update on clostridial phylogeny: Gram-negative spore formers and other misplaced clostridia. Environ Microbiol 2013; 15:2631–2641 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Lawson PA, Rainey FA. Proposal to restrict the genus Clostridium Prazmowski to Clostridium butyricum and related species. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2016; 66:1009–1016 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Gupta RS, Gao B. Phylogenomic analyses of clostridia and identification of novel protein signatures that are specific to the genus Clostridium sensu stricto (cluster I). Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2009; 59:285–294 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Hirano S, Terahara T, Mori K, Hamada M, Matsumoto R et al. Vallitalea longa sp. nov., an anaerobic bacterium isolated from marine sediment. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2023; 73:005882 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Nguyen TTH, Zakem EJ, Ebrahimi A, Schwartzman J, Caglar T et al. Microbes contribute to setting the ocean carbon flux by altering the fate of sinking particulates. Nat Commun 2022; 13:1657 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  9. NITE Biological Resource Center, National Institute of Technology and Evaluation NBRC online catalog. n.d https://www.nite.go.jp/nbrc/catalogue/NBRCMediumDetailServlet?NO=911 accessed 20 May 2024
  10. Frank JA, Reich CI, Sharma S, Weisbaum JS, Wilson BA et al. Critical evaluation of two primers commonly used for amplification of bacterial 16S rRNA genes. Appl Environ Microbiol 2008; 74:2461–2470 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Phromraksa P, Nagano H, Boonmars T, Kamboonruang C. Identification of proteolytic bacteria from thai traditional fermented foods and their allergenic reducing potentials. J Food Sci 2008; 73:M189–M195 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Saitou N, Nei M. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 1987; 4:406–425 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Tamura K, Stecher G, Kumar S. MEGA11: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 11. Mol Biol Evol 2021; 38:3022–3027 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Chenna R, Sugawara H, Koike T, Lopez R, Gibson TJ et al. Multiple sequence alignment with the Clustal series of programs. Nucleic Acids Res 2003; 31:3497–3500 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Mountfort DO, Rainey FA, Burghardt J, Stackebrandt E. Clostridium grantii sp. nov., a new obligately anaerobic, alginolytic bacterium isolated from mullet gut. Arch Microbiol 1994; 162:173–179 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Kim S, Jeong H, Kim S, Chun J. Clostridium ganghwense sp. nov., isolated from tidal flat sediment. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2006; 56:691–693 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Kim S, Jeong H, Chun J. Clostridium aestuarii sp. nov., from tidal flat sediment. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2007; 57:1315–1317 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Aronoff DM. Clostridium novyi, sordellii, and tetani: mechanisms of disease. Anaerobe 2013; 24:98–101 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Zhu H, Fu B, Lu S, Liu H, Liu H. Clostridium bovifaecis sp. nov., a novel acetogenic bacterium isolated from cow manure. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2018; 68:2956–2959 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Chen S, Zhou Y, Chen Y, Gu J. fastp: an ultra-fast all-in-one FASTQ preprocessor. Bioinformatics 2018; 34:i884–i890 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Bolger AM, Lohse M, Usadel B. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics 2014; 30:2114–2120 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Bankevich A, Nurk S, Antipov D, Gurevich AA, Dvorkin M et al. SPAdes: a new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J Comput Biol 2012; 19:455–477 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Tanizawa Y, Fujisawa T, Kaminuma E, Nakamura Y, Arita M. DFAST and DAGA: web-based integrated genome annotation tools and resources. Biosci Microbiota Food Health 2016; 35:173–184 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Tanizawa Y, Fujisawa T, Nakamura Y. DFAST: a flexible prokaryotic genome annotation pipeline for faster genome publication. Bioinformatics 2018; 34:1037–1039 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Brettin T, Davis JJ, Disz T, Edwards RA, Gerdes S et al. RASTtk: a modular and extensible implementation of the RAST algorithm for building custom annotation pipelines and annotating batches of genomes. Sci Rep 2015; 5:8365 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Aziz RK, Bartels D, Best AA, DeJongh M, Disz T et al. The RAST server: rapid annotations using subsystems technology. BMC Genomics 2008; 9:1–15 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Overbeek R, Olson R, Pusch GD, Olsen GJ, Davis JJ et al. The SEED and the rapid annotation of microbial genomes using subsystems technology (RAST). Nucleic Acids Res 2014; 42:D206–D214 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Chaumeil PA, Mussig AJ, Hugenholtz P, Parks DH. GTDB-Tk v2: memory friendly classification with the genome taxonomy database. Bioinformatics 2022; 38:5315–5316 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Minh BQ, Schmidt HA, Chernomor O, Schrempf D, Woodhams MD et al. IQ-TREE 2: new models and efficient methods for phylogenetic inference in the genomic era. Mol Biol Evol 2020; 37:1530–1534 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Hyatt D, Chen G-L, Locascio PF, Land ML, Larimer FW et al. Prodigal: prokaryotic gene recognition and translation initiation site identification. BMC Bioinformatics 2010; 11:1–11 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Eddy SR. Accelerated Profile HMM Searches. PLoS Comput Biol 2011; 7:e1002195 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Wang HC, Minh BQ, Susko E, Roger AJ. Modeling site heterogeneity with posterior mean site frequency profiles accelerates accurate phylogenomic estimation. Syst Biol 2018; 67:216–235 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Hoang DT, Chernomor O, von Haeseler A, Minh BQ, Vinh LS. UFBoot2: improving the ultrafast bootstrap approximation. Mol Biol Evol 2018; 35:518–522 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Meier-Kolthoff JP, Carbasse JS, Peinado-Olarte RL, Göker M. TYGS and LPSN: a database tandem for fast and reliable genome-based classification and nomenclature of prokaryotes. Nucleic Acids Res 2022; 50:D801–D807 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Meier-Kolthoff JP, Auch AF, Klenk H-P, Göker M. Genome sequence-based species delimitation with confidence intervals and improved distance functions. BMC Bioinformatics 2013; 14:1–14 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Rodriguez-R LM, Konstantinidis KT. The enveomics collection: a toolbox for specialized analyses of microbial genomes and metagenomes. PeerJ Preprints 2016 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Goris J, Konstantinidis KT, Klappenbach JA, Coenye T, Vandamme P et al. DNA-DNA hybridization values and their relationship to whole-genome sequence similarities. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2007; 57:81–91 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Richter M, Rosselló-Móra R. Shifting the genomic gold standard for the prokaryotic species definition. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2009; 106:19126–19131 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Caro-Quintero A, Konstantinidis KT. Bacterial species may exist, metagenomics reveal. Environ Microbiol 2012; 14:347–355 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Goris J, Konstantinidis KT, Klappenbach JA, Coenye T, Vandamme P et al. DNA–DNA hybridization values and their relationship to whole-genome sequence similarities. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2007; 57:81–91 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Hamouda T, Shih AY, Baker JR. A rapid staining technique for the detection of the initiation of germination of bacterial spores. Lett Appl Microbiol 2002; 34:86–90 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Schouw A, Leiknes Eide T, Stokke R, Pedersen RB, Steen IH et al. Abyssivirga alkaniphila gen. nov., sp. nov., an alkane-degrading, anaerobic bacterium from a deep-sea hydrothermal vent system, and emended descriptions of Natranaerovirga pectinivora and Natranaerovirga hydrolytica. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2016; 66:1724–1734 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Microbe Division, Japan Collection of Microorganisms, RIKEN BioResource Medium data. n.d https://www.jcm.riken.jp/cgi-bin/jcm/jcm_grmd?GRMD=1217 accessed 24 August 2023
  44. Staneck JL, Roberts GD. Simplified approach to identification of aerobic actinomycetes by thin-layer chromatography. Appl Microbiol 1974; 28:226–231 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Sasser M. Technical Note #101 Identification of Bacteria by Gas Chromatography of Cellular Fatty Acids Newark. DE: MIDI Inc; 1990
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Minnikin DE, Collins MD, Goodfellow M. Fatty acid and polar lipid composition in the classification of Cellulomonas, Oerskovia related taxa. J Appl Bacteriol 1979; 47:87–95 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Dittmer JC, Lester RL. A simple, specific spray for the detection of phospholipids on thin-layer chromatograms. J Lipid Res 1964; 5:126–127 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.006641
Loading
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.006641
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplements

Supplementary material 1

PDF
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error