Skip to content
1887

Abstract

The genus comprises 13 species, the majority of which are plant colonizers. However, some species are occasionally isolated from environmental sources, including water and polluted soil, while others are opportunistic human pathogens. Four novel bacterial strains were isolated from diseased foliage of tomato and Boston fern in Florida, USA. Phylogenetic analysis based on the 16S rRNA gene sequence placed all strains into the genus . The Gram-negative strains produced opaque, creamy white, mucoid colonies, which is typical of the genus . Biolog biochemical profiling also identified those strains as members of . The strains were subjected to whole-genome sequencing, and their genomes were compared with those of reference strains of spp. using average nucleotide identity (ANI). The two strains isolated from Boston fern shared 99% pairwise ANI, as did the two strains isolated from tomato. Among all reference genomes tested, the novel strains shared the highest ANI to subsp. (G21-1742 and NC 40101, 96.76%; SE1, 97.23%; F1, 97.16%) and to subsp. . These values are above the established 95% threshold for species delineation based on ANI. As the ANI between members of the two currently described subspecies of , i.e. and , is also ~97%, it can be inferred that the two groups of novel strains described in this study should be considered as candidates for classification as two new subspecies of , given that the current subspecies also have ~97% with the fern and tomato strains. DNA–DNA hybridization results were consistent with those of ANI; comparison of G21-1742 and NC 40101 with subsp. IAM 15032and subsp. LMG 2199 produced DNA–DNA hybridization (DDH) values of 66.1 and 73.6 %, respectively. Similarly, SE1 and F1 had DDH values of 68.9 and 68.8% with subsp. IAM 15032 and 77.1 and 76.7% with subsp. LMG 2199, respectively. The genomes of all novel isolates carry genes involved in plant pathogenesis, including those of the type III secretion system, which are not present in other strains. Based on genomic and phenotypic data, we conclude that these strains represent the first phytopathogenic subspecies within and the names proposed are subsp. for the two strains isolated from (designated strain, G21−1742=LMG 33362=NCPPB 4765) and subsp. (designated strain, SE1=LMG 3361=NCPPB 4764) for the two strains isolated from .

  • This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License. This article was made open access via a Publish and Read agreement between the Microbiology Society and the corresponding author’s institution.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.006597
2024-12-13
2025-11-11

Metrics

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/ijsem/74/12/ijsem006597.html?itemId=/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.006597&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Baldani JI, Baldani VLD, Seldin L, Dobereiner J. Characterization of Herbaspirillum seropedicae gen. nov., sp. nov., a root-associated nitrogen-fixing bacterium. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 1986; 36: [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Li X, Bao X, Qiao G, Wang L, Shi C et al. First study of bacteremia caused by Herbaspirillum huttiense in China: a brief research report and literature review. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 2022; 12:882827 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Monteiro RA, Balsanelli E, Wassem R, Marin AM, Brusamarello-Santos LCC et al. Herbaspirillum-plant interactions: microscopical, histological and molecular aspects. Plant Soil 2012; 356:175–196 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Pimentel JP, Olivares F, Pitard RM, Urquiaga S, Akiba F et al. Dinitrogen fixation and infection of grass leaves by Pseudomonas rubrisubalbicans and Herbaspirillum seropedicae. Plant Soil 1991; 137:61–65 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Schmidt MA, Balsanelli E, Faoro H, Cruz LM, Wassem R et al. The type III secretion system is necessary for the development of a pathogenic and endophytic interaction between Herbaspirillum rubrisubalbicans and Poaceae. BMC Microbiol 2012; 12:98 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  6. James EK, Olivares FL, Baldani JI, Dobereiner J. Herbaspirillum, an endophytic diazotroph colonizing vascular tissue 3Sorghum bicolor L. Moench. J Exp Bot 1997; 48:785–798 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Olivares FL, James EK, Baldani JI, Döbereiner J. Infection of mottled stripe disease‐susceptible and resistant sugar cane varieties by the endophytic diazotroph Herbaspirilium. New Phytologist 1997; 135:723–737 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Ding L, Yokota A. Proposals of Curvibacter gracilis gen. nov., sp. nov. and Herbaspirillum putei sp. nov. for bacterial strains isolated from well water and reclassification of [Pseudomonas] huttiensis, [Pseudomonas] lanceolata, [Aquaspirillum] delicatum and [Aquaspirillum] autotrophicum as Herbaspirillum huttiense comb. nov., Curvibacter lanceolatus comb. nov., Curvibacter delicatus comb. nov. and Herbaspirillum autotrophicum comb. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2004; 54:2223–2230 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Dobritsa AP, Reddy MCS, Samadpour M. Reclassification of Herbaspirillum putei as a later heterotypic synonym of Herbaspirillum huttiense, with the description of H. huttiense subsp. huttiense subsp. nov. and H. huttiense subsp. putei subsp. nov., comb. nov., and description of Herbaspirillum aquaticum sp. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2010; 60:1418–1426 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Obradovic A, Jones JB, Minsavage GV, Dickstein ER, Momol TM. A leaf spot and blight of greenhouse tomato seedlings incited by a Herbaspirillum sp. Plant Dis 2007; 91:886–890 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Benitez BN, Poudel M, Jones JB, Harmon CL. First report of herbaspirillum sp. causing leaf spots on boston fern (nephrolepis exaltata) in florida; 2023 Plant dis [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Meier-Kolthoff JP, Carbasse JS, Peinado-Olarte RL, Göker M. TYGS and LPSN: a database tandem for fast and reliable genome-based classification and nomenclature of prokaryotes. Nucleic Acids Res 2022; 50:D801–D807 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Meier-Kolthoff JP, Göker M. TYGS is an automated high-throughput platform for state-of-the-art genome-based taxonomy. Nat Commun 2019; 10:2182 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Timilsina S, Pereira-Martin JA, Minsavage GV, Iruegas-Bocardo F, Abrahamian P et al. Multiple recombination events drive the current genetic structure of Xanthomonas perforans in Florida. Front Microbiol 2019; 10:448 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Bankevich A, Nurk S, Antipov D, Gurevich AA, Dvorkin M et al. SPAdes: a new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J Comput Biol 2012; 19:455–477 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Parks DH, Imelfort M, Skennerton CT, Hugenholtz P, Tyson GW. CheckM: assessing the quality of microbial genomes recovered from isolates, single cells, and metagenomes. Genome Res 2015; 25:1043–1055 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Seemann T. Prokka: rapid prokaryotic genome annotation. Bioinformatics 2014; 30:2068–2069 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Pritchard L, Glover RH, Humphris S, Elphinstone JG, Toth IK. Genomics and taxonomy in diagnostics for food security: soft-rotting enterobacterial plant pathogens. Anal Methods 2016
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Richter M, Rosselló-Móra R. Shifting the genomic gold standard for the prokaryotic species definition. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2009; 106:19126–19131 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Page AJ, Cummins CA, Hunt M, Wong VK, Reuter S et al. Roary: rapid large-scale prokaryote pan genome analysis. Bioinformatics 2015; 31:3691–3693 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Stamatakis A. RAxML version 8: A tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinformatics 2014; 30:1312–1313 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Letunic I, Bork P. Interactive Tree Of Life (iTOL): an online tool for phylogenetic tree display and annotation. Bioinformatics 2007; 23:127–128 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  23. van den Belt M, Gilchrist C, Booth TJ, Chooi Y-H, Medema MH et al. CAGECAT: the CompArative GEne Cluster analysis toolbox for rapid search and visualisation of homologous gene clusters. BMC Bioinformatics 2023; 24:181 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Doonan J, Denman S, Pachebat JA, McDonald JE. Genomic analysis of bacteria in the Acute Oak Decline pathobiome. Microbial Genomics 2019; 5: [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Coll NS, Valls M. Current knowledge on the Ralstonia solanacearum type III secretion system. Microb Biotechnol 2013; 6:614–620 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Kang Y, Jelenska J, Cecchini NM, Li Y, Lee MW et al. HopW1 from Pseudomonas syringae disrupts the actin cytoskeleton to promote virulence in Arabidopsis. PLoS Pathog 2014; 10:e1004232 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Gochez AM, Shantharaj D, Potnis N, Zhou X, Minsavage GV et al. Molecular characterization of XopAG effector AvrGf2 from Xanthomonas fuscans ssp. aurantifolii in grapefruit. Mol Plant Pathol 2017; 18:405–419 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Pedrolo AM, Matteoli FP, Soares CRFS, Arisi ACM. Comparative genomics reveal the high conservation and scarce distribution of nitrogen fixation nif genes in the plant-associated genus Herbaspirillum. Microb Ecol 2023; 86:563–574 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.006597
Loading
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.006597
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplements

Supplementary material 1

PDF
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error