Skip to content
1887

Abstract

A Gram-stain-negative, facultatively aerobic, rod-shaped and motile bacterium, designated as CCTCC AB 2023082, was isolated from leaves of in China. Optimal growth occurred at 4–45 ℃ and pH 4.0–10.0 and in the presence of 0–7% (w/v) NaCl. The major fatty acids of the strain CCTCC AB 2023082 were C16 : 0, sum of C16 : 1 ω7c/C16 : 1 ω6c, C17 : 0 cyclo and C18 : 1 ω7c. The polar lipids included unidentified lipids, phospholipids, phosphatidylethanolamine, phosphatidylglycerol and amino phospholipid. The DNA G+C content of strain CCTCC AB 2023082 was 54.2 mol%. 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis indicated that strain CCTCC AB 2023082 formed a distinct lineage within the genus and exhibited the highest similarity to , with a 97.9% 16S rRNA gene sequence similarity. Moreover, the preliminary analysis of the organism’s genome suggested its potential as a biostimulant for augmenting plant growth. According to its genotypic, phenotypic, phylogenetic and chemotaxonomic characteristics, strain CCTCC AB 2023082 should be categorized as a novel species in the genus . The novel species was named sp. nov., and its type strain is CCTCC AB 2023082 (=JCM 36393).

Funding
This study was supported by the:
  • Doctoral Research Start-up Fund of Nanyang Institute of Technology (Award NGBJ-2022-24)
    • Principle Award Recipient: PengyuWu
  • Key Technologies R&D program of Henan Province (Award 222102110261)
    • Principle Award Recipient: JianchengLuo
  • Open Project of Henan Key Laboratory of Industrial Microbial Resources and Fermentation Technology (Award HIMFT20220103)
    • Principle Award Recipient: YutianZhang
  • Open Project of Henan Key Laboratory of Industrial Microbial Resources and Fermentation Technology (Award HIMFT20210103)
    • Principle Award Recipient: PengyuWu
  • Key Scientific Research Projects in Colleges and Universities of Henan Province (Award 24A180018)
    • Principle Award Recipient: PengyuWu
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.006594
2024-11-28
2025-07-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Brady C, Cleenwerck I, Venter S, Coutinho T, De Vos P. Taxonomic evaluation of the genus Enterobacter based on multilocus sequence analysis (MLSA): proposal to reclassify E. nimipressuralis and E. amnigenus into Lelliottia gen. nov. as Lelliottia nimipressuralis comb. nov. and Lelliottia amnigena comb. nov., respectively, E. gergoviae and E. pyrinus into Pluralibacter gen. nov. as Pluralibacter gergoviae comb. nov. and Pluralibacter pyrinus comb. nov., respectively, E. cowanii, E. radicincitans, E. oryzae and E. arachidis into Kosakonia gen. nov. as Kosakonia cowanii comb. nov., Kosakonia radicincitans comb. nov., Kosakonia oryzae comb. nov. and Kosakonia arachidis comb. nov., respectively, and E. turicensis, E. helveticus and E. pulveris into Cronobacter as Cronobacter zurichensis nom. nov., Cronobacter helveticus comb. nov. and Cronobacter pulveris comb. nov., respectively, and emended description of the genera Enterobacter and Cronobacter. Syst Appl Microbiol 2013; 36:309–319 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Gu CT, Li CY, Yang LJ, Huo GC. Enterobacter xiangfangensis sp. nov., isolated from Chinese traditional sourdough, and reclassification of Enterobacter sacchari Zhu et al. 2013 as Kosakonia sacchari comb. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2014; 64:2650–2656 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Li CY, Zhou YL, Ji J, Gu CT. Reclassification of Enterobacter oryziphilus and Enterobacter oryzendophyticus as Kosakonia oryziphila comb. nov. and Kosakonia oryzendophytica comb. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2016; 66:2780–2783 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Wang C, Wu W, Wei L, Feng Y, Kang M et al. Kosakonia quasisacchari sp. nov. recovered from human wound secretion in China. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2019; 69:3155–3160 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Lane D. 16S/23S rRNA sequencing. In Stackebrandt E, Goodfellow M. eds Nucleic Acid Techniques in Bacterial Systematics Chichester, UK: John Wiley and Sons; 1991 pp 115–175
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Liu X, Lai Q, Du Y, Zhang X, Zhong H et al. Sinomicrobium soli sp. nov., isolated from arctic soil. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2019; 69:1070–1074 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Lai Q, Cao J, Yuan J, Li F, Shao Z. Celeribacter indicus sp. nov., a polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon-degrading bacterium from deep-sea sediment and reclassification of Huaishuia halophila as Celeribacter halophilus comb. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2014; 64:4160–4167 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Saitou N, Nei M. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 1987; 4:406–425 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Riesco R, Trujillo ME. Update on the proposed minimal standards for the use of genome data for the taxonomy of prokaryotes. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2024; 74:006300 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Goris J, Konstantinidis KT, Klappenbach JA, Coenye T, Vandamme P et al. DNA-DNA hybridization values and their relationship to whole-genome sequence similarities. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2007; 57:81–91 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Meier-Kolthoff JP, Auch AF, Klenk HP, Göker M. Genome sequence-based species delimitation with confidence intervals and improved distance functions. BMC Bioinformatics 2013; 14:60 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Qin QL, Xie BB, Zhang XY, Chen XL, Zhou BC et al. A proposed genus boundary for the prokaryotes based on genomic insights. J Bacteriol 2014; 196:2210–2215 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Blin K, Shaw S, Kloosterman AM, Charlop-Powers Z, van Wezel GP et al. antiSMASH 6.0: improving cluster detection and comparison capabilities. Nucleic Acids Res 2021; 49:W29–W35 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Kang M, Chhetri G, Kim I, So Y, Seo T. Comparative genomic analyses of four novel Ramlibacter species and the cellulose-degrading properties of Ramlibacter cellulosilyticus sp. nov. Sci Rep 2022; 12:1–13 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Chen L, Xiong Z, Sun L, Yang J, Jin Q. VFDB 2012 update: toward the genetic diversity and molecular evolution of bacterial virulence factors. Nucleic Acids Res 2012; 40:D641–5 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Jia B, Raphenya AR, Alcock B, Waglechner N, Guo P et al. CARD 2017: expansion and model-centric curation of the comprehensive antibiotic resistance database. Nucleic Acids Res 2017; 45:D566–D573 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Bland C, Ramsey TL, Sabree F, Lowe M, Brown K et al. CRISPR recognition tool (CRT): a tool for automatic detection of clustered regularly interspaced palindromic repeats. BMC Bioinformatics 2007; 8:209 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Hitch TCA, Riedel T, Oren A, Overmann J, Lawley TD et al. Automated analysis of genomic sequences facilitates high-throughput and comprehensive description of bacteria. ISME Commun 2021; 1:16 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Richter M, Rosselló-Móra R. Shifting the genomic gold standard for the prokaryotic species definition. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2009; 106:19126–19131 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Kim M, Oh HS, Park SC, Chun J. Towards a taxonomic coherence between average nucleotide identity and 16S rRNA gene sequence similarity for species demarcation of prokaryotes. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2014; 64:346–351 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Thompson CC, Chimetto L, Edwards RA, Swings J, Stackebrandt E et al. Microbial genomic taxonomy. BMC Genomics 2013; 14:913 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Smibert RM, Krieg NR. Phenotypic characterization. In Gerhardt P, Murray RGE, Wood WA, Krieg NR. eds Methods for General and Molecular Bacteriology Washington, DC: American Society for Microbiology; 1994 pp 607–654
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Bernardet JF, Nakagawa Y, Holmes B. Subcommittee on the taxonomy of flavobacterium and cytophaga-like bacteria of the international committee on systematics of prokaryotes. proposed minimal standards for describing new taxa of the family flavobacteriaceae and emended description of the family. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2002; 52:1049–1070 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Zhang WY, Huo YY, Zhang XQ, Zhu XF, Wu M. Halolamina salifodinae sp. nov. and Halolamina salina sp. nov., two extremely halophilic archaea isolated from a salt mine. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2013; 63:4380–4385 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Liu X, Lai Q, Du Y, Li G, Sun F et al. Tamlana nanhaiensis sp. nov., isolated from surface seawater collected from the South China Sea. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 2015; 107:1189–1196 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Meier A, Kirschner P, Schröder KH, Wolters J, Kroppenstedt RM et al. Mycobacterium intermedium sp. nov. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1993; 43:204–209 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Sasser M. Identifcation of bacteria by gas chromatography of cellular fatty acids. In MIDI Technical Note 101 Microbial ID Inc, Newark; 1990
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Liang QY, Xu ZX, Zhang J, Chen GJ, Du ZJ. Salegentibacter sediminis sp. nov., a marine bacterium of the family Flavobacteriaceae isolated from coastal sediment. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2018; 68:2375–2380 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Tindall BJ, Sikorski J, Smibert RM, Krieg NR et al. Phenotypic characterization and the principles of comparative systematics. In Reddy CA, Beveridge TJ, Breznak JA, Marzluf G, Schmidt TM. eds Methods for General and Molecular Microbiology, 3rd edn. Washington: ASM Press; 2007 pp 330–393
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Zhu B, Zhou Q, Lin L, Hu C, Shen P et al. Enterobacter sacchari sp. nov., a nitrogen-fixing bacterium associated with sugar cane (Saccharum officinarum L.). Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2013; 63:2577–2582 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Kämpfer P, McInroy JA, Doijad S, Chakraborty T, Glaeser SP. Kosakonia pseudosacchari sp. nov., an endophyte of Zea mays. Syst Appl Microbiol 2016; 39:1–7 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.006594
Loading
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.006594
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplements

Supplementary material 1

PDF
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error