1887

Abstract

Two Gram-stain-negative, facultatively anaerobic, rod-shaped bacteria were isolated from coastal sediments and salt marshes in Weihai, China, and designated as SDUM158017 and SDUM158016, respectively. Both grew at temperatures ranging from 20 to 43°C and within a pH range of 6.0 to 9.0. However, strain SDUM158016 grew in the presence of 1.0–7.0% (w/v) NaCl, whereas strain SDUM158017 was able to grow in the presence of 1.0–10.0% (w/v) NaCl. Strains SDUM158016 and SDUM158017 contain major fatty acids of C 7 and C and contain Q10 as the sole quinone. Based on 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis, the closest relatives of strains SDUM158016 and SDUM158017 are ‘’ MCCC 1F00103, followed by JCM 11220, with the highest similarities 97.1 and 97.3 %, respectively. The average nucleotide identity values between strain SDUM158016 and species of the genera and ranged from 76.0 to 78.9 %, while they ranged from 75.9 to 78.6% for strain SDUM158017. These values are below the species delineation threshold of 98.6%, suggesting that both strains represent novel species. Phylogenetic analysis of the 16S rRNA genes and genome sequences further indicates that species within the genus and these isolates represent two potentially novel species within the genus . Taken together, strains SDUM158017 and SDUM158016 represent two novel species of the genus , for which the names and are proposed with the type strains SDUM158016 (=KCTC 92632 =MCCC 1H01367) and SDUM158017 (=KCTC 92633 =MCCC 1H01363), respectively. Based on phylogenetic and genomic analyses, we also propose the reclassification of as comb. nov. and as comb. nov.

Funding
This study was supported by the:
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (Award 92351301)
    • Principle Award Recipient: ZongjunDu
  • the Science and Technology Fundamental Resources Investigation Program (Award 2022FY101100)
    • Principle Award Recipient: ZongjunDu
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.006583
2024-11-19
2024-12-08
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Liang KYH, Orata FD, Boucher YF, Case RJ. Roseobacters in a sea of poly- and paraphyly: whole genome-based taxonomy of the family Rhodobacteraceae and the proposal for the split of the “Roseobacter Clade” into a novel family, Roseobacteraceae fam. nov. Front Microbiol 2021; 12:683109 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Moran MA, Belas R, Schell MA, González JM, Sun F et al. Ecological genomics of marine roseobacters. Appl Environ Microbiol 2007; 73:4559–4569 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Biebl H. I. Environmental biology of the marine Roseobacter lineage. Annu Rev Microbiol 2006; 60:255–280 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Brinkhoff T, Giebel H-A, Simon M. Diversity, ecology, and genomics of the Roseobacter clade: a short overview. Arch Microbiol 2008; 189:531–539 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Suzuki T, Mori Y, Nishimura Y. Roseibacterium elongatum gen. nov., sp. nov., an aerobic, bacteriochlorophyll-containing bacterium isolated from the west Coast of Australia. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2006; 56:417–421 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Parte AC, Sardà Carbasse J, Meier-Kolthoff JP, Reimer LC, Göker M. List of Prokaryotic names with Standing in Nomenclature (LPSN) moves to the DSMZ. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2020; 70:5607–5612 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Rathgeber C, Yurkova N, Stackebrandt E, Schumann P, Beatty JT et al. Roseicyclus mahoneyensis gen. nov., sp. nov., an aerobic phototrophic bacterium isolated from a meromictic lake. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2005; 55:1597–1603 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Tang L, Zhang Z, Zhou C, Cui R, Tian Y et al. Roseicyclus marinus sp. nov., isolated from a Synechococcus culture, and emended description of the genus Roseicyclus. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2018; 68:1781–1786 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Liu Q-Q, Li X-L, Rooney AP, Du Z-J, Chen G-J. Tangfeifania diversioriginum gen. nov., sp. nov., a representative of the family Draconibacteriaceae. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2014; 64:3473–3477 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Lee I, Chalita M, Ha S-M, Na S-I, Yoon S-H et al. ContEst16S: an algorithm that identifies contaminated prokaryotic genomes using 16S RNA gene sequences. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2017; 67:2053–2057 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Chalita M, Kim YO, Park S, Oh H-S, Cho JH et al. EzBioCloud: a genome-driven database and platform for microbiome identification and discovery. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2024; 74:006421 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Kumar S, Stecher G, Li M, Knyaz C, Tamura K. MEGA X: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis across computing platforms. Mol Biol Evol 2018; 35:1547–1549 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Li R, Yu C, Li Y, Lam T-W, Yiu S-M et al. SOAP2: an improved ultrafast tool for short read alignment. Bioinformatics 2009; 25:1966–1967 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Yoon S-H, Ha S-M, Lim J, Kwon S, Chun J. A large-scale evaluation of algorithms to calculate average nucleotide identity. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 2017; 110:1281–1286 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Qin Q-L, Xie B-B, Zhang X-Y, Chen X-L, Zhou B-C et al. A proposed genus boundary for the prokaryotes based on genomic insights. J Bacteriol 2014; 196:2210–2215 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Chaumeil P-A, Mussig AJ, Hugenholtz P, Parks DH. GTDB-Tk: a toolkit to classify genomes with the Genome Taxonomy Database. Bioinformatics 2019; 36:1925–1927 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Chernomor O, von Haeseler A, Minh BQ. Terrace aware data structure for phylogenomic inference from supermatrices. Syst Biol 2016; 65:997–1008 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Nguyen L-T, Schmidt HA, von Haeseler A, Minh BQ. IQ-TREE: a fast and effective stochastic algorithm for estimating maximum-likelihood phylogenies. Mol Biol Evol 2015; 32:268–274 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Aziz RK, Bartels D, Best AA, DeJongh M, Disz T et al. The RAST Server: rapid annotations using subsystems technology. BMC Genomics 2008; 9:75 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Kanehisa M, Sato Y, Morishima K. BlastKOALA and GhostKOALA: KEGG tools for functional characterization of genome and metagenome sequences. J Mol Biol 2016; 428:726–731 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Feng X, Liang Q-Y, Zou Q-H, Ye M-Q, Du Z-J. Sulfuriroseicoccus oceanibius gen. nov., sp. nov., a representative of the phylum Verrucomicrobia with a special cytoplasmic membrane. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 2022; 115:337–352 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Yu W-N, Du Z-Z, Chang Y-Q, Mu D-S, Du Z-J. Marinomonas agarivorans sp. nov., an agar-degrading marine bacterium isolated from red algae. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2020; 70:100–104 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Cowan SS. Bacterial characters and characterization, 2nd. edn Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 1974
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Cai M. X. Chapter 14. Determination of biochemical characteristics. In Manual for the Systematic Identification of General Bacteria Science Press; 2001
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Zhu K-L, Wang X-Q, Zhang T-S, Shang D-D, Du Z-J. Salibaculum halophilum gen. nov., sp. nov. and Salibaculum griseiflavum sp. nov., in the family Rhodobacteraceae. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2021; 71: [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Minnikin DE, O’Donnell AG, Goodfellow M, Alderson G, Athalye M et al. An integrated procedure for the extraction of bacterial isoprenoid quinones and polar lipids. J Microbiol Method 1984; 2:233–241 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Kroppenstedt RM. Separation of bacterial menaquinones by HPLC using Reverse Phase (RP18) and a silver loaded ion exchanger as stationary phases. J Liq Chromatogr 1982; 5:2359–2367 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Komagata K, Suzuki KI. Lipid and cell-wall analysis in bacterial systematics. In Methods in Microbiology vol 19 1987 pp 161–207 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Yarza P, Yilmaz P, Pruesse E, Glöckner FO, Ludwig W et al. Uniting the classification of cultured and uncultured bacteria and archaea using 16S rRNA gene sequences. Nat Rev Microbiol 2014; 12:635–645 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Konstantinidis KT, Rosselló-Móra R, Amann R. Uncultivated microbes in need of their own taxonomy. ISME J 2017; 11:2399–2406 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Tang K, Yang Y, Lin D, Li S, Zhou W et al. Genomic, physiologic, and proteomic insights into metabolic versatility in Roseobacter clade bacteria isolated from deep-sea water. Sci Rep 2016; 6:35528 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Zander U, Faust A, Klink BU, de Sanctis D, Panjikar S et al. Structural basis for the oxidation of protein-bound sulfur by the sulfur cycle molybdohemo-enzyme sulfane dehydrogenase SoxCD. J Biol Chem 2011; 286:8349–8360 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Yoon J. Characterization of Roseibacterium persicicum sp. nov., and emended description of the genus Roseibacterium. FEMS Microbiol Lett 2020; 367:fnaa101 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Mao Y, Wei J, Zheng Q, Xiao N, Li Q et al. Roseibacterium beibuensis sp. nov., a novel member of roseobacter clade isolated from Beibu Gulf in the South China Sea. Curr Microbiol 2012; 65:568–574 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.006583
Loading
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.006583
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplements

Supplementary material 1

PDF
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error