Skip to content
1887

Abstract

Gene- and genome-based approaches were used to determine whether little leaf (ViLL) phytoplasma, which occurs in northern Australia, is a distinct ‘ Phytoplasma’ species. The ViLL 16S rRNA gene sequences exhibited the highest known similarity to species in the 16SrXXIX-A and 16SrIX-D subgroups, namely ‘ Phytoplasma omanense’ (98.03–98.10%) and ‘ Phytoplasma phoenicium’ (96.87–97.20%), respectively. A total of 48 single-copy orthologue genes were identified to be shared among the two draft ViLL phytoplasma genomes, 30 publicly available phytoplasma genomes, and one genome as the outgroup taxon. Phylogenomic assessments using the 48 shared single-copy orthologue genes supported that ViLL and ‘. Phytoplasma phoenicium’ were closely related yet distinct species. The 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis and phylogenomic assessment indicate that ViLL phytoplasmas are a distinct taxon. As such, a novel species, ‘ Phytoplasma vignae’, is proposed. Strain BAWM-336 (genome accession number JAUZLI000000000) detected in (bitter melon) serves as the reference strain of this species, with infected plant material deposited in the Victorian Plant Pathology Herbarium (VPRI) as VPRI 44369.

Funding
This study was supported by the:
  • University of Tasmania
    • Principle Award Recipient: BiancaRodrigues Jardim
  • Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development, Government of Western Australia
    • Principle Award Recipient: BiancaRodrigues Jardim
  • Northern Territory Government
    • Principle Award Recipient: BiancaRodrigues Jardim
  • Department of Economic Development, Jobs, Transport and Resources, State Government of Victoria
    • Principle Award Recipient: BiancaRodrigues Jardim
  • Department of Agriculture and Fisheries, Queensland Government
    • Principle Award Recipient: BiancaRodrigues Jardim
  • Hort Innovation
    • Principle Award Recipient: BiancaRodrigues Jardim
  • This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License. This article was made open access via a Publish and Read agreement between the Microbiology Society and the corresponding author’s institution.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.006502
2024-08-27
2025-06-18
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/ijsem/74/8/ijsem006502.html?itemId=/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.006502&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Schneider B, Padovan A, De La Rue S, Eichner R, Davis R et al. Detection and differentiation of phytoplasmas in Australia: an update. Aust J Agric Res 1999; 50:333 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Padovan AC, Gibb KS. Epidemiology of phytoplasma diseases in papaya in northern Australia. J Phytopathol 2001; 149:649–658 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  3. De La Rue S, Padovan A, Gibb K. Stylosanthes is a host for several phytoplasmas, one of which shows unique 16S-23S intergenic spacer region heterogeneity. J Phytopathol 2001; 149:613–619 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Rodrigues Jardim B, Kinoti WM, Tran-Nguyen LTT, Gambley C, Rodoni B et al. Candidatus Phytoplasma stylosanthis, a novel taxon with a diverse host range in Australia, characterised using multilocus sequence analysis of 16S rRNA, secA, tuf, and rp genes. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2021; 71:1–11 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Streten C, Gibb KS. Phytoplasma diseases in sub-tropical and tropical Australia. Austral Plant Pathol 2006; 35:129–146 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Rodrigues Jardim B, Gambley C, Tran-Nguyen LTT, Webster C, Kehoe M et al. A metagenomic investigation of phytoplasma diversity in Australian vegetable growing regions. Microb Genom 2024; 10:001213 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Firrao G, Andersen M, Bertaccini A, Boudon E, Bové JM. Candidatus Phytoplasma’, a taxon for the wall-less, non-helical prokaryotes that colonize plant phloem and insects. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2004; 54:1243–1255 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Bertaccini A, Arocha-Rosete Y, Contaldo N, Duduk B, Fiore N et al. Revision of the ‘Candidatus Phytoplasma species description guidelines. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2022; 72: [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Kirdat K, Tiwarekar B, Thorat V, Sathe S, Shouche Y et al. 'Candidatus Phytoplasma sacchari’, a novel taxon - associated with Sugarcane Grassy Shoot (SCGS) disease. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2021; 71:1–7 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Zhao Y, Wei W, Davis RE, Lee IM, Bottner-Parker KD. The agent associated with blue dwarf disease in wheat represents a new phytoplasma taxon, “Candidatus Phytoplasma tritici.”. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2021; 71:1–11 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Rodrigues Jardim B, Tran-Nguyen LTT, Gambley C, Al-Sadi AM, Al-Subhi AM et al. The observation of taxonomic boundaries for the 16SrII and 16SrXXV phytoplasmas using genome-based delimitation. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2023; 73: [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Constable FE, Joyce PA, Rodoni BC. A survey of key Australian pome fruit growing districts for exotic and endemic pathogens. Austral Plant Pathol 2007; 36:165–172 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Altschul SF, Madden TL, Schäffer AA, Zhang J, Zhang Z et al. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res 1997; 25:3389–3402 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Rodrigues Jardim B, Tran-Nguyen LTT, Gambley C, Rodoni B, Constable FE. Iodixanol density gradients as an effective phytoplasma enrichment approach to improve genome sequencing. Front Microbiol 2022; 13:1–16 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Chen S, Zhou Y, Chen Y, Gu J. fastp: an ultra-fast all-in-one FASTQ preprocessor. Bioinformatics 2018; 34:i884–i890 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Mikheenko A, Saveliev V, Gurevich A. MetaQUAST: evaluation of metagenome assemblies. Bioinformatics 2016; 32:1088–1090 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Bushnell B. BBMap: A Fast, Accurate, Splice-Aware Aligner 2014 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Seemann T. Prokka: rapid prokaryotic genome annotation. Bioinformatics 2014; 30:2068–2069 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Lagesen K, Hallin P, Rødland EA, Staerfeldt H-H, Rognes T et al. RNAmmer: consistent and rapid annotation of ribosomal RNA genes. Nucleic Acids Res 2007; 35:3100–3108 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Hedlund BP, Chuvochina M, Hugenholtz P, Konstantinidis KT, Murray AE et al. SeqCode: a nomenclatural code for prokaryotes described from sequence data. Nat Microbiol 2022; 7:1702–1708 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Katoh K, Standley DM. MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: improvements in performance and usability. Mol Biol Evol 2013; 30:772–780 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Stamatakis A. RAxML version 8: a tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinformatics 2014; 30:1312–1313 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Emms DM, Kelly S. OrthoFinder: solving fundamental biases in whole genome comparisons dramatically improves orthogroup inference accuracy. Genome Biol 2015; 16: [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Emms DM, Kelly S. OrthoFinder: phylogenetic orthology inference for comparative genomics. Genome Biol 2019; 20:1–14 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Minh BQ, Schmidt HA, Chernomor O, Schrempf D, Woodhams MD et al. IQ-TREE 2: new models and efficient methods for phylogenetic inference in the genomic era. Mol Biol Evol 2020; 37:1530–1534 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Kalyaanamoorthy S, Minh BQ, Wong TKF, von Haeseler A, Jermiin LS. ModelFinder: fast model selection for accurate phylogenetic estimates. Nat Methods 2017; 14:587–589 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Chernomor O, Von Haeseler A, Minh BQ. Terrace aware data structure for phylogenomic inference from supermatrices. Syst Biol 2016; 65:997–1008 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.006502
Loading
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.006502
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplements

Supplementary material 1

PDF
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error