Skip to content
1887

Abstract

Two novel bacteria, MJ-SS3 and MJ-SS4, were isolated from tidal flat sediment sampled in Gochang, Republic of Korea. The isolates were Gram-stain-negative, aerobic, non-motile, rod-shaped, yellow-coloured, oxidase-positive, and catalase-positive. Strains MJ-SS3 and MJ-SS4 grew at 20–37 °C (optimum, 30 °C), at pH 6–8 (optimum, pH 7.0) and in the presence of 0–7 % (w/v) NaCl (optimum, 2.0 % NaCl). Strains MJ-SS3 and MJ-SS4 showed 99.9 % 16S rRNA gene sequence similarity. Phylogenetic analysis based on genome and 16S rRNA gene sequences indicated that strains MJ-SS3 and MJ-SS4 were affiliated with the family and most closely related to 1494 (95.3 %), NBU2984 (95.2 %), JLT21 (95.2 %), NH57N (95.1 %), and YCS-16 (95.1 %). The major respiratory quinone was menaquinone-6. The major identified polar lipids were phosphatidylethanolamine, phosphatidylglycerol, phosphatidylcholine, and amino lipids. The major cellular fatty acids of strain MJ-SS3 were iso-C G (24.6 %), iso-C (21.6 %), and iso-C 3-OH (15.8 %). The genome length of strain MJ-SS3 is 3.1 Mbp (DNA G+C content, 32.5 mol%) and it has 2822 coding and 59 tRNA genes. The average amino acid identity and average nucleotide identity values, as well as biochemical, phylogenetic, and physiological characteristics, strongly supported the genotypic and phenotypic differentiation of strains MJ-SS3 and MJ-SS4 from other members of the family . Hence, strains MJ-SS3 and MJ-SS4 are considered to represent a novel species of a new genus in the family , for which the gen. nov., sp. nov. is proposed. The type strain is MJ-SS3 (=KCTC 102114=KEMB 20189=JCM 36595), with reference strain MJ-SS4 (=KCTC 102115=KEMB 20190).

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.006474
2024-08-29
2025-12-05

Metrics

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. McBride MJ. The family Flavobacteriaceae. In Rosenberg E, DeLong EF, Lory S, Stackebrandt E, Thompson F. eds The Prokaryotes Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 2014 pp 643–676
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Ramasamy KP, Mahawar L, Rajasabapathy R, Rajeshwari K, Miceli C et al. Comprehensive insights on environmental adaptation strategies in Antarctic bacteria and biotechnological applications of cold adapted molecules. Front Microbiol 2023; 14:1197797 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Kim I, Kim J, Chhetri G, Seo T. Flavobacterium humi sp. nov., a flexirubin-type pigment producing bacterium, isolated from soil. J Microbiol 2019; 57:1079–1085 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Bowman JP. The marine clade of the family Flavobacteriaceae: the genera Aequorivita, Arenibacter, Cellulophaga, Croceibacter, Formosa, Gelidibacter, Gillisia, Maribacter, Mesonia, Muricauda, Polaribacter, Psychroflexus, Psychroserpens, Robiginitalea, Salegentibacter, Tenacibaculum, Ulvibacter, Vitellibacter and Zobellia. In Dworkin M, Falkow S, Rosenberg E, Schleifer K-H, Stackebrandt E. eds The Prokaryotes New York, NY: Springer New York; pp 677–694 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Abele D, Vazquez S, Buma AGJ, Hernandez E, Quiroga C et al. Pelagic and benthic communities of the Antarctic ecosystem of Potter Cove: genomics and ecological implications. Mar Genom 2017; 33:1–11 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Vila E, Hornero-Méndez D, Lareo C, Saravia V. Biotechnological production of zeaxanthin by an Antarctic Flavobacterium: evaluation of culture conditions. J Biotechnol 2020; 319:54–60 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Silva SG, Nabhan Homsi M, Keller-Costa T, Rocha U, Costa R. Natural product biosynthetic potential reflects macroevolutionary diversification within a widely distributed bacterial taxon. mSystems 2023; 8:e00643-23 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Srinivasan R, Kannappan A, Shi C, Lin X. Marine bacterial secondary metabolites: a treasure house for structurally unique and effective antimicrobial compounds. Mar Drugs 2021; 19:530 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Gavriilidou A, Gutleben J, Versluis D, Forgiarini F, van Passel MWJ et al. Comparative genomic analysis of Flavobacteriaceae: insights into carbohydrate metabolism, gliding motility and secondary metabolite biosynthesis. BMC Genom 2020; 21:569 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Parte AC, Sardà Carbasse J, Meier-Kolthoff JP, Reimer LC, Göker M. List of Prokaryotic names with Standing in Nomenclature (LPSN) moves to the DSMZ. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2020; 70:5607–5612 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Bernardet J-F, Bowman JP. The genus Flavobacterium. In Dworkin M, Falkow S, Rosenberg E, Schleifer K-H, Stackebrandt E. eds The Prokaryotes New York, NY: Springer New York; pp 481–531
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Ran Q, Du X, Han L, Wang J, Li Y. Three novel species of the genus Flavobacterium, Flavobacterium odoriferum sp. nov., Flavobacterium fragile sp. nov. and Flavobacterium luminosum sp. nov., isolated from activated sludge. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2024; 74: [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Avendaño-Herrera R, Saldarriga-Córdoba M, Poblete-Morales M, Irgang R. Flavobacterium psychraquaticum sp. nov., isolated from water system of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) smolts cultured in Chile. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2024; 74:006309 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Frank JA, Reich CI, Sharma S, Weisbaum JS, Wilson BA et al. Critical evaluation of two primers commonly used for amplification of bacterial 16S rRNA genes. Appl Environ Microbiol 2008; 74:2461–2470 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Kim O-S, Cho Y-J, Lee K, Yoon S-H, Kim M et al. Introducing EzTaxon-e: a prokaryotic 16S rRNA gene sequence database with phylotypes that represent uncultured species. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2012; 62:716–721 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Thompson JD, Gibson T, Higgins DG. Multiple sequence alignment using ClustalW and ClustalX. CP Bioinform 2003 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Saitou N, Nei M. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 1987; 4:406–425 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Kumar S, Stecher G, Li M, Knyaz C, Tamura K. MEGA X: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis across computing platforms. Mol Biol Evol 2018; 35:1547–1549 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Kannan L, Wheeler WC. Maximum parsimony on phylogenetic networks. Algorithms Mol Biol 2012; 7:9 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Felsenstein J. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 1985; 39:783–791 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Cao W-R, Lu D-C, Li Y-J, Sun X-K, Sun Y-Y et al. Formosa maritima sp. nov., isolated from coastal sediment. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2020; 70:982–988 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Ding H, Liu J, Yang C, Guo C, Ding L et al. Hanstruepera marina sp. nov. and Hanstruepera flava sp. nov., two novel species in the family Flavobacteriaceae isolated by a modified in situ cultivation technique from marine sediment. Front Microbiol 2022; 13:957397
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Zhang Q, Lin D, Ye J, Lin T-H, Li C et al. Yeosuana marina sp. nov., isolated from shallow-sea hydrothermal systems off Kueishantao Island. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2020; 70:6251–6256 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Wang B, Sun F, Du Y, Liu X, Li G et al. Meridianimaribacter flavus gen. nov., sp. nov., a member of the family Flavobacteriaceae isolated from marine sediment of the South China Sea. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2010; 60:121–127 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Park S, Lee J-S, Lee K-C, Yoon J-H. Geojedonia litorea gen. nov., sp. nov., a member of the family Flavobacteriaceae isolated from coastal seawater. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 2013; 103:1255–1262 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Na S-I, Kim YO, Yoon S-H, Ha S, Baek I et al. UBCG: up-to-date bacterial core gene set and pipeline for phylogenomic tree reconstruction. J Microbiol 2018; 56:280–285 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Chaumeil P-A, Mussig AJ, Hugenholtz P, Parks DH. GTDB-Tk v2: memory friendly classification with the genome taxonomy database. Bioinformatics 2022; 38:5315–5316 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Gerhardt P, Murray RGE, Costilow RN, Nester EW, Wood WA et al. Determinative Methods of Light Microscopy. Manual of Methods for General Bacteriology DC, USA: American Society for Microbiology Washington; 1981 pp 21–33
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Smibert RM, Kreg NR. Phenotypic characterization. In Methods for General and Molecular Bacteriology American Society of Microbiology; 1994 pp 611–654
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Sundararaman A, Srinivasan S, Lee J-H, Lee S-S. Lentibacillus alimentarius sp. nov., isolated from Myeolchi-jeotgal, a traditional Korean high-salt fermented anchovy. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 2018; 111:1065–1071 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Im HS, Joung Y, Lee S-S. Pedobacter riviphilus sp. nov., isolated from stream sediment. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2021; 71: [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Minnikin DE, O’Donnell AG, Goodfellow M, Alderson G, Athalye M et al. An integrated procedure for the extraction of bacterial isoprenoid quinones and polar lipids. J Microbiol Methods 1984; 2:233–241 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Collins MD, Jones D. Distribution of isoprenoid quinone structural types in bacteria and their taxonomic implication. Microbiol Rev 1981; 45:316–354 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Bolger AM, Lohse M, Usadel B. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics 2014; 30:2114–2120 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Bankevich A, Nurk S, Antipov D, Gurevich AA, Dvorkin M et al. SPAdes: a new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J Comput Biol 2012; 19:455–477 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Aziz RK, Bartels D, Best AA, DeJongh M, Disz T et al. The RAST server: rapid annotations using subsystems technology. BMC Genom 2008; 9:75 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Wongbunmak A, Khiawjan S, Suphantharika M, Pongtharangkul T. BTEX biodegradation by Bacillus amyloliquefaciens subsp. plantarum W1 and its proposed BTEX biodegradation pathways. Sci Rep 2020; 10:17408 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Lee I, Chalita M, Ha S-M, Na S-I, Yoon S-H et al. ContEst16S: an algorithm that identifies contaminated prokaryotic genomes using 16S RNA gene sequences. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2017; 67:2053–2057 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Lee I, Ouk Kim Y, Park S-C, Chun J. OrthoANI: an improved algorithm and software for calculating average nucleotide identity. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2016; 66:1100–1103 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Auch AF, Klenk H-P, Göker M. Standard operating procedure for calculating genome-to-genome distances based on high-scoring segment pairs. Stand Genomic Sci 2010; 2:142–148 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Rodriguez-R LM, Konstantinidis KT. The enveomics collection: a toolbox for specialized analyses of microbial genomes and metagenomes. PeerJ Preprints 2016 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.006474
Loading
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.006474
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplements

Supplementary material 1

PDF
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error