Skip to content
1887

Abstract

The species and were isolated from legume nodules and the 16S rRNA sequences of their respective type strains, CCBAU 71042 and CCBAU 71714, were highly divergent from those of the other species of the genera and , respectively. However, the 16S rRNA gene sequences obtained for strains CCBAU 71042 and CCBAU 71714 several years after description, were different from the original ones, showing 100 % similarity to the type strains of and , respectively. Phylogenetic analyses of two housekeeping genes, and , confirmed the high phylogenetic closeness of strains CCBAU 71042 and CCBAU 71714 to the respective type strains of and . In the present work, we compared the genomes of the type strains of and available in several culture collections with those of the respective type strains of and , some of them obtained in this study. The calculated average nucleotide identity– and digital DNA–DNA hybridization values in both cases were higher than those recommended for species differentiation, supporting the proposal for the reclassification of the type strains of and into the species and , respectively.

Funding
This study was supported by the:
  • Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (Award RGPIN-2020-07000)
    • Principle Award Recipient: GeorgeC diCenzo
  • H2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions (Award 101034371)
    • Principle Award Recipient: JoséDavid Flores-Félix
  • H2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions (Award 897795)
    • Principle Award Recipient: EstherMenéndez
  • Junta de Castilla y León (Award CLU-2019-05)
    • Principle Award Recipient: AlvaroPeix
  • Junta de Castilla y León (Award CLU-2O18-04)
    • Principle Award Recipient: EncarnaVelázquez
  • This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License. This article was made open access via a Publish and Read agreement between the Microbiology Society and the corresponding author’s institution.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.006451
2024-07-22
2025-07-14
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/ijsem/74/7/ijsem006451.html?itemId=/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.006451&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Wei GH, Wang ET, Tan ZY, Zhu ME, Chen WX. Rhizobium indigoferae sp. nov. and Sinorhizobium kummerowiae sp. nov., respectively isolated from Indigofera spp. and Kummerowia stipulacea. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2002; 52:2231–2239 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Judicial Comision Judicial opinion No. 81. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2008; 58:1755–1763 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Euzéby JP, Tindall BJ. Status of strains that contravene Rules 27(3) and 30 of the Bacteriological Code. Request for an opinion. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2004; 54:293–301 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Thompson JD, Gibson TJ, Plewniak F, Jeanmougin F, Higgins DG. The CLUSTAL_X windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucl Acids Res 1997; 25:4876–4882 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Kumar S, Stecher G, Tamura K. MEGA7: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Mol Biol Evol 2016; 33:1870–1874 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Rogers JS, Swofford DL. A fast method for approximating maximum likelihoods of phylogenetic trees from nucleotide sequences. Syst Biol 1998; 47:77–89 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Kimura M. A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J Mol Evol 1980; 16:111–120 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Gaunt MW, Turner SL, Rigottier-Gois L, Lloyd-Macgilp SA, Young JWP. Phylogenies of atpD and recA support the small subunit rRNA-based classification of rhizobia. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2001; 51:2037–2048 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Kaur S, Espinosa-Sáiz D, Velázquez E, Menéndez E, diCenzo GC. Complete genome sequences of the species type strains Sinorhizobium garamanticum LMG 24692T and S. numidicum LMG 27396T and CIP 109850T. bioRxiv 2023 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Richter M, Rosselló-Móra R. Shifting the genomic gold standard for the prokaryotic species definition. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2009; 106:19126–19131 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Richter M, Rosselló-Móra R, Oliver Glöckner F, Peplies J. JSpeciesWS: a web server for prokaryotic species circumscription based on pairwise genome comparison. Bioinformatics 2016; 32:929–931 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Meier-Kolthoff JP, Göker M. TYGS is an automated high-throughput platform for state-of-the-art genome-based taxonomy. Nat Commun 2019; 10:2182 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Auch AF, von Jan M, Klenk H-P, Göker M. Digital DNA-DNA hybridization for microbial species delineation by means of genome-to-genome sequence comparison. Stand Genomic Sci 2010; 2:117–134 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Chun J, Oren A, Ventosa A, Christensen H, Arahal DR et al. Proposed minimal standards for the use of genome data for the taxonomy of prokaryotes. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2018; 68:461–466 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.006451
Loading
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.006451
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplements

Supplementary material 1

PDF
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error