Rodentibacter caecimuris comb. nov., arising from the heterotypic synonymy between Pasteurella caecimuris Lagkouvardos et al. 2016 and Rodentibacter heylii Adhikary et al. 2017

References

1. Crosby WB, Woolums AR. Pasteurellaceae. In McVey DS, Kennedy M, Chengappa MM, Wilkes R. eds Veterinary Microbiology, 4th edn. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 2022 pp 118–128
   [Google Scholar]
2. Parte AC, Sardà Carbasse J, Meier-Kolthoff JP, Reimer LC, Göker M. List of prokaryotic names with standing in nomenclature (LPSN) moves to the DSMZ. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2020; 70:5607–5612 [View Article] [PubMed]
   [Google Scholar]
3. Christensen H, Bisgaard M, Pasteurella P. Bergey’s Manual of Systematics of Archaea and Bacteria John Wiley & Sons and Bergey’s Manual Trust; 2020 pp 1–20 [View Article]
   [Google Scholar]
4. Lagkouvardos I, Pukall R, Abt B, Foesel BU, Meier-Kolthoff JP et al. The mouse intestinal bacterial collection (miBC) provides host-specific insight into cultured diversity and functional potential of the gut microbiota. Nat Microbiol 2016; 1:16131 [View Article] [PubMed]
   [Google Scholar]
5. Oren A, Garrity GM. List of new names and new combinations previously effectively, but not validly, published. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2016; 66:4299–4305 [View Article]
   [Google Scholar]
6. Oren A, Arahal DR, Göker M, Moore ERB, Rossello-Mora R et al. International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes. Prokaryotic code (2022 revision). Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2023; 73:005585
   [Google Scholar]
7. Adhikary S, Nicklas W, Bisgaard M, Boot R, Kuhnert P et al. Rodentibacter gen. nov. including Rodentibacter pneumotropicus comb. nov., Rodentibacter heylii sp. nov., Rodentibacter myodis sp. nov., Rodentibacter ratti sp. nov., Rodentibacter heidelbergensis sp. nov., Rodentibacter trehalosifermentans sp. nov., Rodentibacter rarus sp. nov., Rodentibacter mrazii and two genomospecies. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2017; 67:1793–1806 [View Article] [PubMed]
   [Google Scholar]
8. Christensen H, Bisgaard M. Classification of genera of Pasteurellaceae using conserved predicted protein sequences. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2018; 68:2692–2696 [View Article] [PubMed]
   [Google Scholar]
9. Kuhnert P, Christensen H. International committee on systematics of prokaryotes subcommittee on the taxonomy of Pasteurellaceae minutes of the meetings, 9 October 2018, Prato, Italy. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2019; 69:871–872 [View Article] [PubMed]
   [Google Scholar]
10. Meier-Kolthoff JP, Göker M. TYGS is an automated high-throughput platform for state-of-the-art genome-based taxonomy. Nat Commun 2019; 10:2182 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
11. Xie J, Chen Y, Cai G, Cai R, Hu Z et al. Tree visualization by one table (tvBOT): a web application for visualizing, modifying and annotating phylogenetic trees. Nucleic Acids Res 2023; 51:W587–W592 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
12. Auch AF, Klenk HP, Göker M. Standard operating procedure for calculating genome-to-genome distances based on high-scoring segment pairs. Stand Genomic Sci 2010; 2:142–148 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
13. Richter M, Rosselló-Móra R, Oliver Glöckner F, Peplies J. JSpeciesWS: a web server for prokaryotic species circumscription based on pairwise genome comparison. Bioinformatics 2016; 32:929–931 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
14. Yoon S-H, Ha S-M, Kwon S, Lim J, Kim Y et al. Introducing EzBioCloud: a taxonomically united database of 16S rRNA gene sequences and whole-genome assemblies. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2017; 67:1613–1617 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
15. Lee I, Ouk Kim Y, Park SC, Chun J. OrthoANI: an improved algorithm and software for calculating average nucleotide identity. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2016; 66:1100–1103 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
16. Auch AF, von Jan M, Klenk H-P, Göker M. Digital DNA-DNA hybridization for microbial species delineation by means of genome-to-genome sequence comparison. Stand Genomic Sci 2010; 2:117–134 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
17. Kim M, Oh H-S, Park S-C, Chun J. Towards a taxonomic coherence between average nucleotide identity and 16S rRNA gene sequence similarity for species demarcation of prokaryotes. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2014; 64:346–351 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
18. Chun J, Oren A, Ventosa A, Christensen H, Arahal DR et al. Proposed minimal standards for the use of genome data for the taxonomy of prokaryotes. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2018; 68:461–466 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
19. Varghese NJ, Mukherjee S, Ivanova N, Konstantinidis KT, Mavrommatis K et al. Microbial species delineation using whole genome sequences. Nucleic Acids Res 2015; 43:6761–6771 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
20. Meier-Kolthoff JP, Klenk HP, Göker M. Taxonomic use of DNA G+C content and DNA-DNA hybridization in the genomic age. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2014; 64:352–356 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
21. Arahal DR, Bull CT, Busse H-J, Christensen H, Chuvochina M et al. Guidelines for interpreting the International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes and for preparing a request for an opinion. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2023; 73:005782 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
22. Tindall BJ. Marinobacterium iners (Iizuka and Komagata 1964) comb. nov. arising from the synonymy of Marinobacterium georgiense González et al. 1997 and Pseudomonas iners Iizuka and Komagata 1964 (Approved Lists 1980). Curr Microbiol 2019; 76:1128–1129 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
23. Tindall BJ. Marinobacter nauticus (Baumann et al. 1972) comb. nov. arising from instances of synonymy and the incorrect interpretation of the International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes. Arch Microbiol 2020; 202:657–663 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]