Is the bacterial genus name Rhodococcus Zopf 1891 illegitimate? Request for an Opinion

References

1. Tindall BJ. A note on the genus name Rhodococcus Zopf 1891 and its homonyms. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2014; 64:1062–1064 [View Article] [PubMed]
   [Google Scholar]
2. Hansgirg A. Bemerkungen zur Systematik einiger Süsswasseralgen. Österr botan Zeitschrift 1884; 34:313–318 [View Article]
   [Google Scholar]
3. Wittrock VB, Nordstedt CFO. Algae aquae dulcis exsiccatae. Bot Not 1884:121–128
   [Google Scholar]
4. Lapage SP, Sneath PHA, Lessel EF, Skerman VBD, Seeliger HPR. eds International Code of Nomenclature of Bacteria (1975 Revision) Washington, DC: American Society for Microbiology; 1975
   [Google Scholar]
5. Lapage SP, Sneath PHA, Lessel EF, Skerman VBD, Seeliger HPR. eds International Code of Nomenclature of Bacteria (1990 Revision). Bacteriological Code Washington, DC: American Society for Microbiology; 1992
   [Google Scholar]
6. Parker CT, Tindall BJ, Garrity GM. International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2019; 69:S1–S111 [View Article]
   [Google Scholar]
7. Oren A, Arahal DR, Göker M, Moore ERB, Rossello-Mora R et al. International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes. Prokaryotic Code (2022 Revision). Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2023; 73:005585 [View Article] [PubMed]
   [Google Scholar]
8. Zopf W. Ueber Ausscheidung von Fettfarbstoffen (Lipochromen) seitens gewisser Spaltpilze. Ber Deutsch Bot Ges 1891; 9:22–28 [View Article]
   [Google Scholar]
9. Sneath PHA, McGowan V, Skerman VBD. Approved lists of bacterial names. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1980; 30:225–420 [View Article]
   [Google Scholar]
10. Li S-H, Yu X-Y, Park D-J, Hozzein WN, Kim C-J et al. Rhodococcus soli sp. nov., an actinobacterium isolated from soil using a resuscitative technique. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 2015; 107:357–366 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
11. Goodfellow M, Sangal V, Jones AL, Sutcliffe IC. Charting stormy waters: a commentary on the nomenclature of the equine pathogen variously named Prescottella equi, Rhodococcus equi and Rhodococcus hoagii. Equine Vet J 2015; 47:508–509 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
12. Sangal V, Goodfellow M, Jones AL, Seviour RJ, Sutcliffe IC. Refined systematics of the genus Rhodococcus based on whole genome analyses. In Alvarez H. eds Biology of Rhodococcus. Microbiology Monographs vol 16 Springer, Cham; 2019 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
13. Vázquez-Boland JA, Scortti M, Meijer WG. Conservation of Rhodococcus equi (Magnusson 1923) Goodfellow and Alderson 1977 and rejection of Rhodococcus hoagii (Morse 1912) Kämpfer et al. 2014. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2020; 70:3572–3576 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
14. Val-Calvo J, Vázquez-Boland JA. Mycobacteriales taxonomy using network analysis-aided, context-uniform phylogenomic approach for non-subjective genus demarcation. mBio 2023; 14:e0220723 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
15. Parte AC, Sardà Carbasse J, Meier-Kolthoff JP, Reimer LC, Göker M. List of Prokaryotic names with Standing in Nomenclature (LPSN) moves to the DSMZ. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2020; 70:5607–5612 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
16. Tindall BJ. Redefining homonyms under Rule 51b (4) of the International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2016; 66:5618–5619 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
17. Oren A, Arahal DR, Rosselló-Móra R, Sutcliffe IC, Moore ERB. Public discussion on a proposed revision of the International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2021; 71:004918 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
18. Turland N, Wiersema J, Barrie F, Greuter W, Hawksworth D. International Code of Nomenclature for Algae, Fungi, and Plants (Shenzhen Code) Adopted by the Nineteenth International Botanical Congress Shenzhen China: Koeltz Botanical Books; 2018 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
19. Oren A. Three alternative proposals to emend the Rules of the International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes to resolve the status of the Cyanobacteria in the prokaryotic nomenclature. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2020; 70:4406–4408 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
20. Oren A, Arahal DR, Rosselló-Móra R, Sutcliffe IC, Moore ERB. Emendation of General Consideration 5 and Rules 18a, 24a and 30 of the International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes to resolve the status of the Cyanobacteria in the prokaryotic nomenclature. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2021; 71:004939 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
21. Molinari Novoa EA, Guiry MD, Guiry GM. AlgaeBase. World-wide electronic publication, National University of Ireland, Galway; 2023 https://www.algaebase.org accessed 6 November 2023
22. Farr ER, Zijlstra G. eds Index Nominum Genericorum (Plantarum) World-Wide Electronic Publication; 1996
    [Google Scholar]
23. Hauer T, Komárek J. CyanoDB 2.0 - On-Line Database of Cyanobacterial Genera World-wide electronic publication, University of South Bohemia & Institute of Botany AS CR; 2022
    [Google Scholar]
24. Arahal DR, Busse H-J, Bull CT, Christensen H, Chuvochina M et al. Judicial Opinions 103-111. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2022; 72:005197 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]