1887

Abstract

A Gram-stain-negative, strictly aerobic and filamentous bacterial strain, designated as DQS-5, was isolated from the activated sludge of a municipal sewage treatment plant in Shenzhen, PR China. Optimal growth was observed at 28 °C and pH 7.5. Catalase and oxidase activities were detected. Phylogenetic analysis based on 16S rRNA gene sequences showed that strain DQS-5 was most closely related to the genera and (91.0–93.4 % and 92.5 % 16S rRNA gene sequence similarity, respectively) and was close to the member of the family . The complete genome sequence of strain DQS-5 contains 5 653 844 bp and 57.3 mol% G+C. The average nucleotide identity, digital DNA–DNA hybridization and average amino acid identity values between the genome of strain DQS-5 and those of its close relatives were 75.9–77.2, 19.0–20.3 and 57.2–61.8 %, respectively. Chemotaxonomic analysis of strain DQS-5 indicated that the sole respiratory quinone was ubiquinone-8, the predominant cellular fatty acids were C and summed feature 3 (C ω7 and/or C ω6), and the major polar lipids consisted of phosphatidylethanolamine, phosphatidylglycerol, aminophospholipid and aminolipid. The phylogenetic, genotypic, phenotypic and chemotaxonomic data demonstrate that strain DQS-5 represents a novel species in a novel genus within the family , for which the name gen. nov., sp. nov., is proposed. Strain DQS-5 (=KCTC 92788=CCTCC AB 2022320) is the type and only strain of .

Funding
This study was supported by the:
  • Shandong Provincial Education Science Plan (Award Q20194303)
    • Principle Award Recipient: HanChen
  • Shenzhen Municipal Key Laboratory of Neuropsychiatric Modulation, Chinese Academy of Sciences (Award Award XDA23040401)
    • Principle Award Recipient: DongruQiu
  • National Key R&D Program of China (Award 2019YFA0905500)
    • Principle Award Recipient: DongruQiu
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.006249
2024-01-29
2024-12-14
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Brannan DK, Caldwell DE. Thermothrix thiopara: growth and metabolism of a newly isolated thermophile capable of oxidizing sulfur and sulfur compounds. Appl Environ Microbiol 1980; 40:211–216 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Gillis M, Van Van T, Bardin R, Goor M, Hebbar P et al. Polyphasic taxonomy in the genus Burkholderia leading to an emended description of the genus and proposition of Burkholderia vietnamiensis sp. nov. for N2-fixing isolates from rice in Vietnam. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1995; 45:274–289 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Chen WM, Xie PB, Young CC, Sheu SY. Formosimonas limnophila gen. nov., sp. nov., a new member of the family Burkholderiaceae isolated from a freshwater lake. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2017; 67:17–24 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Vaz-Moreira I, Narciso-da-Rocha C, De Brandt E, Vandamme P, Silva Ferreira AC et al. Hydromonas duriensis gen. nov., sp. nov., isolated from freshwater. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2015; 65:4134–4139 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Aizawa T, Vijarnsorn P, Nakajima M, Sunairi M. Burkholderia bannensis sp. nov., an acid-neutralizing bacterium isolated from torpedo grass (Panicum repens) growing in highly acidic swamps. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2011; 61:1645–1650 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Cuadrado V, Gomila M, Merini L, Giulietti AM, Moore ERB. Cupriavidus pampae sp. nov., a novel herbicide-degrading bacterium isolated from agricultural soil. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2010; 60:2606–2612 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Valverde A, Delvasto P, Peix A, Velázquez E, Santa-Regina I et al. Burkholderia ferrariae sp. nov., isolated from an iron ore in Brazil. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2006; 56:2421–2425 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Sun L-N, Wang D-S, Yang E-D, Fang L-C, Chen Y-F et al. Cupriavidus nantongensis sp. nov., a novel chlorpyrifos-degrading bacterium isolated from sludge. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2016; 66:2335–2341 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Chang S-C, Wang J-T, Vandamme P, Hwang J-H, Chang P-S et al. Chitinimonas taiwanensis gen. nov., sp. nov., a novel chitinolytic bacterium isolated from a freshwater pond for shrimp culture. Syst Appl Microbiol 2004; 27:43–49 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Kim B-Y, Weon H-Y, Yoo S-H, Chen W-M, Kwon S-W et al. Chitinimonas koreensis sp. nov., isolated from greenhouse soil in Korea. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2006; 56:1761–1764 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Joung Y, Lee BI, Kang H, Kim H, Joh K. Chitinimonas viridis sp. nov., isolated from a mesotrophic artificial lake. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2014; 64:1123–1126 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Li Y, Zhu H, Lai Q, Lei X, Chen Z et al. Chitinimonas prasina sp. nov., isolated from lake water. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2014; 64:3005–3009 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Padakandla SR, Chae J-C. Chitinimonas naiadis sp. nov., isolated from a freshwater river. J Microbiol Biotechnol 2017; 27:1300–1305 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Yang DJ, Choi HS, Hong JK. Chitinimonas lacunae sp. nov., isolated from artificial pond in Korea. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2017; 67:4323–4327 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Xu Q, Jiang F, Da X, Zhang Y, Geng Y et al. Chitinimonas arctica sp. nov., isolated from Arctic tundra soil. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2020; 70:3455–3461 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Chen W-M, Yang S-H, Huang W-C, Cheng C-Y, Sheu S-Y. Chitinivorax tropicus gen. nov., sp. nov., a chitinolytic bacterium isolated from a freshwater lake. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2012; 62:1086–1091 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Meng YC, Liu HC, Zhou YG, Cai M, Kang Y. Vibrio gangliei sp. nov., a novel member of Vibrionaceae isolated from sawdust in a pigpen. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2018; 68:1969–1974 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Zhou LY, Zhang JY, Chen XY, Du ZJ, Mu DS. Tessaracoccus antarcticus sp. nov., a rhodopsin-containing bacterium from an Antarctic environment and emended description of the genus Tessaracoccus. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2020; 70:1555–1561 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Wang Y, Yu M, Liu Y, Yang X, Zhang X-H. Bacterioplanoides pacificum gen. nov., sp. nov., isolated from seawater of South Pacific Gyre. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2016; 66:5010–5015 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Xu XW, Wu YH, Wang CS, Oren A, Zhou PJ et al. Haloferax larsenii sp. nov., an extremely halophilic archaeon from a solar saltern. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2007; 57:717–720 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Minnikin DE, O’Donnell AG, Goodfellow M, Alderson G, Athalye M et al. An integrated procedure for the extraction of bacterial isoprenoid quinones and polar lipids. J Microbiol Methods 1984; 2:233–241 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Collins MD, Pirouz T, Goodfellow M, Minnikin DE. Distribution of menaquinones in actinomycetes and corynebacteria. J Gen Microbiol 1977; 100:221–230 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Chun J, Goodfellow M. A phylogenetic analysis of the genus Nocardia with 16S rRNA gene sequences. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1995; 45:240–245 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Thompson JD, Gibson TJ, Plewniak F, Jeanmougin F, Higgins DG. The CLUSTAL_X windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Res 1997; 25:4876–4882 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Kumar S, Stecher G, Tamura K. MEGA7: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Mol Biol Evol 2016; 33:1870–1874 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Saitou N, Nei M. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 1987; 4:406–425
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Felsenstein J. Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: a maximum likelihood approach. J Mol Evol 1981; 17:368–376 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Fitch WM. Toward defining the course of evolution – minimum change for a specific tree Topology. Syst Biol 1971; 20:406–416
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Jones DT, Taylor WR, Thornton JM. The rapid generation of mutation data matrices from protein sequences. Comput Appl Biosci 1992; 8:275–282 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Yoon SH, Ha SM, Lim J, Kwon S, Chun J. A large-scale evaluation of algorithms to calculate average nucleotide identity. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 2017; 110:1281–1286 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Meier-Kolthoff JP, Auch AF, Klenk HP, Göker M. Genome sequence-based species delimitation with confidence intervals and improved distance functions. BMC Bioinformatics 2013; 14:60 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Rodriguez-R LM, Konstantinidis KTJM. Bypassing cultivation to identify bacterial species. Microbe Magazine 2014; 9:111–118 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Tian R, Imanian B. VBCG: 20 validated bacterial core genes for phylogenomic analysis with high fidelity and resolution. Microbiome 2023; 11:247 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Konstantinidis KT, Tiedje JM. Prokaryotic taxonomy and phylogeny in the genomic era: advancements and challenges ahead. Curr Opin Microbiol 2007; 10:504–509 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.006249
Loading
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.006249
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplements

Supplementary material 1

PDF
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error