1887

Abstract

An endophytic actinomycete designated TRM65318, was isolated from the root of L. Its taxonomic status was determined using a polyphasic approach. Comparative 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis indicated that strain TRM65318 is phylogenetically most closely related to XHU 5031 (98.15 %) and DSM 15700 (97.78 %). The peptidoglycan belonged to type A4α. The polar lipids were phosphatidylinositol, phosphatidylglycerol, diphosphatidylglycerol, two unknown lipids and three glycolipids. The predominant menaquinones were MK-9(H) and MK-9(H) and the whole-cell sugars contained glucose, mannose and galactose. Major fatty acids were anteiso-C, iso-C and C. Strain TRM65318 had a genome size of 5881012 bp with a genome G+C content of 71.79 mol%. The average nucleotide identity and DNA–DNA hybridization values between strain TRM65318 and the most closely related species were much lower than the thresholds commonly used to define species. At the same time, differences in phenotypic and genotypic data showed that strain TRM65318 could be clearly distinguished from XHU 5031. Therefore, it is concluded that strain TRM65318 represents a novel species of the genus of . The proposed name for this organism is sp. nov., with type strain TRM65318 (=CCTCC AA 2019057=LMG 31679).

Funding
This study was supported by the:
  • Screening of Actinobacterial Diversity and Phosphonic Acid-Producing Strains of Typical Soil Actinomycetes from Different Habitats in the Tarim River Basin (Award 2022-XBQNXZ-019)
    • Principle Award Recipient: XiaoXiaLuo
  • Tarim University Major Project Cultivation Special (Award TDZKZD202202)
    • Principle Award Recipient: XiaoXiaLuo
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (Award 32360009)
    • Principle Award Recipient: XiaoXiaLuo
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.006179
2024-02-05
2024-12-01
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Cui X, Schumann P, Stackebrandt E, Kroppenstedt RM, Pukall R et al. Myceligenerans xiligouense gen. nov., sp. nov., a novel hyphae-forming member of the family Promicromonosporaceae. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2004; 54:1287–1293 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Groth I, Schumann P, Schütze B, Gonzalez JM, Laiz L et al. Myceligenerans crystallogenes sp. nov., isolated from Roman catacombs. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2006; 56:283–287 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Wang Y, Tang S-K, Li Z, Lou K, Mao P-H et al. Myceligenerans halotolerans sp. nov., an actinomycete isolated from a salt lake, and emended description of the genus Myceligenerans. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2011; 61:974–978 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Sarmiento-Vizcaíno A, González V, Braña AF, Molina A, Acuña JL et al. Myceligenerans cantabricum sp. nov., a barotolerant actinobacterium isolated from a deep cold-water coral. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2015; 65:1328–1334 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Guan T-W, Wu N, Tang S-K, Che Z-M, Chen X-G. Myceligenerans salitolerans sp. nov., a halotolerant actinomycete isolated from a salt lake in Xinjiang, China. Extremophiles 2013; 17:147–152 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Moradi M-T, Karimi A, Fotouhi F, Kheiri S, Torabi A et al. In vitro and in vivo effects of Peganum harmala L. seeds extract against influenza a virus. Avicenna J Phytomed 2017; 7:519–530
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Ait Abderrahim L, Taïbi K, Ait Abderrahim C. Assessment of the antimicrobial and antioxidant activities of Ziziphus lotus and Peganum harmala. Iran J Sci Technol Trans Sci 2019; 43:409–414 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Klykleung N, Tanasupawat S, Pittayakhajonwut P, Ohkuma M, Kudo T. Amycolatopsis stemonae sp. nov., isolated from a thai medicinal plant. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2015; 65:3894–3899 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Lei Y-J, Xia Z-F, Luo X-X, Zhang L-L. Actinokineospora pegani sp. nov., an endophytic actinomycete isolated from the surface-sterilized root of Peganum harmala L. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2020; 70:4358–4363 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Weisburg WG, Barns SM, Pelletier DA, Lane DJ. 16S ribosomal DNA amplification for phylogenetic study. J Bacteriol 1991; 173:697–703 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Yoon S-H, Ha S-M, Kwon S, Lim J, Kim Y et al. Introducing EzBioCloud: a taxonomically united database of 16S rRNA gene sequences and whole-genome assemblies. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2017; 67:1613–1617 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Saitou N, Nei M. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 1987; 4:406–425 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Felsenstein J. Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: a maximum likelihood approach. J Mol Evol 1981; 17:368–376 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Nei M, Kumar S. Molecular Evolution and Phylogenetics New York: Oxford University Press; 2000 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Kimura M. A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J Mol Evol 1980; 16:111–120 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Kumar S, Stecher G, Tamura K. MEGA7: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Mol Biol Evol 2016; 33:1870–1874 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Felsenstein J. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 1985; 39:783–791 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Meier-Kolthoff JP, Auch AF, Klenk H-P, Göker M. Genome sequence-based species delimitation with confidence intervals and improved distance functions. BMC Bioinformatics 2013; 14:60 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Yoon S-H, Ha S-M, Lim J, Kwon S, Chun J. A large-scale evaluation of algorithms to calculate average nucleotide identity. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 2017; 110:1281–1286 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Blin K, Shaw S, Steinke K, Villebro R, Ziemert N et al. antiSMASH 5.0: updates to the secondary metabolite genome mining pipeline. Nucleic Acids Res 2019; 47:W81–W87 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Wayne LG, Brenner DJ, Colwell RR, Grimont PAD, Kandler O et al. International Committee on systematic bacteriology. Report of the AD hoc Committee on reconciliation of approaches to bacterial systematics. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1987; 37:463–464 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Stackebrandt E, Goebel BM. Taxonomic note: a place for DNA-DNA reassociation and 16S rRNA sequence analysis in the present species definition in bacteriology. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 1994; 44:846–849 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Richter M, Rosselló-Móra R. Shifting the genomic gold standard for the prokaryotic species definition. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2009; 106:19126–19131 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Shirling EB, Gottlieb D. Methods for characterization of Streptomyces species. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1966; 16:313–340 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Gordon RE, Barnett DA, Handerhan JE, Pang C-N. Nocardia coeliaca, Nocardia autotrophica, and the nocardin strain. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1974; 24:54–63 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Schleifer KH, Kandler O. Peptidoglycan types of bacterial cell walls and their taxonomic implications. Bacteriol Rev 1972; 36:407–477 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Minnikin DE, O’Donnell AG, Goodfellow M, Alderson G, Athalye M et al. An integrated procedure for the extraction of bacterial isoprenoid quinones and polar lipids. J Microbiol Methods 1984; 2:233–241 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Collins MD. Isoprenoid quinone analyses in bacterial classification and identification. In Goodfellow M, Minnikin DE. eds Chemical Methods in Bacterial Systematics London: Academic Press; 1985 pp 267–284
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Lechevalier MP, Lechevalier HA. The chemotaxonomy of actinomycetes. In Dietz A, Thayer DW. eds Society of Industrial Microbiology; Actinomycete Taxonomy 1980 pp 227–291
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Sasser M. Identification of bacteria by gas chromatography of cellular fatty acids Technical Note 101: MIDI Inc.; 1990
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Schumann P. Peptidoglycan structure. Methods Microbiol 2011; 38:101–129
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.006179
Loading
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.006179
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplements

Supplementary material 1

PDF
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error