Genome-based reclassification of Deinococcus saudiensis Hussain et al. 2016 as a later heterotypic synonym of Deinococcus soli Cha et al. 2014

References

1. Brooks BW, Murray RGE. Nomenclature for “Micrococcus radiodurans” and other radiation-resistant cocci: Deinococcaceae fam. nov. and Deinococcus gen. nov., including five species. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1981; 31:353–360 [View Article]
   [Google Scholar]
2. Parte AC. LPSN - list of prokaryotic names with standing in nomenclature (bacterio.net), 20 years on. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2018; 68:1825–1829 [View Article] [PubMed]
   [Google Scholar]
3. Lakra P, Verma H, Talwar C, Singh DN, Singhvi N et al. Genome based reclassification of Deinococcus swuensis as a heterotypic synonym of Deinococcus radiopugnans. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2021; 71: [View Article] [PubMed]
   [Google Scholar]
4. Hussain F, Khan IU, Habib N, Xian W-D, Hozzein WN et al. Deinococcus saudiensis sp. nov., isolated from desert. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2016; 66:5106–5111 [View Article] [PubMed]
   [Google Scholar]
5. Cha S, Srinivasan S, Seo T, Kim MK. Deinococcus soli sp. nov., a gamma-radiation-resistant bacterium isolated from rice field soil. Curr Microbiol 2014; 68:777–783 [View Article] [PubMed]
   [Google Scholar]
6. de Groot A, Chapon V, Servant P, Christen R, Saux M-L et al. Deinococcus deserti sp. nov., a gamma-radiation-tolerant bacterium isolated from the Sahara Desert. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2005; 55:2441–2446 [View Article] [PubMed]
   [Google Scholar]
7. Im W-T, Jung H-M, Ten LN, Kim MK, Bora N et al. Deinococcus aquaticus sp. nov., isolated from fresh water, and Deinococcus caeni sp. nov., isolated from activated sludge. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2008; 58:2348–2353 [View Article] [PubMed]
   [Google Scholar]
8. Wang X-P, Li C-M, Yu Y, Li H-R, Du Z-J et al. Deinococcus arcticus sp. nov., isolated from Silene acaulis rhizosphere soil of the Arctic tundra. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2019; 69:3437–3442 [View Article]
   [Google Scholar]
9. Battista JR. Against all odds: the survival strategies of Deinococcus radiodurans. Annu Rev Microbiol 1997; 51:203–224 [View Article] [PubMed]
   [Google Scholar]
10. Oren A, Garrity GM. List of new names and new combinations previously effectively, but not validly, published. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2016; 66:3761–3764
    [Google Scholar]
11. Yoon S-H, Ha S-M, Kwon S, Lim J, Kim Y et al. Introducing EzBioCloud: a taxonomically united database of 16S rRNA gene sequences and whole-genome assemblies. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2017; 67:1613–1617 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
12. Kumar S, Stecher G, Li M, Knyaz C, Tamura K. MEGA X: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis across computing platforms. Mol Biol Evol 2018; 35:1547–1549 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
13. Saitou N, Nei M. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 1987; 4:406–425 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
14. Felsenstein J. Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: a maximum likelihood approach. J Mol Evol 1981; 17:368–376 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
15. Richter M, Rosselló-Móra R. Shifting the genomic gold standard for the prokaryotic species definition. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2009; 106:19126–19131 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
16. Auch AF, Klenk H-P, Göker M. Standard operating procedure for calculating genome-to-genome distances based on high-scoring segment pairs. Stand Genomic Sci 2010; 2:142–148 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
17. Auch AF, von Jan M, Klenk H-P, Göker M. Digital DNA-DNA hybridization for microbial species delineation by means of genome-to-genome sequence comparison. Stand Genomic Sci 2010; 2:117–134 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
18. Meier-Kolthoff JP, Auch AF, Klenk H-P, Göker M. Genome sequence-based species delimitation with confidence intervals and improved distance functions. BMC Bioinformatics 2013; 14:60 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
19. Sun J, Lu F, Luo Y, Bie L, Xu L et al. OrthoVenn3: an integrated platform for exploring and visualizing orthologous data across genomes. Nucleic Acids Res 2023; 51:W397–W403 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
20. Moore WEC, Stackebrandt E, Kandler O, Colwell RR, Krichevsky MI et al. Report of the ad hoc committee on reconciliation of approaches to bacterial systematics. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 1987; 37:463–464 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
21. Meier-Kolthoff JP, Göker M. TYGS is an automated high-throughput platform for state-of-the-art genome-based taxonomy. Nat Commun 2019; 10:2182 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]