1887

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SYSTEMATIC AND EVOLUTIONARY MICROBIOLOGY logo

Volume 73, Issue 7

sp. nov., a multi-xenobiotics degrading genes harbouring bacterium isolated from sediment of river No Access

Abstract

A Gram-stain-negative, strictly aerobic, non-motile, catalase- and oxidase-positive, pink and rod-shaped strain, designated RY-2, was isolated from sediment of Fuyang River located in Wuqiang County, Hengshui City, Hebei Province, PR China. The strain grew at 25–45 °C (optimum, 37 °C), pH 7.0–8.0 (optimum, pH 7.0) and in the presence of 0–1.5 % (w/v) NaCl (optimum, 1 %). From the phylogenetic analysis of the 16S rRNA gene sequence, strain RY-2 was affiliated to the genus , and had the highest 16S rRNA gene sequence similarity to JCM 17389 (98.3 %) and the similarity values between strain RY-2 and other type strains was all below 89.3 %. The genome size of strain RY-2 was 4.75 Mb and the DNA G+C content was 46.6 %. Values of digital DNA–DNA hybridization and average nucleotide identity between strain RY-2 and the reference strain were 63.2 and 95.5 %, respectively. The major fatty acids (≥5.0 %) were iso-C (37.9 %), summed feature 9 (8.4 %, iso-C 9 and/or C10-methyl), anteiso-C (8.2 %), iso-C 3-OH (7.6 %) and summed feature 4 (5.2 %, iso-C I and/or anteiso-C B) and its sole menaquinone was MK-7. The polar lipids consisted of phosphatidylethanolamine, an unknown phosphoglycolipid, an unidentified phospholipid, two unidentified aminolipids, three unidentified glycolipids and nine unidentified lipids. Based on the results of biochemical, physiological, phylogenomic and chemotaxonomic analyses, strain RY-2 is considered to represent a novel species of the genus within the family , for which the name sp. nov. is proposed. The type strain is RY-2 (=GDMCC 1.2781=JCM 35631).

  • Received:
  • Accepted:
  • Published Online:
Keyword(s): Mariniradius sediminis sp. nov. , multi-xenobiotics degrading genes , phylogenomic tree and polyphasic taxonomy
Funding
This study was supported by the:
  • Natural Science Research Project of Hengshui University (Award 2018ZX001)
    • Principle Award Recipient: WeiShuzhen
  • Major Program of Shandong Provincial Natural Science Foundation (Award ZR2020ZD19)
    • Principle Award Recipient: LiuAijv
  • Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province (Award ZR2020MD121)
    • Principle Award Recipient: HongliangLiu
  • Shandong Provincial Natural Science Foundation for Outstanding Young Scholars (Award ZR2022YQ34)
    • Principle Award Recipient: HongliangLiu
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (Award 42177403)
    • Principle Award Recipient: HongliangLiu
© 2023 The Authors
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.005992
2023-07-28
2024-10-08
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bhumika V, Srinivas TNR, Ravinder K, Anil Kumar P. Mariniradius saccharolyticus gen. nov., sp. nov., a member of the family Cyclobacteriaceae isolated from marine aquaculture pond water, and emended descriptions of the genus Aquiflexum and Aquiflexum balticum. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2013; 63:2088–2094 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Štefanac T, Grgas D, Landeka Dragičević T. Xenobiotics-division and methods of detection: a review. J Xenobiot 2021; 11:130–141 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Roccaro P, Massimiliano S, Vagliasindi F. Removal of Xenobiotic compounds from wastewater for environment protection: treatment processes and costs. Chem Eng Trans 2013; 32:505–510
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Zhao J, Wu E, Zhang B, Bai X, Lei P et al. Pollution characteristics and ecological risks associated with heavy metals in the Fuyang river system in North China. Environ Pollut 2021; 281:116994 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Su C, Lu Y, Johnson AC, Shi Y, Zhang M et al. Which metal represents the greatest risk to freshwater ecosystem in bohai region of china?. Ecosyst Health Sustain 2017; 3: [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Qingxue L, Tianyu D, Wangru S, Hanyu L, Lina W et al. Pollution characteristics and risk assessment of antibiotics in typical northern urban rivers. Asian J Ecotoxicol 2022; 2022:213–229
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Miglani R, Parveen N, Kumar A, Ansari MA, Khanna S et al. Degradation of xenobiotic pollutants: an environmentally sustainable approach. Metabolites 2022; 12:818 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Wilson KH, Blitchington RB, Greene RC. Amplification of bacterial 16S ribosomal DNA with polymerase chain reaction. J Clin Microbiol 1990; 28:1942–1946 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Yoon S-H, Ha S-M, Kwon S, Lim J, Kim Y et al. Introducing EzBioCloud: a taxonomically united database of 16S rRNA gene sequences and whole-genome assemblies. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2017; 67:1613–1617 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Tamura K, Stecher G, Kumar S. MEGA11: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis version 11. Mol Biol Evol 2021; 38:3022–3027 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Saitou N, Nei M. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 1987; 4:406–425 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Kumar S, Stecher G, Tamura K. MEGA7: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Mol Biol Evol 2016; 33:1870–1874 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Felsenstein J. Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: a maximum likelihood approach. J Mol Evol 1981; 17:368–376 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Thompson JD, Higgins DG, Gibson TJ. CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res 1994; 22:4673–4680 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Felsenstein J. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 1985; 39:783–791 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Luo R, Liu B, Xie Y, Li Z, Huang W et al. SOAPdenovo2: an empirically improved memory-efficient short-read de novo assembler. Gigascience 2012; 1:18 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Gurevich A, Saveliev V, Vyahhi N, Tesler G. QUAST: quality assessment tool for genome assemblies. Bioinformatics 2013; 29:1072–1075 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Parks DH, Imelfort M, Skennerton CT, Hugenholtz P, Tyson GW. CheckM: assessing the quality of microbial genomes recovered from isolates, single cells, and metagenomes. Genome Res 2015; 25:1043–1055 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Richter M, Rosselló-Móra R, Oliver Glöckner F, Peplies J. JSpeciesWS: a web server for prokaryotic species circumscription based on pairwise genome comparison. Bioinformatics 2016; 32:929–931 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Yoon S-H, Ha S, Lim J, Kwon S, Chun J. A large-scale evaluation of algorithms to calculate average nucleotide identity. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 2017; 110:1281–1286 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Meier-Kolthoff JP, Carbasse JS, Peinado-Olarte RL, Göker M. TYGS and LPSN: a database tandem for fast and reliable genome-based classification and nomenclature of prokaryotes. Nucleic Acids Res 2022; 50:D801–D807 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Rodriguez-R LM, Konstantinidis KT. Bypassing cultivation to identify bacterial species. Microbe 2014; 9:111–118 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Na S-I, Kim YO, Yoon S-H, Ha S-M, Baek I et al. UBCG: up-to-date bacterial core gene set and pipeline for phylogenomic tree reconstruction. J Microbiol 2018; 56:280–285 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Zhang H, Yohe T, Huang L, Entwistle S, Wu P et al. dbCAN2: a meta server for automated carbohydrate-active enzyme annotation. Nucleic Acids Res 2018; 46:W95–W101 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Drula E, Garron M-L, Dogan S, Lombard V, Henrissat B et al. The carbohydrate-active enzyme database: functions and literature. Nucleic Acids Res 2022; 50:D571–D577 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Blin K, Shaw S, Kloosterman AM, Charlop-Powers Z, van Wezel GP et al. antiSMASH 6.0: improving cluster detection and comparison capabilities. Nucleic Acids Res 2021; 49:W29–W35 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Chun J, Oren A, Ventosa A, Christensen H, Arahal DR et al. Proposed minimal standards for the use of genome data for the taxonomy of prokaryotes. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2018; 68:461–466 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Medlar AJ, Törönen P, Holm L. AAI-profiler: fast proteome-wide exploratory analysis reveals taxonomic identity, misclassification and contamination. Nucleic Acids Res 2018; 46:W479–W485 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Tomás AF, Karakashev D, Angelidaki I. Thermoanaerobacter pentosaceus sp. nov., an anaerobic, extremely thermophilic, high ethanol-yielding bacterium isolated from household waste. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2013; 63:2396–2404 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Kim M, Oh HS, Park SC, Chun J. Towards a taxonomic coherence between average nucleotide identity and 16S rRNA gene sequence similarity for species demarcation of prokaryotes. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2014; 64:346–351 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Arias-Barrau E, Olivera ER, Luengo JM, Fernández C, Galán B et al. The homogentisate pathway: a central catabolic pathway involved in the degradation of L-phenylalanine, L-tyrosine, and 3-hydroxyphenylacetate in Pseudomonas putida. J Bacteriol 2004; 186:5062–5077 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Brammar WJ, Charles IG, Matfield M, Liu CP, Drew RE et al. The nucleotide sequence of the amiE gene of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. FEBS Lett 1987; 215:291–294 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Teufel R, Mascaraque V, Ismail W, Voss M, Perera J et al. Bacterial phenylalanine and phenylacetate catabolic pathway revealed. Proc Natl Acad Sci 2010; 107:14390–14395 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Claus D. A standardized Gram staining procedure. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 1992; 8:451–452 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Powers EM. Efficacy of the Ryu nonstaining KOH technique for rapidly determining gram reactions of food-borne and waterborne bacteria and yeasts. Appl Environ Microbiol 1995; 61:3756–3758 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Biehler E, Mayer F, Hoffmann L, Krause E, Bohn T. Comparison of 3 spectrophotometric methods for carotenoid determination in frequently consumed fruits and vegetables. J Food Sci 2010; 75:C55–61 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Ron EYC, Sardari RRR, Anthony R, van Niel EWJ, Hreggvidsson GO et al. Cultivation technology development of Rhodothermus marinus DSM 16675. Extremophiles 2019; 23:735–745 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Sasser M. Identifcation of bacteria by gas chromatography of cellular fatty acids. USFCC Newsl 1990; 20:1–6
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Minnikin DE, O’Donnell AG, Goodfellow M, Alderson G, Athalye M et al. An integrated procedure for the extraction of bacterial isoprenoid quinones and polar lipids. J Microbiol Methods 1984; 2:233–241 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Collins MD, Pirouz T, Goodfellow M, Minnikin DE. Distribution of menaquinones in actinomycetes and corynebacteria. J Gen Microbiol 1977; 100:221–230 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Wayne LG. International Committee on Systematic Bacteriology: announcement of the report of the ad hoc committee on reconciliation of approaches to bacterial systematics. Zentralbl Bakteriol Mikrobiol Hyg A 1988; 268:433–434 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Tindall BJ, Rosselló-Móra R, Busse H-J, Ludwig W, Kämpfer P. Notes on the characterization of prokaryote strains for taxonomic purposes. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2010; 60:249–266 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Fardeau M-L, Salinas MB, L’Haridon S, Jeanthon C, Verhé F et al. Isolation from oil reservoirs of novel thermophilic anaerobes phylogenetically related to Thermoanaerobacter subterraneus: reassignment of T. subterraneus, Thermoanaerobacter yonseiensis, Thermoanaerobacter tengcongensis and Carboxydibrachium pacificum to Caldanaerobacter subterraneus gen. nov., sp. nov., comb. nov. as four novel subspecies. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2004; 54:467–474 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Verbeke TJ, Dumonceaux TJ, Wushke S, Cicek N, Levin DB et al. Isolates of Thermoanaerobacter thermohydrosulfuricus from decaying wood compost display genetic and phenotypic microdiversity. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 2011; 78:473–487 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.005992
Loading
Mariniradius sediminis sp. nov., a multi-xenobiotics degrading genes harbouring bacterium isolated from sediment of river
Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 73, 005992 (2023); https://doi.org/10.1099/ijsem.0.005992
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.005992
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.005992
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplements

Supplementary material 1

PDF

Most cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error