1887

Abstract

A rod-shaped, aerotolerant, Gram-stain-positive bacterium isolated from pig faeces was designated as strain YH-lim2214. Analysis of the 16S rRNA gene sequence revealed that the isolate was most closely related to KCTC 25258 with 98.0 % similarity. The average nucleotide identity and average amino acid identity values between YH-lim2214 and the most closely related strain KCTC 25258 were 81.4 and 81.3 %, respectively. The major fatty acids were C 9, summed feature 7 and C. The cell-wall peptidoglycan type was A4α -Lys-Asp. The genomic DNA G+C content was 51.1 mol%. The chemotaxonomic, phenotypic and phylogenetic properties of YH-lim2214 (=KCTC 25572=JCM 35701) suggest that it represents a novel taxon, for which the name sp. nov. is proposed.

Funding
This study was supported by the:
  • National Research Foundation of Korea (Award 2021R1A2C2009051)
    • Principle Award Recipient: Joong-KiKook
  • Korea Research Institute of Bioscience and Biotechnology (Award KGS2222221)
    • Principle Award Recipient: YoungHyo Chang
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.005988
2023-07-24
2024-12-14
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Zheng J, Wittouck S, Salvetti E, Franz CMAP, Harris HMB et al. A taxonomic note on the genus Lactobacillus: description of 23 novel genera, emended description of the genus Lactobacillus Beijerinck 1901, and union of Lactobacillaceae and Leuconostocaceae. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2020; 70:2782–2858 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Parte AC. LPSN - List of Prokaryotic names with Standing in Nomenclature (bacterio.net), 20 years on. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2018; 68:1825–1829 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Koutsoumanis K, Allende A, Alvarez-Ordóñez A, Bolton D et al. EFSA Panel on Biological Hazards (BIOHAZ).Update of the list of QPS-recommended biological agents intentionally added to food or feed as notified to EFSA 10: Suitability of taxonomic units notified to EFSA until March 2019. EFSA J 2019; 17:e05753 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Salvetti E, O’Toole PW. The genomic basis of Lactobacilli as health-promoting organisms. Microbiol Spectr 2017; 5: [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Zheng J, Ruan L, Sun M, Gänzle M, Björkroth J. A genomic view of Lactobacilli and Pediococci demonstrates that phylogeny matches ecology and physiology. Appl Environ Microbiol 2015; 81:7233–7243 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Tieking M, Kaditzky S, Valcheva R, Korakli M, Vogel RF et al. Extracellular homopolysaccharides and oligosaccharides from intestinal lactobacilli. J Appl Microbiol 2005; 99:692–702 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Shin Y, Paek J, Kim H, Kook J-K, Chang Y-H. Faecalicatena absiana sp. nov., an obligately anaerobic bacterium from a pig farm faeces dump. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2022; 72:005238 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Bai L, Paek J, Shin Y, Park H-Y, Chang YH. Lacticaseibacillus absianus sp. nov., isolated from the cecum of a mini-pig. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2019; 71:10 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Chang Y-H, Jung MY, Park I-S, Oh H-M. Sporolactobacillus vineae sp. nov., a spore-forming lactic acid bacterium isolated from vineyard soil. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2008; 58:2316–2320 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Chun J, Goodfellow M. A phylogenetic analysis of the genus Nocardia with 16S rRNA gene sequences. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1995; 45:240–245 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Paek J, Bai L, Shin Y, Kim H, Kook J-K et al. Lacticaseibacillus kribbianus sp. nov., isolated from pig farm faeces dump. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2022; 72:005617 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Paek J, Bai L, Shin Y, Kim H, Kook JK et al. Description of Paenibacillus dokdonensis sp. nov., a new bacterium isolated from soil. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2021; 71:004707
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Shin Y, Paek J, Kim H, Kook JK, Chang YH. Clostridium Vitabionis sp. nov., isolated from the large intestine of a mini-pig. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2021; 71:004694
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Paek J, Shin Y, Kim J-S, Kim H, Kook J-K et al. Description of Absiella argi gen. nov., sp. nov., and transfer of Eubacterium dolichum and Eubacterium tortuosum to the genus Absiella as Absiella dolichum comb. nov. and Absiella tortuosum comb. nov. Anaerobe 2017; 48:70–75 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Schumann P. Peptidoglycan structure. Methods Microbiol 2011; 38:101–129
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Ma S, Huang Y, Wang C, Fan H, Dai L et al. Defluviitalea raffinosedens sp. nov., a thermophilic, anaerobic, saccharolytic bacterium isolated from an anaerobic batch digester treating animal manure and rice straw. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2017; 67:1607–1612 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Shin Y, Paek J, Kim H, Kook J-K, Kim J-S et al. Absicoccus porci gen. nov., sp. nov., a member of the family Erysipelotrichaceae isolated from pig faeces. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2020; 70:732–737 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Bankevich A, Nurk S, Antipov D, Gurevich AA, Dvorkin M et al. SPAdes: a new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J Comput Biol 2012; 19:455–477 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Simão FA, Waterhouse RM, Ioannidis P, Kriventseva EV, Zdobnov EM. BUSCO: assessing genome assembly and annotation completeness with single-copy orthologs. Bioinformatics 2015; 31:3210–3212 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Seemann T. Prokka: rapid prokaryotic genome annotation. Bioinformatics 2014; 30:2068–2069 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Parks DH, Imelfort M, Skennerton CT, Hugenholtz P, Tyson GW. CheckM: assessing the quality of microbial genomes recovered from isolates, single cells, and metagenomes. Genome Res 2015; 25:1043–1055 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Rodriguez-R LM, Konstantinidis KT. The enveomics collection: a toolbox for specialized analyses of microbial genomes and metagenomes. PeerJ Preprints 2016 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Meier-Kolthoff JP, Carbasse JS, Peinado-Olarte RL, Göker M. TYGS and LPSN: a database tandem for fast and reliable genome-based classification and nomenclature of prokaryotes. Nucleic Acids Res 2021; 50:D801–D807 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Alanjary M, Steinke K, Ziemert N. AutoMLST: an automated web server for generating multi-locus species trees highlighting natural product potential. Nucleic Acids Res 2019; 47:W276–W282 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Chun J, Oren A, Ventosa A, Christensen H, Arahal DR et al. Proposed minimal standards for the use of genome data for the taxonomy of prokaryotes. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2018; 68:461–466 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Brady A, Salzberg SL. Phymm and PhymmBL: metagenomic phylogenetic classification with interpolated Markov models. Nat Methods 2009; 6:673–676 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Parks DH, MacDonald NJ, Beiko RG. Classifying short genomic fragments from novel lineages using composition and homology. BMC Bioinformatics 2011; 12:328 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.005988
Loading
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.005988
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplements

Supplementary material 1

PDF
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error