Skip to content
1887

Abstract

During a screening study for in two unrelated flocks of Muscovy ducks pharyngeal and cloacal swabs were collected. A total of 59 -like isolates sharing the same colony morphology were subcultured and subsequently characterized. Colonies on bovine blood agar were nonhaemolytic, regular, circular, slightly raised, shiny, intransparent with an entire margin, greyish and had an unguent-like consistency. Isolate AT1 was characterized by 16S rRNA gene sequencing and showed the highest similarity of 96.1 % to the type strain of and 96.0 % to the type strain of , respectively. In addition, and gene sequences also showed the highest similarity to the genus . The phylogenetic comparison of concatenated conserved protein sequences also showed a unique position of AT1 compared to other species of . Full phenotypic characterization of the isolates showed that between two () and 10 () phenotypic characteristics separate the taxon isolated from Muscovy ducks from the accepted species of . Whole genomic sequences of two strains analysed by the type strain genome server showed the highest similarity of 24.9 % to the genome of the type strain of and 23.0 % to the genome of the type strain of . The species sp. nov. is proposed based on the phenotypic and genotypic similarity to as well as differences to the other validly published species of the genus. The leukotoxin protein was not predicted in the genome of AT1. The G+C content of the type strain of sp. nov., AT1 (=CCUG 76754=DSM 115341) is 37.99 mol%, calculated from the whole genome. The investigation further proposes that is reclassified as a later heterotypic synonym of , since and are closely genetically related, and was validly published before .

Funding
This study was supported by the:
  • Statens Jordbrugs- og Veterinærvidenskabelige Forskningsråd
    • Principle Award Recipient: NotApplicable
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.005947
2023-06-26
2025-01-24
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Angen O, Mutters R, Caugant DA, Olsen JE, Bisgaard M. Taxonomic relationships of the [Pasteurella] haemolytica complex as evaluated by DNA-DNA hybridizations and 16S rRNA sequencing with proposal of Mannheimia haemolytica gen. nov., comb. nov., Mannheimia granulomatis comb. nov., Mannheimia glucosida sp. nov., Mannheimia ruminalis sp. nov. and Mannheimia varigena sp. nov. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1999; 49 Pt 1:67–86 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Blackalu P, Angen O, Fegan N, Blackall L, Mutters R et al. Characterisation of a novel Mannheimia sp from Australian feedlot cattle. Aust Vet J 2001; 79:634–639 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Kuhnert P, Brodard I, Schönecker L, Akarsu H, Christensen H et al. Mannheimia pernigra sp. nov., isolated from bovine respiratory tract. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2021; 71:004643 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Christensen H, Bojesen AM, Bisgaard M. Mannheimia caviae sp. nov., isolated from epidemic conjunctivitis and otitis media in guinea pigs. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2011; 61:1699–1704 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Li F, Zhao W, Zhu J, Hong Q, Shao Q et al. Mannheimia ovis sp. nov., isolated from dead sheep with hemorrhagic pneumonia. Curr Microbiol 2020; 77:3504–3511 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Li F, Zhao W, Hong Q, Shao Q, Zhu J et al. Mannheimia bovis sp. nov., isolated from a dead cow with hemorrhagic pneumonia. Curr Microbiol 2021; 78:1692–1698 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Christensen H, Kuhnert P, Busse H-J, Frederiksen WC, Bisgaard M. Proposed minimal standards for the description of genera, species and subspecies of the Pasteurellaceae. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2007; 57:166–178 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Whitman WB, Rainey F, Kämpfer P, Trujillo M, Chun J et al. Bergey’s Manual of Systematics of Archaea and Bacteria Wiley Online Library; 2020 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Felis GE, Dellaglio F. On species descriptions based on a single strain: proposal to introduce the status species proponenda (sp. pr.). Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2007; 57:2185–2187 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Angen Ø, Ahrens P, Kuhnert P, Christensen H, Mutters R. Proposal of Histophilus somni gen. nov., sp. nov. for the three species incertae sedis “Haemophilus somnus”, “Haemophilus agni” and “Histophilus ovis.”. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2003; 53:1449–1456 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Adhikary S, Nicklas W, Bisgaard M, Boot R, Kuhnert P et al. Rodentibacter gen. nov. including Rodentibacter pneumotropicus comb. nov., Rodentibacter heylii sp. nov., Rodentibacter myodis sp. nov., Rodentibacter ratti sp. nov., Rodentibacter heidelbergensis sp. nov., Rodentibacter trehalosifermentans sp. nov., Rodentibacter rarus sp. nov., Rodentibacter mrazii and two genomospecies. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2017; 67:1793–1806 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Yoon SH, Ha SM, Kwon S, Lim J, Kim Y et al. Introducing EzBioCloud: a taxonomically united database of 16S rRNA gene sequences and whole-genome assemblies. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2017; 67:1613–1617 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Sayers EW, Bolton EE, Brister JR, Canese K, Chan J et al. Database resources of the National Center for Biotechnology Information. Nucleic Acids Res 2022; 50:D20–D26 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Larkin MA, Blackshields G, Brown NP, Chenna R, McGettigan PA et al. Clustal W and Clustal X version 2.0. Bioinformatics 2007; 23:2947–2948 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Hall TA. Bioedit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucl Acids Symp Ser 1999; 41:95–98
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Kumar S, Stecher G, Tamura K. MEGA7: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Mol Biol Evol 2016; 33:1870–1874 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Auch AF, von Jan M, Klenk H-P, Göker M. Digital DNA-DNA hybridization for microbial species delineation by means of genome-to-genome sequence comparison. Stand Genomic Sci 2010; 2:117–134 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Auch AF, Klenk H-P, Göker M. Standard operating procedure for calculating genome-to-genome distances based on high-scoring segment pairs. Stand Genomic Sci 2010; 2:142–148 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Meier-Kolthoff JP, Göker M. TYGS is an automated high-throughput platform for state-of-the-art genome-based taxonomy. Nat Commun 2019; 10:2182 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Yoon SH, Ha SM, Lim JM, Kwon SJ, Chun J. A large-scale evaluation of algorithms to calculate average nucleotide identity. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 2017; 110:1281–1286 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Christensen H, Bisgaard M. Classification of genera of Pasteurellaceae using conserved predicted protein sequences. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2018; 68:2692–2696 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Christensen H, Kuhnert P, Busse H-J, Blackall P, Bisgaard M et al. Pasteurellaceae. In Trujillo ME, Dedysh S, DeVos P, Hedlund B, Kämpfer P et al. eds Bergey’s Manual of Systematics of Archaea Wiley & Sons; 2020
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Kuhnert P, Korczak BM. Prediction of whole-genome DNA–DNA similarity, determination of G+C content and phylogenetic analysis within the family Pasteurellaceae by multilocus sequence analysis (MLSA). Microbiology 2006; 152:2537–2548 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Bisgaard M, Nørskov-Lauritsen N, de Wit SJ, Hess C, Christensen H. Multilocus sequence phylogenetic analysis of Avibacterium. Microbiology 2012; 158:993–1004 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Goris J, Konstantinidis KT, Klappenbach JA, Coenye T, Vandamme P et al. DNA-DNA hybridization values and their relationship to whole-genome sequence similarities. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2007; 57:81–91 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Altschul SF, Madden TL, Schäffer AA, Zhang J, Zhang Z et al. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res 1997; 25:3389–3402 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.005947
Loading
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.005947
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplements

Supplementary material 1

PDF
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error