Skip to content
1887

Abstract

Oren and Garrity recently published 42 new prokaryotic phylum names, including , which they describe as a synonym of the effectively published name and its orthographic correction . However, the name was listed as a division in the Approved Lists of Bacterial Names, which suggests that it should be treated as having been validly published. Recent emendations to rules require that a named phylum now requires a named type genus and a phylum name is formed by the addition of the suffix to the stem of the name of the designated type genus. However, there are strong practical arguments for retaining the name , notwithstanding the uncertainty over whether the name already has standing. This matter is referred to the Judicial Commission, asking for an opinion on the standing and retention of the name .

Funding
This study was supported by the:
  • Medical Research Council (Award MR/T030062/1)
    • Principle Award Recipient: MarkJ. Pallen
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.005933
2023-07-06
2025-03-24
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/ijsem/73/7/ijsem005933.html?itemId=/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.005933&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Oren A, Garrity GM. Valid publication of the names of forty-two phyla of prokaryotes. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2021; 71: [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Gibbons NE, Murray RGE. Proposals concerning the higher taxa of bacteria. Int J Bacteriol 1978; 28:1–6 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Murray RGE. The higher taxa, or, a place for everything. In Bergey’s Manual of Systematic Bacteriology vol 1 Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins; 1984 pp 31–34
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Woese CR, Stackebrandt E, Macke TJ, Fox GE. A phylogenetic definition of the major eubacterial taxa. Syst Appl Microbiol 1985; 6:143–151 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Hugenholtz P, Pitulle C, Hershberger KL, Pace NR. Novel division level bacterial diversity in a Yellowstone hot spring. J Bacteriol 1998; 180:366–376 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Vartoukian SR, Palmer RM, Wade WG. The division “Synergistes.”. Anaerobe 2007; 13:99–106 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Turland NJ, Wiersema JH, Barrie FR et al. International Code of Nomenclature for algae, fungi, and plants (Shenzhen Code) adopted by the Nineteenth International Botanical Congress Shenzhen, China, July 2017 Koeltz Botanical Books; 2018
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Sneath PHA, McGowan V, Skerman VBD. Approved lists of bacterial names. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 1980; 30:225–420 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Parker CT, Tindall BJ, Garrity GM. International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2019; 69:S1–S111 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Candolle A de. Lois de La Nomenclature Botanique Masson; 1867 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Buchanan RE, John-Brooks RSt, Breed RS. International Bacteriological Code of Nomenclature. J Bacteriol 1948; 55:287–306 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  12. International Committee on Bacteriological Nomenclature The International Code of Nomenclature of the Bacteria and Viruses Ames, Iowa: Iowa State College Press; 1958
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Editorial Board of the Judicial Commission of the International Committee on Nomenclature of Bacteria International Code of Nomenclature of Bacteria. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 1966; 16:459–490 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Lapage SP, Sneath PHA, Lessel EF, Skerman VBD, Seeliger HPR et al. International code of nomenclature of bacteria. Washington, DC: Revision American Society for Microbiology; 1975
  15. Lapage SP, Sneath PHA, Lessel EF, Skerman VBD, Seeliger HPR et al. International code of nomenclature of bacteria: bacteriological code 1990 Revision; 1992
  16. Cohn F. Untersuchungen úber Bacterien. In Cohn F. eds Beiträge Zur Biologie Der Pflanzen (Heft 1) Breslau: JU Kern; 1872 p 175
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Judicial Commission of the International Committee on Systematics of Prokaryotes The nomenclatural types of the orders Acholeplasmatales, Halanaerobiales, Halobacteriales, Methanobacteriales, Methanococcales, Methanomicrobiales, Planctomycetales, Prochlorales, Sulfolobales, Thermococcales, Thermoproteales and Verrucomicrobiales are the genera Acholeplasma, Halanaerobium, Halobacterium, Methanobacterium, Methanococcus, Methanomicrobium, Planctomyces, Prochloron, Sulfolobus, Thermococcus, Thermoproteus and Verrucomicrobium, respectively. Opinion 79. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2005; 55:517–518 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Oren A, da Costa MS, Garrity GM, Rainey FA, Rosselló-Móra R et al. Proposal to include the rank of phylum in the international code of nomenclature of prokaryotes. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2015; 65:4284–4287 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Whitman WB, Oren A, Chuvochina M, da Costa MS, Garrity GM et al. Proposal of the suffix -ota to denote phyla. Addendum to “Proposal to include the rank of phylum in the International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes.”. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2018; 68:967–969 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Oren A, Arahal DR, Rosselló-Móra R, Sutcliffe IC, Moore ERB. Emendation of Rules 5b, 8, 15 and 22 of the International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes to include the rank of phylum. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2021; 71: [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Ley RE, Turnbaugh PJ, Klein S, Gordon JI. Microbial ecology: human gut microbes associated with obesity. Nature 2006; 444:1022–1023 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Göker M. Solving the remaining problems with names of classes. Request for an Opinion. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2022; 72: [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Tindall BJ. The undesirable retroactive changes to Rule 8 of the International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2016; 66:4895–4896 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Tindall BJ. Names at the rank of class, subclass and order, their typification and current status: supplementary information to opinion 79. Judicial Commission of the International Committee on Systematics of Prokaryotes. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2014; 64:3599–3602 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Whitman WB, Bull CT, Busse H-J, Fournier P-E, Oren A et al. Request for revision of the Statutes of the International Committee on Systematics of Prokaryotes. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2019; 69:584–593 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Judicial Commission of the International Committee on Bacterial Nomenclature Conservation of the family name Enterobacteriaceae, of the name of the type genus, and designation of the type species Opinion No. 15. Int Bull Bacteriol Nomencl Taxon 1958; 8:73–74 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.005933
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error