1887

Abstract

A Gram-stain-negative, non-motile, aerobic and ovoid-rod-shaped bacterial strain, designated as 2C3345, was isolated from soil of a mangrove nature reserve in Shenzhen, PR China and its taxonomic position was investigated. The 16S rRNA gene sequence of strain 2C3345 exhibited the highest similarity value to that of the type strains NBRC 113114 (98.4 %), KCTC 42013 (98.1 %), DSM 15422 (98.0 %) and DSM 13605 (97.9 %). Strain 2C3345 grew optimally at 28–30 °C, pH 7.0 and without NaCl. The predominant ubiquinone in 2C3345 was identified as Q-8. The major fatty acids of 2C3345 were iso-C, iso-C and summed feature 9 (is0-Cω9 and/or 10-methyl C). The major polar lipids of 2C3345 were phosphatidylcholine (PC), phosphatidylglycerol (PG), diphosphatidglycerol (DPG), phosphatidylethanolamine (PE), an unidentified phospholipid, an unidentified aminolipid and two unidentified lipids. The DNA G+C content of strain 2C3345 was 69.9 %. The draft genome sequence of 2C3345 included 2 888 645 bp in total (=310 730 bp) with a medium read coverage of 388.6×and 21 scaffolds. DNA–DNA hybridisation with type strains of species of the genus showed 24.4, 22.4, 24.1 and 23.2% relatedness to NBRC 113114, KCTC 42013, DSM 15422 and DSM 13605, respectively. And the average nucleotide identity by (ANIb) values between 2C3345 and these four reference strains were 81.9, 80.0, 81.2 and 80.6 %, respectively, lower than the 95–96% threshold value for dividing prokaryotic species. On the basis of its phenotypic, chemotaxonomic, phylogenetic and phylogenomic properties, strain 2C3345 is considered to represent a novel species within the genus , for which the name sp. nov. is proposed. The type strain is 2C3345 (=KCTC 92730 =MCCC 1K08335).

Funding
This study was supported by the:
  • Shenzhen Environmental Science and New Energy Technology Engineering Laboratory (Award JCYJ20210324093409025)
    • Principle Award Recipient: YingXu
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.005915
2023-05-31
2024-12-10
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Busse HJ, Kämpfer P, Moore ERB, Nuutinen J, Tsitko IV et al. Thermomonas haemolytica gen. nov., sp. nov., a γ-proteobacterium from kaolin slurry. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2002; 52:473–483 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Liu Z-T, Dai J-Y, Lian Z-H, Liu L, Xian W-D et al. Thermomonas flagellata sp. nov. and Thermomonas alba sp. nov., two novel members of the phylum Pseudomonadota isolated from hot spring sediments. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2022; 72:72 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Alves MP, Rainey FA, Nobre MF, da Costa MS. Thermomonas hydrothermalis sp. nov., a new slightly thermophilic gamma-proteobacterium isolated from a hot spring in central Portugal. Syst Appl Microbiol 2003; 26:70–75 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Guo S-Z, Wu T, Zhu H-Z, Yan L, Liu Z-P et al. Niabella beijingensis sp. nov. and Thermomonas beijingensis sp. nov., two bacteria from constructed wetland. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2022; 72:72 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Kim MK, Im WT, In JG, Kim SH, Yang DC. Thermomonas koreensis sp. nov., a mesophilic bacterium isolated from a ginseng field. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2006; 56:1615–1619 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Wang L, Zheng S, Wang D, Wang L, Wang G. Thermomonas carbonis sp. nov., isolated from the soil of a coal mine. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2014; 64:3631–3635 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Ju J-H, Kim J-S, Lee D-H, Jeon JH, Heo S-Y et al. Thermomonas aquatica sp. nov., isolated from an industrial wastewater treatment plant. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2019; 69:3399–3404 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Mergaert J, Cnockaert MC. Thermomonas fusca sp. nov. and Thermomonas brevis sp. nov., two mesophilic species isolated from a denitrification reactor with poly(ε-caprolactone) plastic granules as fixed bed, and emended description of the genus Thermomonas. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2003; 53:1961–1966 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Kim M, Park MS, Kang I, Cho JC. Thermomonas paludicola sp. nov., isolated from a lotus wetland. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2023; 73:73 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Wu X-T, He Y-Q, Li G-X, Xiao H, Dai X-R et al. Genome sequence of sulfide-dependent denitrification bacterium Thermomonas sp. strain XSG, isolated from marine sediment. Microbiol Resour Announc 2021; 10:e00057-21 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  11. dos Santos HF, Cury JC, do Carmo FL, dos Santos AL, Tiedje J et al. Mangrove bacterial diversity and the impact of oil contamination revealed by pyrosequencing: bacterial proxies for oil pollution. PLoS One 2011; 6:e16943 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Li P, Wu S, Yin H, Wu H, Peng Q et al. Bacterial community diversity and dynamics of Dongzhai harbor mangrove soils in China. Can J Microbiol 2019; 65:703–712 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  13. He B, Li R, Chai M, Qiu G. Threat of heavy metal contamination in eight mangrove plants from the Futian mangrove forest, China. Environ Geochem Health 2014; 36:467–476 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Ye Y, Chen C, Ren Y, Wang R, Zhang C et al. Pseudomonas mangrovi sp. nov., isolated from mangrove soil. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2019; 69:377–383 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Wang Y, Huang H, Yuan W, Wei H, Chen Y et al. Streptomyces mangrovi sp. nov., an actinomycete from mangrove soil. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2015; 65:3086–3090 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Huang H, Liu M, Zhong W, Mo K, Zhu J et al. Nonomuraea mangrovi sp. nov., an actinomycete isolated from mangrove soil. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2018; 68:3144–3148 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Ancheeva E, Daletos G, Proksch P. Lead compounds from mangrove-associated microorganisms. Mar Drugs 2018; 16:319 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Beveridge TJ, Lawrence JR, Murray RG. Sampling and staining for light microscopy. Methods Mol Microbiol 200719–33 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Tindall BJ, Sikorski J, Smibert RA, Krieg NR. Phenotypic characterization and the principles of comparative systematics. Methods Mol Microbiol 2007330–393 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Cowan ST. Cowan and Steel’s Manual for the Identification of Medical Bacteria Cambridge: Cambridge university press; 2004
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Sasser M. Identification of bacteria by gas chromatography of cellular fatty acids. Usfcc Newsl 1990
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Collins M. Isoprenoid quinone analyses in bacterial classification and identification. In Goodfellow M, Minnikin DE. eds Chemical Methods in Bacterial Systematics London: Academic Press; 1985 pp 267–287
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Kates M. Techniques of Lipidology, 2. rev. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 1986 pp 106–107
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Yoon S-H, Ha S-M, Kwon S, Lim J, Kim Y et al. Introducing EzBioCloud: a taxonomically united database of 16S rRNA gene sequences and whole-genome assemblies. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2017; 67:1613–1617 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Thompson JD, Gibson TJ, Plewniak F, Jeanmougin F, Higgins DG. The CLUSTAL_X windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Res 1997; 25:4876–4882 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Saitou N, Nei M. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 1987; 4:406–425 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Felsenstein J. Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: a maximum likelihood approach. J Mol Evol 1981; 17:368–376 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Tamura K, Stecher G, Kumar S. MEGA11: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis version 11. Mol Biol Evol 2021; 38:3022–3027 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Felsenstein J. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 1985; 39:783–791 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Li R, Zhu H, Ruan J, Qian W, Fang X et al. De novo assembly of human genomes with massively parallel short read sequencing. Genome Res 2010; 20:265–272 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Bankevich A, Nurk S, Antipov D, Gurevich AA, Dvorkin M et al. SPAdes: a new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J Comput Biol 2012; 19:455–477 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Benson G. Tandem repeats finder: a program to analyze DNA sequences. Nucleic Acids Res 1999; 27:573–580 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Ge R, Mai G, Wang P, Zhou M, Luo Y et al. CRISPRdigger: detecting CRISPRs with better direct repeat annotations. Sci Rep 2016; 6:32942 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Bertelli C, Brinkman FSL. Improved genomic island predictions with IslandPath-DIMOB. Bioinformatics 2018; 34:2161–2167 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Delcher AL, Bratke KA, Powers EC, Salzberg SL. Identifying bacterial genes and endosymbiont DNA with Glimmer. Bioinformatics 2007; 23:673–679 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Yoon SH, Ha SM, Lim J, Kwon S, Chun J. A large-scale evaluation of algorithms to calculate average nucleotide identity. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 2017; 110:1281–1286 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Lee I, Ouk Kim Y, Park SC, Chun J. OrthoANI: an improved algorithm and software for calculating average nucleotide identity. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2016; 66:1100–1103 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Kim D, Park S, Chun J. Introducing EzAAI: a pipeline for high throughput calculations of prokaryotic average amino acid identity. J Microbiol 2021; 59:476–480 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Meier-Kolthoff JP, Auch AF, Klenk HP, Göker M. Genome sequence-based species delimitation with confidence intervals and improved distance functions. BMC Bioinformatics 2013; 14:60 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Kim J, Na SI, Kim D, Chun J. UBCG2: Up-to-date bacterial core genes and pipeline for phylogenomic analysis. J Microbiol 2021; 59:609–615 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Aziz RK, Bartels D, Best AA, DeJongh M, Disz T et al. The RAST Server: rapid annotations using subsystems technology. BMC Genomics 2008; 9:75 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Blin K, Shaw S, Kloosterman AM, Charlop-Powers Z, van Wezel GP et al. antiSMASH 6.0: improving cluster detection and comparison capabilities. Nucleic Acids Res 2021; 49:W29–W35 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.005915
Loading
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.005915
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplements

Supplementary material 1

PDF
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error