1887

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SYSTEMATIC AND EVOLUTIONARY MICROBIOLOGY logo

Volume 73, Issue 5

sp. nov., isolated from rhizospheric soil of banana No Access

Abstract

A Gram-stain-negative, aerobic, short rod-shaped and motile novel bacterial strain, designated MAHUQ-52, was isolated from the rhizospheric soil of a banana plant. Colonies grew at 10–35 °C (optimum, 28 °C), pH 6.0–9.5 (optimum, pH 7.0–7.5), and in the presence of 0–1.0 % NaCl (optimum 0 %). The strain was positive for catalase and oxidase tests, as well as hydrolysis of gelatin, casein, starch and Tween 20. Based on the results of phylogenetic analysis using 16S rRNA gene and genome sequences, strain MAHUQ-52 clustered together within the genus . Strain MAHUQ-52 was closely related to R798 (98.6 %) and RP-1-19 (98.3 %). The novel strain MAHUQ-52 has a draft genome size of 4 677 454 bp (25 contigs), annotated with 4193 protein-coding genes, 64 tRNA and 19 rRNA genes. The genomic DNA G+C content was 63.0 %. The average nucleotide identity (ANI) and digital DNA–DNA hybridization (dDDH) values between strain MAHUQ-52 and closely related type strains were ≤88.4 and 35.8 %, respectively. The only respiratory quinone was ubiquinone-8. The major fatty acids were identified as C and summed feature 3 (C iso 2-OH and/or C 7). Strain MAHUQ-52 contained phosphatidylethanolamine, diphosphatidylglycerol and phosphatidylglycerol as the major polar lipids. On the basis of dDDH and ANI values, as well as genotypic, chemotaxonomic and physiological data, strain MAHUQ-52 represents a novel species within the genus , for which the name sp. nov. is proposed, with MAHUQ-52 (=KACC 21999=CGMCC 1.18577) as the type strain.

  • Received:
  • Accepted:
  • Published Online:
Keyword(s): digital DNA–DNA hybridization , genome sequence , Massilia agrisoli and rhozhosperic soil
© 2023 The Authors
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.005897
2023-05-24
2024-04-25
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Kämpfer P, Lodders N, Martin K, Falsen E. Revision of the genus Massilia La Scola et al. 2000, with an emended description of the genus and inclusion of all species of the genus Naxibacter as new combinations, and proposal of Massilia consociata sp. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2011; 61:1528–1533 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Wang J, Zhang J, Pang H, Zhang Y, Li Y et al. Massilia flava sp. nov., isolated from soil. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2012; 62:580–585 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Kong BH, Li YH, Liu M, Liu Y, Li CL et al. Massilia namucuonensis sp. nov., isolated from a soil sample. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2013; 63:352–357 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  4. La Scola B, Birtles RJ, Mallet MN, Raoult D. Massilia timonae gen. nov., sp. nov., isolated from blood of an immunocompromised patient with cerebellar lesions. J Clin Microbiol 1998; 36:2847–2852 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  5. La Scola B, Birtles RJ, Mallet MN, Raoult D. Massilia timonae gen. nov., sp. nov., isolated from blood of an immunocompromised patient with cerebellar lesions. J Clin Microbiol 1998; 36:2847–2852 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Dahal RH, Chaudhary DK, Kim DU, Kim J. Cold-shock gene cspC in the genome of Massilia polaris sp. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 2021; 114:1275–1284 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Wang H, Zhang X, Wang S, Zhao B, Lou K et al. Massilia violaceinigra sp. nov., a novel purple-pigmented bacterium isolated from glacier permafrost. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2018; 68:2271–2278 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Chaudhary DK, Kim J. Massilia agri sp. nov., isolated from reclaimed grassland soil. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2017; 67:2696–2703 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Zhao X, Li X, Qi N, Gan M, Pan Y et al. Massilia neuiana sp. nov., isolated from wet soil. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2017; 67:4943–4947 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Altankhuu K, Kim J. Massilia solisilvae sp. nov., Massilia terrae sp. nov. and Massilia agilis sp. nov., isolated from forest soil in South Korea by using a newly developed culture method. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2017; 67:3026–3032 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Shen L, Liu Y, Gu Z, Xu B, Wang N et al. Massilia eurypsychrophila sp. nov. a facultatively psychrophilic bacteria isolated from ice core. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2015; 65:2124–2129 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Singh H, Du J, Won K, Yang JE, Yin C et al. Massilia arvi sp. nov., isolated from fallow-land soil previously cultivated with Brassica oleracea, and emended description of the genus Massilia. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2015; 65:3690–3696 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Zul D, Wanner G, Overmann J. Massilia brevitalea sp. nov., a novel betaproteobacterium isolated from lysimeter soil. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2008; 58:1245–1251 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Holochová P. Massilia frigida sp. nov., and one massilia genomospecies isolated from antarctic streams, lakes and regoliths. Syst Appl Microbiol 2020; 43: [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Gallego V, Sánchez-Porro C, García MT, Ventosa A. Massilia aurea sp. nov., isolated from drinking water. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2006; 56:2449–2453 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Weon HY, Kim BY, Hong SB, Jeon YA, Koo BS et al. Massilia niabensis sp. nov. and Massilia niastensis sp. nov., isolated from air samples. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2009; 59:1656–1660 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Lane DJ. 16S/23S rRNA sequencing. Stackebrandt E, Goodfellow M. Nucleic Acid Techniques in Bacterial Systematic Wiley; New York: 1991115–175
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Kim O-S, Cho Y-J, Lee K, Yoon S-H, Kim M et al. Introducing EzTaxon-e: a prokaryotic 16S rRNA gene sequence database with phylotypes that represent uncultured species. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2012; 62:716–721 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Thompson JD, Gibson TJ, Plewniak F, Jeanmougin F, Higgins DG. The CLUSTAL_X windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Res 1997; 25:4876–4882 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Hall TA. BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for windows 95/98/NT. Nucl Acids Symp Ser 1999; 41:95–98
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Kimura M. The Neutral Theory of Molecular Evolution Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1983 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Saitou N, Nei M. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Bio Evol 1987; 4:406–425
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Kumar S, Stecher G, Tamura K. MEGA7: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Mol Biol Evol 2016; 33:1870–1874 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Alanjary M, Steinke K, Ziemert N. AutoMLST: an automated web server for generating multi-locus species trees highlighting natural product potential. Nucleic Acids Res 2019; 47:W276–W282 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Na SI, Kim YO, Yoon SH, Ha SM, Baek I et al. UBCG: Up-to-date bacterial core gene set and pipeline for phylogenomic tree reconstruction. J Microbiol 2018; 56:280–285 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Yoon SH, Ha SM, Lim JM, Kwon SJ, Chun J. A large-scale evaluation of algorithms to calculate average nucleotide identity. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 2017; 110:1281–1286 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Meier-Kolthoff JP, Auch AF, Klenk HP, Göker M. Genome sequence-based species delimitation with confidence intervals and improved distance functions. BMC Bioinformatics 2013; 14:60 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Shi W, Sun Q, Fan G, Hideaki S, Moriya O et al. gcType: a high-quality type strain genome database for microbial phylogenetic and functional research. Nucleic Acids Res 2021; 49:D694–D705 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Overbeek R, Olson R, Pusch GD, Olsen GJ, Davis JJ et al. The SEED and the Rapid Annotation of microbial genomes using Subsystems Technology (RAST). Nucl Acids Res 2014; 42:D206–D214 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Richter M, Rosselló-Móra R. Shifting the genomic gold standard for the prokaryotic species definition. Proc Natl Acad Sci 2009; 106:19126–19131 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Moore WEC, Stackebrandt E, Kandler O, Colwell RR, Krichevsky MI et al. Report of the ad hoc committee on reconciliation of approaches to bacterial systematics. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 1987; 37:463–464 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Stackebrandt E, Goebel BM. Taxonomic note: a place for DNA-DNA reassociation and 16S rRNA sequence analysis in the present species definition in bacteriology. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 1994; 44:846–849 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Huq MA. Chryseobacterium chungangensis sp. nov., a bacterium isolated from soil of sweet gourd garden. Arch Microbiol 2018; 200:581–587 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Cappuccino JG, Sherman N. Biochemical activities of microorganisms. In Microbiology, A Laboratory Manual Menlo Park, CA: The Benjamin/Cummings Publishing Co., Inc; 1992 pp 188–247
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Fautz E, Reichenbach H. A simple test for flexirubin-type pigments. FEMS Microbiol Lett 1980; 8:87–91 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Huq MA. Caenispirillum humi sp. nov., a bacterium isolated from the soil of Korean pine garden. Arch Microbiol 2018; 200:343–348 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Sasser M. Technical Note 101: Identification of Bacteria by Gas Chromatography of Cellular Fatty Acids Newark, DE: MIDI Inc; 1990
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Hiraishi A, Ueda Y, Ishihara J, Mori T. Comparative lipoquinone analysis of influent sewage and activated sludge by high-performance liquid chromatography and photodiode array detection. J Gen Appl Microbiol 1996; 42:457–469 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Collins MD, Jones D. Distribution of isoprenoid quinone structural types in bacteria and their taxonomic implication. Microbiol Rev 1981; 45:316–354 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Minnikin DE, O’Donnell AG, Goodfellow M, Alderson G, Athalye M et al. An integrated procedure for the extraction of bacterial isoprenoid quinones and polar lipids. J Microbiol Methods 1984; 2:233–241 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Akter S, Huq MA. Sphingomonas chungangi sp. nov., a bacterium isolated from garden soil sample. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2020; 70:4151–4157 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Lu HB, Cai ZP, Yang YG, Xu MY. Correction to: Duganella rivus sp. nov., Duganella fentianensis sp. nov., Duganella qianjiadongensis sp. nov. and Massilia guangdongensis sp. nov., isolated from subtropical streams in China and reclassification of all species within genus Pseudoduganella. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 2020; 113:1713–1714 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Kämpfer P, Irgang R, Busse HJ, Poblete-Morales M, Kleinhagauer T et al. Pseudoduganella danionis sp. nov., isolated from zebrafish (Danio rerio). Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2016; 66:4671–4675 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.005897
Loading
Massilia agrisoli sp. nov., isolated from rhizospheric soil of banana
Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 73, 005897 (2023); https://doi.org/10.1099/ijsem.0.005897
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.005897
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.005897
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplements

Supplementary material 1

PDF

Most cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error