1887

Abstract

In the process of exploring the microbial diversity of pig farms, a Gram-stain-negative, aerobic, rod-shaped, non-spore-forming, non-motile bacterial strain, designated P2K, was isolated from soil sample collected at a pig farm, Guangdong Province, PR China. Phylogenetic analysis based on 16S rRNA gene sequences indicated that strain P2K belonged to the genus , with the highest sequence similarity to PYM5-11 (98.6%) and BUT-6 (98.3 %). The genome size of strain P2K was 6.0 Mb with a DNA G+C content of 68.3 mol%. Average nucleotide identity values between strain P2K and the type strains of the genus were 81.1–81.6 %. The digital DNA–DNA hybridization values between P2K and these relative species were 24.5–25.6%. The polar lipids were phosphatidylethanolamine, phosphatidylglycerol, an unknown aminolipids, two unknown lipids and three unknown phospholipids. The major respiratory quinone of strain P2K was ubiquinone Q-8, and the main fatty acids (>10.0 % of total fatty acids) of strain P2K were iso-C, iso-C and summed feature 9 (C 10-methyl and/or iso-C ω9). Based on phenotypic and genotypic data, strain P2K represents a novel species within the genus , for which the name sp. nov. is proposed, with the type strain P2K (=GDMCC 1.3107=JCM 35231).

Funding
This study was supported by the:
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (Award 31900084)
    • Principle Award Recipient: YangZhou
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.005852
2023-04-21
2024-04-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Naushad S, Adeolu M, Wong S, Sohail M, Schellhorn HE et al. A phylogenomic and molecular marker based taxonomic framework for the order Xanthomonadales: proposal to transfer the families Algiphilaceae and Solimonadaceae to the order Nevskiales ord. nov. and to create a new family within the order Xanthomonadales, the family Rhodanobacteraceae fam. nov., containing the genus Rhodanobacter and its closest relatives. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 2015; 107:467–485 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Makk J, Homonnay ZG, Kéki Z, Lejtovicz Z, Márialigeti K et al. Tahibacter aquaticus gen. nov., sp. nov., a new gammaproteobacterium isolated from the drinking water supply system of Budapest (Hungary). Syst Appl Microbiol 2011; 34:110–115 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Wu Y-D, Deng S-K, Shi C, Zhu J-C, He J et al. Tahibacter caeni sp. nov., isolated from activated sludge. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2015; 65:633–638 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Jiaqian X, Xiaodong X, Junming H, Yanxing LI. Efficiency and microbial analysis of deodorization process of biofilter enhanced by composite filler under low temperature in southern fujian. Chin J Environ Eng 2022; 16:1123–1132
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Bai N, Li S, Zhang J, Zhang H, Zhang H et al. Efficient biodegradation of DEHP by CM9 consortium and shifts in the bacterial community structure during bioremediation of contaminated soil. Environ Pollut 2020; 266:115112 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Guo R, Xu X, Sun Z, Hu X. Performance and bacterial community of bio-electrochemical system treating simulated domestic wastewater containing low concentration of cephalosporin antibiotics. Environ Technol 2022; 43:893–906 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Liu X, Yang D, Zhou Y, Zhang J, Luo L et al. Electrocatalytic properties of N-doped graphite felt in electro-Fenton process and degradation mechanism of levofloxacin. Chemosphere 2017; 182:306–315 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Dąbrowska M, Muszyńska B, Starek M, Żmudzki P, Opoka W. Degradation pathway of cephalosporin antibiotics by in vitro cultures of Lentinula edodes and Imleria badia. IBBS 2018; 127:104–112 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Li J. Current status and prospects for in-feed antibiotics in the different stages of pork production - A review. ASIAN-Australas J Anim Sci 2017; 30:1667–1673 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Reichenbach H, Dworkin M. The myxobacteria. In The Prokaryotes Springer; 1992 pp 3416–3487
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Reasoner DJ, Geldreich EE. A new medium for the enumeration and subculture of bacteria from potable water. Appl Environ Microbiol 1985; 49:1–7 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Weisburg WG, Barns SM, Pelletier DA, Lane DJ. 16S ribosomal DNA amplification for phylogenetic study. J Bacteriol 1991; 173:697–703 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Fierer N, Hamady M, Lauber CL, Knight R. The influence of sex, handedness, and washing on the diversity of hand surface bacteria. Proc Natl Acad Sci 2008; 105:17994–17999 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Nübel U, Garcia-Pichel F, Muyzer G. PCR primers to amplify 16S rRNA genes from cyanobacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol 1997; 63:3327–3332 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Yoon S-H, Ha S-M, Kwon S, Lim J, Kim Y et al. Introducing EzBioCloud: a taxonomically united database of 16S rRNA gene sequences and whole-genome assemblies. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2017; 67:1613–1617 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Kumar S, Stecher G, Li M, Knyaz C, Tamura K. MEGA X: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis across computing platforms. Mol Biol Evol 2018; 35:1547–1549 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Saitou N, Nei M. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 1987; 4:406–425 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Felsenstein J. Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: a maximum likelihood approach. J Mol Evol 1981; 17:368–376 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Fitch WM. Toward defining the course of evolution: minimum change for a specific tree topology. Syst Boil 1971; 20:406–416 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Kimura M. A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J Mol Evol 1980; 16:111–120 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Bankevich A, Nurk S, Antipov D, Gurevich AA, Dvorkin M et al. SPAdes: a new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J Comput Biol 2012; 19:455–477 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Lee I, Chalita M, Ha S, Yoon S, Chun J. ContEst16S: an algorithm that identifies contaminated prokaryotic genomes using 16S RNA gene sequences. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2017; 67:2053–2057
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Na S-I, Kim YO, Yoon S-H, Ha S-M, Baek I et al. UBCG: Up-to-date bacterial core gene set and pipeline for phylogenomic tree reconstruction. J Microbiol 2018; 56:280–285 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Meier-Kolthoff JP, Göker M. TYGS is an automated high-throughput platform for state-of-the-art genome-based taxonomy. Nat Commun 2019; 10:2182 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Yoon S-H, Ha S-M, Lim J, Kwon S, Chun J. A large-scale evaluation of algorithms to calculate average nucleotide identity. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 2017; 110:1281–1286 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Meier-Kolthoff JP, Auch AF, Klenk H-P, Göker M. Genome sequence-based species delimitation with confidence intervals and improved distance functions. BMC Bioinform 2013; 14:1–14 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Aziz RK, Bartels D, Best AA, DeJongh M, Disz T et al. The RAST Server: rapid annotations using subsystems technology. BMC Genomics 2008; 9:1–15 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Overbeek R, Olson R, Pusch GD, Olsen GJ, Davis JJ et al. The SEED and the Rapid Annotation of microbial genomes using Subsystems Technology (RAST). Nucleic Acids Res 2014; 42:D206–14 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Zhang H, Yohe T, Huang L, Entwistle S, Wu P et al. dbCAN2: a meta server for automated carbohydrate-active enzyme annotation. Nucleic Acids Res 2018; 46:W95–W101 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Blin K, Kim HU, Medema MH, Weber T. Recent development of antiSMASH and other computational approaches to mine secondary metabolite biosynthetic gene clusters. Brief Bioinform 2019; 20:1103–1113 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Yoon S-H, Ha S-M, Lim J, Kwon S, Chun J. A large-scale evaluation of algorithms to calculate average nucleotide identity. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 2017; 110:1281–1286 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Goris J, Konstantinidis KT, Klappenbach JA, Coenye T, Vandamme P et al. DNA-DNA hybridization values and their relationship to whole-genome sequence similarities. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2007; 57:81–91 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Overbeek R, Olson R, Pusch GD, Olsen GJ, Davis JJ et al. The SEED and the Rapid Annotation of microbial genomes using Subsystems Technology (RAST). Nucleic Acids Res 2014; 42:D206–14 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Paul SK. Culture, Media, Language London: Routledge; 1980
    [Google Scholar]
  35. MacWilliams MP, Liao MK. Luria broth (LB) and luria agar (LA) media and their uses protocol. ASM MicrobeLibrary American Society for Microbiology; 2006 https://asm.org/Protocols/Luria-Broth-LB-and-Luria-Agar-LA-Media-and-Their-U
  36. Buck JD. Nonstaining (KOH) method for determination of Gram reactions of marine bacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol 1982; 44:992–993 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Cowan ST. Cowan and Steel’s Manual for the Identification of Medical Bacteria Cambridge University Press; 2004
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Smibert RM. Phenotypic characterization. In Methods for General and Molecular Bacteriology Washington, DC: American Society for Microbiology; 1994
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Tindall BJ, Sikorski J, Smibert RA, Krieg NR. Phenotypic characterization and the principles of comparative systematics. In Methods for General and Molecular Microbiology Washington, DC: American Society for Microbiology; 2007 pp 330–393
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Pandey KK, Mayilraj S, Chakrabarti T. Pseudomonas indica sp. nov., a novel butane-utilizing species. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2002; 52:1559–1567 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Sasser M. Technical Note 101: Identification of Bacteria by Gas Chromatography of Cellular Fatty Acids Newark, DE: MIDI Inc; 1990
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Minnikin DE, O’Donnell AG, Goodfellow M, Alderson G, Athalye M et al. An integrated procedure for the extraction of bacterial isoprenoid quinones and polar lipids. J Microbiol Methods 1984; 2:233–241 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Minnikin DE, Collins MD, Goodfellow M. Fatty acid and polar lipid composition in the classification of Cellulomonas, Oerskovia and related taxa. J Appl Bacteriol 1979; 47:87–95 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Bauer AW, Kirby WMM, Sherris JC, Turck M. Antibiotic susceptibility testing by a standardized single disk method. Am J Clin Pathol 1966; 45:493–496 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Pikovskaya RI. Mobilization of phosphorus in soil in connection with vital activity of some microbial species. Mikrobiologiya 1948; 17:362–370
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Pérez-Miranda S, Cabirol N, George-Téllez R, Zamudio-Rivera LS, Fernández FJ. O-CAS, a fast and universal method for siderophore detection. J Microbiol Methods 2007; 70:127–131 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.005852
Loading
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.005852
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplements

Supplementary material 1

PDF
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error