International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes. Prokaryotic Code (2022 Revision)

References

1. Parker CT, Tindall BJ, Garrity GM. International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes (2008 revision). Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2019; 69:S1–S111 [View Article]
   [Google Scholar]
2. Oren A, Arahal DR, Rosselló-Móra R, Sutcliffe IR, Moore ERB. Preparing a revision of the International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2021; 71:004598 [View Article]
   [Google Scholar]
3. Whitman WB, Bull CT, Busse H-J, Fournier P-E, Oren A et al. Request for revision of the Statutes of the International Committee on Systematics of Prokaryotes. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2019; 69:584–593 [View Article]
   [Google Scholar]
4. Oren A, Arahal DR, Rosselló-Móra R, Sutcliffe IC, Moore EJB. Public discussion on a proposed revision of the International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2022; 71:004918
   [Google Scholar]
5. Oren A, Arahal DR, Rosselló-Móra R, Sutcliffe IC, Moore EJB. Emendation of Rules 5b, 8, 15, and 22 of the International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes to include the rank of phylum. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2021; 71:004851 [View Article]
   [Google Scholar]
6. Oren A, Arahal DR, Rosselló-Móra R, Sutcliffe IR, Moore ERB. Emendation of general consideration 5 and rules 18a, 24a, and 30 of the International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes to resolve the status of the Cyanobacteria in the prokaryotic nomenclature. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2021; 71:004939 [View Article]
   [Google Scholar]
7. Turland NJ, Wiersema JH, Barrie FR, Greuter W, Hawksworth DL et al. International Code of Nomenclature for algae, fungi, and plants (Shenzhen Code) adopted by the Nineteenth International Botanical Congress Shenzhen, China, July 2017. Regnum Vegetabile 159 Glashütten: Koeltz Botanical Books; 2018
   [Google Scholar]
8. Sutcliffe IC, Dijkshoorn L, Whitman WB. on behalf of the ICSP Executive Board Minutes of the International Committee on Systematics of Prokaryotes online discussion on the proposed use of gene sequences as type for naming of prokaryotes, and outcome of vote. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2020; 70:4416–4417 [View Article]
   [Google Scholar]
9. Ash C, Priest FG, Collins MD. Paenibacillus gen. nov. In Validation of the Publication of New Names and New Combinations Previously Effectively Published Outside the IJSB, List no. 51. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1994; 44:852
   [Google Scholar]
10. Roop RM, Smibert RM, Johnson JL, Krieg NR. Designation of the neotype strain for Campylobacter sputorum (Prévot) Véron and Chatelain 1973. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1986; 36:348 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
11. Kelly DP, Wood AP. Reclassification of some species of Thiobacillus to the newly designated genera Acidithiobacillus gen. nov., Halothiobacillus gen. nov. and Thermithiobacillus gen. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2000; 50:511–516 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
12. Sly LI, Cahill MM, Osawa R, Fujisawa T. The tannin-degrading species Streptococcus gallolyticus and Streptococcus caprinus are subjective synonyms. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1997; 47:893–894 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
13. Raj HD. A new species - Microcyclus flavus . Int J Syst Bacteriol 1970; 20:61–81 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
14. Cohn F. Untersuchungen über Bakterien. Beiträge Biol Pflanz 1872; 1:127–224
    [Google Scholar]
15. Cato EP, Moore WEC, Nygaard G, Holdeman LV. Actinomyces meyeri sp. nov., specific epithet rev. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1984; 34:487–489 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
16. Xie CH, Yokota A. Reclassification of Alcaligenes latus strains IAM 12599T and IAM 12664 and Pseudomonas saccharophila as Azohydromonas lata gen. nov., comb. nov., Azohydromonas australica sp. nov. and Pelomonas saccharophila gen. nov., comb. nov., respectively. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2005; 55:2419–2425 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
17. Goodfellow M, Pirouz T. Numerical classification of sporoactinomycetes containing meso-diaminopimelic acid in the cell wall. J Gen Microbiol 1982; 128:503–527 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
18. White PB. Notes on organisms serologically related to S. enteritidis gärtner: I. The Dublin and Tokyo types of Salmonella . J Hyg (Lond) 1930; 29:443–445 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
19. Bergey DH, Harrison FC, Breed RS, Hammer BW, Huntoon FM et al. Bergey’s Manual of Determinative Bacteriology, 1st ed.. Washington, DC: Society of American Bacteriologists; 1923
    [Google Scholar]
20. Bernardet J-F, Segers P, Vancanneyt M, Berthe F, Kersters K et al. Cutting a gordian knot: emended classification and description of the genus Flavobacterium, emended description of the family Flavobacteriaceae, and proposal of Flavobacterium hydatis nom. nov. (basonym, Cytophaga aquatilis Strohl and Tait 1978). Int J Syst Bacteriol 1996; 46:128–148 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
21. Pederson CS. Genus Lactobacillus Beijerinck, 1901. In Breed RS, Murray EGD, Smith NR. Bergey’s Manual of Determinative Bacteriology, 7th ed.. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins; 1957542–552
    [Google Scholar]
22. Pridham TG, Lyons AJ, Seckinger HL. Comparison of some dried holotype and neotype specimens of streptomycetes with their living counterparts. Int Bull Bacteriol Nomencl Taxon 1965; 15:191–237 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
23. Breed RS, Murray EGD, Smith NR. Bergey’s Manual of Determinative Bacteriology, 7th ed.. Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins; 1957
    [Google Scholar]
24. Rogosa M. Peptococcaceae, a new family to include the Gram-positive, anaerobic cocci of the genera Peptococcus, Peptostreptococcus, and Ruminococcus . Int J Syst Bacteriol 1971; 21:234–237 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
25. Bøvre K. Proposal to divide the genus Moraxella Lwoff 1939 emend. Henriksen and Bøvre 1968 into two subgenera – subgenus Moraxella (Lwoff 1939) Bøvre 1979 and subgenus Branhamella (Catlin 1970) Bøvre 1979. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1979; 29:403–406
    [Google Scholar]
26. Whitmore A. An account of a glanders-like disease occurring in Rangoon. J Hyg 1913; 13:1–34 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
27. Buchanan RE, St John-Brooks R, Breed RS. International Bacteriological Code of Nomenclature. J Bacteriol 1948; 55:287–306 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
28. Schwabacher H, Lucas DR, Rimington C. Bacterium melaninogenicum; a misnomer. J Gen Microbiol 1947; 1:109–120 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
29. Lessel EF. Status of the name Proteus morganii and designation of the neotype strain. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1971; 21:55–57 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
30. Buchanan RE, Holt JG, Lessel EF. Index Bergeyana. An Annotated Alphabetic Listing of Names of the Taxa of the Bacteria Baltimore, MD: Williams and Wilkins; 1966
    [Google Scholar]
31. Sneath PHA. Correction of orthography of epithets in Pasteurella and some problems with recommendations on latinization. Letter to the editor. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1992; 42:658–659
    [Google Scholar]
32. Buchanan RE, St. John-Brooks R, Breed RS. International Bacteriological Code of Nomenclature in 4th International Congress for Microbiology, Report of Proceedings, July 20–26, 1947 Copenhagen: 1947587–606
    [Google Scholar]
33. Buchanan RE, St John-Brooks R, Breed RS. International Bacteriological Code of Nomenclature. J Gen Microbiol 1949; 3:444–462 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
34. International Code of Nomenclature of Bacteria and Viruses Ames, IA: State College Press; 1958
    [Google Scholar]
35. Editorial Board International Code of Nomenclature of Bacteria (1966 Revision). Int J Syst Bacteriol 1966; 16:459–490 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
36. Lapage SP, Sneath PHA, Lessel EF, Skerman VBD, Seeliger HPR et al. International Code of Nomenclature of Bacteria and Statutes of the International Committee on Systematic Bacteriology and Statutes of the Bacteriology Section of the International Association of Microbiological Societies (1976 Revision) Washington, DC: American Society for Microbiology; 1975 (Russian translation published 1978 by USSR Academy of Sciences, Moscow; Japanese translation published 1982 by Center for Academic Publications, Tokyo; Chinese translation published 1989 by Science Press, Beijing
    [Google Scholar]
37. Lapage SP, Sneath PHA, Lessel EF, Skerman VBD, Seeliger HPR et al. International Code of Nomenclature of Bacteria and Statutes of the International Committee on Systematic Bacteriology and Statutes of the Bacteriology and Applied Microbiology Section of the International Union of Microbiological Societies (1990 Revision) Washington, DC: American Society for Microbiology; 1992 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK8817/ [accessed 29 July 2022]
    [Google Scholar]
38. Turland NJ, Wiersema JH, Barrie FR, Greuter W, Hawksworth DL et al. International Code of Nomenclature for algae, fungi, and plants (Shenzhen Code) adopted by the Nineteenth International Botanical Congress Shenzhen, China, July 2017. Regnum Vegetabile 159 Glashütten: Koeltz Botanical Books; 2018 https://www.iapttaxon.org/nomen/main.php [accessed 29 July 2022]
    [Google Scholar]
39. Brickell CD, Alexander C, Cubey JJ, David JC, Hoffman MHA et al. International Code of Nomenclature for Cultivated Plants. , 9th ed.. Scripta Horticulturae 18 Leuven: ISHS; 2016 https://www.ishs.org/scripta-horticulturae/international-code-nomenclature-cultivated-plants-ninth-edition [accessed 29 July 2022]
    [Google Scholar]
40. International Code of Zoological Nomenclature, 4th ed.. London, UK: The International Trust for Zoological Nomenclature; 1999 https://www.iczn.org/the-code/the-codeonline/ [accessed 29 July 2022]
    [Google Scholar]
41. The International Code of Virus Classification and Nomenclature ICTV Code; 2018 https://talk.ictvonline.org/information/w/ictv-information/383/ictv-code [accessed 29 July 2022]
    [Google Scholar]
42. Greuter W, Garrity GM, Hawksworth DL, Jahn R, Kirk PM et al. Draft BioCode (2011): Principles and rules regulating the naming of organisms. Taxon 2011; 60:201–212 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/tax.601019 [accessed 29 July 2022] [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
43. Theurillat J-P, Willner W, Fernández-González F, Bültmann H, Čarni A et al. International Code of Phytosociological Nomenclature. , 4th edition. Appl Veg Sci 2021; 24:e12491 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/avsc.12491 [accessed 29 July 2022] [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
44. Skerman VBD, Sneath PHA, McGowan V. Approved Lists of Bacterial Names. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1980; 30:225–420 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
45. Hill LR, Skerman VBD, Sneath PHA. Corrigenda to the Approved Lists of Bacterial Names: edited for the International Committee on Systematic Bacteriology. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1984; 34:508–511 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
46. Skerman VBD, McGowan V, Sneath PHA. Approved Lists of Bacterial Names, Amended edition. American Society for Microbiology; Washington: 1989
    [Google Scholar]
47. Sneath PHA. The preparation of the approved lists of bacterial names. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2005; 55:2247–2249 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
48. Gibbons NE, Pattee KB, Holt JG. Supplement to Index Bergeyana Baltimore: The Williams & Wilkins Co; 1982
    [Google Scholar]
49. Moore WEC, Cato EP, Moore LVH. Index of the Bacterial and Yeast Nomenclatural Changes Published in the International Journal of Systematic Bacteriology since the 1980 Approved Lists of Bacterial Names (1 January 1980 to 1 January 1985). Int J Syst Bacteriol 1985; 35:382–407 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
50. Moore WEC, Moore LVH. Index of the Bacterial and Yeast Nomenclatural Changes Published in the International Journal of Systematic Bacteriology since the 1980 Approved Lists of Bacterial Names (1 January 1980 to 1 January 1989) Washington, DC: American Society for Microbiology; 1989
    [Google Scholar]
51. Garrity GM, Lilburn TG, Cole JR, Harrison SH, Euzéby J et al. 2007 The Taxonomic Outline of Bacteria and Archaea, Release 7.7 Michigan State University Board of Trustees; http://doi.org/10.1601/toba7.7 [accessed 19 December 2021]
    [Google Scholar]
52. Bergey’s Manual of Systematics of Archaea and Bacteria Published by John Wiley & Sons, Inc., in association with Bergey’s Manual Trust; https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/book/10.1002/9781118960608 [accessed 29 July 2022]
    [Google Scholar]
53. Dye DW, Bradbury JF, Goto M, Hayward AC, Lelliott RA et al. Standards for naming pathovars of phytopathogenic bacteria and a list of pathovar names and pathotype strains. Rev Plant Pathol 1980; 59:153–168
    [Google Scholar]
54. Hauer T, Komárek J. CyanoDB 2.0 - On-line database of cyanobacterial genera. World-wide electronic publication, Univ. of South Bohemia & Inst. of Botany AS CR 2020 http://www.cyanodb.cz [accessed 29 July 2022]
    [Google Scholar]
55. Silva PC. Names of Classes and Families of Living Algae with Special Reference to Their Use in the Index Nominum Genericorum (Plantarum) (Regnum Vegetabile vol. 103) Utrecht: Bohn, Scheltema & Holkema; 1980
    [Google Scholar]
56. Farr ER, Leussink JA, Stafleu FA. Index Nominum Genericorum (Plantarum), vols. 3 (Regnum Vegetabile vol. 100–102) Utrecht: Bohn, Scheltema & Holkema; 1979
    [Google Scholar]
57. Farr ER, Leussink JA, Zijlstra G. Index Nominum Genericorum (Plantarum) Supplementum I (Regnum Vegetabile vol. 113) Utrecht: Bohn, Scheltema & Holkema; 1986
    [Google Scholar]
58. Fourtanier E, Kociolek JP. (comps) Catalogue of Diatom Names, California Academy of Sciences (updated 19 Sep 2011) Available online at: http://researcharchive.calacademy.org /research/diatoms/names/index.asp [accessed 29 July 2022]
    [Google Scholar]
59. Guiry MD, Guiry GM. AlgaeBase World-wide electronic publication, National University of Ireland; Galway: Available online at: www.algaebase.org [accessed 29 July 2022]
    [Google Scholar]
60. Kusber W-H, Jahn R. Annotated list of diatom names by Horst Lange-Bertalot and co-workers. Version 3.0 2003 Available online at: www.algaterra.org/Names_Version3_0.pdf [accessed 29 July 2022]
    [Google Scholar]
61. Neave SA. Nomenclator Zoologicus, 1758–1935 4 vols, 3 suppls London: Zoological Society; 1939
    [Google Scholar]
62. Sharpe D. Index Zoologicus, 1800–1900 London: Zoological Society; 1902 Index Zoologicus. 1902–present. London: Zoological Society
    [Google Scholar]
63. Levine ND, Corliss JO, Cox FE, Deroux G, Grain J et al. A newly revised classification of the protozoa. J Protozool 1980; 27:37–58 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
64. Aescht E. Catalogue of the Generic Names of Ciliates (Protozoa, Ciliophora) Linz, Austria: Oberoesterreichisches Landesmuseum; 2001
    [Google Scholar]
65. Hawksworth DL, Sutton BC, Ainsworth GC. Ainsworth & Bisby’s Dictionary of the Fungi, 7th ed.. Kew: Commonwealth Mycological Institute; 1983
    [Google Scholar]
66. Index to Fungi 1940–present (semi-annual) Wallingford: CAB International;
    [Google Scholar]
67. Kirk P, Cannon P, Stalpers J, Minter D. Dictionary of the Fungi, 10th ed.. CABI International; 2008
    [Google Scholar]
68. Kurtzman CP, Fell JW. The Yeasts: A Taxonomic Study, 4th ed.. Elsevier; 1998
    [Google Scholar]
69. Robert V, Stegehuis G, Stalpers J. The MycoBank engine and related databases Available online at www.mycobank.org [accessed 19 December 2021]
    [Google Scholar]
70. Matthews REF. Classification and Nomenclature of Viruses. Fourth report of the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses. Intervirology 1982; 17:1–199 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
71. Wildy P. Classification and Nomenclature of Viruses. First Report of the International Committee on Nomenclature of Viruses Basel: S. Karger; 1971
    [Google Scholar]
72. Species 2000 & ITIS Catalogue of Life www.catalogueoflife.org [accessed 19 December 2022] Naturalis; Leiden, the Netherlands:
    [Google Scholar]
73. Chun J, Oren A, Ventosa A, Christensen H, Arahal DR et al. Minimal standards for the use of genome data for the taxonomy of prokaryotes. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2018; 68:461–466 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
74. Logan NA, Berge O, Bishop AH, Busse H-J, De Vos P et al. Proposed minimal standards for describing new taxa of aerobic, endospore-forming bacteria. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2009; 59:2114–2121 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
75. Mattarelli P, Holzapfel W, Franz CMAP, Endo A, Felis GE et al. Recommended minimal standards for description of new taxa of the genera Bifidobacterium, Lactobacillus and related genera. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2014; 64:1434–1451 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
76. Corbel MJ, Brinley Morgan WJ. Proposal for minimal standards for descriptions of new species and biotypes of the genus Brucella (erratum). Int J Syst Bacteriol 1975; 25:83–89 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
77. Corbel MJ, Brinley Morgan WJ. Proposal for minimal standards for descriptions of new species and biotypes of the genus Brucella . Int J Syst Bacteriol 1975; 25:243 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
78. Ursing JB, Lior H, Owen RJ. Proposal of minimal standards for describing new species of the family Campylobacteraceae . Int J Syst Bacteriol 1994; 44:842–845 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
79. On S, Miller WG, Houf K, Fox JG, Vandamme P. Minimal standards for describing new species belonging to the families Campylobacteraceae and Helicobacteraceae: Campylobacter, Arcobacter, Helicobacter and Wolinella spp. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2017; 67:5296–5311 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
80. Bernardet J-F, Nakagawa Y, Holmes B. Subcommittee on the taxonomy of Flavobacterium and Cytophaga-like bacteria of the International Committee on Systematics of Prokaryotes. Proposed minimal standards for describing new taxa of the family Flavobacteriaceae and emended description of the family. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2002; 52:1049–1070 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
81. Oren A, Ventosa A, Grant WD. Proposed minimal standards for description of new taxa in the order Halobacteriales . Int J Syst Bacteriol 1997; 47:233–238 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
82. Arahal DR, Vreeland RH, Litchfield CD, Mormile MR, Tindall BJ et al. Recommended minimal standards for describing new taxa of the family Halomonadaceae . Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2007; 57:2436–2446 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
83. Arahal DR, Vreeland RH, Litchfield CD, Mormile MR, Tindall BJ et al. Recommended minimal standards for describing new taxa of the family Halomonadaceae. Erratum. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2008; 58:2673 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
84. Dewhirst FE, Fox JG, On SL. Recommended minimal standards for describing new species of the genus Helicobacter . Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2000; 50:2231–2237 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
85. On S, Miller WG, Houf K, Fox JG, Vandamme P. Minimal standards for describing new species belonging to the families Campylobacteraceae and Helicobacteraceae: Campylobacter, Arcobacter, Helicobacter and Wolinella spp. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2017; 67:5296–5311 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
86. Boone DR, Whitman WB. Proposal of minimal standards for describing new taxa of methanogenic bacteria. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1988; 38:212–219 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
87. Schumann P, Kämpfer P, Busse H-J, Evtushenko LI. Subcommittee on the Taxonomy of the Suborder Micrococcineae of the International Committee on Systematics of Prokaryotes Proposed minimal standards for describing new genera and species of the suborder Micrococcineae . Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2009; 59:1823–1849 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
88. International Committee on Systematic Bacteriology Subcommittee on the Taxonomy of Mollicutes Proposal of minimal standards for descriptions of new species of the class Mollicutes . Int J Syst Bacteriol 1979; 29:172–180 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
89. Brown DR, Whitcomb RF, Bradbury JM. Revised minimal standards for description of new species of the class Mollicutes (division Tenericutes). Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2007; 57:2703–2719 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
90. Whitcomb RF. Evolution and devolution of minimal standards for descriptions of species of the class Mollicutes: analysis of two Spiroplasma descriptions. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2007; 57:201–206 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
91. Bøvre K, Henriksen SD. Minimal standards for description of new taxa within the genera Moraxella and Acinetobacter: proposal by the subcommittee on moraxella and allied bacteria. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1976; 26:92–96 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
92. Lévy-Frébault VV, Portaels F. Proposed minimal standards for the genus Mycobacterium and for description of new slowly growing Mycobacterium species. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1992; 42:315–323 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
93. International Committee on Systematic Bacteriology Subcommittee on the Taxonomy of Mycoplasmatales Minutes of meeting, 5 and 6 September 1973, Jerusalem, Israel. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1972; 22:184–188 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
94. Christensen H, Kuhnert P, Busse H-J, Frederiksen WC, Bisgaard M. Proposed minimal standards for the description of genera, species and subspecies of the Pasteurellaceae . Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2007; 57:166–178 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
95. de Lajudie PM, Andrews M, Ardley J, Eardly B, Jumas-Bilak E et al. Minimal standards for the description of new genera and species of rhizobia and agrobacteria. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2019; 69:1852–1863 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
96. Graham PH, Sadowsky MJ, Keyser HH, Barnet YM, Bradley RS et al. Proposed minimal standards for the description of new genera and species of root- and stem-nodulating bacteria. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1991; 41:582–587 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
97. Freney J, Kloos WE, Hajek V, Webster JA, Bes M et al. Recommended minimal standards for description of new staphylococcal species. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1999; 49:489–502 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
98. Young JM, Bradbury JF, Gardan L, Gvozdyak RI, Stead DE et al. Comment on the reinstatement of Xanthomonas citri (ex Hasse 1915) Gabriel et al. 1989 and X. phaseoli (ex Smith 1897) Gabriel et al. 1989: indication of the need for minimal standards for the genus Xanthomonas . Int J Syst Bacteriol 1991; 41:172–177 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
99. Oren A. How to name new taxa of archaea and bacteria. In Bergey’s Manual of Systematics of Archaea and Bacteria John Wiley & Sons, in association with Bergey’s Manual Trust; 2019 https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118960608.bm00008.pub2 [accessed 29 July 2022]
    [Google Scholar]
100. Trüper HG. How to name a prokaryote?: Etymological considerations, proposals and practical advice in prokaryote nomenclature. FEMS Microbiol Rev 1999; 23:231–249 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
101. Trüper HG, Euzéby JP. International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes. Appendix 9: Orthography. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2009; 59:2107–2113 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
102. Buchanan RE. Chemical terminology and microbiological nomenclature. Int Bull Bacteriol Nomencl Taxon 1960;10:16-22; reprinted. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1994; 44:588–590
     [Google Scholar]
103. MacAdoo TO. Nomenclatural literacy. In Goodfellow M, O’Donnell AG. Handbook of New Bacterial Systematics London: Academic Press; 1993339–358
     [Google Scholar]
104. Oren A. Proposal to change recommendation 12c of the International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2015; 65:4288 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
105. Oren A, Schink B. Formation of names of genera of prokaryotes that end on -oides or -opsis. A proposal for addenda to Rule 65(2) and Appendix 9 of the International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2016; 66:2452–2453 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
106. Oren A, Schink B. Use of Greek in the prokaryotic nomenclature: proposal to change Principle 3, Recommendation 6, Rule 7, Rule 65 and Appendix 9 of the International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2020; 70:3559–3560 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
107. Oren A, Schink B. Further guidelines for the formation of compound specific and subspecific epithets. A proposal to emend Appendix 9 of the International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2020; 70:3561–3562 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
108. Oren A, Vandamme P, Schink B. Notes on the use of Greek word roots in genus and species names of prokaryotes. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2016; 66:2129–2140 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
109. Oren A, Garrity GM, Schink B, Ventura S. “Localimania” revisited: guidelines for the formation of specific epithets for names of prokaryotes based on names of institutions or their acronyms. A proposal for emendation of Appendix 9 to the International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2017; 67:1618–1619 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
110. Oren A, Chuvochina M, Schink B. The use of Greek and Latin prepositions and prefixes in compound names: proposed emendation of Appendix 9 of the International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2019; 69:1831–1832 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
111. Oren A, Chuvochina M, Ventura S. Formation of compound generic names based on personal names: a proposal for emendation of Appendix 9 of the International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2019; 69:594–596 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
112. Trüper HG. Help! Latin! How to avoid the most common mistakes while giving Latin names to newly discovered prokaryotes. Microbiologia 1996; 12:473–475
     [Google Scholar]
113. Trüper HG. How to name a prokaryote? Etymological considerations, proposals and practical advice in prokaryote nomenclature. FEMS Microbiol Rev 1999; 23:231–249 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
114. Trüper HG. Etymology in nomenclature of procaryotes. In Boone DR, Castenholz RW, Garrity GM. Bergey’s Manual of Systematic Bacteriology, 2nd edn. 1 New York: Springer; 200189–99
     [Google Scholar]
115. Trüper HG. The use of Neolatin in biological nomenclature. Neulateinisches Jahrb J Neo-Latin Lang Lit 2004; 6:318–327
     [Google Scholar]
116. Trüper HG. Is ‘localimania’ becoming a fashion for prokaryote taxonomists?. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2005; 55:1753 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
117. Trüper HG. Neo-Latinists worldwide willing to help microbiologists. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2007; 57:1164–1166 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
118. Murray RGE, Schleifer KH. Taxonomic notes: a proposal for recording the properties of putative taxa of procaryotes. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1994; 44:174–176 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
119. Judicial Commission of the IJSB Minutes of the meetings, 2 and 6 july 1994, Prague, Czech Republic. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1995; 45:195–196 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
120. Murray RE, Stackebrandt E. Taxonomic Note: Implementation of the provisional status Candidatus for incompletely described procaryotes. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1995; 45:186–187 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
121. Oren A. A plea for linguistic accuracy - also for Candidatus taxa . Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2017; 67:1085–1094 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
122. Whitman WB. Modest proposals to expand the type material for naming of prokaryotes. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2016; 66:2108–2112
     [Google Scholar]
123. Whitman WB, Sutcliffe IC, Rossello-Mora R. Proposal for changes in the International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes: granting priority to Candidatus names. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2019; 69:2174–2175 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
124. Sutcliffe IC, Dijkshoorn L, Whitman WB. on behalf of the ICSP Executive Board Minutes of the International Committee on Systematics of Prokaryotes online discussion on the proposed use of gene sequences as type for naming of prokaryotes, and outcome of vote. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2020; 70:4416–4417 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
125. Oren A, Garrity GM, Parker CT, Chuvochina M, Trujillo ME. Lists of names of prokaryotic Candidatus taxa. Candidatus List no. 1. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2020; 70:3956–4042
     [Google Scholar]
126. Oren A, Garrity GM, Trujillo ME. Registration of names of prokaryotic Candidatus taxa in the IJSEM. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2020; 70:3955 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
127. Oren A, Garrity GM. Lists of names of prokaryotic Candidatus taxa. Candidatus List no. 2. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2021; 71:004671 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
128. Oren A, Garrity GM. Lists of names of prokaryotic Candidatus taxa. Candidatus List no. 3. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2022; 72:005186 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
129. Sutcliffe IC, Whitman WB. on behalf of the ICSP The van Niel International Prize for Studies in Bacterial Systematics, awarded in 2020 to Tanja Woyke. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2020; 70:5594–5595 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
130. Dijkshoorn L. International Committee on Systematics of Prokaryotes. Minutes of the meetings, 7, 8 and 9 July 2017, Valencia, Spain. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2018; 68:2104–2110 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
131. Dijkshoorn L. Minutes of the International Committee on Systematics of Prokaryotes. Minutes of the miniplenary meeting 11 July 2019, Glasgow, Scotland. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2021; 71:004706 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]