1887

Abstract

Two extremely halophilic archaeal strains, PSR5 and PSR8, were isolated from a saline soil sample collected from the Tarim Basin, Xinjiang, PR China. Both strains had two copies of the 16S rRNA genes and , showing 2.6 and 3.9% divergence, respectively. The gene of PSR5 showed 98.4 and 95.3% similarity to the and genes of strain PSR8; the gene of PSR5 displayed 97.4 and 96.7% similarity to those of strain PSR8, respectively. Phylogenetic analyses based on the 16S rRNA and genes revealed that strains PSR5 and PSR8 formed a single cluster, and then tightly clustered with the current four species (93.5–97.1% similarities for the 16S rRNA gene and 89.3–90.9% similarities for the gene, respectively). Several phenotypic characteristics differentiate strains PSR5 and PSR8 from current members. The polar lipids of the two strains are phosphatidic acid, phosphatidylglycerol, phosphatidylglycerol phosphate methyl ester phosphatidylglycerol sulphate and three glycolipids. One of the glycolipids is sulphated mannosyl glucosyl diether, and the remaining two glycolipids are unidentified. The average nucleotide identity, DNA–DNA hybridization, amino acid identity and percentage of conserved proteins values between the two strains were 88.5, 39.1, 89.3 and 72.8 %, respectively, much lower than the threshold values proposed as a species boundary. These values among the two strains and members were 77.9–79.2, 22.0–23.5, 75.1–78.2 and 56.8–69.9 %, respectively, much lower than the recommended threshold values for species delimitation. These results suggested that strains PSR5 and PSR8 represent two novel species of . Based on phenotypic, chemotaxonomic, genomic and phylogenetic properties, strains PSR5 (=CGMCC 1.16851=JCM 34141) and PSR8 (=CGMCC 1.17025=JCM 34142) represent two novel species of the genus , for which the names sp. nov. and sp. nov. are proposed.

Funding
This study was supported by the:
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (Award 32070003)
    • Principle Award Recipient: Heng-LinCui
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.005543
2022-10-18
2024-04-24
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Cui HL, Dyall-Smith ML. Cultivation of halophilic archaea (class Halobacteria) from thalassohaline and athalassohaline environments. Mar Life Sci Technol 2021; 3:243–251 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Savage KN, Krumholz LR, Oren A, Elshahed MS. Haladaptatus paucihalophilus gen. nov., sp. nov., a halophilic archaeon isolated from a low-salt, sulfide-rich spring. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2007; 57:19–24 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Roh SW, Lee ML, Bae JW. Haladaptatus cibarius sp. nov., an extremely halophilic archaeon from seafood, and emended description of the genus Haladaptatus. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2010; 60:1187–1190 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Cui H-L, Sun F-F, Gao X, Dong Y, Xu X-W et al. Haladaptatus litoreus sp. nov., an extremely halophilic archaeon from a marine solar saltern, and emended description of the genus Haladaptatus. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2010; 60:1085–1089 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Liu B-B, Zhao W-Y, Chu X, Hozzein WN, Prabhu DM et al. Haladaptatus pallidirubidus sp. nov., a halophilic archaeon isolated from saline soil samples in Yunnan and Xinjiang, China. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 2014; 106:901–910 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Han D, Cui HL. Halostella pelagica sp. nov. and Halostella litorea sp. nov., isolated from salted brown alga Laminaria. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2020; 70:1969–1976 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Oren A, Ventosa A, Grant WD. Proposed minimal standards for description of new taxa in the order Halobacteriales. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1997; 47:233–238 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Cui HL, Yang X, Mou YZ. Salinarchaeum laminariae gen. nov., sp. nov.: a new member of the family Halobacteriaceae isolated from salted brown alga Laminaria. Extremophiles 2011; 15:625–631 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Cui HL, Zhou PJ, Oren A, Liu SJ. Intraspecific polymorphism of 16S rRNA genes in two halophilic archaeal genera, Haloarcula and Halomicrobium. Extremophiles 2009; 13:31–37 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Minegishi H, Kamekura M, Itoh T, Echigo A, Usami R et al. Further refinement of the phylogeny of the Halobacteriaceae based on the full-length RNA polymerase subunit B’ (rpoB’) gene. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2010; 60:2398–2408 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Tamura K, Stecher G, Peterson D, Filipski A, Kumar S. MEGA6: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 6.0. Mol Biol Evol 2013; 30:2725–2729 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Felsenstein J. Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: a maximum likelihood approach. J Mol Evol 1981; 17:368–376 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Saitou N, Nei M. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 1987; 4:406–425 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Fitch WM. Toward defining the course of evolution: minimum change for a specific tree topology. Syst Biol 1971; 20:406–416 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Yoon S-H, Ha S-M, Kwon S, Lim J, Kim Y et al. Introducing EzBioCloud: a taxonomically united database of 16S rRNA gene sequences and whole-genome assemblies. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2017; 67:1613–1617 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Yoon S-H, Ha S-M, Lim J, Kwon S, Chun J. A large-scale evaluation of algorithms to calculate average nucleotide identity. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 2017; 110:1281–1286 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Meier-Kolthoff JP, Auch AF, Klenk HP, Göker M. Genome sequence-based species delimitation with confidence intervals and improved distance functions. BMC Bioinformatics 2013; 14:60 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Kanehisa M, Goto S, Kawashima S, Okuno Y, Hattori M. The KEGG resource for deciphering the genome. Nucleic Acids Res 2004; 32:D277–80 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Li L, Stoeckert CJ Jr, Roos DS. OrthoMCL: identification of ortholog groups for eukaryotic genomes. Genome Res 2003; 13:2178–2189 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Edgar RC. MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res 2004; 32:1792–1797 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Capella-Gutiérrez S, Silla-Martínez JM, Gabaldón T. TrimAl: a tool for automated alignment trimming in large-scale phylogenetic analyses. Bioinformatics 2009; 25:1972–1973 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Nguyen L-T, Schmidt HA, von Haeseler A, Minh BQ. IQ-TREE: a fast and effective stochastic algorithm for estimating maximum-likelihood phylogenies. Mol Biol Evol 2015; 32:268–274 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Cui HL, Gao X, Yang X, Xu XW. Halorussus rarus gen. nov., sp. nov., a new member of the family Halobacteriaceae isolated from a marine solar saltern. Extremophiles 2010; 14:493–499 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Wainø M, Tindall BJ, Ingvorsen K. Halorhabdus utahensis gen. nov., sp. nov., an aerobic, extremely halophilic member of the Archaea from Great Salt Lake, Utah. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2000; 50 Pt 1:183–190 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Kim M, Oh HS, Park SC, Chun J. Towards a taxonomic coherence between average nucleotide identity and 16S rRNA gene sequence similarity for species demarcation of prokaryotes. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2014; 64:346–351 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Luo C, Rodriguez-R LM, Konstantinidis KT. MyTaxa: an advanced taxonomic classifier for genomic and metagenomic sequences. Nucleic Acids Res 2014; 42:e73 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Goris J, Konstantinidis KT, Klappenbach JA, Coenye T, Vandamme P et al. DNA-DNA hybridization values and their relationship to whole-genome sequence similarities. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2007; 57:81–91 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Durán-Viseras A, Sánchez-Porro C, Ventosa A. Genomic insights into new species of the genus Halomicroarcula reveals potential for new osmoadaptative strategies in halophilic archaea. Front Microbiol 2021; 12:751746 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Youssef NH, Savage-Ashlock KN, McCully AL, Luedtke B, Shaw EI et al. Trehalose/2-sulfotrehalose biosynthesis and glycine-betaine uptake are widely spread mechanisms for osmoadaptation in the Halobacteriales. ISME J 2014; 8:636–649 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Ziegler C, Bremer E, Krämer R. The BCCT family of carriers: from physiology to crystal structure. Mol Microbiol 2010; 78:13–34 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Elling FJ, Becker KW, Könneke M, Schröder JM, Kellermann MY et al. Respiratory quinones in Archaea: phylogenetic distribution and application as biomarkers in the marine environment. Environ Microbiol 2016; 18:692–707 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.005543
Loading
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.005543
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplements

Supplementary material 1

PDF
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error