1887

Abstract

Two Gram-stain-negative, facultatively anaerobic, non-motile, rod-shaped bacteria, strains h42 and ALG8, were isolated individually from the Indian Ocean and intertidal zone of Zhoushan, China. The results of 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis showed that the sequence similarity between strains h42 and ALG8 was 99.7 %, and the closest related strains were C7 (97.77 and 97.62 %) and GYSW-23 (95.31 and 95.45 %). Phylogenetic analysis based on 16S rRNA gene sequences shows that these two novel strains belong to a distinct new lineage of the family in the order . The average nucleotide identity and DNA–DNA hybridization values between the two novel strains and C7 and GYSW-23 were 72.73–78.15 % and 19.70–20.80 %, respectively. The DNA G+C content of strains h42 and ALG8 was 62.36 % and 62.17 mol %. The major fatty acids (>10 %) in strain h42 were C, C cyclo 8 and summed feature 8 (C 6 and/or C 7), and in strain ALG8 were C cyclo 8 and summed feature 8 (Cω6 and/or C 7). The predominant isoprenoid ubiquinone of the two novel strains was Q-10; their major polar lipids were identified as diphosphatidylglycerol, phosphatidylglycerol, phosphatidylethanolamine, phosphatidylcholine, two unidentified glycolipids, an unidentified aminoglycolipid, an unidentified phospholipid and an unidentified lipid. Based on the results of the morphological, physiological, chemotaxonomic and phylogenetic analysis of these two strains, a novel species of a new genus in the family is proposed, named as gen. nov., sp. nov. The type strain and non-type strain of are h42 (=KCTC 72875=CGMCC 1.17849=MCCC 1K04735) and ALG8 (=KCTC 82194=MCCC 1K04733).

Funding
This study was supported by the:
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (Award 91851114)
    • Principle Award Recipient: Xue-WeiXu
  • National Key R&D Program of China (Award 2018YFC0310704)
    • Principle Award Recipient: HongCheng
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.005341
2022-05-06
2024-04-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Hördt A, López MG, Meier-Kolthoff JP, Schleuning M, Weinhold L-M et al. Analysis of 1,000+ type-strain genomes substantially improves taxonomic classification of Alphaproteobacteria . Front Microbiol 2020; 11:468 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Simon M, Scheuner C, Meier-Kolthoff JP, Brinkhoff T, Wagner-Döbler I et al. Phylogenomics of Rhodobacteraceae reveals evolutionary adaptation to marine and non-marine habitats. ISME J 2017; 11:1483–1499 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Imhoff JF, TRuPER HG, Pfennig N. Rearrangement of the species and genera of the phototrophic “Purple Nonsulfur Bacteria.”. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1984; 34:340–343 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Wagner-Döbler I, Biebl H. Environmental biology of the marine Roseobacter lineage. Annu Rev Microbiol 2006; 60:255–280 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Buchan A, González JM, Moran MA. Overview of the marine roseobacter lineage. Appl Environ Microbiol 2005; 71:5665–5677 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Liang KYH, Orata FD, Boucher YF, Case RJ. Roseobacters in a sea of poly- and paraphyly: whole genome-based taxonomy of the family Rhodobacteraceae and the proposal for the split of the “Roseobacter Clade” into a novel family, Roseobacteraceae fam. nov. Front Microbiol 2021; 12:683109 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Chen M, Song Y, Feng X, Tang K, Jiao N et al. Genomic characteristics and potential metabolic adaptations of hadal trench Roseobacter and Alteromonas bacteria based on single-cell genomics analyses. Front Microbiol 2020; 11:1739 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Wirth JS, Whitman WB. Phylogenomic analyses of a clade within the roseobacter group suggest taxonomic reassignments of species of the genera Aestuariivita, Citreicella, Loktanella, Nautella, Pelagibaca, Ruegeria, Thalassobius, Thiobacimonas and Tropicibacter, and the proposal of six novel genera. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2018; 68:2393–2411 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Winker S, Woese CR. A definition of the domains Archaea, Bacteria and Eucarya in terms of small subunit ribosomal RNA characteristics. Syst Appl Microbiol 1991; 14:305–310 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Kumar S, Stecher G, Tamura K. MEGA7: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis Version 7.0 for Bigger Datasets. Mol Biol Evol 2016; 33:1870–1874 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Saitou N, Nei M. The neighbor-joining method: A new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 1987; 4:406–425 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Felsenstein J. Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: A maximum likelihood approach. J Mol Evol 1981; 17:368–376 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Fitch WM. Toward defining the course of evolution: minimum change for a specific tree topology. Systematic Zoology 1971; 20:406 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Prjibelski A, Antipov D, Meleshko D, Lapidus A, Korobeynikov A. Using SPAdes de novo assembler. Curr Protoc Bioinformatics 2020; 70:e102 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Parks DH, Imelfort M, Skennerton CT, Hugenholtz P, Tyson GW. CheckM: assessing the quality of microbial genomes recovered from isolates, single cells, and metagenomes. Genome Res 2015; 25:1043–1055 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Sun C, Fang Y-C, Li H, Chen J, Ye Y-L et al. Complete genome sequence of marine Roseobacter lineage member Monaibacterium sp. ALG8 with six plasmids isolated from seawater around brown algae. Mar Genomics 2021; 60:100878 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Chun J, Oren A, Ventosa A, Christensen H, Arahal DR et al. Proposed minimal standards for the use of genome data for the taxonomy of prokaryotes. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2018; 68:461–466 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Meier-Kolthoff JP, Auch AF, Klenk H-P, Göker M. Genome sequence-based species delimitation with confidence intervals and improved distance functions. BMC Bioinformatics 2013; 14:60 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Qin Q-L, Xie B-B, Zhang X-Y, Chen X-L, Zhou B-C et al. A proposed genus boundary for the prokaryotes based on genomic insights. J Bacteriol 2014; 196:2210–2215 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Aziz RK, Bartels D, Best AA, DeJongh M, Disz T et al. The RAST Server: rapid annotations using subsystems technology. BMC Genomics 2008; 9:75 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Xu L, Wu Y-H, Zhou P, Cheng H, Liu Q et al. Investigation of the thermophilic mechanism in the genus Porphyrobacter by comparative genomic analysis. BMC Genomics 2018; 19:385 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Xu L, Ye K-X, Dai W-H, Sun C, Xu L-H et al. Comparative genomic insights into secondary metabolism biosynthetic gene cluster distributions of marine Streptomyces . Mar Drugs 2019; 17:498 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Lechner M, Findeiss S, Steiner L, Marz M, Stadler PF et al. Proteinortho: detection of (co-)orthologs in large-scale analysis. BMC Bioinformatics 2011; 12:124 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Katoh K, Standley DM. MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: improvements in performance and usability. Mol Biol Evol 2013; 30:772–780 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Capella-Gutiérrez S, Silla-Martínez JM, Gabaldón T. trimAl: a tool for automated alignment trimming in large-scale phylogenetic analyses. Bioinformatics 2009; 25:1972–1973 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Nguyen L-T, Schmidt HA, von Haeseler A, Minh BQ. IQ-TREE: a fast and effective stochastic algorithm for estimating maximum-likelihood phylogenies. Mol Biol Evol 2015; 32:268–274 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Richter M, Rosselló-Móra R. Shifting the genomic gold standard for the prokaryotic species definition. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2009; 106:19126–19131 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Konstantinidis KT, Tiedje JM. Prokaryotic taxonomy and phylogeny in the genomic era: advancements and challenges ahead. Curr Opin Microbiol 2007; 10:504–509 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Luo C, Rodriguez-R LM, Konstantinidis KT. MyTaxa: an advanced taxonomic classifier for genomic and metagenomic sequences. Nucleic Acids Res 2014; 42:e73 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Stropko SJ, Pipes SE, Newman JD. Genome-based reclassification of Bacillus cibi as a later heterotypic synonym of Bacillus indicus and emended description of Bacillus indicus . Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2014; 64:3804–3809 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Karunakaran R, Ebert K, Harvey S, Leonard ME, Ramachandran V et al. Thiamine is synthesized by a salvage pathway in Rhizobium leguminosarum bv. viciae strain 3841. J Bacteriol 2006; 188:6661–6668 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Wallrapp FH, Pan J-J, Ramamoorthy G, Almonacid DE, Hillerich BS et al. Prediction of function for the polyprenyl transferase subgroup in the isoprenoid synthase superfamily. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2013; 110:E1196–202 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Dong X-Z, Cai M-Y. Determinative Manual for Routine Bacteriology Beijing: Scientific Press (English translation); 2001
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Yu X-D, Yu X-Y, Fu G-Y, Zhao Z, Shen X et al. Marortus luteolus gen. nov., sp. nov., isolated from surface seawater of the East Sea in China. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2019; 69:1490–1495 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Ostle AG, Holt JG. Nile blue A as A fluorescent stain for poly-beta-hydroxybutyrate. Appl Environ Microbiol 1982; 44:238–241 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Carpenter CM, Suhrland LG, Morrison M. The oxalate salt of p-aminodimethylaniline, an improved reagent for the oxidase test. Science 1947; 105:649–650 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Xu L, Huo Y-Y, Li Z-Y, Wang C-S, Oren A et al. Chryseobacterium profundimaris sp. nov., a new member of the family Flavobacteriaceae isolated from deep-sea sediment. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 2015; 107:979–989 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Granger DL, Taintor RR, Boockvar KS, Hibbs JB. Measurement of nitrate and nitrite in biological samples using nitrate reductase and Griess reaction. Methods Enzymol 1996; 268:142–151 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Chernikova TN, Dallimore J, Lünsdorf H, Heipieper HJ, Golyshin PN. Monaibacterium marinum, gen. nov, sp. nov, a new member of the Alphaproteobacteria isolated from seawater of Menai Straits, Wales, UK. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2017; 67:3310–3317 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Park S, Won S-M, Park J-M, Jung Y-T, Yoon J-H. Pontivivens insulae gen. nov., sp. nov., isolated from seawater. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2015; 65:2896–2902 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Xu X-W, Huo Y-Y, Bai X-D, Wang C-S, Oren A et al. Kordiimonas lacus sp. nov., isolated from a ballast water tank, and emended description of the genus Kordiimonas . Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2011; 61:422–426 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Kuykendall LD, Roy MA, O’neill JJ, Devine TE. Fatty acids, antibiotic resistance, and deoxyribonucleic acid homology groups of Bradyrhizobium japonicum . Int J Syst Bacteriol 1988; 38:358–361 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Kamekura M, Kates M. Lipids of Halophilic Archaebacteria Boca Raton: CRC Press; 1988
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Reddy CA, Beveridge TJ, Breznak JA, Marzluf GA, Schmidt TM et al. Phenotypic Characterization and the Principles of Comparative Systematics Washington, DC, USA: ASM Press; 2007
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Tindall BJ, Rosselló-Móra R, Busse H-J, Ludwig W, Kämpfer P. Notes on the characterization of prokaryote strains for taxonomic purposes. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2010; 60:249–266 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Chang Y-Q, Meng X, Du Z-Z, Du Z-J. Oceanibium sediminis gen. nov., sp. nov., isolated from marine sediment. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2019; 69:249–254 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.005341
Loading
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.005341
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplements

Supplementary material 1

PDF
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error