1887

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SYSTEMATIC AND EVOLUTIONARY MICROBIOLOGY logo

Volume 72, Issue 3

sp. nov., isolated from the gut of the larva of No Access

Abstract

A Gram-stain-positive, non-spore-forming, yellow-pigmented, non-motile, non-flagellated, facultative anaerobic and rod-shaped bacterial strain, designated BI34, was isolated from the gut of the larva of . Strain BI34 grew at 15–40 °C (optimum, 37 °C), at pH 6.5–9.0 (optimum, pH 7.5) and in the presence of 0–7 % (w/v) NaCl (optimum, 2 %). Based on the results of 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis, strain BI34 belonged to the phylum and was closely related to NBRC 104118 (99.3 %), NBRC 15516 (99.1 %), BIT-GX5 (99.0 %), SE3 (99.0 %), NBRC 110994 (98.4 %) and DS-61 (97.0 %). The genome to genome relatedness of the average nucleotide identity (ANI) and the digital DNA–DNA hybridization (dDDH) values calculated by the Genome-to-Genome Distance Calculator between strain BI34 and its related species mentioned above were lower than the threshold of 95 and 70 % for speciation, respectively. The predominant menaquinone of strain BI34 contained MK-9(H), and the major fatty acids were anteiso-C, C and anteiso-C. Strain BI34 had diphosphatidylglycerol and phosphatidylglycerol as major polar lipids. The whole-cell sugars were galactose, glucose and ribose, and the cell-wall peptidoglycan contained lysine, alanine, aspartic acid and glutamic acid. The DNA G+C content of strain BI34 was 73.8 mol%. The difference in physiological and biochemical characteristics and the below-threshold values of genome-to-genome relatedness indicate that strain BI34 represents a novel species in the genus , for which the name sp. nov. is proposed. The type strain is BI34 (=KCTC 49302=NBRC 114073).

  • Received:
  • Accepted:
  • Published Online:
Keyword(s): Actinobacteria and intestine of herbivorous insect
© 2022 The Authors
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.005296
2022-03-29
2024-12-02
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Schumann P, Weiss N, Stackebrandt E. Reclassification of Cellulomonas cellulans (Stackebrandt and Keddie 1986) as Cellulosimicrobium cellulans gen. nov., comb. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2001; 51:1007–1010 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Brown JM, Steigerwalt AG, Morey RE, Daneshvar MI, Romero L-J et al. Characterization of clinical isolates previously identified as Oerskovia turbata: proposal of Cellulosimicrobium funkei sp. nov. and emended description of the genus Cellulosimicrobium. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2006; 56:801–804 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Yoon JH, Kang SJ, Schumann P, Oh TK. Cellulosimicrobium terreum sp. nov., isolated from soil. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2007; 57:2493–2497 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Stackebrandt E, Schumann P, Cui XL. Reclassification of Cellulosimicrobium variabile Bakalidou et al. 2002 as Isoptericola variabilis gen. nov., comb. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2004; 54:685–688 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Nouioui I, Carro L, García-López M, Meier-Kolthoff JP, Woyke T et al. Genome-based taxonomic classification of the phylum Actinobacteria. Front Microbiol 2018; 9: [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Hamada M, Shibata C, Tamura T, Nurkanto A, Ratnakomala S et al. Cellulosimicrobium marinum sp. nov., an actinobacterium isolated from sea sediment. Arch Microbiol 2016; 198:439–444 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Oh M, Kim JH, Yoon JH, Schumann P, Kim W. Cellulosimicrobium arenosum sp. nov., isolated from marine sediment sand. Curr Microbiol 2018; 75:901–906 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Sultanpuram VR, Mothe T, Chintalapati S, Chintalapati VR. Cellulosimicrobium aquatile sp. nov., isolated from Panagal reservoir, Nalgonda, India. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 2015; 108:1357–1364 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Dou TY, Chen J, Liu C. Isolation and subunit compositions of the xylanosome complexes produced by Cellulosimicrobium species. Enzyme Microb Technol 2020; 133:109445 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Heo J, Kim SJ, Kim JS, Hong SB, Kwon SW. Paenibacillus protaetiae sp. nov., isolated from gut of larva of Protaetia brevitarsis seulensis. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2020; 70:989–994 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Cho H, Heo J, Hamada M, Tamura T, Saitou S et al. Gryllotalpicola protaetiae sp. nov., isolated from insect Protaetia brevitarsis seulensis, and emended descriptions of the genus Gryllotalpicola and the species Gryllotalpicola soli. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2020; 70:715–720 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Heo J, Cho H, Kim MA, Hamada M, Tamura T et al. Protaetiibacter intestinalis gen. nov., of the family Microbacteriaceae, isolated from gut of Protaetia brevitarsis seulensis, reclassification of Lysinimonas kribbensis Jang et al. 2013 as Pseudolysinimonas kribbensis gen. nov., comb. nov. and emended description of the genus Lysinimonas Jang et al. 2013. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2019; 69:2101–2107 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Peng A, Qu X, Liu F, Li X, Li E et al. Angucycline glycosides from an intertidal sediments strain Streptomyces sp. and their cytotoxic activity against hepatoma carcinoma cells. Mar Drugs 2018; 16:470 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Yoon S-H, Ha S-M, Kwon S, Lim J, Kim Y et al. Introducing EzBioCloud: a taxonomically united database of 16S rRNA gene sequences and whole-genome assemblies. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2017; 67:1613–1617 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Hall T. BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for windows 95/98/nt. Nucleic Acids Symp Ser 1999; 41:95–98
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Thompson JD, Gibson TJ, Plewniak F, Jeanmougin F, Higgins DG. The CLUSTAL_X windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Res 1997; 25:4876–4882 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Saitou N, Nei M. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 1987; 4:406–425 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Felsenstein J. Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: a maximum likelihood approach. J Mol Evol 1981; 17:368–376 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Fitch WM. Toward defining the course of evolution: minimum change for a specific tree topology. Systematic Biology 1971; 20:406–416 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Kumar S, Stecher G, Li M, Knyaz C, Tamura K. MEGA X: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis across computing platforms. Mol Biol Evol 2018; 35:1547–1549 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Kim H, Oh H-W, Kim J-A, Park D-S, Park H-M et al. Luteimicrobium xylanilyticum sp. nov., isolated from the gut of a long-horned beetle, Massicus raddei. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2014; 64:1401–1405 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Walker BJ, Abeel T, Shea T, Priest M, Abouelliel A et al. Pilon: an integrated tool for comprehensive microbial variant detection and genome assembly improvement. PLoS One 2014; 9:e112963 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Kim M, Oh HS, Park SC, Chun J. Towards a taxonomic coherence between average nucleotide identity and 16S rRNA gene sequence similarity for species demarcation of prokaryotes. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2014; 64:346–351 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Meier-Kolthoff JP, Auch AF, Klenk H-P, Göker M. Genome sequence-based species delimitation with confidence intervals and improved distance functions. BMC Bioinformatics 2013; 14:60 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Na S-I, Kim YO, Yoon S-H, Ha S-M, Baek I et al. UBCG: Up-to-date bacterial core gene set and pipeline for phylogenomic tree reconstruction. J Microbiol 2018; 56:280–285 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Li Z, Mertens KN, Gottschling M, Gu H, Söhner S et al. Taxonomy and molecular phylogenetics of Ensiculiferaceae, fam. nov. (Peridiniales, Dinophyceae), with consideration of their life-history. Protist 2020; 171:125759 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Breakwell DP, Moyes RB, Reynolds J. Differential staining of bacteria: flagella stain. Curr Protoc Microbiol 2009; Appendix 3:Appendix 3G [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Cowan ST, Steel KJ. Manual for the Identification of Medical Bacteria New York, NY: Cambridge University Press; 1965
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Lányi B. Classical and rapid identification methods for medically important bacteria. Methods Microbiol 1988; 19:1–67
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Kämpfer P, Steiof M, Dott W. Microbiological characterization of a fuel-oil contaminated site including numerical identification of heterotrophic water and soil bacteria. Microb Ecol 1991; 21:227–251 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Sasser M. Identification of bacteria by gas chromatography of cellular fatty acids. MIDI technical note 101 Newark DE: MIDI Inc; 1990
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Komagata K, Suzuki KI. 4 lipid and cell-wall analysis in bacterial slipid and cell-wall analysis in bacterial systematics. Methods Microbiol 1988; 19:161–207
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Minnikin DE, O’Donnell AG, Goodfellow M, Alderson G, Athalye M et al. An integrated procedure for the extraction of bacterial isoprenoid quinones and polar lipids. J Microbiol Methods 1984; 2:233–241 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Staneck JL, Roberts GD. Simplified approach to identification of aerobic actinomycetes by thin-layer chromatography. Appl Microbiol 1974; 28:226–231 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Yokota A, Takeuchi M, Sakane T, Weiss N. Proposal of six new species in the genus Aureobacterium and transfer of Flavobacterium esteraromaticum Omelianski to the genus Aureobacterium as Aureobacterium esteraromaticum comb. nov. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1993; 43:555–564 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Hu L, Xia M, Gao X, Huo YX, Yang Y. Cellulosimicrobium composti sp. nov., a thermophilic bacterium isolated from compost. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2021; 71:004905 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Aviles FA, Kyndt JA. Cellulosimicrobium fucosivorans sp. nov., isolated from San Elijo Lagoon, contains a fucose metabolic pathway linked to carotenoid production. Arch Microbiol 2021; 203:4525–4538 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.005296
Loading
Cellulosimicrobium protaetiae sp. nov., isolated from the gut of the larva of Protaetia brevitarsis seulensis
Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 72, 005296 (2022); https://doi.org/10.1099/ijsem.0.005296
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.005296
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.005296
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplements

Supplementary material 1

PDF

Most cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error