1887

Abstract

A Gram-stain-variable, motile, aerobic, spore-forming, rod-shaped bacterium, designated as strain LOB 377, was isolated from soil sampled in Koka County (now Konan City), in Shiga Prefecture, Japan. To determine its taxonomic position, the bacterium was evaluated by a polyphasic approach based on genomic, phenotypic and chemotaxonomic tests. From phylogenetic analysis based on 16S rRNA gene sequences, strain LOB 377 (LC570960) was revealed to have the highest similarity to the type strain of FJAT-13985 (9.1 %). The average nucleotide identity and digital DNA–DNA hybridization values between both strains based on whole genome sequences were 84.1 and 42.8 %, respectively, which were below the recommended thresholds. The strain grew at 15–45 °C (optimum, 25–37 °C), at pH 5.5–9.5 (optimum, pH 6.5–8.5) and with 1.0–2.0 % (w/v) NaCl. Cell-wall peptidoglycan of the strain contained -diaminopimelic acid. The major menaquinone was menaquinone-7. Predominant fatty acids were iso-C, anteiso-C, iso-C and C ω11. The polar lipids were phosphatidylglycerol, unidentified phospholipid and unidentified aminophospholipid. The DNA G+C content was 40.5 mol%. According to the genomic, phenotypic and chemotaxonomic results, strain LOB 377 represents a novel species in the genus , for which the name sp. nov. is proposed. The type strain is LOB 377 (=ATCC 31382=NBRC 114637=DSM 113418).

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.005253
2022-02-22
2024-04-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Patel S, Gupta RS. A phylogenomic and comparative genomic framework for resolving the polyphyly of the genus Bacillus: Proposal for six new genera of Bacillus species, Peribacillus gen. nov., Cytobacillus gen. nov., Mesobacillus gen. nov., Neobacillus gen. nov., Metabacillus gen. nov. and Alkalihalobacillus gen. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2020; 70:406–438 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Nagel M, Andreesen JR. Bacillus niacini sp. nov., a nicotinate-metabolizing mesophile isolated from soil. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1991; 41:134–139 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Logan NA, Lebbe L, Hoste B, Goris J, Forsyth G et al. Aerobic endospore-forming bacteria from geothermal environments in northern Victoria Land, Antarctica, and Candlemas Island, South Sandwich archipelago, with the proposal of Bacillus fumarioli sp. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2000; 50:1741–1753 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Heyrman J, Vanparys B, Logan NA, Balcaen A, Rodríguez-Díaz M et al. Bacillus novalis sp. nov., Bacillus vireti sp. nov., Bacillus soli sp. nov., Bacillus bataviensis sp. nov. and Bacillus drentensis sp. nov., from the Drentse A grasslands. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2004; 54:47–57 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Nguyen N-L, Kim Y-J, Hoang V-A, Min JW, Liang Z-Q et al. Bacillus ginsengisoli sp. nov., isolated from soil of a ginseng field. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2013; 63:855–860 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Ten LN, Baek S-H, Im W-T, Larina LL, Lee J-S et al. Bacillus pocheonensis sp. nov., a moderately halotolerant, aerobic bacterium isolated from soil of a ginseng field. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2007; 57:2532–2537 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Liu B, Liu G-H, Hu G-H, Chen M-C. Bacillus mesonae sp. nov., isolated from the root of Mesona chinensis. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2014; 64:3346–3352 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Kämpfer P, Busse H-J, Glaeser SP, Kloepper JW, Hu C-H et al. Bacillus cucumis sp. nov. isolated from the rhizosphere of cucumber (Cucumis sativus). Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2016; 66:1039–1044 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Zhang M-Y, Cheng J, Cai Y, Zhang T-Y, Wu Y-Y et al. Bacillus notoginsengisoli sp. nov., a novel bacterium isolated from the rhizosphere of Panax notoginseng. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2017; 67:2581–2585 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Jiang L, Lee MH, Jeong JC, Kim D-H, Kim CY et al. Neobacillus endophyticus sp. nov., an endophytic bacterium isolated from selaginella involvens roots. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2021; 71:004581
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Han L, Yang G, Zhou X, Yang D, Hu P et al. Bacillus thermocopriae sp. nov., isolated from a compost. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2013; 63:3024–3029 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Yu L, Tang X, Wei S, Qiu Y, Xu X et al. Two novel species of the family Bacillaceae: Oceanobacillus piezotolerans sp. nov. and Bacillus piezotolerans sp. nov., from deep-sea sediment samples of Yap Trench. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2019; 69:3022–3030 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Bittar F, Bibi F, Ramasamy D, Lagier J-C, Azhar EI et al. Non contiguous-finished genome sequence and description of Bacillus jeddahensis sp. nov. Stand Genomic Sci 2015; 10:47 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Gupta RS, Patel S, Saini N, Chen S. Robust demarcation of 17 distinct Bacillus species clades, proposed as novel Bacillaceae genera, by phylogenomics and comparative genomic analyses: description of Robertmurraya kyonggiensis sp. nov. and proposal for an emended genus Bacillus limiting it only to the members of the Subtilis and Cereus clades of species. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2020; 70:5753–5798 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Tamura T, Nakagawa Y, Kawasaki H. Extraction of Genomic DNA. Identification Manual of Actinoycetes The Society for Actinomycetes Japan; 2001 pp 83–88
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Nakagawa Y, Kawasaki H. DNA sequence method of 16S rRNA gene. Identification Manual of Actinoycetes The Society for Actinomycetes Japan; 2001 pp 88–95
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Kimura M. A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J Mol Evol 1980; 16:111–120 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Kumar S, Stecher G, Tamura K. MEGA7: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Mol Biol Evol 2016; 33:1870–1874 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Felsenstein J. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 1985; 39:783–791 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Rodriguez-R LM, Konstantinidis KT. The enveomics collection: a toolbox for specialized analyses of microbial genomes and metagenomes. PeerJ Preptints 2016; 4:e1900vl
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Meier-Kolthoff JP, Auch AF, Klenk HP, Göker M. Genome sequence-based species delimitation with confidence intervals and improved distance functions. BMC Bioinformatics 2013; 14:60 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Katayama-fujimura Y, Komatsu Y, Kuraishi H, Kaneko T. Estimation of DNA base composition by high performance liquid chromatography of its nuclease P1 hydrolysate. Agricultural and Biological Chemistry 1984; 48:3169–3172 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Barrow GI, Feltham RKA. Cowan and Steel’s Manual for the Identification of Medical Bacteria, 3rd edn. Cambridge: University Press; 1993
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Suzuki K. Amino acid analysis of Cell wall. Identification Manual of Actinoycetes The Society for Actinomycetes Japan; 2001 pp 50–55
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Bligh EG, Dyer WJ. A rapid method of total lipid extraction and purification. Can J Biochem Physiol 1959; 37:911–917 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Minnikin DE, Collins MD, Goodfellow M. Fatty acid and polar lipid composition in the classification of Cellulomonas, Oerskovia and related taxa. J Appl Bacteriol 1979; 47:87–95 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Kudo T. Phospholipid. Experimental Method of Microbial Classification and Identification Springer-Verlag Tokyo; 2001 pp 135–144
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Kudo T. Phospholipid analysis. Identification Manual of Actinoycetes The Society for Actinomycetes Japan; 2001 pp 66–72
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Dittmer JC, Lester RL. A simple, specific spray for the detection of phospholipids on thin-layer chromatograms. J Lipid Res 1964; 5:126–127 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Moore WEC, Stackebrandt E, Kandler O, Colwell RR, Krichevsky MI et al. Report of the ad hoc Committee on Reconciliation of Approaches to Bacterial Systematics. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1987; 37:463–464 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Goris J, Konstantinidis KT, Klappenbach JA, Coenye T, Vandamme P et al. DNA-DNA hybridization values and their relationship to whole-genome sequence similarities. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2007; 57:81–91 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Richter M, Rosselló-Móra R. Shifting the genomic gold standard for the prokaryotic species definition. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2009; 106:19126–19131 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Whitman WB, Rainey F, Kämpfer P, Trujillo M, Chun J et al. Bergey’s Manual of Systematics of Archaea and Bacteria NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc; 2015 pp 1–164 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Tuo L, Liu F, Yan XR, Liu Y. Bacillus taxi sp. nov., a novel endophytic bacterium isolated from root of Taxus chinensis (Pilger) Rehd. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2020; 70:481–486 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Venkateswaran K, Kempf M, Chen F, Satomi M, Nicholson W et al. Bacillus nealsonii sp. nov., isolated from a spacecraft-assembly facility, whose spores are gamma-radiation resistant. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2003; 53:165–172 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.005253
Loading
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.005253
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplements

Supplementary material 1

PDF
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error