1887

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SYSTEMATIC AND EVOLUTIONARY MICROBIOLOGY logo

Volume 72, Issue 1

sp. nov., isolated from oil-contaminated soil No Access

Abstract

A yellow-coloured, Gram-stain-positive, motile, aerobic and rod-shaped bacteria, designated DKR-3, was isolated from oil-contaminated experimental soil. Strain DKR-3 could grow at pH 5.0–10.5 (optimum, pH 7.0–8.5), at 10–40 °C (optimum, 25–32 °C) and tolerated 3.5 % of NaCl. Phylogenetic analyses based on its 16S rRNA gene sequence indicated that strain DKR-3 formed a lineage within the family and was clustered with members of the genus . Strain DKR-3 had highest 16S rRNA gene sequence similarities to DSM 20111 (98.3 %), JCM 18111 (98.2 %) and DSM 20107 (97.8 %). The predominant respiratory quinone was tetrahydrogenated menaquinone with nine isoprene units [MK-9(H)]. The principal cellular fatty acids were anteiso-C, C and anteiso-C. The major polar lipids were diphosphatidylglycerol and phosphatidylglycerol. The cell-wall diamino acid was -ornithine whereas rhamnose and glucose were the cell-wall sugars. The DNA G+C content was 74.2mol %. The genome of strain DKR-3 was 3.74 Mb and contained three putative biosynthetic gene clusters. The average nucleotide identity and digital DNA–DNA hybridization relatedness values between strain DKR-3 and its phylogenetically related members were below the species threshold values. Based on a polyphasic study, strain DKR-3 represents a novel species belonging to the genus , for which the name sp. nov. is proposed. The type strain is DKR-3 (=KACC 22071=NBRC 114730).

  • Received:
  • Accepted:
  • Published Online:
Keyword(s): Cellulomonadaceae , Cellulomonas fulva , experimental soil , oil-contaminated soil and phylogeny
Funding
This study was supported by the:
  • National Research Foundation of Korea (Award 2020R1I1A1A01071920)
    • Principle Award Recipient: DhirajKumar Chaudhary
© 2022 The Authors
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.005209
2022-01-31
2024-04-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Dahal RH, Chaudhary DK, Kim D-U, Kim J et al. Chitinophaga fulva sp. nov., isolated from forest soil. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2021. DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.16773898.v1; 71: [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Bergey D, Harrison F, Breed R, Hammer B, Huntoon F. Bergey’s Manual of Determinative Bacteriology, 1st ed. Baltimore Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore: 1923
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Kellerman K, McBeth I. The fermentation of cellulose. Zentralblatt für Bakteriol Parasitenkunde, Infekt und Hyg Abteilung II 1912; 34:485–494
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Parte AC, Sardà Carbasse J, Meier-Kolthoff JP, Reimer LC, Göker M. List of Prokaryotic names with Standing in Nomenclature (LPSN) moves to the DSMZ. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2020; 70:5607–5612 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Lee H-J, Kim S-Y, Whang K-S. Cellulomonas citrea sp. nov., isolated from paddy soil. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2020; 70:5304–5311 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Shi Z, Luo G, Wang G. Cellulomonas carbonis sp. nov., isolated from coal mine soil. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2012; 62:2004–2010 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Elberson MA, Malekzadeh F, Yazdi MT, Kameranpour N, Noori-Daloii MR et al. Cellulomonas persica sp. nov. and Cellulomonas iranensis sp. nov., mesophilic cellulose-degrading bacteria isolated from forest soils. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2000; 50 Pt 3:993–996 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  8. An D-S, Im W-T, Yang H-C, Kang MS, Kim KK et al. Cellulomonas terrae sp. nov., a cellulolytic and xylanolytic bacterium isolated from soil. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2005; 55:1705–1709 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Kim S-K, Kook M, Yan Z-F, Trinh H, Zheng S-D et al. Cellulomonas aurantiaca sp. nov., isolated from a soil sample from a tangerine field. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 2019; 112:1623–1632 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Chaudhary DK, Dahal RH, Hong Y. Noviherbaspirillum pedocola sp. nov., isolated from oil-contaminated experimental soil. Arch Microbiol 2021; 203:3071–3076 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Frank JA, Reich CI, Sharma S, Weisbaum JS, Wilson BA et al. Critical evaluation of two primers commonly used for amplification of bacterial 16S rRNA genes. Appl Environ Microbiol 2008; 74:2461–2470 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Yoon S-H, Ha S-M, Kwon S, Lim J, Kim Y et al. Introducing EzBioCloud: a taxonomically united database of 16S rRNA gene sequences and whole-genome assemblies. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2017; 67:1613–1617 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Kumar S, Stecher G, Tamura K. MEGA7: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Mol Biol Evol 2016; 33:1870–1874 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Felsenstein J. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 1985; 39:783–791 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Kimura M. A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J Mol Evol 1980; 16:111–120 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Bankevich A, Nurk S, Antipov D, Gurevich AA, Dvorkin M et al. SPAdes: a new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J Comput Biol 2012; 19:455–477 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Zhang Z, Schwartz S, Wagner L, Miller W. A greedy algorithm for aligning DNA sequences. J Comput Biol 2000; 7:203–214 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Lee I, Chalita M, Ha S-M, Na S-I, Yoon S-H et al. ContEst16S: an algorithm that identifies contaminated prokaryotic genomes using 16S RNA gene sequences. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2017; 67:2053–2057 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Tatusova T, DiCuccio M, Badretdin A, Chetvernin V, Nawrocki EP et al. NCBI prokaryotic genome annotation pipeline. Nucleic Acids Res 2016; 44:6614–6624 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Aziz RK, Bartels D, Best AA, DeJongh M, Disz T et al. The RAST Server: rapid annotations using subsystems technology. BMC Genomics 2008; 9:75 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Na S-I, Kim YO, Yoon S-H, Ha S-M, Baek I et al. UBCG: Up-to-date bacterial core gene set and pipeline for phylogenomic tree reconstruction. J Microbiol 2018; 56:280–285 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Yoon S-H, Ha S-M, Lim J, Kwon S, Chun J. A large-scale evaluation of algorithms to calculate average nucleotide identity. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 2017; 110:1281–1286 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Meier-Kolthoff JP, Auch AF, Klenk H-P, Göker M. Genome sequence-based species delimitation with confidence intervals and improved distance functions. BMC Bioinformatics 2013; 14:60 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Schattner P, Brooks AN, Lowe TM. The tRNAscan-SE, snoscan and snoGPS web servers for the detection of tRNAs and snoRNAs. Nucleic Acids Res 2005; 33:W686–9 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Lagesen K, Hallin P, Rødland EA, Staerfeldt H-H, Rognes T et al. RNAmmer: consistent and rapid annotation of ribosomal RNA genes. Nucleic Acids Res 2007; 35:3100–3108 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Couvin D, Bernheim A, Toffano-Nioche C, Touchon M, Michalik J et al. CRISPRCasFinder, an update of CRISRFinder, includes a portable version, enhanced performance and integrates search for Cas proteins. Nucleic Acids Res 2018; 46:W246–W251 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Blin K, Shaw S, Kloosterman AM, Charlop-Powers Z, van Wezel GP et al. antiSMASH 6.0: improving cluster detection and comparison capabilities. Nucleic Acids Res 2021; 49:W29–W35 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Richter M, Rosselló-Móra R. Shifting the genomic gold standard for the prokaryotic species definition. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2009; 106:19126–19131 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Doetsch RN. Determinative methods of light microscopy. In Gerhardt P, Murray RGE, Costilow RN, Nester EW, Wood WA. eds Manual of Methods for General Bacteriology Washington, DC; USA: American Society for Microbiology; 1981 pp 21–33
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Chaudhary DK, Bajagain R, Jeong S-W, Kim J. Biodegradation of diesel oil and n-alkanes (C18, C20, and C22) by a novel strain Acinetobacter sp. K-6 in unsaturated soil. Environ Eng Res 2019; 25:290–298 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Sasser M. Technical Note No. 101: Bacterial Identification by Gas Chromatographic Analysis of Fatty Acid Methyl Esters MIDI; 1990
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Minnikin DE, O’Donnell AG, Goodfellow M, Alderson G, Athalye M et al. An integrated procedure for the extraction of bacterial isoprenoid quinones and polar lipids. J Microbiol Methods 1984; 2:233–241 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Komagata K, Suzuki KI. 4 lipid and cell-wall analysis in bacterial systematics. Methods Microbiol 1988; 19:161–207
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Schleifer KH, Kandler O. Peptidoglycan types of bacterial cell walls and their taxonomic implications. Bacteriol Rev 1972; 36:407–477 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.005209
Loading
Cellulomonas fulva sp. nov., isolated from oil-contaminated soil
Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 72, 005209 (2022); https://doi.org/10.1099/ijsem.0.005209
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.005209
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.005209
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplements

Loading data from figshare Loading data from figshare

Most cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error