1887

Abstract

A novel strain, SUN51, was isolated from soils sampled in Wisconsin, USA, as part of a biogeography survey. Genome sequencing revealed that this strain had less than 90 % average nucleotide identity (ANI) to type species of : SUN51 was most closely related to A217 (99.5 % 16S rRNA gene identity, 89.4 % ANI). Genome size was estimated at 8.81 Mb, and the genome DNA G+C content was 72 mol%. The strain possessed the cellular fatty acids anteiso-C, iso-C, 16 : 1 ω7c, anteiso-C, iso-C and C. The predominant menaquinones were MK-9 H4, MK-9 H6 and MK-9 H8. Strain SUN51 contained the polar lipids phosphatidic acid, phosphatidyl ethanolamine, phosphatidyl glycerol and diphosphatidyl glycerol. The cell wall contained -diaminopimelic acid. The strain could grow on a broad range of carbon sources and tolerate temperatures of up to 40 °C. The results of the polyphasic study confirmed that this isolate represents a novel species of the genus , for which the name sp. nov. is proposed. The type strain of this species is SUN51 (=NRRL B-65543=JCM 33736).

Funding
This study was supported by the:
  • Directorate for Biological Sciences (Award DEB-1456821)
    • Principle Award Recipient: DanielH. Buckley
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.005178
2022-01-17
2024-04-23
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Challis GL, Hopwood DA. Synergy and contingency as driving forces for the evolution of multiple secondary metabolite production by Streptomyces species. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2003; 100 Suppl 2:14555–14561 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Doroghazi JR, Buckley DH. Intraspecies comparison of Streptomyces pratensis genomes reveals high levels of recombination and gene conservation between strains of disparate geographic origin. BMC Genomics 2014; 15:970–984 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Labeda DP, Dunlap CA, Rong X, Huang Y, Doroghazi JR et al. Phylogenetic relationships in the family Streptomycetaceae using multi-locus sequence analysis. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 2017; 110:563–583 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Cheng K, Rong X, Huang Y. Widespread interspecies homologous recombination reveals reticulate evolution within the genus Streptomyces . Mol Phylogenet Evol 2016; 102:246–254 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Rong X, Doroghazi JR, Cheng K, Zhang L, Buckley DH et al. Classification of Streptomyces phylogroup pratensis (Doroghazi and Buckley, 2010) based on genetic and phenotypic evidence, and proposal of Streptomyces pratensis sp. nov. Syst Appl Microbiol 2013; 36:401–407 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Andam CP, Choudoir MJ, Vinh Nguyen A, Sol Park H, Buckley DH. Contributions of ancestral inter-species recombination to the genetic diversity of extant Streptomyces lineages. ISME J 2016; 10:1731–1741 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Choudoir MJ, Doroghazi JR, Buckley DH. Latitude delineates patterns of biogeography in terrestrial Streptomyces. Environ Microbiol 2016; 18:4931–4945 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Choudoir MJ, Pepe-Ranney C, Buckley DH. Diversification of secondary metabolite biosynthetic gene clusters coincides with lineage divergence in Streptomyces . Antibiotics 2018; 7:1–15 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Andam CP, Doroghazi JR, Campbell AN, Kelly PJ, Choudoir MJ et al. A latitudinal diversity gradient in terrestrial bacteria of the genus Streptomyces . mBio 2016; 7:e02200-15 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Doroghazi JR, Buckley DH. Widespread homologous recombination within and between Streptomyces species. ISME J 2010; 4:1136–1143 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Shirling EB, Gottlieb D. Methods for characterization of Streptomyces species. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1966; 16:313–340 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Good NE, Winget GD, Winter W, Connolly TN, Izawa S et al. Hydrogen ion buffers for biological research. Biochemistry 1966; 5:467–477 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Ferguson WJ, Braunschweiger KI, Braunschweiger WR, Smith JR, McCormick JJ et al. Hydrogen ion buffers for biological research. Anal Biochem 1980; 104:300–310 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Ruzin SE. Plant Microtechnique and Microscopy New York City, NY: Oxford University Press; 1999
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Gaspar ML, Chang Y-F, Jesch SA, Aregullin M, Henry SA. Interaction between repressor Opi1p and ER membrane protein Scs2p facilitates transit of phosphatidic acid from the ER to mitochondria and is essential for INO1 gene expression in the presence of choline. J Biol Chem 2017; 292:18713–18728 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Nikodinovic J, Barrow KD, Chuck J-A. High yield preparation of genomic DNA from Streptomyces . Biotechniques 2003; 35:932–934 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Coil D, Jospin G, Darling AE. A5-miseq: an updated pipeline to assemble microbial genomes from Illumina MiSeq data. Bioinformatics 2015; 31:587–589 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Bosi E, Donati B, Galardini M, Brunetti S, Sagot M-F et al. MeDuSa: a multi-draft based scaffolder. Bioinformatics 2015; 31:2443–2451 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Parks DH, Imelfort M, Skennerton CT, Hugenholtz P, Tyson GW. CheckM: assessing the quality of microbial genomes recovered from isolates, single cells, and metagenomes. Genome Res 2015; 25:1043–1055 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Seemann T. Prokka: rapid prokaryotic genome annotation. Bioinformatics 2014; 30:2068–2069 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Jain C, Rodriguez-R LM, Phillippy AM, Konstantinidis KT, Aluru S. High throughput ANI analysis of 90K prokaryotic genomes reveals clear species boundaries. Nat Commun 2018; 9:5114 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Kumar S, Stecher G, Tamura K. MEGA7: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Mol Biol Evol 2016; 33:1870–1874 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Meier-Kolthoff JP, Auch AF, Klenk H-P, Göker M. Genome sequence-based species delimitation with confidence intervals and improved distance functions. BMC Bioinformatics 2013; 14:1–14 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Rong X, Huang Y. Taxonomic evaluation of the Streptomyces hygroscopicus clade using multilocus sequence analysis and DNA–DNA hybridization, validating the MLSA scheme for systematics of the whole genus. Syst Appl Microbiol 2012; 35:7–18 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Markowitz VM, Chen I-MA, Palaniappan K, Chu K, Szeto E et al. IMG: the Integrated Microbial Genomes database and comparative analysis system. Nucleic Acids Res 2012; 40:D115–22 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Howe K, Bateman A, Durbin R. QuickTree: building huge neighbour-joining trees of protein sequences. Bioinformatics 2002; 18:1546–1547 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Stamatakis A. RAxML version 8: a tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinformatics 2014; 30:1312–1313 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Johnson MJ, Zaretskaya I, Raytselis Y, Merezhuk Y, McGinnis S et al. NCBI BLAST: a better web interface. Nucleic Acids Res 2008; 36:W5–9 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Guo Y, Zheng W, Rong X, Huang Y. A multilocus phylogeny of the Streptomyces griseus 16S rRNA gene clade: use of multilocus sequence analysis for streptomycete systematics. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2008; 58:149–159 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  30. USDA Agricultural Research Service ARS microbial genomic sequence database serverUSDA Agricultural Research Service 2017 https://data.nal.usda.gov/dataset/ars-microbial-genomic-sequence-database-server
  31. Emms DM, Kelly S. STAG: species tree inference from all genes [preprint]. bioRxiv 2018267914: DOI: 10.1101/267914
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Emms DM, Kelly S. STRIDE: Species Tree Root Inference from Gene Duplication Events. Mol Biol Evol 2017; 34:3267–3278 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Emms DM, Kelly S. OrthoFinder: solving fundamental biases in whole genome comparisons dramatically improves orthogroup inference accuracy. Genome Biol 2015; 16:1–14 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Goris J, Konstantinidis KT, Klappenbach JA, Coenye T, Vandamme P et al. DNA-DNA hybridization values and their relationship to whole-genome sequence similarities. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2007; 57:81–91 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Saygin H. Genomic insight into the Streptomyces aurantiacus clade: reclassification of Streptomyces ederensis as a later heterotypic synonym of Streptomyces umbrinus and Streptomyces glomeroaurantiacus as a later heterotypic synonym of Streptomyces aurantiacus . Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2021; 71:4797 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Lanoot B, Vancanneyt M, Cleenwerck I, Wang L, Li W et al. The search for synonyms among streptomycetes by using SDS-PAGE of whole-cell proteins. Emendation of the species Streptomyces aurantiacus, Streptomyces cacaoi subsp. cacaoi, Streptomyces caeruleus and Streptomyces violaceus . Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2002; 52:823–829 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Wang Z, Tian J, Li X, Gan L, He L et al. Streptomyces dioscori sp. nov., a novel endophytic actinobacterium isolated from bulbil of Dioscorea bulbifera L. Curr Microbiol 2018; 75:1384–1390 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.005178
Loading
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.005178
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error