1887

Abstract

This paper describes a novel species isolated in 2011 and 2012 from nursery-grown cultivars in Flanders, Belgium. After 4 days at 28 °C, the strains yielded yellow, round, convex and mucoid colonies. Pathogenicity of the strains was confirmed on its isolation host, as well as on . Analysis using MALDI-TOF MS identified the strains as belonging to the genus but excluded them from the species . A phylogenetic tree based on confirmed the close relation to . Three fatty acids were dominant in the isolates: anteiso-C, iso-C and summed feature 3 (C 7/C 6). Unlike pathovars, the strains were unable to grow in the presence of lithium chloride and could only weakly utilize -fructose-6-PO and glucuronamide. Phylogenetic characterization based on multilocus sequence analysis and phylogenomic characterization revealed that the strains are close to, yet distinct from, . The genome sequences of the strains had average nucleotide identity values ranging from 94.35–95.19 % and DNA–DNA hybridization values ranging from 55.70 to 59.40 % to genomes of the pathovars. A genomics-based loop-mediated isothermal amplification assay was developed which was specific to the strains for its early detection. A novel species, e sp. nov., is proposed with strain LMG 31884 (=CCOS 1956) as the type strain.

Funding
This study was supported by the:
  • schweizerischer nationalfonds zur förderung der wissenschaftlichen forschung (Award IZCOZ0_177064)
    • Principle Award Recipient: NayC. Dia
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.005163
2021-12-16
2024-03-28
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Dowson DW. On the systematic position and generic names of the Gram-negative bacterial plant pathogens. Zentralblatt Bakteriol Parasitenkd Infekt 2 1939; 100:177–193
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Ryan RP, Vorhölter F-J, Potnis N, Jones JB, Van Sluys M-A et al. Pathogenomics of Xanthomonas: understanding bacterium-plant interactions. Nat Rev Microbiol 2011; 9:344–355 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Vauterin L, Swings J, Kersters K et al. Towards an improved taxonomy of xanthomonas. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 1990; 40:312–316
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Lazo GR, Roffey R, Gabriel DW. Pathovars of Xanthomonas campestris are distinguishable by restriction fragment-length polymorphism. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 1987; 37:214–221
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Murata N, Starr MP. A concept of the genus Xanthomonas and its species in the light of segmental homology of deoxyribonucleic acids. J Phytopathol 1973; 77:285–323 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Vauterin L, Hoste B, Kersters K, Swings J. Reclassification of Xanthomonas. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 1995; 45:472–489
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Parkinson N, Aritua V, Heeney J, Cowie C, Bew J et al. Phylogenetic analysis of Xanthomonas species by comparison of partial gyrase B gene sequences. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2007; 57:2881–2887 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Parkinson N, Cowie C, Heeney J, Stead D. Phylogenetic structure of Xanthomonas determined by comparison of gyrB sequences. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2009; 59:264–274 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Young JM, Park DC, Shearman HM, Fargier E. A multilocus sequence analysis of the genus Xanthomonas. Syst Appl Microbiol 2008; 31:366–377 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Fischer-Le Saux M, Bonneau S, Essakhi S, Manceau C, Jacques M-A. Aggressive emerging pathovars of Xanthomonas arboricola represent widespread epidemic clones distinct from poorly pathogenic strains, as revealed by multilocus sequence typing. Appl Environ Microbiol 2015; 81:4651–4668 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Timilsina S, Kara S, Jacques MA, Potnis N, Minsavage GV et al. Reclassification of Xanthomonas gardneri (ex Šutič 1957) Jones et al. 2006 as a later heterotypic synonym of Xanthomonas cynarae Trébaol et al. 2000 and description of X. cynarae pv. cynarae and X. cynarae pv. gardneri based on whole genome analyses. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2019; 69:343–349 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Morinière L, Burlet A, Rosenthal ER, Nesme X, Portier P et al. Clarifying the taxonomy of the causal agent of bacterial leaf spot of lettuce through a polyphasic approach reveals that xanthomonas cynarae trébaol et al. 2000 emend. timilsina et al. 2019 is a later heterotypic synonym of xanthomonas hortorum vauterin et al. 1995. Syst Appl Microbiol 2020; 43:126087 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Trébaol G, Gardan L, Manceau C, Tanguy JL, Tirilly Y et al. Genomic and phenotypic characterization of Xanthomonas cynarae sp. nov., a new species that causes bacterial bract spot of artichoke (Cynara scolymus L.). Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2000; 50 Pt 4:1471–1478 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Jones JB, Lacy GH, Bouzar H, Stall RE, Schaad NW. Reclassification of the xanthomonads associated with bacterial spot disease of tomato and pepper. Syst Appl Microbiol 2004; 27:755–762 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  15. EU Commission Commission Implementing Directive (EU), 2020. Amending Council Directives 66/401/EEC, 66/402/EEC, 68/193/EEC, 2002/55/EC, 2002/56/EC and 2002/57/EC, Commission Directives 93/49/EEC and 93/61/EEC and Implementing Directives 2014/21/EU and 2014/98/EU as regards pests of plants on seeds and other plant reproductive material. Official J L41 2020; L319:1–77
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Kendrick JB. Bacterial blight of carrot. J Agric Res 1934; 49:493
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Brown NA. Bacterial leaf spot of geranium in the eastern United States. J Agric Res 1923; 23:361–372
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Niederhauser JS. A bacterial leaf spot and blight of the Russian dandelion. Phytopathology 1943; 33:959–961
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Arnaud G. Une maladie bactérienne du lierre (Hedera helix L.). Comptes Rendus Hebd Séances Académie Sci 1920; 171:121–122
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Brown NA. Some bacterial diseases of lettuce. J Agric Res 1918; 13:367–388
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Cottyn B, De Paepe B, Dia NC, Van Malderghem C, Pothier JF et al. First report of bacterial leaf spot of Hydrangea in retail nurseries in Belgium caused by strains assigned to a new Xanthomonas hortorum clade. New Dis Reps 2021; 43:e120008 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Garita-Cambronero J, Palacio-Bielsa A, López MM, Cubero J. Comparative genomic and phenotypic characterization of pathogenic and non-pathogenic strains of Xanthomonas arboricola reveals insights into the infection process of bacterial spot disease of stone fruits. PLoS ONE 2016; 11:
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Dia NC, Rezzonico F, Smits THM, Pothier JF. Complete or high-quality draft genome sequences of six Xanthomonas hortorum strains sequenced with short- and long-read technologies. Microbiol Resour Announc 2020; 9:e00828-20. [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Kumar S, Stecher G, Li M, Knyaz C, Tamura K. MEGA X: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis across computing platforms. Mol Biol Evol 2018; 35:1547–1549 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Hauben L, Vauterin L, Swings J, Moore ERB. Comparison of 16S ribosomal DNA sequences of all Xanthomonas species. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1997; 47:328–335 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Glaeser SP, Kämpfer P. Multilocus sequence analysis (MLSA) in prokaryotic taxonomy. Syst Appl Microbiol 2015; 38:237–245 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Nei M, Kumar S. Molecular Evolution and Phylogenetics Oxford University Press; 2000
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Meier-Kolthoff JP, Göker M. TYGS is an automated high-throughput platform for state-of-the-art genome-based taxonomy. Nat Commun 2019; 10:1–10 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Lefort V, Desper R, Gascuel O. FastME 2.0: a comprehensive, accurate, and fast distance-based phylogeny inference program. Mol Biol Evol 2015; 32:2798
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Farris JS. Estimating phylogenetic trees from distance matrices. The American Naturalist 1972; 106:645–668 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Kreft L, Botzki A, Coppens F, Vandepoele K, Van Bel M. PhyD3: a phylogenetic tree viewer with extended phyloXML support for functional genomics data visualization. Bioinformatics 2017; 33:2946–2947 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Jain C, Rodriguez-R LM, Phillippy AM, Konstantinidis KT, Aluru S. High throughput ANI analysis of 90K prokaryotic genomes reveals clear species boundaries. Nat Commun 2018; 9:1–8 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Meier-Kolthoff JP, Auch AF, Klenk H-P, Göker M. Genome sequence-based species delimitation with confidence intervals and improved distance functions. BMC Bioinformatics 2013; 14:60 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Richter M, Rosselló-Móra R. Shifting the genomic gold standard for the prokaryotic species definition. PNAS 2009; 106:19126–19131 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Richter M, Rosselló-Móra R, Oliver Glöckner F, Peplies J. JSpeciesWS: a web server for prokaryotic species circumscription based on pairwise genome comparison. Bioinformatics 2016; 32:929–931 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Blom J, Kreis J, Spänig S, Juhre T, Bertelli C et al. EDGAR 2.0: an enhanced software platform for comparative gene content analyses. Nucleic Acids Res 2016; 44:W22–8 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  37. LAMP: Design primers for loop-mediated isothermal amplification; 2020 http://www.premierbiosoft.com/isothermal/lamp.html Accessed 16 August 2020
  38. Blaser S, Diem H, von Felten A, Gueuning M, Andreou M et al. From laboratory to point of entry: development and implementation of a loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP)-based genetic identification system to prevent introduction of quarantine insect species. Pest Manag Sci 2018; 74:1504–1512 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.005163
Loading
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.005163
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplements

Supplementary material 1

PDF
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error