1887

Abstract

The taxonomic positions of members within the family were assessed based on phylogenomic trees reconstructed using core-proteome and genome distance phylogeny approaches. The closely clustered genome sequences from the type strains of validly published names within the family were analysed using overall genome-related indices based on average nucleotide identity, average amino acid identity and digital DNA–DNA hybridization values. The family consists of the type genus , as well as the genera , , , , , , , , , gen. nov., , , , , , , , , gen. nov., , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , and . The G+C contents of the genomes ranged from 66.2 to 74.6 mol% and genome sizes ranged from 3.69 to 12.28 Mbp. Based on the results of phylogenomic analysis, the names comb. nov., comb. nov. and comb. nov. are proposed. This study revealed that is a heterotypic synonym of , is a heterotypic synonym of , is a heterotypic synonym of , and and are heterotypic synonyms of . This study addresses the nomenclature conundrums of and as well as and .

Funding
This study was supported by the:
  • Universiti Malaya Research University Grant (Award ST003-2021)
    • Principle Award Recipient: Fei Aaron TeoWee
  • Innovation Group Project of Southern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory (Zhuhai) (Award No.311021006)
    • Principle Award Recipient: LiWen-Jun
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.005075
2021-10-29
2024-06-25
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Salam N, Jiao J-Y, Zhang X-T, Li W-J. Update on the classification of higher ranks in the phylum Actinobacteria. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2020; 70:1331–1355 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Nouioui I, Carro L, García-López M, Meier-Kolthoff JP, Woyke T et al. Genome-based taxonomic classification of the phylum Actinobacteria. Front Microbiol 2018; 9:2007 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Labeda DP, Goodfellow M, Chun J, Zhi X-Y, Li W-J. Reassessment of the systematics of the suborder Pseudonocardineae: transfer of the genera within the family Actinosynnemataceae Labeda and Kroppenstedt 2000 emend Zhi et al. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 20111259–1264
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Labeda DP, Kroppenstedt RM. Phylogenetic analysis of Saccharothrix and related taxa: Proposal for Actinosynnemataceae fam. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2000; 50 Pt 1:331–336 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Embley MT, Smida J, Stackebrandt E. The phylogeny of mycolate-less wall chemotype iv actinomycetes and description of Pseudonocardiaceae fam. nov. Syst Appl Microbiol 1988; 11:44–52 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Parte AC, Sardà Carbasse J, Meier-Kolthoff JP, Reimer LC, Göker M. List of Prokaryotic names with Standing in Nomenclature (LPSN) moves to the DSMZ. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2020; 70:5607–5612 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Duangmal K, Suksaard P, Pathom-Aree W, Mingma R, Matsumoto A et al. Actinopolyspora salinaria sp. nov., a halophilic actinomycete isolated from solar saltern soil. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2016; 66:1660–1665 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Lai H, Jiang Y, Chen X, Li Q, Jiang C et al. Haloactinomyces albus gen. nov., sp. nov., isolated from the Dead Sea. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2017; 67:1163–1168 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Guan T-W, Xia Z-F, Tang S-K, Wu N, Chen Z-J et al. Amycolatopsis salitolerans sp. nov., a filamentous actinomycete isolated from a hypersaline habitat. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2012; 62:23–27 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Lai H, Jiang Y, Saker R, Chen X, Bouras N. Reclassification of Mzabimyces algeriensis Saker et al. 2015 as Halopolyspora algeriensis comb. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2017; 67:2787–2790 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Moshtaghi Nikou M, Ramezani M, Harirchi S, Makzoom S, Amoozegar MA. Salinifilum gen. nov., with description of Salinifilum proteinilyticum sp. nov., an extremely halophilic actinomycete isolated from Meighan wetland, Iran, and reclassification of Saccharopolyspora aidingensis as Salinifilum aidingensis comb. nov.. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2017; 67:4221–4227 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Tian X-P, Zhi X-Y, Qiu Y-Q, Zhang Y-Q, Tang S-K et al. Sciscionella marina gen. nov., sp. nov., a marine actinomycete isolated from a sediment in the northern South China Sea. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2009; 59:222–228 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Hayashi Sant’Anna F, Bach E, Porto RZ, Guella F, Hayashi Sant’Anna E et al. Genomic metrics made easy: What to do and where to go in the new era of bacterial taxonomy. Crit Rev Microbiol 2019; 45:182–200 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Chun J, Oren A, Ventosa A, Christensen H, Arahal DR et al. Proposed minimal standards for the use of genome data for the taxonomy of prokaryotes. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2018; 68:461–466 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Rodriguez-R LM, Gunturu S, Harvey WT, Rosselló-Mora R, Tiedje JM et al. The Microbial Genomes Atlas (MiGA) webserver: taxonomic and gene diversity analysis of archaea and bacteria at the whole genome level. Nucleic Acids Res 2018; 46:W282–W288 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Ramírez-Durán N, de la Haba RR, Vera-Gargallo B, Sánchez-Porro C, Alonso-Carmona S et al. Taxogenomic and comparative genomic analysis of the genus Saccharomonospora focused on the identification of biosynthetic clusters PKS and NRPS. Front Microbiol 2021; 12:603791 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Tamura T, Ishida Y, Otoguro M, Hatano K, Labeda D et al. Reclassification of Streptomyces caeruleus as a synonym of Actinoalloteichus cyanogriseus and reclassification of Streptomyces spheroides and Streptomyces laceyi as later synonyms of Streptomyces niveus. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2008; 58:2812–2814 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Euzéby J. Notification that new names and new combinations have appeared in volume 58, part 12, of the IJSEM. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2009; 59:452–453 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Yoon S-H, Ha S-M, Kwon S, Lim J, Kim Y et al. Introducing EzBioCloud: A taxonomically united database of 16S rRNA gene sequences and whole-genome assemblies. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2017; 67:1613–1617 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Benson DA, Cavanaugh M, Clark K, Karsch-Mizrachi I, Lipman DJ et al. GenBank. Nucleic Acids Res 2013; 41:D36–42 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Garrity GM. NamesforLife: Browsertool takes expertise out of the database and puts it right in the browser. Microbiol Today 2010; 2:9
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Rodriguez-R L, Konstantinidis K. The Enveomics collection: A toolbox for specialized analyses of microbial genomes and metagenomes. PeerJ Preprints 2016; 4:e1900–1901
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Meier-Kolthoff JP, Auch AF, Klenk H-P, Göker M. Genome sequence-based species delimitation with confidence intervals and improved distance functions. BMC Bioinformatics 2013; 14:1–14 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Avram O, Rapoport D, Portugez S, Pupko T. M1CR0B1AL1Z3R-a user-friendly web server for the analysis of large-scale microbial genomics data. Nucleic Acids Res 2019; 47:W88–W92 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Meier-Kolthoff JP, Göker M. TYGS is an automated high-throughput platform for state-of-the-art genome-based taxonomy. Nat Commun 2019; 10:2182 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Price MN, Dehal PS, Arkin AP. FastTree 2 – Approximately maximum-likelihood trees for large alignments. PLOS ONE 2010; 5:e9490 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Lefort V, Desper R, Gascuel O. Fastme 2.0: A comprehensive, accurate, and fast distance-based phylogeny inference program. Mol Biol Evol 2015; 32:2798–2800 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Parks DH, Chuvochina M, Chaumeil P-A, Rinke C, Mussig AJ et al. A complete domain-to-species taxonomy for bacteria and archaea. Nat Biotechnol 2020; 38:1079–1086 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Shin S-K, Cho Y-J, Yi H. Synonymy of Micropolyspora internatus and Saccharomonospora viridis and emended description of Saccharomonospora viridis. J Microbiol Biotechnol 2017; 27:149–154 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Greiner-mai E, Korn-wendisch F, Kutzner HJ. Taxonomic revision of the genus Saccharomonospora and description of Saccharomonospora glauca sp. nov. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1988; 38:398–405 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Yoon J-H, Kim S-B, Lee ST, Park Y-H. DNA-DNA relatedness between Saccharomonospora species: ‘Saccharomonospora caesia’ as a synonym of Saccharomonospora azurea. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 1999; 49:671–673
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Greiner-Mai E, Kroppenstedt RM, Korn-Wendisch F, Kutzner HJ. Morphological and biochemical characterization and emended descriptions of thermophilic actinomycetes species. Syst Appl Microbiol 1987; 9:97–109 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Parker C, Tindall B, Garrity G. International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2019; 69:S1–S111 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Sneath PHA, McGowan V, Skerman VBD. Approved lists of bacterial names. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 1980; 30:225–420 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  35. List Editors Validation of the publication of new names and new combinations previously effectively published outside the IJSB: List no.9. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 1982; 32:384–385
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Goodfellow M, Pirouz T. Numerical classification of sporoactinomycetes containing meso-diaminopimelic acid in the cell wall. J Gen Microbiol 1982; 128:503–527 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Kim SB. Saccharomonospora. Trujillo ME, Dedysh S, DeVos P, Hedlund B, Kämpfer P. eds In Bergey’s Manual of Systematics of Archaea and Bacteria John Wiley & Sons, Inc., in association with Bergey’s Manual Trust; 20151–11
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Li Q, Rückert C, Li G, Huang P, Schneider O et al. Prauserella flavalba sp. nov., a novel species of the genus Prauserella, isolated from alkaline soil. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2020; 70:380–387 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Guan T-W, Wu N, Xia Z-F, Ruan J-S, Zhang X-P et al. Saccharopolyspora lacisalsi sp. nov., a novel halophilic actinomycete isolated from a salt lake in Xinjiang, China. Extremophiles 2011; 15:373–378 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Zhou Y, Pei S, Xie F, Gu L, Zhang G. Saccharopolyspora coralli sp. nov. a novel actinobacterium isolated from the stony coral Porites. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2020; 70:3241–3246 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Singh P, Hira P, Rawat CD, Lal R, Sood U. Genome-based reclassification of Amycolatopsis eurytherma as a later heterotypic synonym of Amycolatopsis thermoflava. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2021; 71:004642 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Tindall BJ. Marinobacter nauticus (Baumann et al. 1972) comb. nov. arising from instances of synonymy and the incorrect interpretation of the International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes. Arch Microbiol 2020; 202:657–663 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Tindall BJ. Rule 24b of the International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes and regulating the priority of names and epithets considered to be associated with heterotypic synonyms. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2019; 69:3980–3983 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Oren A, Garrity GM. List of new names and new combinations previously effectively, but not validly, published. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2018; 68:3379–3393 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Li Y, Tang S-K, Chen Y-G, Wu J-Y, Zhi X-Y et al. Prauserella salsuginis sp. nov., Prauserella flava sp. nov., Prauserella aidingensis sp. nov. and Prauserella sediminis sp. nov., isolated from a salt lake. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2009; 59:2923–2928 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Shirling EB, Gottlieb D. Cooperative description of type strains of Streptomyces. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 1972; 22:265–394
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Tamura T, Zhiheng L, Yamei Z, Hatano K. Actinoalloteichus cyanogriseus gen. nov., sp. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2000; 50:1435–1440 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Tang S-K, Wang Y, Klenk H-P, Shi R, Lou K et al. Actinopolyspora alba sp. nov. and Actinopolyspora erythraea sp. nov., isolated from a salt field, and reclassification of Actinopolyspora iraqiensis Ruan et al. 1994 as a heterotypic synonym of Saccharomonospora halophila. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2011; 61:1693–1698 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Meklat A, Bouras N, Mokrane S, Zitouni A, Schumann P et al. Bounagaea algeriensis gen. nov., sp. nov., an extremely halophilic actinobacterium isolated from a Saharan soil of Algeria. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 2015; 108:473–482 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Franco CMM, Labeda DP. The order Pseudonocardiales. Rosenberg E, DeLong EF, Lory S, Stackebrandt E, Thompson F. eds In The Prokaryotes Actinobacteria Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 2014 pp 743–860
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Aouiche A, Bouras N, Mokrane S, Zitouni A, Schumann P et al. Actinokineospora mzabensis sp. nov., a novel actinomycete isolated from Saharan soil. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 2015; 107:291–296 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Kämpfer P, Glaeser SP, Busse H-J, Abdelmohsen UR, Ahmed S et al. Actinokineospora spheciospongiae sp. nov., isolated from the marine sponge Spheciospongia vagabunda. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2015; 65:879–884 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Okoro CK, Bull AT, Mutreja A, Rong X, Huang Y et al. Lechevalieria atacamensis sp. nov., Lechevalieria deserti sp. nov. and Lechevalieria roselyniae sp. nov., isolated from hyperarid soils. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2010; 60:296–300 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Wu J-F, Li J, You Z-Q, Zhang S. Prauserella coralliicola sp. nov., isolated from the coral Galaxea fascicularis. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2014; 64:3341–3345 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Liu J-M, Habden X, Guo L, Tuo L, Jiang Z-K et al. Prauserella endophytica sp. nov., an endophytic actinobacterium isolated from Tamarix taklamakanensis. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 2015; 107:1401–1409 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.005075
Loading
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.005075
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplements

Supplementary material 1

PDF
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error